Weird Stuff/Unexplained
See other Weird Stuff/Unexplained Articles
Title: Translation Needed Please
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 14, 2011
Author: Wingnut
Post Date: 2011-09-14 11:08:51 by war
Keywords: None
Views: 51218
Comments: 80
Some wingnut on another board has this as his tagline: "I will be voting for whoever [sic] wins the GOP PRIMARY. PERIOD." Does he mean the FIRST primary, the last primary or the primary in his state? If whomever wins that primary doesn't win the nomination, will he be writing in a candidate? Enquiring minds want to know...
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-16) not displayed.
.
.
.
#17. To: lucysmom (#15)
ROFLMAO...you JUST beat me!!!!
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Hey - high five!
"...all of the equations in neoclassical economics are rubbish. The differential equations describe nothing. Economics is not about mathematics, it is about the human being." Sandeep Jaitly
Among all my kook anti groupies, he is the one with the most serious mental health issues in my opinion. Sometimes its extremely satisfying to note in passing, but then I see something like this via a non 'article' posted in the news column. Or more likely a cut and paste I usually ignore from one of you guys. Its just sad. An allegedly grown man begging another man he's never met to pay attention to him, every single day? By any means? Wow... Greg was right about him before he died (magic to some of you). He's just a sick twisted fuck with no life off the internet, combined with raw envy. Its the only rational explanation after a decade of this type of behavior. And once again, he's pushing the patience of somebody that granted him posting rights in a political forum. Eventually, he'll wear out our hosts patience, and get banned permanently. As he has at FR (twice at least), LP, PBN/PLN, GBR, etc etc etc. Hell, they even banned him from a couple of other LP offshoots that exist solely for kooks (so it seems, anyway). This is why I've never bothered to ask any site owner to ban him. I know eventually they'll do so on their own. They always find themselves forced to, due to what appears to be an obvious personality disorder. My honest opinion here. When you repeat an action over and over again, expecting a different result..... Its just sad. The most pathetic part of all? He'll get gratification - I won't speculate type here - that I even bothered to comment on this thread. The databases on multiple websites do not lie. Literally hundreds of thousands of posts unresponded to. Wow. So his disorder forces him to 'this'. Oh well, he's not my problem, he's Stone's problem, as he was JR's, Goldi's, and a half a dozen others.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
You are correct. At least I will admit when I make a mistake.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
It should be seriously. It should also be whoever, as was PROVEN to you but you are too much of an idiot to admit it.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Stone bans lots of people I've seen, but then lets them come back.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Stone has the personality disorder around here.
Greg was right about him before he died (magic to some of you). He's just a sick twisted fuck with no life off the internet, combined with raw envy. Its the only rational explanation after a decade of this type of behavior. And once again, he's pushing the patience of somebody that granted him posting rights in a political forum. Eventually, he'll wear out our hosts patience, and get banned permanently. As he has at FR (twice at least), LP, PBN/PLN, GBR, etc etc etc. Hell, they even banned him from a couple of other LP offshoots that exist solely for kooks (so it seems, anyway). This is why I've never bothered to ask any site owner to ban him. I know eventually they'll do so on their own. They always find themselves forced to, due to what appears to be an obvious personality disorder. My honest opinion here. When you repeat an action over and over again, expecting a different result..... Its just sad. The most pathetic part of all? He'll get gratification - I won't speculate type here - that I even bothered to comment on this thread. The databases on multiple websites do not lie. Literally hundreds of thousands of posts unresponded to. Wow. So his disorder forces him to 'this'. Oh well, he's not my problem, he's Stone's problem, as he was JR's, Goldi's, and a half a dozen others. I thought you said you were the one who was in his head! LOLOL
And anyway for you clowns, while I agree that "take you serious" may not be grammatically correct, it is so commonly used in everyday talk that I guarantee you will not go through the week without using it yourselves in some manner, despite your posturings. However, whoever was also correct as I demonstrated, and if either of you had any integrity, you'd admit it, but I already know you leftards have never had any integrity.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
So does Boofer with that piece of crap above. FWIW, Magic, whom I had kept in fairly steady contact with, sent me an email in the Spring before his death asking me to consider burying the hatchet with Boofer. I had no idea that the Colonel was ill. I got a very nice email from his family after he had passed and to this day I honor one of his legacies... It's hilarious that Boofer harps on my internet posting...my businesses are doing very well...knock wood...he, on the other hand, is bitching that he, his wife and his "partner" are about to go tits up but he still manages time to post all day. Over the last year, we've developed 3 new products, recession proof - there's always a school year, weddings and anniversries - to go with the dozen or so we have that are somewhat seasonal. And I have two years left here on my 100% guaranteed contract... Sucks to be him so of course he lashes out...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
(GRIN)
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Keep treading water until the 50spf wears off Paddy...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
It must be booze of some kind. Going to the doc now for follow-up. I'm as healthy as an ox. Later 'gator
They told my dad that and he died the next night in his sleep... Good luck...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
They told my dad that and he died the next night in his sleep... You must be a real hoot at parties . . . :-)
__________________________________________________________________________________________ BTW, I can never be too much of an idiot. I always seem to find the right amount...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
I used to be but lately I seem to be a victim of the US Mail when it comes to receiving my invites and none of my friends have email... Don't you think that's odd?
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
him + he = whoever him + him = whomever Who is used as a subject and whom is used as an object. Correct: I will be voting for whomever.... (object of the preposition for.) Correct: If whoever wins.... (subject).
I don't even have 100K posts in total anywhere let alone "unresponded to". Anazing how he used his cute little rant to pretend importance...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
I wasn't going to go through a 5th grade lesson in grammar and useage with him. I was correct...he was wrong...the rest was just comedy...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
This is the rule. Go to the grammar link and look it up: To determine whether to use whoever or whomever, here is the rule: him + he = whoever him + him = whomever Examples: Give it to whoever/whomever asks for it first. Give it to him. He asks for it first. Therefore, Give it to whoever asks for it first. http://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/whoever.asp --- In the same sense: I will be voting for whoever wins the GOP PRIMARY. I will be voting for him. He wins the GOP Primary. Therefore whoever is correct. The reason for this is while it is an object of a preposition, it is also the subject of a dependent clause.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
You are too stupid to understand 5th grade grammar as you have demonstrated.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
This fifth grade stuff is confusing. Regardless I know what it means either way.
Back to 4th grade for you, Paddy.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
You should have stayed in school for another 3 years to find out for sure...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
I've provided you with the grammar link, dumbass. You just pull shit out of your ass like you do everything else.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Nolu nailed it... You're choking on it like it was Kobe Bryant...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
I provided him with the grammar link, too. Again, you are thinking one dimensionally, as that is all you are capable of. I know the difference between an object and a subject, idiot. I didn't write the Rule; I am merely relaying it to you, but you are too dumb to understand it.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
"I will be voting for whoever [sic] wins the GOP PRIMARY. PERIOD." Uhh, dat means they will vote for whomever wins the GOP Primary. AGAINST the Marxist Communituh-in-Chief. You're welcome.
"It's not surprising, then, they [White Pennsylvanians] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." ~ Comrade-in-Chief Barry Hussein 0bama
You can quote every Rule in the book, Paddy...I'm using the correct one. You are not.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
You must be a real hoot at parties . . . LOL War'll live for a long time (or as long as he avoids open car doors while cruising tight NYC streets.) He knocks down his dozen vitamins with Absolute neat.
"It's not surprising, then, they [White Pennsylvanians] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." ~ Comrade-in-Chief Barry Hussein 0bama
You have been shown you were wrong and either too much of an asshole to admit it or to dumb to realize it or both. That's ALWAYS your problem.
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Another link you might can learn from: http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/whomever-whoever.aspx The trouble begins with the fact that “whoever did this” and “whomever I hire” aren’t just ordinary clauses; they’re noun clauses—clauses that act just like nouns. When you use these noun clauses as subjects or objects in larger sentences, the picture gets more complicated. Suppose the noun clause “whoever did this” is part of a sentence like “I want to speak to whoever did this.” Uh-oh, you may think, “whoever” is the object of “to,” and it should be “whomever”! Noun Clauses with “Whoever” and “Whomever” But you’d be wrong—“whoever” was the right choice when we were thinking about the clause “whoever did this” by itself, and it’s still the right choice now. But what about that “to,” in “I want to speak to whoever did this”? The answer is that the object of “to” is not “whoever.” It’s the entire clause “whoever did this.” Remember, this is a noun clause; they call it that because the whole thing acts like a noun, and in this case, the whole thing is the object of “to.”
Obama has played at being a president while enjoying the perks … golf, insanely expensive vacations at tax-payer expense. He has ignored the responsibilities of the job; no plans, no budgets, no alternatives … just finger pointing; making him a complete failure as a president
Still waiting for those CRA numbers. Patiently... [snicker] "Whomever" was the correct word choice...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
You overestimate yourself. It's now "enquiring," it's "idiotic." Ass.
To:Skippy, toe-jam, old man Fred Alzheimers Mertz, _jim, loonymom/ming, e-type-jackoff, goober56, Wrek, calcon, dummy DwarF, continental op, Biff, gobsheit and meguro From: Capitalist Eric Message: You're SOCIALIST morons. ESAD. Note to self: Proofread before posting a feeble insult that will be made even more feeble by a typo... PS: Avoid comma splices.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
His sandbox, his rules.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
You've called for my banning several times, Boofer. Can you make it through one day without telling a lie?
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Correct: I will be voting for whomever.... (object of the preposition for.) [no gnu taxes] Therefore whoever is correct. The reason for this is while it is an object of a preposition, it is also the subject of a dependent clause. Oops! You are correct and I did get one bass ackwards. [paraphrase] I will be voting for he who wins the GOP PRIMARY. Whoever is correct. The whole clause is the object. I believe it is a nominative (or noun) clause.
I'll invoke Rule #3...whatever sounds right IS right...and still declare victory...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
and for that, you have my respect.
"...all of the equations in neoclassical economics are rubbish. The differential equations describe nothing. Economics is not about mathematics, it is about the human being." Sandeep Jaitly
Comments (58 - 80) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#18. To: war (#17)
ROFLMAO...you JUST beat me!!!!
#19. To: no gnu taxes (#11)
It's the same way you are about everything.
#20. To: lucysmom (#15)
Idiot, it exists EXACTLY as stated. This is why nobody takes you serious.
#21. To: war (#16)
#22. To: Badeye (#19)
This is why I've never bothered to ask any site owner to ban him.
#23. To: no gnu taxes (#22)
#24. To: Badeye, war (#19)
Among all my kook anti groupies, he is the one with the most serious mental health issues in my opinion. Sometimes its extremely satisfying to note in passing, but then I see something like this via a non 'article' posted in the news column. Or more likely a cut and paste I usually ignore from one of you guys. Its just sad. An allegedly grown man begging another man he's never met to pay attention to him, every single day? By any means? Wow...
#25. To: war, lucysmom (#21)
#26. To: Fred Mertz (#23)
Stone has the personality disorder around here.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#27. To: mininggold (#24)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#28. To: no gnu taxes (#25)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#29. To: war (#26)
Over the last year, we've developed 3 new products, recession proof -
#30. To: Fred Mertz (#29)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#31. To: war (#30)
I'm as healthy as an ox.
ABC NEWS: [Ron Paul] added that the United States is in 130 countries and has 900 bases around the world, and added that “we’re broke.”. He was booed at a Tea-Party debate.
Congratulations Mr. and Mrs. Statist and all ships at sea. Your demonization of the Tea Party has worked - you need no longer fear it! Carry on!!
#32. To: no gnu taxes (#21)
...but you are too much of an idiot to admit it.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#33. To: Get Outta Dodge! (#31)
You must be a real hoot at parties . . .
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#34. To: no gnu taxes (#3)
To determine whether to use whoever or whomever, here is the rule:
"I will be voting for whoever [sic] wins the GOP PRIMARY. PERIOD."
"If whomever wins that primary doesn't win the nomination, will he be writing in a candidate?"
#35. To: mininggold (#24)
Literally hundreds of thousands of posts unresponded to.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#36. To: nolu chan (#34)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#37. To: nolu chan (#34)
#38. To: war (#36)
#39. To: no gnu taxes, nolu chan (#37)
#40. To: no gnu taxes (#37)
The reason for this is while it is an object of a preposition, it is also the subject of a dependent clause.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#41. To: A K A Stone (#39)
This fifth grade stuff is confusing.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#42. To: war (#40)
#43. To: no gnu taxes (#42)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#44. To: war (#43)
#45. To: war (#0)
Some wingnut on another board has this as his tagline:
#46. To: no gnu taxes (#44)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#47. To: Get Outta Dodge!, war (#31)
I'm as healthy as an ox. They told my dad that and he died the next night in his sleep...
#48. To: war (#46)
You can quote every Rule in the book, Paddy...I'm using the correct one.
#49. To: war, nolu chan (#46)
#50. To: no gnu taxes (#48)
You have been shown you were wrong and either too much of an asshole to admit it or to dumb to realize it or both. That's ALWAYS your problem.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#51. To: war (#0)
Enquiring minds want to know...
#52. To: Capitalist Eric (#51)
(Edited)
It's now "enquiring," it's "idiotic."
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#53. To: no gnu taxes (#22)
#54. To: Badeye (#53)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#55. To: no gnu taxes (#37)
Who is used as a subject and whom is used as an object.
"I will be voting for whoever [sic] wins the GOP PRIMARY. PERIOD."
"I will be voting for whoever [sic] wins the GOP PRIMARY.
#56. To: nolu chan (#55)
I will be voting for he who wins the GOP PRIMARY.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#57. To: no gnu taxes (#20)
At least I will admit when I make a mistake.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]