politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: The real debate: Watch the swing states, not the national polls (5 PDT, 8 EDT - Reagan Library)
Source:
New Jersey On-Line
URL Source: http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshin ... eal_debate_watch_the_swin.html
Published: Sep 7, 2011
Author: Paul Mulshine/The Star Ledger
Post Date: 2011-09-07 19:30:53 by Hondo68
Keywords: seven super-swing states, magic number of 270 electoral, fight is for swing states
Views: 3944
Comments: 10
Forget all the nonsense about who's leading in the various national polls. Start thinking about who could win the swing states. That's pollster Larry Sabato's analysis in the Wall Street Journal. Here's the key paragraph: "Republicans therefore are a lock or lead in 24 states for 206 electoral votes, and Democrats have or lead in 19 states for 247 electoral votes. That's why seven super-swing states with 85 electors will determine which party gets to the magic number of 270 electoral votes: Colorado (9), Florida (29), Iowa (6), Nevada (6), New Hampshire (4), Ohio (18) and Virginia (13)." Those who follow national polls like to look at popular-vote totals, which are fun but not dispositive. Sabato's got a much better angle of attack. As he notes, most of the red states will go to whatever Republican is nominated. Most of the blue states will go Democratic. The fight is for those swing states. Here's where it gets interesting. I have long argued that liberal journalists should not be covering contests among conservatives, and this shows why. Consider the way the mainstream media played the Iowa Straw Poll results. As I and others have noted, the outcome was a statistical tie between Michele Bachmann and Ron Paul. Yet the media ignored Paul and built up Bachmann beyond all reason. Now imagine you're a Democratic-leaning reporter who wants to see Obama re- elected. How better to accomplish that goal than by promoting a Republican who's likely to lose in those swing states? It's hard to imagine Bachmann winning in those states. Meanwhile Paul lines up better than Bachmann against President Obama in the national polls you can see here. But most of the numbers in those polls are meaningless for determining how the swing states will turn out. That polling hasn't been done yet. But Paul's philosophy of limited government and liberty is likely to go over much better in the seven states Sabato lists than is Bachmann's end-times apocalyptic approach to the Mideast and her economic illiteracy at home. Bachmann looks like a candidate tailor-made to win the red states and not much else. So does Rick Perry, another big favorite of the mainstream media, though in Perry's case he's leading some polls and can't be ignored. I'm not a big Mitt Romney fan, but I can see why so many mainstream Republicans like him. He's got a really good chance in those swing states. When you watch that debate tonight, look for where Perry ends up on key issues. On foreign policy questions as on economic questions, Paul has been providing the debating points - though you'd never get the TV talking heads to admit it. His questions about monetary policy that were derided as nutty back in 2008 are now mainstream in the GOP. And on foreign policy, it's the candidates backing the failed neoconservativism of the Bush years who are now stuck defending Obama's continuation of those policies. So the pressure's on Perry to state where he stands. That should be fun. As for how he'd do in the swing states if he got the nomination, that might not be so pleasant to watch.
Poster Comment:
Michele Bachmann: the liberals would love to see her compete in the swing states.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#2. To: hondo68 (#0)
Too damn bad few will watch this freakshow tonight as I'm sure it will be great entertainment but only on MSNBC. Up against Big Brother you know. {{{smirk}}}
I'm trying to watch it on the web, but my connection is too shaky.
Ron Paul said he doesn't want machine guns on the border. I disagree with him on that.
So do I. I'd like to see our entire southern border become the largest military base in the nation.
There are no replies to Comment # 10. End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: Brian S (#2)
#4. To: We The People, *Ron Paul for President* (#3)
trying to watch it on the web, but my connection is too shaky.
#10. To: hondo68 (#4)
Ron Paul said he doesn't want machine guns on the border. I disagree with him on that.
Replies to Comment # 10.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]