[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles

Title: The Electric Car Nightmare
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article30619.html
Published: Sep 26, 2011
Author: Andrew_McKillop
Post Date: 2011-09-26 14:12:16 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 112518
Comments: 247

Electric car and low carbon energy boomers from Carlos Ghosn of Renault-Nissan and Dan Akerson of GM, to Sir Richard Branson, Al Gore, James Lovelock, Stewart Brand and a host of other promoters of the politically correct future never lose a chance preaching massive numbers of all electric cars in the national car fleets of every developed country by around 2020.

To be sure, what "massive" means is variable geometry - it could be just a few million cars, it might be more and they hope out loud, a lot more.

Ghosn says his firm will be able to crank out 1 million-a-year Leaf-type family electric saloons "by 2015", and much more after that. Other major car making chiefs like Akerson, and the chiefs of emerging giant automakers in China and India are less sure, or more cautious, but say they could easily match anything Renault-Nissan can do "within 10 or 15 years" if the market demand - and above all the government subsidies - are there.

Ghosn thinks out loud that French and other European governments will jumpstart the electric car flood by handing out subsidies of up to 7000 euro on each electric car. For 1 million-a-year that would be a cool 7 billion euro-a-year tinkling through Renault-Nissan cash registers, handed out by generous, but unfortunately stony broke European governments. Is that credible ? Is that sustainable ?

We also need to believe there will be magic scientific breakthroughs with electric car batteries, making them cheaper, easier and faster to charge, have longer life times, and not flake out after a few hundred recharges in fast charge mode, using high voltage and high amperage charging instead of regular home voltage plug-in charging at a mere 5 kW a time. We will hope, with the car industry, that rare earth element supply will keep up with mass production of electric cars (needing strange expensive metals like neodymium for electric motor magnets), noting that present world supply is at present about 95 percent sourced from China, which does not intend to raise production, but cut it.

We will suppose that battery swapping problems will be solved: each electric car in the hoped-for new and massive all electric car fleets of Europe, the US, Japan, China and India will need as many as 3 batteries, at around 12 000 euro each, to keep the cars running 24/7. Funky highway swap stations run by Better Place and other new entrant, nice business model players will look after this, we are told, backed by supposedly serious banks - seriously close to failure and needing new and massive bailouts of public cash again - like HSBC which arranged $ 350 million of loans for Better Place.

ITS NIGHTTIME AND WINTER

We are imagining all those problems were solved - and the electric power nightmare is now certain. If the electric car future happens - if the things are built and operated in the numbers that the boomers dream about in public - we are almost sure to get massive electric power system failures. Power down. Lights out. System breakdown.

Take the case of Europe. Say the boomers' dream came true in Europe, with its all-green low carbon energy quest written into the laws and regulations of all 27 member states since December 2008. This says at least 20 percent of all energy in Europe must be renewable by 2020, and also that energy demand per unit economic output will be cut by 20 percent: energy economy will be promoted by all means, including cuts in transport energy demand. In Europe's cities of 2020, the European Commission says, the public will love bicycles, electric trams, electric trains and gas powered buses - and will adore electric cars.

Road and land transport presently takes about 7.8 million barrels a day, or one-half of all oil consumed in Europe. Replacing even a tiny part of that with biofuels is such a no-no that the first target of replacing oil in transport, of 10 percent by 2020 (not even 20 percent, you note) was cut to 5.6 percent a few months after the December 2008 European low carbon quest was announced. This new modest 5.6 percent goal could itself be cut even further.

So the natural solution is: electric cars, recharged by windmills and solar power stations in those glitzy powerpoint shows on a host of European Union Web sites. Who cares if its not possible ?

THE NIGHMARE COMES

By 2020, lets suppose a massive 8 percent of Europe's car fleet is "all electric". To be sure, that 8 percent doesnt seem massive to normal persons,but if we supposed the European car fleet didn't grow by one single unit from 2011, from today's count of about 210 million cars, that would make about 16 million all electrics needing very regular charging, on Europe's roads in the year 2020.

These 16 million all electric cars on Europe's roads would need about 5 kW when their batteries are recharged.

As we know already from user and driver studies for electric car owners they have a paranoid and constant fear of running out of juice. They compulsively recharge the battery whenever it shows even a slight fall of its charge. They like fast charge high power battery boosting (440 volt triphase current), when it is available - despite it being very bad for battery life. Supposedly, again according to Ghosn of Renault-Nissan, high power booster charging will be made available in "hundreds of cities", in France at some undefined date, hinting that generous green-minded president Sarkozy will look after the problem of who will pay for that.

So its Sunday evening in winter in Europe, in the year 2020. Everybody with an electric car is worrying about their Monday morning crawl-in to work on those 8-lane highways with thousands of other drivers making it to work, at an average 10 miles-per-hour in their non-electric cars able to hit 100 miles-per-hour. In those urban daily crawl-ins the recommended battery stretching maximum cruise speed of about 40 miles-per-hour for electric cars is not such problem - but the battery charging mania is.

Like we already know, electric cars are quiet, accelerate fast if the battery is charged, and as long as you dont run the heater and de-icer in winter or airconditioning in summer, the wipers, the headlamps, the in-car stereo, the GPS, telephone, computer and other power-consuming needs and gimmicks, you might get 100 miles with a fully charged battery, if you run economic for the last 30 or 40 miles of the charge, at a speed of 25 or 30 miles-per-hour. And that only costs about 35 000 euro for a Leaf !

HOW DO WE CHARGE THE THINGS ?

Running real sweet and low, that is slow and economical in the daily crawl-in to work should not be a problem for proud owners of planet saving all electrics, but funny thing, Carlos Ghosn and Dan Akerson, and all the other boomers and promoters never say that. Our problem is that its Sunday night in winter, in Europe in 2020, and there are 16 million all electric cars out there to charge at 5 kW each.

Its cold, the wind is not blowing so you can forget about windmills (Europe proudly has about 45 percent of the world's entire windfarm capacity, as of early 2011), and its nighttime, so those expensive solar power plants are also off-line. We will however be generous, and imagine that only 80 percent of the European all electric car fleet is going to be on charge at those somber moments. Say 13 million plugged in and needing 5 kW for 5 hours, to charge their big, heavy, low power storage capacity (able to store about the energy equivalent of 1 US gallon of fuel), and very expensive batteries.

Down at Better Place and its highway battery swap station clones, imagine what they are doing on Sunday nights ? Charging batteries.

To be sure, the electric car boomers never get on to how we supply the power, but we will. Charging 13 million cars, some 80 percent of a massive 8 percent of Europe's car fleet number of today, will make it necessary to find 5 x 13 million kilowatts of additional power. That is 65 million kilowatts of power.

In the electricity business they talk megawatts, so the need is 65 000 MW. One way to understand what that means: in Carlos Ghosn's soft touch France of Nicolar Sarkozy, its much vaunted nuclear power programme - supplying the most national nuclear electric power in the world - has a total of 58 nuclear reactors with a combined total capacity of around 63 600 MW. That is if all of them could run at full power simultaneously - which they can't. It took France around 40 years to build up that 63 600 MW of nuclear capacity, we can add.

So one way we could or might charge up a lot less than 8 percent of the European car fleet would be to build 65 000 MW of new electric power capacity. Since that in fact is not going to be possible - electric car owners will need to be told to not use their electric cars and use one or other of their family fleet of good old thermal-type cars, or take a day off, use bicycles or buses, work at home, or give up working entirely - after all, they are saving the planet by preventing global warming catastrophe !

Otherwise, it is easy to forecast what happens when around 13 million all electric cars plug-in simultaneously. We get total system overload, large area power cuts, and possible long term damage to overused power grids, transformer stations, and electrical equipment as power surges and collapses with the onslaught of demand.

AND WHAT WOULD IT COST ?

What would it cost to charge the hoped for mass market electric car fleets of 2020 ? This depends on how you do it. If we choose either offshore windfarms or nuclear power to do it, we have per-kilowatt capital costs of around 6000 euro in Europe. This is based on German, UK, Danish and other offshore windfarm construction and projects, and French EPR nuclear power plants being cumbersomely, slowly and expensively built at two-only locations in Europe (Finland, France).

Each electric car costing the state 7000 euro in government hand-outs, would therefore also need about 30000 euro of invstment in new wind or nuclear power plants to handle its 5 kW power demand (and 3 times more if its needs 15 kW high charge boosting). The time limit would also be problem, but because we are discussing pure fantasy schemes and childish daydreams that does not matter.

For amusement purposes, we could compare that 37000 euro total of subsidies-plus-power plant capacity needs, with the the lifetime average fuels costs of a normal thermal-type automobile - about 1600 litres of fuel, or 10 barrels, each year of its operating life. To be sure, $200-a-barrel oil, the favourite scary oil price forecast of Carlos Ghosn and Sir Richard Branson, would help make the electric car seem just a little less vanity tech.

If we are talking solar power plants, plus nighttime storage of electricity able to supply 65 000 MW on demand the costs are so far out - if it was technically possible - there is no need even imagining them. We end up with a simple readout: we would need coal or gas power plants, but again for amusement purposes, we can give a price tag for charging less than 8 percent of Europe's fantasy fleet of all electric cars in the year 2020 using "low carbon" nuclear or offshore wind power.

At 6000 euro per kilowatt, and 6 billion euro for 1000 MW of power generating capacity, we find that for 65 000 MW the spending need would be 378 billion euro. At a mere 1500 euro per kilowatt for coal fired plants with CCS, the price tag would only be around 95 billion euro - but who is going to pay ?

IT WONT HAPPEN

Welcome to the "all electric" car future - that will not happen. If it did, there would be a permanent threat of total breakdown for national, or even continental power grids in the European case. Anybody who believes in that "ecological" future is just plain stupid or too lazy to work out a few simple numbers.


Poster Comment:

"Anybody who believes in that "ecological" future is just plain stupid or too lazy to work out a few simple numbers..."

***AHEM***

Paging goober56, Rat-boy mike, loonymom/whining-old, calCON and the REST of the stupid, lazy leftists on this forum...
Paging goober56, Rat-boy mike, loonymom/whining-old, calCON and the REST of the stupid, lazy leftists on this forum...

LOL.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 220.

#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

Stop posting your dull-witted drivel.

Biff Tannen  posted on  2011-09-26   14:42:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Biff Tannen (#1)

What, are you mad that I didn't mention your name in the list of stupid, dull- witted and lazy leftist losers?

I'll try to remember next time.

For now, if you have a problem with the article, please post something of substance, or kindly STFU.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-09-26   14:50:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Capitalist Eric, Ferret Mike, mininggold, war, Fed Mertz, All (#2)

For now, if you have a problem with the article, please post something of substance, or kindly STFU.

Oh Eric, that is funny!

lucysmom  posted on  2011-09-27   12:05:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: lucysmom, Ferret Mike, mininggold, war, Fed Mertz, A K A Stone, Badeye, jwpegler, CZ82, nolu chan, hondo68, eskimo, socalv8, sneakypete, Mad Dog, Liberator (#6)

Oh Eric, that is funny!

When you leftist losers knee-jerk back to the 25 rules of disinformation (coupled with Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals,"), you confirm what I already knew: you've got nothing to contradict the facts of the article.

And with that I'll say to you all: "Thanks for playing, asshat!"

Ping to the rest for your amusement.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-09-27   14:00:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Capitalist Eric, lucysmom, Ferret Mike, mininggold, war, Fed Mertz, A K A Stone, Badeye, jwpegler, CZ82, nolu chan, hondo68, eskimo, socalv8, sneakypete, Mad Dog (#9)

When you leftist losers knee-jerk back to the 25 rules of disinformation (coupled with Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals,"), you confirm what I already knew:

you've got nothing to contradict the facts of the article.

And THAT is why it's next to impossible to find an honest socialist to debate reality. It's a losing argument.

IF they admit the obvious, they've admitted to consent of the destruction of "America as we know it."

The safe play for 98% of forum leftists/socialists is...slinging batsh*t disinformation by the ton, changing the subject, tangential emoting, joking instead, dismissing the subject, acting dopey, and creating strawmen.

Liberator  posted on  2011-09-27   17:04:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Liberator, Capitalist Eric, lucysmom, Ferret Mike, mininggold, war, Fed Mertz, A K A Stone, Badeye, jwpegler, CZ82, nolu chan, hondo68, eskimo, socalv8, Mad Dog (#14)

it's next to impossible to find an honest socialist to debate reality.

That's because socialists are dreamers. They dream up plans where the world would be perfect if every tiny little detail of their dreams worked perfectly.

The problem is the world is and will always be a imperfect place because humans are imperfect by nature,and any dream you have that operates contrary to human nature is doomed to fail.

Socialism/communism works GREAT for families and small communities,but falls apart when you get a population base any bigger than that. People GENERALLY don't mind sharing with and sacrificing for people they are related to or know personally,but close off when you want them to share with and sacrifice for people they don't know.

It has always been that way and it will always be that way.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-09-27   19:38:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: sneakypete (#33)

People GENERALLY don't mind sharing with and sacrificing for people they are related to or know personally,but close off when you want them to share with and sacrifice for people they don't know.

It has always been that way and it will always be that way.

Then how do you account for disaster relief sent to Haiti, Pakistan, Japan, SE Asia, etc. by Americans?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-09-27   22:03:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: lucysmom, sneakypete (#49)

People GENERALLY don't mind sharing with and sacrificing for people they are related to or know personally,but close off when you want them to share with and sacrifice for people they don't know.

That is why you need a govt to overcome the general assholeness of human beings.

I don't want to aid Southerners who are hurricane victims for example but the govt overcomes my hatred of that breed.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-09-27   23:45:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Godwinson (#55)

That is why you need a govt to overcome the general assholeness of human beings.

Maybe a retard like you needs the government to do their thinking for them,but not me.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-09-27   23:50:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: sneakypete, Godwinson (#56) (Edited)

(Godwinson: "That is why you need a govt to overcome the general assholeness of human beings.")

Maybe a retard like you needs the government to do their thinking for them,but not me.

Liberals/Leftists presume to speak for anyone BUT themselves. Only they are not "assholes," which is why they love when police states "discipline" the rest of the masses (of obvious "assholes.")

Liberator  posted on  2011-09-28   10:48:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: Liberator, sneakypete, war, lucysmom (#82) (Edited)

(Godwinson: "That is why you need a govt to overcome the general assholeness of human beings.")

Maybe a retard like you needs the government to do their thinking for them,but not me.

So, in the kook world you live in lib, people can use their own judgment to figure out if they had too much to drink when getting behind the wheel of a car?

If you retards were islands, you can screw up your surroundings as much as possible. But since I have to share the earth with you assholes, the govt exists to prevent you morons from damaging the rest of us.

Godwinson  posted on  2011-09-28   10:53:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: Godwinson, sneakypete, war, lucysmom (#85)

Since I have to share the earth with you assholes, the govt exists to prevent you morons from damaging the rest of us.

Is this an admission that you support preemptive police-state assaults and arrests of conservatives because you somehow feel threatened by them?

You DO realize you're a Nazi, right?

Liberator  posted on  2011-09-28   10:58:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: Liberator (#88)

You DO realize you're a Nazi, right?

Nazis were the conservatives.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-09-28   11:50:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: lucysmom (#108)

Nazis were the conservatives.

ROFLMAO!

That must be why they defined themselves as Socialists,huh?

sneakypete  posted on  2011-09-28   12:20:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#126. To: sneakypete (#119)

That must be why they defined themselves as Socialists,huh?

The Chinese call their country the People's Republic of China, does that make them republican?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-09-28   12:32:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#134. To: lucysmom (#126)

That must be why they defined themselves as Socialists,huh?

The Chinese call their country the People's Republic of China, does that make them republican?

I don't know why I even bother to keep trying to educate you,but here we go again.

Germany was never called "Nazi". The word "Nazi" defined their political system.

Maoism,a form of communism,defined the political system in China in the past,but China is no longer a communist country. They have morphed into being a fascist country.

BTW,you still believe the US was formed as a democracy,don't you?

sneakypete  posted on  2011-09-28   12:54:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#167. To: sneakypete, lucysmom (#134)

I don't know why I even bother to keep trying to educate you,but here we go again.

Germany was never called "Nazi". The word "Nazi" defined their political system.

Maoism,a form of communism,defined the political system in China in the past,but China is no longer a communist country. They have morphed into being a fascist country.

BTW,you still believe the US was formed as a democracy,don't you?

You're conducting quite a clinic, Pete.

Liberator  posted on  2011-09-28   14:04:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#169. To: Liberator, sneakypete (#167)

You're conducting quite a clinic, Pete.

Histrionics aside, all pete has to do is post a definition of 'conservative'.

mininggold  posted on  2011-09-28   14:08:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#170. To: mininggold, Liberator, sneakypete (#169)

Histrionics aside, all pete has to do is post a definition of 'conservative'.

As I said above, when you gave ME this bullshit question:

"It depends on whether you follow classical definitions, modern definitions (as exemplified by the left-leaning MSM vs. the GOP) vs. liberatarians. You ask for a hard definition of a political viewpoint, which is the same as demanding a definition for the color blue. It's a bullshit question. And THAT is why you asked it.

OTOH, the National Socialist Party of pre-WWII Germany (Nazis, as we call them) had an established ideology. You can't simply change history to suit your purposes, so you (once again) attempt to divert attention away from your loser position...

How amusing. And... how typical."

You're QUITE the one-trick pony, aren't you?

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-09-28   14:19:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#176. To: Capitalist Eric, Mininggold, sneakypete, lucysmom, war (#170)

As I said above, when you gave ME this bullshit question:

Mininggold: "It depends on whether you follow classical definitions, modern definitions (as exemplified by the left-leaning MSM vs. the GOP) vs. liberatarians. You ask for a hard definition of a political viewpoint, which is the same as demanding a definition for the color blue. It's a bullshit question. And THAT is why you asked it.

OTOH, the National Socialist Party of pre-WWII Germany (Nazis, as we call them) had an established ideology. You can't simply change history to suit your purposes, so you (once again) attempt to divert attention away from your loser position...

Wow. What a convoluted, dead-end horseshit response by mininggold.

CE: "You're QUITE the one-trick pony, aren't you?"

Yes she is. But they all are in this regard.

These nuts will do or say anything to avoid the actual real analogous comparison between Nazis, Commies - and American "Progressives."

For their next distracting trick, I predict war and Mininggold will march through this forum on circus elephants in matching red lycra-spandex jumpsuits and tooting vuvuzelas.

Liberator  posted on  2011-09-28   15:07:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#180. To: Liberator (#176) (Edited)

Wow. What a convoluted, dead-end horseshit response by mininggold.

CE: "You're QUITE the one-trick pony, aren't you?"

Yes she is. But they all are in this regard.

These nuts will do or say anything to avoid the actual real analogous comparison between Nazis, Commies - and American "Progressives."

For their next distracting trick, I predict war and Mininggold will march through this forum on circus elephants in matching red lycra-spandex jumpsuits and tooting vuvuzelas.

The Nazi Party ran on a platform of promising to return Germany to it's past greatness. If that's not a conservative idea, maybe you need to find a different definition.

The candidates supported by you code talker Tea Baggers ran on similiar promises.

mininggold  posted on  2011-09-28   15:15:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#186. To: mininggold (#180)

The Nazi Party ran on a platform of promising to return Germany to it's past greatness.

And Hitler wouldn't lie, would he?

What was the reality of the Nazi Party in practice?

Liberator  posted on  2011-09-28   15:21:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#190. To: Liberator (#186)

And Hitler wouldn't lie, would he?

What was the reality of the Nazi Party in practice?

His practice was much like the current crop that call themselves conservatives in the US.

mininggold  posted on  2011-09-28   15:24:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#192. To: mininggold (#190)

His [Hitler] practice was much like the current crop that call themselves conservatives in the US.

To call you insane is insulting to the insane. You're insane x 1000.

Liberator  posted on  2011-09-28   15:28:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#195. To: Liberator (#192)

To call you insane is insulting to the insane. You're insane x 1000.

I see you're huddling behind your Saul Alinsky type innuendo again. Why don't you refute it if you can.

mininggold  posted on  2011-09-28   15:31:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#196. To: mininggold (#195)

Keep in mind that the person hurling that invective is a regular poster at LP...

war  posted on  2011-09-28   15:47:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#209. To: war, mininggold (#196)

Keep in mind that the person hurling that invective is a regular poster at LP...

While you are at it,make sure that you remember that war was a regular poster on LP too,before he got bounced.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-09-28   18:58:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#210. To: sneakypete (#209) (Edited)

While you are at it,make sure that you remember that war was a regular poster on LP too,before he got bounced.

Yea so?

IN retrospect that was a sign of my normalcy...

war  posted on  2011-09-28   19:20:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#212. To: war (#210)

While you are at it,make sure that you remember that war was a regular poster on LP too,before he got bounced.

Yea so?

So you clearly implied someone else was stupid because they were a regular poster at LP.

IN retrospect that was a sign of my normalcy...

Posting there was,getting bounced is a sign of nothing at all.

Normal people like to hear a variety of viewpoints,and argue their points against the points of others because they understand that it not only helps refine their own arguments,but maybe there is a chance they can convince a sheeple from the other side to consider an opposing point of view.

Unfortunately,there are too few people that want to hear anything other than echoes,and even fewer boards were opposing views are tolerated. Usually it is a gang of leftists ratpacking anybody that doesn't agree with the collective viewpoint,or a gang of neo-cons doing the same things for the same reasons.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-09-28   20:47:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#214. To: sneakypete (#212)

So you clearly implied someone else was stupid because they were a regular poster at LP.

It's not called The Cuckoo's Nest for nossing, Schotzie...

Normal people like to hear a variety of viewpoints,and argue their points against the points of others because they understand that it not only helps refine their own arguments,but maybe there is a chance they can convince a sheeple from the other side to consider an opposing point of view.

Did you just talk yourself into agreeing with me?

war  posted on  2011-09-29   7:42:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#216. To: war (#214)

Did you just talk yourself into agreeing with me?

No,but it seems like I talked you into agreeing with me.

Mostly. You still won't admit you were wrong for slamming anybody that posts on LP even though you used to post there daily until you got banned.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-09-29   9:40:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#217. To: sneakypete (#216)

You still won't admit you were wrong for slamming anybody that posts on LP even though you used to post there daily until you got banned.

I wasn't wrong.

100% very happy that I no longer post there and here's one of 10,000,000 reasons why...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

#79. To: sneakypete (#22) (Edited)

Okay. NOW you're lying!

It was explained to you by others, and by me, that the sight of the first gun was BAD. It was off. And here you go lying about it again. Her father is a very experienced hunter, and HE didn't know the sight was bad.

I know you know better...and that pisses me off beyond words.

One thing I cannot tolerate is a liar...especially when I know they know the truth.

You just keep lying about Palin on LP, and pretty soon, you'll be lyin about her someplace else.

I have a ZERO tolerance for liars, especially about Sarah Palin and her kin.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-12-14 15:56:31 ET Reply Trace

war  posted on  2011-09-29   11:57:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#218. To: war (#217)

I have a ZERO tolerance for liars, especially about Sarah Palin and her kin.

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-12-14 15:56:31 ET Reply Trace

Too Funny. I wondered why Sneaky did a flip on Sarah Palin.

You have to sell your soul to post as a regular over there.

mininggold  posted on  2011-09-29   12:30:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#219. To: mininggold (#218)

Sad...

war  posted on  2011-09-29   12:36:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#220. To: war (#219)

Sad...

Yeah really, there used to be some good, honest discussions there.

mininggold  posted on  2011-09-29   12:41:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 220.

        There are no replies to Comment # 220.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 220.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com