[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Water Cooler Title: Anti-Choice Zealots Go After Clinic Owner's Children -- Here's How He's Fighting Back When those who provide health services for women and their families, including young children, get targeted personally by anti-choice activists, how do they make it clear that such behavior is unacceptable without stooping to the level of their opponents? One clinic landlord in Germantown, Maryland is planning a coordinated response against his harassers. He is taking this measure after anti-choicers picketed him and his children at the kids' school, displaying a huge sign accusing him of being a "baby-killer" in plain view of all the other parents and children on open school night. Perhaps most disturbingly, the sign carried the landlord's name, phone number and photograph. (For the sake of their privacy, we are not printing his name.) Given the hostile environment and the threat of violence facing abortion providers and those connected to them, this sort of distinguishing personal information can literally be quite threatening if put in the hands of the wrong zealot. School officials in Maryland were disgusted with the protest. “The idea that a group of protesters would target a school because the child of someone they are targeting attends the school...is fairly despicable,” Montgomery County schools spokeswoman Lesli Maxwell told the Washington Post. Earlier this summer, we reported on the harassment, intimidation and threats abortion doctors are facing around the country, specifically at the Germantown Reproductive Health Services clinic, where a "Summer of Mercy" was planned to protest and harass workers, patients and the practice of abortion provider Leroy Carhart. "Summer of Choice" was an effort by activists to counter them. Well, summer of protests or no summer of protests, Carhart is still there and fortunately, nothing material has changed for women who desperately need reproductive health services. Now one of the clinic's co-owners is facing the kind of intense personal harassment and scrutiny that is common as a ramp-up tactic in the anti-choice movement. Last week, members of the "Defend Life" community received the following directive, which included the personal contact information of the landlord and the names of his wife and children: Lest the threatening rhetoric and disclosure of personal information give you pause, the directive did include this caveat: Whew? While the calls he has received have been polite, apparently, these protesters' "Christ-like" behavior doesn't exclude the kind of personal harassment in which the protesters have engaged, targeting his kids at their school. Since the campaign kicked off, writes the landlord in an email to AlterNet and other bloggers and writers, "I have received about 25 phone calls, 4 letters, and about 100 emails. I have the names and contact information from each of the people reaching out to me." So he's decided that it's time to call back, politely, with thanks for the prayers and wishes he has received, and with the hope that a phone call and email will literally bring home to his "gentle" opponents what it's like to have that safe personal space invaded--even by so-called well-wishers. Here's the email the clinic landlord sent out to prospective volunteers for his grassroots campaign: 1) The family truly appreciates your prayers. 2) Your opinions and pleas have been heard but I will consider this phase I. Once I get further information about the protesters that showed up at the school I will ask for the same effort regarding their efforts. I have set up this email (enddlterrorism@gmail.com)... solely for this effort. Please let me know if you are willing to help. You do not need to give me any more information than your email address if you do not want to, however, I will keep all information confidential. His efforts at a friendly personal pushback strike me as brilliant. How many anti-choicers would still be in the "persuasion" business if they knew the "discussion" would carry on to their own homes, where their families reside? And more importantly, how would they react knowing that there are others on the opposing side who are as gently and firmly devoted as they are? Some would surely continue, but others might be moved by a dose of sudden empathy for their opponents.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.
#1. To: BrainShit (#0)
Chuckles.....a killer / felon POS being concerned about "stooping" to the level of mere people who protest the pro death activities. Ahem.....now THATS rich.
I know you meant "THAT'S".
Do you think abortion is good or evil Fred? Do you follow your church on this issue or do you just go there as a social event?
Do you think alcohol is evil and a sin to drink? Same thing IMO. Get religion out of politics and foreign policy. Very simple thing to do. You have the Taliban mindset - look in the mirror and see it.
No of course not. Jesus made wine for a wedding. It is drinking to much that would be a problem.
The Hard Shell Baptists around here claim it was grape juice. I'm happy to read that you're enlightened about alcohol. You do have the Taliban mindset...if you look in the mirror. We've had this abortion discussion before. I am pro-life but I won't go out of my way to vote for dry counties to keep folks from going to other counties to purchase their booze. Get it yet?
#11. To: Fred Mertz (#9)
They are wrong. Who ever heard of having grape juice for a wedding. Hey Al did you bring the grape juice. No no way. It was wine.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|