Title: Welcome Nolu Chan Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Aug 11, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-08-11 17:46:58 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:418331 Comments:437
As you are unwilling to address your yukon disaster, you could always address the Orly filing with your Yale knowledge. That should be fun.
Stealing the hamster wheel is okay. Your's has got to be worn out.
If your Orly investigation, cough, cough, is as ludicrous as your failure to explain how contradictions prove a conspiracy then she should be in pretty good shape. Been to Yale, never studied there. Met with their forensics teams many, many times and even they hadn't gone to Yale Law.
Fred, I'm backing away from this half-wit; I never feel very funny when sad news takes over.
If your Orly investigation, cough, cough, is as ludicrous....
If my opinion of the Orly filing is ludicrous, then your opinion of it must be that it will prevail. We only have a very short time to wait until a court, yet again, confirms the obvious. You're full of crap.
Admiral/doctor/pilot/CEO/MBA and Yale trained lawyer harrowup,
Didn't he say recently that he's a forensic psychologist.
HARROWUP HAS CREATED MORE TITLES THEN "IDI AMIN"
"His full self-bestowed title ultimately became "His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular",
When called upon to put up or shut up, you shut up and run back to mommy. Try not to fall into the deep end of the entropy pool while high on MD5 hash. How about a copy of 8-bit ASCII 291? Or a screenshot of your magic IPA 95.154.230.291?
Document your claim or shut the hell up Admiral harrowup, FR, 10/24/2003
Back it up with the facts or retract. Admiral harrowup, FR, 10/24/2003
Cite your facts, retract or shut up. Admiral harrowup, FR, 10/24/2003
Try googling the word "defamation", then wade through the hits.
When you try to intimidate folks you need to be more than loud...
You made the claim:
... there are literally thousands of defamation suits that result favorably for plaintiffs - including against the press, and many of those for statements of opinion.
... 79 posted on 10/24/2003 11:01 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
Back it up with the facts or retract.
If you don't you can be charged with intimidation
That's why I want all your aliases. Think about it. Once we get to discovery you'll have to pay for the search time...and we wouldn't want Opey and Habsey to work that off in the Pokey...
Face it, fella. You are a blowhard who keeps going just one more step over the line.
288 posted on Friday, October 24, 2003 2:11:59 PM by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
I DON"T FEEL LIKE BUIDING YOUR LINKS. Paste and smear yourself.
http://www.whiteo.com/practice.html - a law firm with verdicts
http://www.jackscamp.com/news/Case%20Summ.%20-%20VA%20S.C.PDF - Virginia damages and ratings sweeps
1. SKINNER V. TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC. The dispute in this Berkeley County case arose when an office manager at the medical facility where the plaintiff used to work accused him of stealing equipment and sabotaging the office. Once those allegations spread in the community, the plaintiff found it impossible to find work as a doctor. The jury awarded the doctor $30 million on his defamation claim - including $10 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff also pressed a conversion claim over a patient list the hospital failed to return to him. The jury awarded $250,000 on that claim. (Defamation/Conversion). - South Carolina
http://library.lp.findlaw.com/articles/file/00471/004989/title/subject/topic/government%20law_contracts/filename/governmentlaw_3_8 - Maryland business defamation 7 figure award
http://www-cs-education.stanford.edu/classes/cs201/Projects/defamation-and-the-internet/sections/liability/part3.html - Defamation and the internet
None of them were Chancellor Palpatine. Maybe he is just trying to forewarn other freepers here.
No. He is trying to intimidate others with gobbleygook and claiming thousands of defamation cases have been won by plaintiffs many involving 'opinion' when just the opposite is true.
He's all mouth on a lard.
345 posted on Friday, October 24, 2003 2:35:28 PM by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
Tell me my lie, oh great one, how I lied. You wanted some links to plaintiffs cases. i gave you some, but don't feel like cranking out links for you all die. And you never answered my question about the discovery threat. What, pray tell, are you wanting to discover on me, and what are you suing me for? I'm all ears.
Foremost, where a media defendant is involved, a statement on matters of public concern must be provable as false before liability can be assessed, Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U. S. 767, thus ensuring full constitutional protection for a statement of opinion having no provably false factual connotation. Next, statements that cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about an individual are protected, see, e.g., Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U. S. 6, thus assuring that public debate will not suffer for lack of "imaginative expression" or the "rhetorical hyperbole" which has traditionally added much to the discourse of this Nation. The reference to "opinion" in dictum in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U. S. 323, 418 U. S. 339-340, was not intended to create a wholesale defamation exemption for "opinion." Read in context, the Gertz dictum is merely a reiteration of Justice Holmes' "marketplace of ideas" concept, see Abrams v. United States, 250 U. S. 616, 250 U. S. 630. Simply couching a statement -- "Jones is a liar" -- in terms of opinion -- "In my opinion, Jones is a liar" -- does not dispel the factual implications contained in the statement. Pp. 497 U. S. 11-21.
2. A reasonable factfinder could conclude that the statements in the Diadiun column imply an assertion that Milkovich perjured himself in a judicial proceeding. The article did not use the sort of loose, figurative, or hyperbolic language that would negate the impression that Diadiun was seriously maintaining Milkovich committed perjury. Nor does the article's general tenor negate this impression. In addition, the connotation that Milkovich committed perjury is sufficiently factual that it is susceptible of being proved true or false by comparing, inter alia, his testimony before the OHSAA board with his subsequent testimony before the trial court. Pp. 497 U. S. 21-22.
An opinion, susceptible of being proved true or false, is sufficient to maintain a libel action.
In my opinion, Chancellor Palpatine is an attorney.
#3, your task was to revisit your problems with ASCII and HTML associations. Don't knock yourself out. I've work to do.
I have no problem with non-existent ASCII and HTML "associations".
You have a problem with computer terminology to the point where you lapse into incoherent baby talk.
ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange), or more specifically the high bit ASCII Table is a standard using 8 bits (one byte) of computer memory to create a table of 256 different outcomes or characters. The value range that may be contained in 8 bits, or 1 byte of memory is 0-255 decimal. The original low bit ASCII Table only allowed 128 different outcomes as one bit was used as a parity bit for error checking.
HTML (HyperText Markup Language) is a computer language.
IPA (Internet Protocol Address), version 4 (IPAv4) is an address expressed in dot decimal notation, e.g., 255.255.255.255. Each 3-digit block, or octet, is the decimal expression of 8 bits of binary memory.
It is the physical impossibility of 8 binary bits to express a decimal value greater than 255 which limits the high bit ASCII Table to 256 outcomes or characters. It is the precise same physical limitation that limits any dot decimal IPA octet to a value ranging from 0-255. You, however, claimed that 95.154.230.291 is valid.
Your baby talk about an imagined association between ASCII and HTML compares to an association between a language and an alphabet.
We all know you are a blithering idiot. There is no need to reinforce the point.
As for your "work," get back to enjoying your queso de cabrito. Perhaps you have more experience with queso de cabrito and could explain how you make that stuff.
"Still waiting for your narrative on how contradictions prove collusion."
Bullshit question.
So we agree. Your assertions regarding Gatlin and others were bullshit.
Good, that's a start, #3. Now I'd like to move on but you're still stuck on being out to lunch on your ASCII v HTML association.
Ask bucky for help; he claims extensive ability and practice in shutting down the internet.
I only suggest bucky because you appear to be just as dumb now as you were then and you won't be intimidated by his demonstrated paucity of brilliance.
Then again, we could explore your OCD treatment. What meds are you taking now? It seems one of them has screwed up your ability to organize a concise thought without multiple attempts; such anxiety is totally unnecessary; there is an edit feature here.
Just remember that every time you c/p some irrelevant discussion out of context and bluster some half-baked conclusion you are forced to accept the fact that you're just turning mincemeat back into raw sausage which is far less attractive.
So harrowup has a very long history of being an internet bully who stalks people around the internet, making threats and causing disturbances for entire forums.
ah- that explains a great deal.
Is he paid to do this, or just a totally miserable human being - who thrives on attacking people?
What is the deal with this cat?
Does he only have a hardon for people who have been trashed by Jim Rob, or is this is general thing aimed at all internet users?
I have no problem with non-existent ASCII and HTML "associations".
You have a problem with computer terminology to the point where you lapse into incoherent baby talk.
ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange), or more specifically the high bit ASCII Table is a standard using 8 bits (one byte) of computer memory to create a table of 256 different outcomes or characters. The value range that may be contained in 8 bits, or 1 byte of memory is 0-255 decimal. The original low bit ASCII Table only allowed 128 different outcomes as one bit was used as a parity bit for error checking.
HTML (HyperText Markup Language) is a computer language.
IPA (Internet Protocol Address), version 4 (IPAv4) is an address expressed in dot decimal notation, e.g., 255.255.255.255. Each 3-digit block, or octet, is the decimal expression of 8 bits of binary memory.
It is the physical impossibility of 8 binary bits to express a decimal value greater than 255 which limits the high bit ASCII Table to 256 outcomes or characters. It is the precise same physical limitation that limits any dot decimal IPA octet to a value ranging from 0-255. You, however, claimed that 95.154.230.291 is valid.
Your baby talk about an imagined association between ASCII and HTML compares to an association between a language and an alphabet.
We all know you are a blithering idiot. There is no need to reinforce the point.
As for your "work," get back to enjoying your queso de cabrito. Perhaps you have more experience with queso de cabrito and could explain how you make that stuff.
When called upon to put up or shut up, you shut up and run back to mommy. Try not to fall into the deep end of the entropy pool while high on MD5 hash. How about a copy of 8-bit ASCII 291? Or a screenshot of your magic IPA 95.154.230.291?
I don't follow your links; however, you seem to have missed my questions in your haste to c/p before nap time.
"Still waiting for your narrative on how contradictions prove collusion."
#3 writes: Bullshit question.
Hup writes: So we agree. Your assertions regarding Gatlin and others were bullshit.
[Another win for the good guys.]
Good, that's a start, #3. Now I'd like to move on but you're still stuck on being out to lunch on your ASCII v HTML association.
Ask bucky for help; he claims extensive ability and practice in shutting down the internet.
I only suggest bucky because you appear to be just as dumb now as you were then and you won't be intimidated by his demonstrated paucity of brilliance.
Then again, we could explore your OCD treatment. What meds are you taking now? It seems one of them has screwed up your ability to organize a concise thought without multiple attempts; such anxiety is totally unnecessary; there is an edit feature here.
Just remember that every time you c/p some irrelevant discussion out of context and bluster some half-baked conclusion you are forced to accept the fact that you're just turning mincemeat back into raw sausage which is far less attractive.
Ask bucky for help; he claims extensive ability and practice in shutting down the internet.
I said that? Perhaps you can refresh my memory with a link or two, if you don't mind. I know you have a busy schedule slurping your soup after waiting in line at the generous local, publick soup kitchen but it is the least you can do, pal.
Does he only have a hardon for people who have been trashed by Jim Rob, or is this is general thing aimed at all internet users?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Yes, about a decade's worth, including his time as a flying monkey for FR, defending Jim and John Rob. At FR he trashed everybody not on FR. For example, he called Goldi unstable. Trolls such as harrowup are trained not to actually take substantive positions. On this thread, with all his bluster, he has not actually made one substantive comment, or documented any part of his diversionary nonsense.
Look at what harrowup, unsycophant, demedici and jjbrouwer are doing here. They are the cyber equvilent of feces hurling monkeys at the zoo. Zero content and even less respect for the site and its members. Scroll through the thread and see that they are simply trying to "hijack" the threads through repetitive, childish rants and ad hominem attack. All of it is designed to bring attention to them and take attention away from any serious discussion. Harrowup has repeatedly bragged of his ability to do this.
I do not post at LP nor do I read the site. I believe Neil McIver is every bit as sincere as Jim Robinson but has associated with some very unstable characters like Goldi-lox. You seem to know more about LP than anyone you've accused of being there. Who are you there? unamused?
955 posted on Friday, October 24, 2003 6:29:05 PM by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 932 | View Replies]
This is the sort of flying monkey feces flinging he engaged in:
Don't think he is the physical type; that's what he has Goldi-lox for...McIver reminds me of kids who have spent too much time playing D & D.
harrowup posted on 2002-07-21 21:33:17 ET ReplyTrace
Did you ever picture Neil as a jack-booted Nazi at a Hitler youth march? Or that he had Goldi for the jackbooted Nazi physical type stuff?
harrowup has a decade long history of being internet trash who will whore himself out to say and do anything to shower his monkey flinging crap to disrupt any serious discussion of some chosen topics. When he moved from FR to LP, the only real change was what street corner he was working.
I said that? Perhaps you can refresh my memory with a link or two, if you don't mind.
The admiral does not do links and quotes. That's only what he demands of everyone else, even about things they never said. For his own nonsense, he always has an excuse or diversion.
I have no problem with non-existent ASCII and HTML "associations".
You have a problem with computer terminology to the point where you lapse into incoherent baby talk.
ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange), or more specifically the high bit ASCII Table is a standard using 8 bits (one byte) of computer memory to create a table of 256 different outcomes or characters. The value range that may be contained in 8 bits, or 1 byte of memory is 0-255 decimal. The original low bit ASCII Table only allowed 128 different outcomes as one bit was used as a parity bit for error checking.
HTML (HyperText Markup Language) is a computer language.
IPA (Internet Protocol Address), version 4 (IPAv4) is an address expressed in dot decimal notation, e.g., 255.255.255.255. Each 3-digit block, or octet, is the decimal expression of 8 bits of binary memory.
It is the physical impossibility of 8 binary bits to express a decimal value greater than 255 which limits the high bit ASCII Table to 256 outcomes or characters. It is the precise same physical limitation that limits any dot decimal IPA octet to a value ranging from 0-255. You, however, claimed that 95.154.230.291 is valid.
Your baby talk about an imagined association between ASCII and HTML compares to an association between a language and an alphabet.
We all know you are a blithering idiot. There is no need to reinforce the point. You have documented that you do not know what you are talking about and were just trying to B.S. your way through.
As for your "work," get back to enjoying your queso de cabrito. Perhaps you have more experience with queso de cabrito and could explain how you make that stuff.
I do not post at LP nor do I read the site. I believe Neil McIver is every bit as sincere as Jim Robinson but has associated with some very unstable characters like Goldi-lox. You seem to know more about LP than anyone you've accused of being there. Who are you there? unamused?
955 posted on Friday, October 24, 2003 6:29:05 PM by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
I have a question for the GREAT&POWERFUL harrowup on the above comment:
If you didn't post or read LP at that time, how on Earth could you make such claims about the managers?
What a waste of a life. :( I am so sad for him. He is nothing more than a big grudge match - and because he uses so many different screen names, he is attacking people that have no idea of the origins of his obsession for them.
THAT is his legacy on this Earth? Cyber harasser/cyber stalker/extraordinaire. With a huge hardon- He freeped, the anti-freepers. wow- how sad.
And it all started with a scam of a website - that was designed to peel money from conservatives. Bunch of carnies.