[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Deprivation of rights under color of law
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 1, 2011
Author: U.S. Code
Post Date: 2011-09-01 21:55:22 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 2249
Comments: 4

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 13 – § 242

Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


Poster Comment:

Found this as a comment somewhere I was reading

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)

14th Amendment, Section 1:

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The 14th Amdt requires equal protection of the law to any person. That phrasing encompasses citizen and non-citizen alike. Corporations are considered persons too!

14th Amendment, Section 5:

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

I do believe you found the enforcement legislation.

http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2010/title18/parti/chapter13/section242/

2010 US Code
Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure
PART I —CRIMES (§§ 1—2725)
CHAPTER 13 —CIVIL RIGHTS (§§ 241—249)
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

http://tvwiki.tv/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad

Some historians have speculated that the reason Chief Justice Waite may have declined to hear arguments regarding the personhood status of corporations is because he may have been convinced that this was the original intent of Congress when drafting the amendment through testimony by Roscoe Conkling during the San Mateo County v. Southern Pacific Railroad case of 1882. Roscoe Conkling was one of the authors of the Fourteenth Amendment and he claimed that members of congress were careful to use the word "person" rather than "citizen" when writing the Fourteenth Amendment so that corporations could be included in the definition. As evidence, he read from a secret journal that was written during the drafting process. However, in 1932, a Stanford law librarian, Howard Graham discovered that the entries read during Conkling's testimony differed from the entries in the secret journal. He concluded that Roscoe Conkling, who was working for the railroad industry at the time of his testimony before the Supreme Court, purposely mislead the court with his testimony in order to grant corporations the same constitutional rights as natural persons. Eight detailed publications by Graham about the topic were compiled and republished as Everyman's Constitution in 1968.

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-02   0:32:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: nolu chan (#1)

I was hoping you would chime in on this. You always have something to offer that is enlightening.

Do you have anything else interesting about this Roscoe Conkling? Did you just learn about him or have you heard of him before?

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-09-02   0:39:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: nolu chan (#1) (Edited)

use the word "person" rather than "citizen" when writing the Fourteenth Amendment so that corporations could be included in the definition

Corporations being considered persons and privileged ones at that, is one of my pet peeves. I believe that the special person status afforded corporations, violates the Constitution's prohibition against "Titles of Nobility". The board of directors is deemed to have special privileges and immunities not recognized for regular citizens.


"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul

Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.

Hondo68  posted on  2011-09-02   1:11:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: A K A Stone (#2)

Do you have anything else interesting about this Roscoe Conkling? Did you just learn about him or have you heard of him before?

Roscoe Conkling was a well known Whig and later Republican, a big time lawyer, and then a Congressman and Senator. Grant offered to make him Chief Justice of the Supreme Court but Conkling declined. I have known about Conkling and this Santa Clara story for years and have several books that cover it at length. The relevant chapter of a book by Thom Hartmann is online and is an interesting read.

http://www.thomhartmann.com/unequal-protection/excerpt-theft

Unequal Protection: The rise of corporate dominance and theft of human rights
by Thom Hartmann

Excerpt from Unequal Protection: The Theft of Human Rights

The first thing to understand is the difference between the natural person and the fictitious person called a corporation. They differ in the purpose for which they are created, in the strength which they possess, and in the restraints under which they act.

Man is the handiwork of God and was placed upon earth to carry out a Divine purpose; the corporation is the handiwork of man and created to carry out a money-making policy.

There is comparatively little difference in the strength of men; a corporation may be one hundred, one thousand, or even one million times stronger than the average man. Man acts under the restraints of conscience, and is influenced also by a belief in a future life. A corporation has no soul and cares nothing about the hereafter.

A corporation has no rights except those given it by law. It can exercise no power except that conferred upon it by the people through legislation, and the people should be as free to withhold as to give, public interest and not private advantage being the end in view.
-- William Jennings Bryan
address to the Ohio 1912 Constitutional Convention

Part of the American Revolution was about to be lost, a century after it had been fought.

[snip]

Another book is Age of Betrayal: The Triumph of Money in America 1865-1900, by Jack Beatty. His relevant chapter is called The Scandal of Santa Clara.

U.S. Const., Article 3, Section 4, Clause 1 defines the jurisdiction of Federal courts:

The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.

You may notice that for individuals to invoke the jurisdiction of the court, the Constitution speaks explicitly and repeatedly to citizens. Even when you are able to think of corporations as artificial persons, it remains difficult to imagine them as citizens. It is an interesting tale of legal legerdemain.

nolu chan  posted on  2011-09-02   1:47:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com