Title: Allen West (R-FL): ‘Marxist’ Obama Intentionally Destroying Economy Source:
Breitbart TV URL Source:http://www.breitbart.tv/allen-west- ... entionally-destroying-economy/ Published:Sep 29, 2011 Author:950 radio Post Date:2011-09-29 08:24:52 by Happy Quanzaa Keywords:Allan West, Obamanomics in Action, sabotage Views:36026 Comments:59
"It's intentional because that's who this President is. The President is a Marxist who believes in the separation of classes."
"It's intentional because that's who this President is. The President is a Marxist who believes in the separation of classes."
Yeah, same old crap. The self-proclaimed elite and socialist administrators abscond with all the wealth and leave all the dupes in the socialist utopia in abject poverty. Good grief, this has been the only fate of any socialist utopia in human history, why are there still enough dupes who keep falling for this scam and destroying societies with their stupidity.
There's something about the air in Alaska that makes people terminally confused.
. . . . says the resident of a state which first elected Ahhhnold then Jerry Brown as governor, and has a dingbat named Boxer masquerading as a US Senator.
. says the resident of a state which first elected Ahhhnold then Jerry Brown as governor, and has a dingbat named Boxer masquerading as a US Senator.
Soo?? There's not one state that hasn't had a similar history.
Ahhnold was sold by the state Pubbies as the antidote for Grey Davis when it was the oil companies and Enron creating their energy shenanigans. Later we actually found that Davis did less damage than Ahnold, who also made sure Prop 286 would never be resurrected.
How can one be pro-life for criminals, yet pro-death for babies? I know, I know - being pro-death for babies is a requirement to be a D.
Do you think that is an honest statement of his position or are you parroting right-wing hyperbole?
Interesting you should ask.
I'm going to be completely honest with you here. Your question - "is it just because he's a D" - was actually a legitimate one.
Being an east-coaster, I'll have to admit I didn't know a lot about Brown other than he'd been gov. of California once before, and that he'd dated Linda Ronstadt. And somewhere along the line he'd acquired the moniker "Gov. Moonbeam."
I did know he had a Jesuit background, so when you asked your question I thought - "well maybe there's some chance he IS pro-life (for babies)." If that had been the case, I would have been put on the spot (and rightly so.)
I need not have worried - apparently he (like every other major D) values that more than any ikky moral conviction he may once have held. A simple search showed that - yes - he indeed is in favor of killing innocent babies.
Just to be fair - I did another search to see if he was at least CONSISTENT in his state-sponsored death views and was in favor of capital punishment.
No way!
So no, what I said was an honest statement of his position from my viewpoint.
Wait...So opposing murdering an innocent preborn baby is supposed to be the equivalent of opposing executing a convicted murderer?
We humans don't have the omniscience of God, therefore a murder conviction is not the same thing as guilt.
A comprehensive study of 328 criminal cases over the last 15 years in which the convicted person was exonerated suggests that there are thousands of innocent people in prison today.
Almost all the exonerations were in murder and rape cases...
A former Dallas County prosecutor has abandoned his longstanding support of the death penalty and is now opposed to capital punishment based on recent exonerations in Texas and elsewhere. James Fry, who prosecuted Charles Chatman--a man recently exonerated from prison in Dallas County--said he was “shaken to the core” by the high number of exonerations throughout the nation and by evidence of flawed eyewitness testimony.
Until we humans have perfect knowledge, then I oppose the death penalty.
It is also because I do not have the perfect knowledge of God that I am pro-choice - which is not the same thing as support for murdering babies.
Until pro-lifers are willing to put their wallets on the line to insure that every child born in the US has access to quality education, a safe home, healthy food to eat, medical care, decent clothes to wear, then I find there position to be hypocritical.
