Leak a document
See other Leak a document Articles
Title: Hannity Grows his Nose in a Full Hour Fast and Furious Special for FAUX Snooze.
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 20, 2011
Author: Coral Snake
Post Date: 2011-08-20 01:00:53 by Coral Snake
Keywords: Hannity, Pinocchio, LongNose, Lies, FastAndFurious
Views: 22645
Comments: 37
Hannity Grows his Nose in a Full Hour Fast and Furious Special for FAUX Snooze. By Coral Snake Sean Hannity devoted a full hour today to the official lie about the Fast and Furious FALSE FLAG fiasco that involved the deliberate arming of criminals by the agency that is supposed to be enforcing federal gun laws (the BATFE). Only once during the whole special were the anti gun prejudices of the Obama Administration even hinted at as a possible reason for the fiasco that killed a border agent and led to eleven more violent crimes in America. It can therefore be concluded that FAUX Snooze is still following the “controlled opposition” model in the false Left/Right paradigm that Rupert Murdoch the “phone hacking” king intended for it. Otherwise how about telling the truth about Obama trying to get international “gun control” standards in the UN Small Arms treaty while this Fast and Furious false flag fiasco was going on in order to get around the Second Amendment and more easily enforce the first two commandments of the Georgia Guidestones (democide and eugenic selection of survivors) Hannity and Murdoch.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Coral Snake, *The Two Parties ARE the Same*, *Ron Paul for President* (#0)
(Edited)
Hannity is just there for 400 pound housewives and grannies to look at and say... He's a cute boy! I can't stand to watch his pious alter boy act. IMO, the guns were for protecting the D&R drug cartel. The D&R's have just about killed the dollar and the economy, so drug sales have become more important than ever. There's an election coming up so there's voting machines to rig, caucus delegates to buy, dead people and illegal aliens to register as voters, MSM talking heads to pay off, and sheeple to con. Voter fraud don't come cheap!
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
It's more like an accessory/subcontractor in a criminal cartel, but I agree.
You shouldn't talk about Tea Bagger women that way. Since they just love him.
You must suffer from low self esteem to talk about your peers that way.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
I'm talking about my Tea Party loving cousins. They just love Hannity.
Normally, when I read your commentaries, I literally cringe in fear because of either an overly anxious commentary attempting to suggest a single, simple idea in 1000 words or more or filled with grammatical syntax and spelling errors. At times, I have found myself thinking what is Coral Snake actually suggesting? And often, I leave your threads with more bewilderment than the previous experience at reading your posts adding to my almost firm opinion of yourself. But, this article that you posted is clear, concise and cuts to the chase. It is well thought out and (in fact) I re-read it again just to be certain that I didn't miss something. Good work!
Good work! And those expressive keywords are sure to attract mature, intelligent adults to the "article".
Well, not as much as the mature, intelligent 'tea bagger' type keywords.
He's the Arthur Godfrey of his time; a no talent schmoozer who dominates the old lady/nursing home market.
'Tea Bagger' is an appropriate and descriptive title since the first act was to send tea bags to Congress. 'Tea Party' is an intentional misappropriation since it was actually a rebellion against privileged capitalism running amok.
It's just a happy coincidence for you then, that it also describes a sexual act? Sure. Completely innocent, mature and intelligent justification.... on a school playground maybe.
Sure. Completely innocent, mature and intelligent justification.... on a school playground maybe. To whom does it denote a sexual act? Plus you guys are free to find your own name, but I hate to tell you this, 'The Tea Party' has been already taken.
Thank you. Obviously I attracted your own comment as you are not just a mature intelligent and mature adult but gifted as well.
Since you are unwilling to discuss the points of the 'article' other than place your personal value on them I thought I would do the same.
Unlike most Americans, I turned the boob-tube off back in 1993. So, as strange as it may seem I can't comment on the points of the 'article'; my comment was directed towards the well thought-out qualitative characteristics of Coral Snake's own commentary to express an original idea with remarckable clarity. I can't say that I agree with him or not in other words as I lack the details. I am impressed with his rejuvenated capabilities to articulate his ideas is all. Coral Snake did a good job on an original viewpoint, in my opinion.
whinngold,To whom does it denote a sexual act? Plus you guys are free to find your own name, but I hate to tell you this, 'The Tea Party' has been already taken. Well lookie there, the old skanky total libTURD WHORE pretends not to be doing what libTIURD whores do. Gee who saw THAT coming? /S YOU libTURD WHORES that's who, you gibbering libTURD whore, and YOU know it you vile piece of libTURD shit. libTURD filth such as YOU and your ilk, are TRYING to make the AMERICAN people reject the very people who are trying to save this country from FILTH such as you. You vile gibbering libTURD whore. YOU libTURD whores are purposely calling your own family a name which means a perverted sexual act as a method to insult and dismiss them you foul gibbering lying piece of hypocritical libTURD shit. Then, you being such a foul, lying, cowardly piece of libTURD shit, that you can't even admit it. YOU ARE FILTH, AND YOUR POLITICAL TIME IS ENDING NOW you gibbering piece of libTURD anti-AMERICA shit. YOU are without any doubt one of the foulest pieces of low born shit that it has ever been my misfortune to "meet". Do the world a favor you disgusting, bitter, old fat assed, cat piss smelling, miserable bitch. Put yourself out of our misery. MISERABLE libTURD SKANK SCUM. SCUM
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Most of the time I don't have any trouble understanding his other stuff, so I missed your point.
Earlier, you commented to me: I replied: If I don't watch TV, how on Earth can I discuss specific points of the 'article'? BTW, I wouldn't watch FOX NEWS to save your life similar to even clicking on World Nuts Daily and a barrel of other websites that are nothing more than lies, BS, cheap fabrications and excuses for the downfall of America. Also, I don't listen to radio programs at all; talking heads leave me bored to death listening/reading and/or watching their regurgitated political rhetoric thus wasting my time. If I happen to see an article posted on a chit-chat forum authored by any of the websites that I suspect as propaganda, as an example: WND, NewsMax and other silly propaganda sites, I won't read the material much less rarely comment on it; I may have ridiculed a poster or two for reading that crap though. But, it is much different to see an opinion that strings together ideas that are obvious to me based on the manner and way the MSM handles skipping over details based on their own editing templates. Again, Coral Snake did a good job on his own commentary.
Yes he did. Well written and concise. I don't watch FAUX Snooze either. I used to in my Pubby days and thought it was great. It's all BS.
Thank you. The reason most of my new articles are so long is that they are intended to cover very long periods of "Progressive" history. Basically from the time of the publication of Edward Bellamy's Socialist novel Looking Backward in the 1880s until today.
You are welcome. Unlike yourself, however, I am not very creative in original ideas. I think the finest political thread I ever personally created was: "Why I perform my own automobile oil changes." It didn't receive one comment despite all the hard work I placed in the article and as a result, here I am just a mere poster on a webboard that once in awhile notices someone with more gift than myself because fine folks like yourself take the time to experience/bathe in the light of the "dark side."
Are you daft or am I expected to read your mind?? You made the comment about not watching Fox News after I made mine. And as far as clarity goes, maybe heeding the advice you gave Coral Snake wouldn't hurt.
What I am suggesting is that you can possess and entertain thousands of questions, mininggold. I can't answer all of them as you are a bit too snippy with me and can not understand my comments in the first place. If you would be more specific, perhaps even more friendly I would be much more frank with you in discussion.
I just made an ASCII search for "FOX NEWS" for this thread. I think you are full of hot aire with this comment: I made the first comment regarding or referencing, "FOX NEWS" or otherwise faire and balanced warped TV newscasting. You should watch your keyboard more closely as it could be a mere ouija board without you knowing it, creating all kinds of havoc within your own household much less a chit-chat channel.
You are correct. Of course, that is the reason for my being here. What are yours?
To participate in some honest discussion with unique posters.
When do you plan to start? Your project is "shovel ready".
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Do you regard my answers directed to you as honest?
Not when you are play acting with your dolls.
You are a bit evasive, don't you think? Is that tone and temperament intended to show your own "honesty?"
I guess you ought to know since you've been shoveling 'it' here for quite a while. I think I'll take a pass, you need the work more than I.
Why become personal? I'm not alluding to anything you haven't already admitted to and even bragged about.
Here all along this thread, I was thinking we were becoming fantastick friends and getting all chummy as palsie-walsies; I guess I misread your ideas of being "honest." You did state that you are looking for "honest discussions" didn't you? Oh playing with dolls? Where did you find that claim?
Aren't your little 'monikers' a lot like toy dolls?
Yet we find ourselves back on your favorite topic...yourself.
No, not at all. Permit me to explain my viewpoint, if you have a moment. First off, most posters (if not all) are using fictitious monickers or "handles" on the Internet, much less other methods of communication or in fact even via the incorporation of a business. There is nothing special about a monicker, in other words. The only reason why I use this monicker, "buckeroo" is because I have used it since the days of CERFnet (1993 and on in time) when I appeared on IRC political channels. Second, there is no restriction on using a different monicker at all. Where I take a limit to this viewpoint is using "multiple clients," I don't do it. I use one and only one monicker at a time on any chit-chat channel. Third, I don't mess around. If I have something to say, I am going to say it; but I do not play shenanigans. Most web based chit-chat channels require a bonafide email address to establish a method of authentication about the user. I perform that deed although I must add I have more REAL email addys than I have IP addys and my IP addys are in the many thousands; you can verify this with Stone as he has an unusual hobby of checking IPs for each user when they post. In other words, I am not going to waste time setting up an account unless I have something to say. That FACT, in and by itself, is important to note. If these chit-chat channels don't like me, fine. If they ban my monicker because I am following the common-sense rules, that is fine, too. I just spring back up when I feel like it.
You have corrupted this discussion long enough with me. You have yet to add one iota of significant considerations towards Coral Snake's original commentary. Where you have attempted to play with me, you have actually caused a problem because there is nothing you add to the commentary other than I have found that when you use the term "honest discussions" it has really been devious and mischievous obfuscations chasing after areas that have nothing to do with the original intent of the thread; in other words, I am done with you on this thread.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#2. To: Coral Snake (#0)
FAUX Snooze is still following the “controlled opposition” model in the false Left/Right paradigm
#3. To: hondo68 (#1)
Hannity is just there for 400 pound housewives and grannies to look at and say... He's a cute boy! I can't stand to watch his pious alter boy act.
#4. To: mininggold (#3)
Tea Bagger women
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#5. To: hondo68 (#4)
You must suffer from low self esteem to talk about your peers that way.
#6. To: Coral Snake (#0)
#7. To: buckeroo (#6)
But, this article that you posted is clear, concise and cuts to the chase. It is well thought out and (in fact) I re-read it again just to be certain that I didn't miss something.
#8. To: mininggold (#7)
And those expressive keywords are sure to attract mature, intelligent adults to the "article".
#9. To: hondo68 (#1)
#10. To: We The People (#8)
Well, not as much as the mature, intelligent 'tea bagger' type keywords.
#11. To: mininggold (#10)
'Tea Bagger' is an appropriate and descriptive title since the first act was to send tea bags to Congress.
#12. To: We The People (#11)
(Edited)
It's just a happy coincidence for you then, that it also describes a sexual act?
#13. To: mininggold (#7)
And those expressive keywords are sure to attract mature, intelligent adults to the "article".
#14. To: buckeroo (#13)
Thank you. Obviously I attracted your own comment as you are not just a mature intelligent and mature adult but gifted as well.
#15. To: mininggold, Coral Snake (#14)
Since you are unwilling to discuss the points of the 'article' other than place your personal value on them I thought I would do the same.
#16. To: whinnyold, We The People (#12)
It's just a happy coincidence for you then, that it also describes a sexual act? Sure. Completely innocent, mature and intelligent justification.... on a school playground maybe.
#17. To: buckeroo (#15)
Unlike most Americans, I turned the boob-tube off back in 1993. So, as strange as it may seem I can't comment on the points of the 'article'; my comment was directed towards the well thought-out qualitative characteristics of Coral Snake's own commentary to express an original idea with remarckable clarity. I can't say that I agree with him or not in other words as I lack the details.
#18. To: mininggold (#17)
Most of the time I don't have any trouble understanding his other stuff, so I missed your point.
Since you [buckeroo] are unwilling to discuss the points of the 'article' other than place your personal value on them I thought I would do the same.
Unlike most Americans, I turned the boob-tube off back in 1993. So, as strange as it may seem I can't comment on the points of the 'article'; my comment was directed towards the well thought-out qualitative characteristics of Coral Snake's own commentary to express an original idea with remarckable clarity. I can't say that I agree with him or not in other words as I lack the details.
#19. To: buckeroo, Coral Snake (#18)
Again, Coral Snake did a good job on his own commentary.
#20. To: buckeroo (#6)
The FARO RESERVE BANK!!! 
#21. To: Coral Snake (#20)
#22. To: buckeroo (#18)
If I don't watch TV, how on Earth can I discuss specific points of the 'article'? BTW, I wouldn't watch FOX NEWS to save your life similar to even clicking on World Nuts Daily and a barrel of other websites that are nothing more than lies, BS, cheap fabrications and excuses for the downfall of America. Also, I don't listen to radio programs at all; talking heads leave me bored to death listening/reading and/or watching their regurgitated political rhetoric thus wasting my time.
#23. To: mininggold (#22)
Are you daft or am I expected to read your mind??
#24. To: mininggold (#22)
You made the comment about not watching Fox News after I made mine.
You [buckeroo] made the comment about not watching Fox News after I made mine.
#25. To: mininggold (#22)
And as far as clarity goes, maybe heeding the advice you gave Coral Snake wouldn't hurt.
#26. To: buckeroo (#25)
You are correct. Of course, that is the reason for my being here. What are yours?
#27. To: mininggold, *Extended Clip Progressives* (#26)
(Edited)
To participate in some honest discussion with unique posters.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#28. To: mininggold (#26)
To participate in some honest discussion with unique posters.
#29. To: buckeroo (#28)
Do you regard my answers directed to you as honest?
#30. To: mininggold (#29)
#31. To: hondo68 (#27)
(Edited)
When do you plan to start? Your project is "shovel ready".
#32. To: buckeroo (#30)
(Edited)
You are a bit evasive, don't you think? Is that tone and temperament intended to show your own "honesty?"
#33. To: mininggold (#32)
Why become personal?
I'm not alluding to anything you haven't already admitted to and even bragged about.
#34. To: buckeroo (#33)
Oh playing with dolls? Where did you find that claim?
#35. To: buckeroo (#33)
Here all along this thread, I was thinking we were becoming fantastick friends and getting all chummy as palsie-walsies; I guess I misread your ideas of being "honest." You did state that you are looking for "honest discussions" didn't you?
#36. To: mininggold (#34)
Aren't your little 'monikers' a lot like toy dolls?
#37. To: mininggold, Coral Snake (#35)
Yet we find ourselves back on your favorite topic...yourself.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]