[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: 34% say country would be better off under Hillary Clinton: poll
Source: Raw Story
URL Source: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/09/ ... ff-under-hillary-clinton-poll/
Published: Sep 16, 2011
Author: Kase Wickman
Post Date: 2011-09-16 18:35:32 by nolu chan
Keywords: Obama, Hillary, Buyer
Views: 90024
Comments: 139

34% say country would be better off under Hillary Clinton: poll

By Kase Wickman
Friday, September 16th, 2011 -- 3:33 pm

More than a third of Americans said that if Hillary Clinton had been elected president in 2008, the country would be in better shape than it is right now under President Barack Obama's leadership.

The Bloomberg poll showed that Clinton, currently serving as secretary of state, garnered a 64 percent favorability rating, making her the most popular national politician in the country.

Thirty-four percent expressed wishful thinking about a Clinton presidency, up from the 25 percent who responded the same in July 2010.

In the 2008 election, Obama won the majority of delegates necessary to clinch the Democratic nomination after the primaries. During the drawn-out primary battle, Clinton actually won the popular vote, though Obama won 29 states to her 21.

Only 13 percent of respondents said that things would be worse under a Clinton White House.

It's not just Democrats expressing buyers' remorse either: 39 percent of Republicans said that Clinton would run the country better than Obama has.

“Some of her appeal is that she is not Barack Obama,” said J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co., the group that conducted poll.

No matter what the public's opinion of her, any wishful thinking will remain a fantasy.

“It’s below zero,” Clinton told CNN when asked about the chance of her challenging Obama in 2012. “One of the great things about being secretary of state is I am out of politics. I am not interested in being drawn back into it by anybody.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#1. To: nolu chan (#0)

I made this point in 2008.

war  posted on  2011-09-16   19:18:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: war, nolu chan (#1)

I thought it was funny when Hillary was losing originally. They both suck. McCain sucked too. Palin has potential.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-09-16   19:55:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: A K A Stone, war (#2)

Palin has potential.

Palin's 15 minutes came and went. Hillary's stock has risen as Secretary of State while Obama's stock has fallen. I made the point some months back that Hillary would make the stronger candidate this time around. The GOP, with its weak field, is probably happy they are not running against her.

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-16   23:31:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: nolu chan (#3)

Palin's 15 minutes came and went. Hillary's stock has risen as Secretary of State while Obama's stock has fallen. I made the point some months back that Hillary would make the stronger candidate this time around. The GOP, with its weak field, is probably happy they are not running against her.

LOL!

What a load of BULLSHIT.

Governor Palin isn't even an announced candidate and who are the libTURDS in a FRENZY over?

They don't ever tell us who they FEAR most do they councilor?

Hitlery is TOAST.

Sec State is a DEAD end job.

Go ahead, name all of the SecStates who later went on to be elected president in all of American history.

"Weak" GOP field?

LOL! What a LOAD of DNC/MinistryofTruth/libTURD crap!

Any of those people in the GOP primary would BEAT the wee little failed man child messiah "king" right now.

AND any of them would be orders of magnitudes BETTER for America than obammy would be.

F it.

I'm pissing into the breeze.

"America, killed by a THEORY."

But don't worry man, YOUR children will make real good slaves.

And most importantly, when THEY needed you, you were PURE, and that's what really counts isn't it?

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-17   0:01:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Mad Dog (#5)

Governor Palin isn't even an announced candidate and who are the libTURDS in a FRENZY over?

They don't ever tell us who they FEAR most do they councilor?

Hitlery is TOAST.

Sec State is a DEAD end job.

Half-term Governor Palin is not running, will not run, would not win the nomination were she to run, and would likely ensure GOP failure if she were to be the candidate. She is manifestly, overwhelmingly incompetent. The Dems would love to run against Palin.

Hillary is not running and will not run. The only way she could run is if Obama were to drop out. Had Obama decided not to run and had she been running, Hillary would have been a formidable candidate. As I said, "they are not running against her."

The GOP frontrunners are Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. With the current economic/jobs climate, Obama should not even be competitive. That he is competitive with the GOP frontrunners speaks loudly to their inherent weakness.

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-17   3:14:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: nolu chan (#6)

1.) a.)Half-term Governor Palin b.) is not running, will not run, would not win the nomination were she to run, and would likely ensure GOP failure if she were to be the candidate. She is manifestly, overwhelmingly incompetent. The Dems would love to run against Palin.

2.) a.) Hillary is not running and will not run. b.)The only way she could run is if Obama were to drop out. Had Obama decided not to run and had she been running, Hillary would have been a formidable candidate. As I said, "they are not running against her."

3.) a.) The GOP frontrunners are Mitt Romney and Rick Perry. With the current economic/jobs climate, Obama should not even be competitive. That he is competitive with the GOP frontrunners speaks loudly to their inherent weakness.

LOL!

1.)

a.) FACTUALLY you little wannabe shyster, in the interest of TRUTH and FACT; even half of a term still would equal "Governor" as an honorific. Want to BET on it sparky?

b.) YOU are a wannabe shyster sparky not a blind sear seated at "the navel of the world". Even your rodent cadres would balk at actually claiming to know the future! But well done! for sheer balls and effort and stupidity! You are a wannabe shyster afterall and that REQUIRES that you be a legend in YOUR own, ahem, "mind".

2.)

a.) LOL! what a MOROOOOOON! We have already covered this sparky, you cannot and do not know what is going to happen in the next second let along in the more long term future you arrogant wittle rascal!

b.) Show us ALL sparky where Hitlery is prevented by RULE or LAW from running against the messiah "king" obammy? As I said sparky, you don't KNOW shit, you just have an OPINION. Which, I guess, means the same thing to you wannabe shysters? Eh sparky?

3.)

a.) Frankly sparky that's just too stoopid to even address.

The PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION is over a YEAR away, NOTHING that is NOW will be THEN, when the REAL time comes.

DUH ....

Frankly sparky that really shows what a stoopid little PDS insane fuckwad you are.

That you "think" obammy is "competitive" with the GOP field underlines how stoopid you truly are.

I feel very EMBARRASSED for you sparky.

That must REALLY sting being so STOOOOOOPID when you want more than anything to be "smart"?

I feel your pain sparky.

Boo whoo ...

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-17   7:49:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Mad Dog (#8)

FACTUALLY, I gave Sarah Palin the honorific of Governor, and accurately and FACTUALLY characterized her as a half-term Governor, avoiding the term half-governor.

The only way Hillary could run is if Obama were to drop out. This is because Obama has raised about a billion dollars and the Democrat Party would not back her in a contested election. If the party do not decide to move Obama out first, Hillary would not obtain party support. As such, she might as well run for the nomination of the Green Party or some other third party. It is political reality.

While the presidential election is a year away, the primaries are not. And your track record is so good, especially with your inability to remember. Or are you still celebrating the election of President McCain?

#29. To: Happy2BMe-OnLP (#8)

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Zogby is a tool of the left, he was wrong with GORE he was wrong with KERRY.

LOL!

The OH-BAA-mi's coronation is premature, and will help defeat him.

LOL!

Mad Dog  posted on  2008-10-22   15:14:36 ET  Reply   Trace

You do not offer an opinion. You offer only pre-set party talking points.

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-18   2:00:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: nolu chan (#9)

You do not offer an opinion.

You aren't really all that bright are you counselor?

THAT was EXACTLY MY POINT, about YOU, you supercilious azzhole.

YOU offer NOTHING but YOUR OWN OPINIONS, AND you act as if your OPINIONS are FACTS.

AND azzhole, you didn't address GOVERNOR Palin by her honorific in your post to me and haven't addressed GOVERNOR Palin by her honorific in general azzhole.

So while you may be aware of the correct ENGLISH useage, you are incapable for some reason, (wink, wink, nod, nod), of DOING it.

You want to exercise your PDS? Have at it counselor, just don't even try to look down your nose at anyone. Because you aren't anything but a jabbering posing poppin jay.

Better pay attention to that PLANK in your eyes before you start bitching about the motes in other's.

IF you don't like my "style" piss off.

YOU need a BRAIN to be able to understand what I say.

The "left" is OUR blood enemy you fool.

WE are at WAR with them for the FUTURE of this nation and people RIGHT NOW.

The wee little failed man child messiah "king" obammy is just the latest step towards TYRANNY you stupid supercilious cunt.

SHOW ME ANYWHERE, ANYTIME, WHERE I HAVE EVER SUPPORTED "PARTY" OVER NATION.

You CAN'T because I NEVER have, and NEVER would.

The ONLY thing "pre-set" about ME is my absolute devotion to the CONSTITUTION and PEOPLE of the United States of America.

I have actually taken an OATH to preserve and protect it, and them. Which I am still bound under duty AND preference to preform.

EVERYONE knows when I express MY OPINION(S) azzhole, because I state that it is MY OPINION.

I always provide CITATIONS and links to anything that I claim is a FACT.

You are a wannabe shyster I'm an ex-engineer.

You bury your mistakes shyster, we expose and FIX our problems by the establishing the objective FACTS azzwipe.

So Fuck you, you phony supercilious bitch.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-18   16:08:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Mad Dog (#10)

I always provide CITATIONS and links to anything that I claim is a FACT.
—Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET

You aren't really all that bright are you counselor?... Have at it counselor...
—Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET

You are a wannabe shyster... You bury your mistakes shyster...
—Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET

You appear to have inadvertently forgotten to include the CITATIONS and LINKS that you ALWAYS provide to anything that you claim is a FACT.

Does this mean that your claims are admittedly not FACT?

Or are you unable or unwilling to provide the CITATIONS and LINKS that you ALWAYS provide in support of your nonsense?

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-20   0:30:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: nolu chan (#18) (Edited)

I always provide CITATIONS and links to anything that I claim is a FACT.

—Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET You aren't really all that bright are you counselor?... Have at it counselor... —Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET You are a wannabe shyster... You bury your mistakes shyster... —Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET

You appear to have inadvertently forgotten to include the CITATIONS and LINKS that you ALWAYS provide to anything that you claim is a FACT.

Does this mean that your claims are admittedly not FACT?

Or are you unable or unwilling to provide the CITATIONS and LINKS that you ALWAYS provide in support of your nonsense?

LOL!

I REALLY got your goat didn't I shyster?

FOUR posts?

LOL! You powerless little shyster insect.

I didn't provide citations, because the above is my OPINION.

Unlike YOU shyster I don't confuse MY OPINIONS with FACTS.

And when I claim a FACT, I always provide a citation.

Anyhow shyster, your act is obvious to EVERYONE.

You are so insecure it's pitiful.

FOUR posts shyster?

LOL!

I OWN you bitch!

LOL!

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-20   14:58:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Mad Dog (#22)

YOU have NEVER served in any branch of the US armed forces anywhere at any time have YOU, you lubber bitch?

Mad Dog #20, 2011-09-20, 14:42:47 ET

Wrong guess.

It is really interesting to me "counselor" how when I piss you off, you immediately go and TRY to revive lies about my service. ... YOU have NEVER served in any branch of the US armed forces anywhere at any time have YOU, you lubber bitch?

Mad Dog #20, 2011-09-20, 14:42:47 ET

I shall take apart your imbecilic bullshit piece by piece.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=169733&Disp=326#C326

#326. To: sneakypete (#325)

No, you are incorrect, the US NAVY had "Naval Enlistment Codes", (NECs).

During Vietnam the USMC was part of the NAV,(the Commandant of the Marine Corps reported directly to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), (I think that Slick Willie aka the Stainmeister, changed that).

The Corps had MOSs. But they knew, (and hated) that they were part of the USN.

But you doggies did it ALL yourselves right?

Right.

Out of forty, (40), "graduates" of NTC San Diego, company 217, 1968; 38 went to serve with the Corps as Corpsmen, two (2) went to the 7th fleet.

But you doggies did it ALL your ownselves right?

Right.

DesRon 15, look it up doggie.

Mad Dog posted on 2006-12-21 3:14:46 ET Reply Trace

Mad Dog, if you were a Navy veteran, you should know that a U.S. Navy NEC is NOT, as you state, a Naval Enlistment Code. NEC does not stand for that, has nothing whatever to do with reenlistment eligibility nor the characterization of one's enlistment.

Care to try again, you wannabe Navy veteran?

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-20   15:20:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: failed shyster nolu chan (#24)

Mad Dog, if you were a Navy veteran, you should know that a U.S. Navy NEC is NOT, as you state, a Naval Enlistment Code. NEC does not stand for that, has nothing whatever to do with reenlistment eligibility nor the characterization of one's enlistment.

So you want to make the $10K bet that I have challenged you with coward?

No problem.

Navy jobs are designated by "NEC" numbers aren't they you gibbering little shyster bitch?

In FACT you little lubber shyster bitch, according to the 1968 edition of the Blue jacket's Manual pg 192, it says, and I quote ... "This is where the Navy ENLISTED Classification Codes (NECs) come into use."

Do you think that just MAYBE the "Bluejacket's Manual" just MIGHT know what it's talking about when it's talking about the fucking NAVY, you simpering little shyster bitch?

I was a blue water Destroyer deck/weapons sailor, and I have ALL the tickets to prove it you ignorant snotty little land lubber bitch.

I AM a shellback.

You owe Stone $10K you foul little shyster lubber wog bitch.

BUT of course YOU'LL never pay him, will you fraud?

LOL!

You ignorant fuckwad lubber bitch.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-21   15:19:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: failed shyster wog nolu chan (#27)

.

When are you sending Stone the 10 Grand that you owe him, you foul little lubber wog shyster bitch?

Eh wog?

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-21   15:38:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: failed shyster wog nolu chan (#28)

When are you sending Stone the 10 Grand that you owe him, you foul little lubber wog shyster bitch?

Eh wog?

10Gs wog.

You owe STONE $10K you shyster lubber wog.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-21   19:31:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Mad Dog, nolu chan (#29)

Thanks for the entertaining thread.

A couple of things. I believe that you are both Navy vets.

Secondly. I notice that nolu chan cites UN resolutions. I for one could care less about the UN. Chan do you think that the UN is a legitimate organization to tell Israel or anyone what to do? Do you think that we should have to obey the UN? I think that the UN is unconstitutional myself. You can't have a treaty with a non nation.

Also on the article. I think that people who say that Hillary would have been better then Obama are correct. That doesn't mean they think that Hillary is any good. Republicans just say she would be better but would never vote for her. Democrats probably wish it was her instead of Obama at this point.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-09-21   19:48:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: A K A Stone, counselor nolu chan w.s. (#31)

Thanks for the entertaining thread.

A couple of things. I believe that you are both Navy vets.

Secondly. I notice that nolu chan cites UN resolutions. I for one could care less about the UN. Chan do you think that the UN is a legitimate organization to tell Israel or anyone what to do? Do you think that we should have to obey the UN? I think that the UN is unconstitutional myself. You can't have a treaty with a non nation.

Also on the article. I think that people who say that Hillary would have been better then Obama are correct. That doesn't mean they think that Hillary is any good. Republicans just say she would be better but would never vote for her. Democrats probably wish it was her instead of Obama at this point.

Thanks.

OK, the bet wasn't if chan is or isn't a vet , it's that I'm NOT a US NAVY vet.

So ... kewl! When are you going to send STONE the $10K that you just lost chan?

Also, what CONSERVATIVE of ANY sort takes ANYTHING that the UN says or does seriously? NOTHING that the UN comes up with is binding on the citizens of the USA, OUR LAWS are based on the US CONSTITUTION and nothing else.

imo 'ol chan is no CONSERVATIVE.

At this point EVERYBODY thinks that somebody would have/could have be better than the wee little failed man child messiah "king" obammy has been and IS.

It's just that the libTURDS and public supporters of the fraud don't have the courage or honor to even tell themselves the truth that they already know in their own hearts.

imo the vast majority of libTURDS are INSANE COWARDS and LIARS and HYPOCRITES.

All that you have to do, is to watch what they DO, not what they SAY.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-21   21:52:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Mad Dog (#32)

Thanks.

OK, the bet wasn't if chan is or isn't a vet , it's that I'm NOT a US NAVY vet.

So ... kewl! When are you going to send STONE the $10K that you just lost chan?

I was hoping for 10 grand. But I was looking up there and I don't see where he accepted. I don't think he would think that you adequately proved it by me simply agreeing with you.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-09-21   22:26:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 33.

#39. To: Mad Dog, A K A Stone (#33)

#18. To: Mad Dog (#10)

I always provide CITATIONS and links to anything that I claim is a FACT.
—Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET

You aren't really all that bright are you counselor?... Have at it counselor...
—Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET

You are a wannabe shyster... You bury your mistakes shyster...
—Mad Dog #10, 2011-09-18, 16:08:50 ET

You appear to have inadvertently forgotten to include the CITATIONS and LINKS that you ALWAYS provide to anything that you claim is a FACT.

Does this mean that your claims are admittedly not FACT?

Or are you unable or unwilling to provide the CITATIONS and LINKS that you ALWAYS provide in support of your nonsense?

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-20   0:30:00 ET  Reply 

A million billion dollars says you still haven't and can't provide documentation that I am a counselor or shyster.

Pay it to Stone.

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-21 23:30:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: A K A Stone, wang chang aka wannabe shyster aka loser lubber wog chan aka ... (#33)

I was hoping for 10 grand. But I was looking up there and I don't see where he accepted. I don't think he would think that you adequately proved it by me simply agreeing with you.

"Hope springs eternal".

chan is just another all talk coward.

It's not about the truth with creeps like him.

His only interest is to try to call me a liar.

IF he served then he KNOWS in his bones the truth, and that makes him even a bigger POS imo.

Chan is a coward and a little punk creep.

Of course a punk like him would never put his money where his mouth is because ... well ... he's just a PUNK.

Mad Dog  posted on  2011-09-22 14:19:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com