Leak a document
See other Leak a document Articles
Title: Hannity Grows his Nose in a Full Hour Fast and Furious Special for FAUX Snooze.
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 20, 2011
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2011-08-20 01:00:53 by Coral Snake
Keywords: Hannity, Pinocchio, LongNose, Lies, FastAndFurious
Views: 22638
Comments: 37
Hannity Grows his Nose in a Full Hour Fast and Furious Special for FAUX Snooze. By Coral Snake Sean Hannity devoted a full hour today to the official lie about the Fast and Furious FALSE FLAG fiasco that involved the deliberate arming of criminals by the agency that is supposed to be enforcing federal gun laws (the BATFE). Only once during the whole special were the anti gun prejudices of the Obama Administration even hinted at as a possible reason for the fiasco that killed a border agent and led to eleven more violent crimes in America. It can therefore be concluded that FAUX Snooze is still following the “controlled opposition” model in the false Left/Right paradigm that Rupert Murdoch the “phone hacking” king intended for it. Otherwise how about telling the truth about Obama trying to get international “gun control” standards in the UN Small Arms treaty while this Fast and Furious false flag fiasco was going on in order to get around the Second Amendment and more easily enforce the first two commandments of the Georgia Guidestones (democide and eugenic selection of survivors) Hannity and Murdoch.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
#6. To: Coral Snake (#0)
Normally, when I read your commentaries, I literally cringe in fear because of either an overly anxious commentary attempting to suggest a single, simple idea in 1000 words or more or filled with grammatical syntax and spelling errors. At times, I have found myself thinking what is Coral Snake actually suggesting? And often, I leave your threads with more bewilderment than the previous experience at reading your posts adding to my almost firm opinion of yourself. But, this article that you posted is clear, concise and cuts to the chase. It is well thought out and (in fact) I re-read it again just to be certain that I didn't miss something. Good work!
Good work! And those expressive keywords are sure to attract mature, intelligent adults to the "article".
Thank you. Obviously I attracted your own comment as you are not just a mature intelligent and mature adult but gifted as well.
Since you are unwilling to discuss the points of the 'article' other than place your personal value on them I thought I would do the same.
Unlike most Americans, I turned the boob-tube off back in 1993. So, as strange as it may seem I can't comment on the points of the 'article'; my comment was directed towards the well thought-out qualitative characteristics of Coral Snake's own commentary to express an original idea with remarckable clarity. I can't say that I agree with him or not in other words as I lack the details. I am impressed with his rejuvenated capabilities to articulate his ideas is all. Coral Snake did a good job on an original viewpoint, in my opinion.
Most of the time I don't have any trouble understanding his other stuff, so I missed your point.
Earlier, you commented to me: I replied: If I don't watch TV, how on Earth can I discuss specific points of the 'article'? BTW, I wouldn't watch FOX NEWS to save your life similar to even clicking on World Nuts Daily and a barrel of other websites that are nothing more than lies, BS, cheap fabrications and excuses for the downfall of America. Also, I don't listen to radio programs at all; talking heads leave me bored to death listening/reading and/or watching their regurgitated political rhetoric thus wasting my time. If I happen to see an article posted on a chit-chat forum authored by any of the websites that I suspect as propaganda, as an example: WND, NewsMax and other silly propaganda sites, I won't read the material much less rarely comment on it; I may have ridiculed a poster or two for reading that crap though. But, it is much different to see an opinion that strings together ideas that are obvious to me based on the manner and way the MSM handles skipping over details based on their own editing templates. Again, Coral Snake did a good job on his own commentary.
Are you daft or am I expected to read your mind?? You made the comment about not watching Fox News after I made mine. And as far as clarity goes, maybe heeding the advice you gave Coral Snake wouldn't hurt.
You are correct. Of course, that is the reason for my being here. What are yours?
To participate in some honest discussion with unique posters.
Do you regard my answers directed to you as honest?
Not when you are play acting with your dolls.
You are a bit evasive, don't you think? Is that tone and temperament intended to show your own "honesty?"
#32. To: buckeroo (#30)
(Edited)
Why become personal? I'm not alluding to anything you haven't already admitted to and even bragged about.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#7. To: buckeroo (#6)
But, this article that you posted is clear, concise and cuts to the chase. It is well thought out and (in fact) I re-read it again just to be certain that I didn't miss something.
#13. To: mininggold (#7)
And those expressive keywords are sure to attract mature, intelligent adults to the "article".
#14. To: buckeroo (#13)
Thank you. Obviously I attracted your own comment as you are not just a mature intelligent and mature adult but gifted as well.
#15. To: mininggold, Coral Snake (#14)
Since you are unwilling to discuss the points of the 'article' other than place your personal value on them I thought I would do the same.
#17. To: buckeroo (#15)
Unlike most Americans, I turned the boob-tube off back in 1993. So, as strange as it may seem I can't comment on the points of the 'article'; my comment was directed towards the well thought-out qualitative characteristics of Coral Snake's own commentary to express an original idea with remarckable clarity. I can't say that I agree with him or not in other words as I lack the details.
#18. To: mininggold (#17)
Most of the time I don't have any trouble understanding his other stuff, so I missed your point.
Since you [buckeroo] are unwilling to discuss the points of the 'article' other than place your personal value on them I thought I would do the same.
Unlike most Americans, I turned the boob-tube off back in 1993. So, as strange as it may seem I can't comment on the points of the 'article'; my comment was directed towards the well thought-out qualitative characteristics of Coral Snake's own commentary to express an original idea with remarckable clarity. I can't say that I agree with him or not in other words as I lack the details.
#22. To: buckeroo (#18)
If I don't watch TV, how on Earth can I discuss specific points of the 'article'? BTW, I wouldn't watch FOX NEWS to save your life similar to even clicking on World Nuts Daily and a barrel of other websites that are nothing more than lies, BS, cheap fabrications and excuses for the downfall of America. Also, I don't listen to radio programs at all; talking heads leave me bored to death listening/reading and/or watching their regurgitated political rhetoric thus wasting my time.
#25. To: mininggold (#22)
And as far as clarity goes, maybe heeding the advice you gave Coral Snake wouldn't hurt.
#26. To: buckeroo (#25)
You are correct. Of course, that is the reason for my being here. What are yours?
#28. To: mininggold (#26)
To participate in some honest discussion with unique posters.
#29. To: buckeroo (#28)
Do you regard my answers directed to you as honest?
#30. To: mininggold (#29)
Replies to Comment # 30. You are a bit evasive, don't you think? Is that tone and temperament intended to show your own "honesty?"
End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]