[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place? "Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil" "New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris" "Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony" Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX) Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’ ‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist' Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away. No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say ! "Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ " "Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate" "The Teleprompter Campaign" Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh "Pagans in Paris" "Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election". "Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally Trump Assassination Attempt We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF. Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation 2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution. If you need a Good Opening for black, use this. "Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now" How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK. South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel Today I turned 50! San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport! Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next' Will it ever end? Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar? Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception. Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten Status: Not Logged In; Sign In United States News See other United States News Articles Title: Obama's Approval Rating Now at 36% (Obama Supporters Are the Dregs of Society Now) Source: [None] URL Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief ... approval-slips-to-historic-low Published: Sep 24, 2011 Author: Justin Sink Post Date: 2011-09-24 10:09:27 by no gnu taxes Keywords: None Views: 13592 Comments: 35 President Barack Obama's approval ratings have fallen to a new low, with only 36 percent of Americans saying that they approve of the way he is handling his job overall, according to a new poll from the Economist/YouGov. A majority of Americans - 56 percent - disapprove of the president's performance. The Economist/YouGov poll surveyed 1000 respondents with a margin of error of 3.7 percent. Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 35. #4. To: no gnu taxes (#0) Oddly not included by Padlock was this: Still, there are glimmers of hope for Obama and the Democrats. As has been true in other polls, more trust Democrats than Republicans to handle the issue of job creation, and more believe that government spending is the way to create more jobs. war  posted on  2011-09-24   11:08:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #5. To: war (#4) "As has been true in other polls, more trust Democrats than Republicans to handle the issue of job creation, and more believe that government spending is the way to create more jobs." The padlock scum of the world hope mostly for successful denial of the right to vote by rethugs in measures like the closing of the DMVs in Wiscolnsin and the memos there about keping quiet about the what, where to get and deadlines in tregards to the free voter's ID cards. This buzzard is actuallt frightened the expectable, which is that the encumbant is re-elected after the Rethugs tear each other apart in a vicious primary season. And the fear about Social Security and Medicare is as primal with the voters and an issue gets, and we are going to see incredible numbers of ads hammering home the GOPer weakness on this point. I really would be surprised to see President Obama defeated when push comes to shove, and all is said and done. Ferret Mike  posted on  2011-09-24   12:06:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #10. To: Ferret Mike (#5) Mike. Liberals are evil. If we lived in a better country they wouldn't be allowed to vote or have any say in any matter. A K A Stone  posted on  2011-09-25   10:33:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #24. To: A K A Stone, Ferret Mike (#10) Mike. Liberals are evil. If we lived in a better country they wouldn't be allowed to vote or have any say in any matter. In addition to reaching the age of 18 and being a US Citizen, there should be additional requirements to vote: He/she needs To be AT LEAST ONE of the following: 1. A proplerty owner 2. An income tax payer 3. A veteran of the US armed forces. Get Outta Dodge!  posted on  2011-09-25   13:13:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #25. To: Get Outta Dodge! (#24) When you claimed to be for smaller government I didn't realize that you were referring to those who may participate in it. war  posted on  2011-09-25   13:30:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #26. To: war (#25) (Edited) When you claimed to be for smaller government I didn't realize that you were referring to those who may participate in it. That's part of it. Why should those who have no stake in government (especially the financial aspect of it) be allowed to participate in it? If I'm not a stockholder in Wal-Mart, should I be allowed to vote on how they run their business? Get Outta Dodge!  posted on  2011-09-25   13:38:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #27. To: Get Outta Dodge! (#26) If I'm not a stockholder in Wal-Mart, should I be allowed to vote on how they run their business? You do with your dollars. The government, tho, is not Wal-Mart. The government is US. Read the first three words of the USCON until they sink in. war  posted on  2011-09-25   13:40:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #28. To: war (#27) (Edited) You do with your dollars. True, but Wal-Mart has competitors which are available to me if I decide I don't wish to support Wal-Mart. The fedgov is a monopoly - it doesn't. The government, tho, is not Wal-Mart. The government is US. Last time I checked, Wal- Mart was a helluva lot more successful. But you're right, they serve a different function. Read the first three words of the USCON until they sink in. You know (but won't admit it) the living breathing Constitution actually died a long, long time ago. But I love how you on the Left LOVE to dust it off and bash people over the heads with it when it suits your purpose - and ignore it when it doesn't. I threw my proposals out there knowing something that drastic would never be implemented, but rather to illustrate what should be done. If people were serious about saving what's left of the country, that is. Get Outta Dodge!  posted on  2011-09-25   13:52:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #29. To: Get Outta Dodge! (#28) (Edited) The USCON is a living breathing document. First off, every Framer understood how the common law functions, it evolves. Secondly, it has within it a mechanism to change it, a mechanism that has been used several times throughout history. Do you know what agency, outside of the three branches and the military, is created by the USCON? war  posted on  2011-09-25   13:56:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #31. To: war (#29) Do you know what agency, outside of the three branches and the military, is created by the USCON? For some reason, I think it was the patent office - but that's just a guess. Get Outta Dodge!  posted on  2011-09-25   14:09:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #33. To: Get Outta Dodge! (#31) (Edited) USPS. "To establish post offices and post roads..." war  posted on  2011-09-25   14:13:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #34. To: war (#33) Can you show me - chapter and verse in the Constitution - where Supreme Court Justices by simple majority get to in effect amend the Constitution? Your premise is false. Are you saying then that abominations from my standpoint (Roe v. Wade) and abominations from your standpoint (Citizen's United v. FCC) did not in principle amend the Constitution? I took your advice and read Federalist 78. What I glean from it is that SCOTUS is much more powerful than Hamilton would have wanted it to be. I stand by my assertion that your "Living, Breathing" Constitution has given us the situation where yes - the SCOTUS CAN amend the Constitution. How nice when we agree with the decision. Not so nice when we don't And how much better if issues like abortion and corporations having "free speech" rights were actually vetted through the amendment process as the founders envisioned it - cumbersome though that may be. Article III gives the SCOTUS the power to decide the constitutionality oi laws. Read The Federalist #78 for a more detailed description of the SCOTUS to review laws, acts and exercises of power, most of the latter of which are implied powers. Deciding the Constitutionality of laws should not be the same as amending the Constitution. Get Outta Dodge!  posted on  2011-09-25   20:39:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #35. To: Get Outta Dodge! (#34) Are you saying then that abominations from my standpoint (Roe v. Wade) and abominations from your standpoint (Citizen's United v. FCC) did not in principle amend the Constitution? Yes. The judiciary decides what a law means. We can disagree about the meaning of words...privacy...person... I took your advice and read Federalist 78. What I glean from it is that SCOTUS is much more powerful than Hamilton would have wanted it to be. I don't see how you decided that. 78 makes it pretty clear that the SCOTUS will be the final word on whether or not a law a exercise of power is constitutional. war  posted on  2011-09-26   8:42:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 35.         There are no replies to Comment # 35. End Trace Mode for Comment # 35. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com