Despite their honest intentions, many of the Occupy Wall Street protesters are being suckered into a trap and calling for the very “solutions” that are part of the financial elite’s agenda to torpedo the American middle class – higher taxes and more big government.
Watch the clip below in which journalist Adam Kokesh talks to Occupy Wall Street protesters.
The ignorance displayed in this interviews knows no bounds. These protesters just don’t get it. They are calling for the government to use force to impose their ideas, all in the name of bringing down corporations who they don’t realize have completely bought off government regulators. Corporations and government enjoy a mutually beneficial relationship – getting one to regulate the other is asinine and only hurts smaller businesses who are legitimately trying to compete in a free market economy that barely exists.
The zeal for totalitarian government amongst some of the “protesters” is shocking. One sign being carried around read, “A government is an entity which holds the monopolistic right to initiate force,” which seems a little ironic when protesters complain about being physically assaulted by police in the same breath.
One woman interviewed by Kokesh also announces her intention to help Obama to capture a second term. How can a self-proclaimed Occupy Wall Street protester simultaneously support the man whose 2008 campaign was bankrolled by Wall Street, whose 2012 campaign is reliant on Wall Street to an even greater extent, and whose cabinet was filled with Wall Street operatives?
Something is very wrong with this picture.
The usual suspects, mega-rich foundations and elitists, behind the young radicals have also started to emerge – George Soros, The Ruckus Society, the Tides Foundation and the Ford Foundation.
“The belated crusade against Wall Street is even more pathetic as it is coordinated by groups who wouldn’t exist without men like Soros, who made their money from deals that make the Street look sparkling clean. It’s class warfare as a cynical jab at the populist center, the people who mutter to themselves that the Street is full of crooks and so is Congress,” writes Daniel Greenfield.
The thousands of Americans currently expressing their disgust at Wall Street and the bankers who have ruined the economy to the detriment of the poor and middle class should be commended for getting off their hind ends and doing something, unlike the millions who will continue to watch American Idol, drink beer and laugh in ignorance as the country is flushed down the toilet. It should also be added that there is a sprinkling of “End the Fed” demonstrators who truly understand the root cause of the problem.
However, the fact that the majority of the Occupy Wall Street demonstrators are advocating “solutions” which the very elite they claim to be protesting against also want should set alarm bells ringing.
The official Occupy Wall Street website vehemently supports Obama’s tax agenda, again in the deluded belief that Obama, the ultimate Wall Street puppet, genuinely wants to go after big corporations who use loopholes to avoid paying income tax.
In calling for higher taxes on the middle class, the protesters are mimicking the likes of billionaire Warren Buffet. The top corporations pay virtually zero income tax because of loopholes that they have crafted in league with bought off government regulators. Obama’s tax hikes will only impact genuine middle class businesses and middle class Americans earning over $200,000 – with the rate of inflation as it is this can hardly be described as the “super rich”.
As Anthony Wile writes, the protesters are being completely misdirected by their socialist/communist leaders. The real center of financial control is the Federal Reserve and the city of London, and yet ideologue Michael Moore said earlier this week that “ending capitalism” was more important than dealing with the Fed.
Wiles notes that the protesters seem obsessed with those who conduct financial transactions, not those who actually run global central banks, the real string pullers.
“To get at the root of the problem, one should be protesting, say, in London’s City where central banking originated. Or protesting in front of the Federal Reserve in Washington DC. These are real seats of power. But the shadowy and excessively powerful and wealthy individuals who have created the modern economic system are quite satisfied no doubt to have Wall Street take the blame. It suits their purposes,” writes Wiles.
“It is too bad that the Occupy Wall Street movement seems to be obscuring the larger issues by apparently blaming the private (transactional) sector in entirety for what has occurred in the past few years.”
The ignorance displayed in this interviews knows no bounds.
The zeal for totalitarian government amongst some of the “protesters” is shocking. One sign being carried around read, “A government is an entity which holds the monopolistic right to initiate force,”
Stone, haven't you and your ilk expressed similar sentiments?
#4. To: lucysmom, A K A Stone, mininggold, NewsJunky (#3)
I find Stone and his fellow kooks - always contradict themselves - for example - they demonize Wall Street - but it's just lip service - because when others try and do something about it they get all pro Wall Street.
Another example is their gun fetish. They swear they need guns and militia to fight the govt and yet are statists and support police crack down on demonstrators - 700+ people arrested in NYC?
Fucking, hell people. Putin has not arrested that many anti-Putin protestors in Russia. If 700 people were arrested in one day in the Middle East the fucking State Dept would be declaring a human rights emergency and calling the regime that did it criminal.
Yet here in the "land of the free" these statist pigs who claim to be "libertarians" and or anti-big govt - cheer the arrests of so many people and police brutality.
Yet here in the "land of the free" these statist pigs who claim to be "libertarians" and or anti-big govt - cheer the arrests of so many people and police brutality.
It's like they don't have a clue what the words they use mean.
#6. To: lucysmom, A K A Stone, mininggold, NewsJunky (#5)
It's like they don't have a clue what the words they use mean.
Last night's PBS documentary "Prohibition" touched on this. When the Republicans of that era were calling for a ban on alcohol, the historians showed how what was being said was that what the GOP wanted banned was alcohol being banned for those "other people" (German immigrants, Irish Catholics, Blacks, etc).
What the general Republican prohibitionist wanted outlawed was the "saloon" culture where these immigrants they hated congregated but because the fight for prohibition was led by religious kooks and extremists what they got passed was a near total ban on alcohol.
I find again and again, when the GOP talk about this or that they mean not to have it apply to themselves but to "others".
For example, when the Black Panthers showed up at a town hall meeting in California legally armed with rifles and shotguns the whites who are the most pro NRA - pro militia - pro gun types could not get gun banning laws passed fast enough.
If Mexicans showed up marching in streets with legal firearms - the same 2nd Amendment lovers would be advocating restrictions on gun ownership (on Mexicans but they won't say that outright) and so on.
