Title: Welcome Nolu Chan Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Aug 11, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-08-11 17:46:58 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:418496 Comments:437
To everything there is a season, a time for every purpose under the sun. A time to be born and a time to die; a time to plant and a time to pluck up that which is planted; a time to kill and a time to heal ... a time to weep and a time to laugh; a time to mourn and a time to dance ... a time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing; a time to lose and a time to seek; a time to rend and a time to sew; a time to keep silent and a time to speak; a time to love and a time to hate; a time for war and a time for peace.
ecclesiastes 3:1-8
Very sorry to hear that Fred.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
mochajoke, dung-beetle, shit bug, queen of the maggots
You are making a bigger fool of yourself than even your past idiocy would suggest, democrat.
The fact that you think you're in a name calling contest... well, let's just say you've brought a knife to a gun fight and you're too stupid to know you've been shot in the brain, are face down on the sidewalk and flailing wildly at the air.
It's funny to watch you make a fool of yourself, but there's an air of sadness to it all too.
As previously stated it only proves your [nolu chan] failure to ever get anything right even when you have plagiarized the result.
I took a wee bit of time to review some of our communication exchanges from LP from 2003 and on in time; I am fairely sure that we have had similar exchanges on FR before I got the ZOT; I shall review those too.
But, you were a BUSHBOT MAXIMOSIS! Man, you are for GWBUSH; you are for illegal immigrants invading this country; no wonder you got along with Jim Robinson with the exception of your snide remarcks and vicious attacks.
You backed the Iraqi War effort in 2003! I shall (as I have time) produce some of our exchanges. You are a HOOT! This is going to be a fun day!
Too BASIC. You sound as if you have been trying to smoke MD5 hash. Why don't you show how your stream of unconsciousness is siphoned from the entropy pool?
You could always go off on a quest and come back and show us all a screen shot of your magic IPA 95.154.230.291.
But, you were a BUSHBOT MAXIMOSIS! Man, you are for GWBUSH; you are for illegal immigrants invading this country; no wonder you got along with Jim Robinson with the exception of your snide remarcks and vicious attacks.
And as an FR shill, he joined flying monkeys spewing nonsense about Neil. Far from a jackbooted thug, he would seem to be a Libertarian. It seems the only argument this screwup has is that others are part of some psycho cult.
You're a piece of work, sours. You delete unsycophant's post quoting aligyrl's vulgarity...and you find accusations of doing a monica were not specific enough...
You have allowed so much BS from the Afer crowd there isn't a chance in hell you're going to survive as anything but a site for Cal to have a soap-box and the afers a place to get some face time with her...now that she isn't a cow.
harrowup posted on 2002-07-20 7:23:50 ET ReplyTrace
From: harrowup Date: Sat Jul 13, 2002 3:24 pm Subject: Re: Liberty Post
Another 'government sucks' group claiming that no one else loves liberty or the constitution more than they do...and everyone else is not really a conservative.
With any luck, the beta-gammas will manage to destroy it and then move over to Liberty Forum in order to REALLY get their butts kicked.
Will they EVER learn that their chain has been yanked so long and so thoroughly that it no longer has links? I guess that is why they ctd's so poorly.
+++++
It's clear you have this forum's best interests at heart, Admiral.
...stream of unconsciousness is siphoned from the entropy pool?
No Lettuce for Chew!
Sour Grapes Only!
#3 aka Stevie Dung Beetle & his Maggot Band.
There you go again. Plagiarizing a concise thought and then by making a positive a negative turning a reasonable philosophical theory into a jargon rich pile of dung.
BASIC? ASCII v. HTML? I think not. You've pasted so much dung you overlooked your understanding of the incident up thread.
We're still waiting for your narrative on how contradictions confirm collusion...
As you are unwilling to address your yukon disaster, you could always address the Orly filing with your Yale knowledge. That should be fun.
Stealing the hamster wheel is okay. Your's has got to be worn out.
If your Orly investigation, cough, cough, is as ludicrous as your failure to explain how contradictions prove a conspiracy then she should be in pretty good shape. Been to Yale, never studied there. Met with their forensics teams many, many times and even they hadn't gone to Yale Law.
Fred, I'm backing away from this half-wit; I never feel very funny when sad news takes over.
If your Orly investigation, cough, cough, is as ludicrous....
If my opinion of the Orly filing is ludicrous, then your opinion of it must be that it will prevail. We only have a very short time to wait until a court, yet again, confirms the obvious. You're full of crap.
Admiral/doctor/pilot/CEO/MBA and Yale trained lawyer harrowup,
Didn't he say recently that he's a forensic psychologist.
HARROWUP HAS CREATED MORE TITLES THEN "IDI AMIN"
"His full self-bestowed title ultimately became "His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular",
When called upon to put up or shut up, you shut up and run back to mommy. Try not to fall into the deep end of the entropy pool while high on MD5 hash. How about a copy of 8-bit ASCII 291? Or a screenshot of your magic IPA 95.154.230.291?
Document your claim or shut the hell up Admiral harrowup, FR, 10/24/2003
Back it up with the facts or retract. Admiral harrowup, FR, 10/24/2003
Cite your facts, retract or shut up. Admiral harrowup, FR, 10/24/2003
Try googling the word "defamation", then wade through the hits.
When you try to intimidate folks you need to be more than loud...
You made the claim:
... there are literally thousands of defamation suits that result favorably for plaintiffs - including against the press, and many of those for statements of opinion.
... 79 posted on 10/24/2003 11:01 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
Back it up with the facts or retract.
If you don't you can be charged with intimidation
That's why I want all your aliases. Think about it. Once we get to discovery you'll have to pay for the search time...and we wouldn't want Opey and Habsey to work that off in the Pokey...
Face it, fella. You are a blowhard who keeps going just one more step over the line.
288 posted on Friday, October 24, 2003 2:11:59 PM by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
I DON"T FEEL LIKE BUIDING YOUR LINKS. Paste and smear yourself.
http://www.whiteo.com/practice.html - a law firm with verdicts
http://www.jackscamp.com/news/Case%20Summ.%20-%20VA%20S.C.PDF - Virginia damages and ratings sweeps
1. SKINNER V. TRIDENT MEDICAL CENTER, LLC. The dispute in this Berkeley County case arose when an office manager at the medical facility where the plaintiff used to work accused him of stealing equipment and sabotaging the office. Once those allegations spread in the community, the plaintiff found it impossible to find work as a doctor. The jury awarded the doctor $30 million on his defamation claim - including $10 million in punitive damages. The plaintiff also pressed a conversion claim over a patient list the hospital failed to return to him. The jury awarded $250,000 on that claim. (Defamation/Conversion). - South Carolina
http://library.lp.findlaw.com/articles/file/00471/004989/title/subject/topic/government%20law_contracts/filename/governmentlaw_3_8 - Maryland business defamation 7 figure award
http://www-cs-education.stanford.edu/classes/cs201/Projects/defamation-and-the-internet/sections/liability/part3.html - Defamation and the internet
None of them were Chancellor Palpatine. Maybe he is just trying to forewarn other freepers here.
No. He is trying to intimidate others with gobbleygook and claiming thousands of defamation cases have been won by plaintiffs many involving 'opinion' when just the opposite is true.
He's all mouth on a lard.
345 posted on Friday, October 24, 2003 2:35:28 PM by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
Tell me my lie, oh great one, how I lied. You wanted some links to plaintiffs cases. i gave you some, but don't feel like cranking out links for you all die. And you never answered my question about the discovery threat. What, pray tell, are you wanting to discover on me, and what are you suing me for? I'm all ears.
Foremost, where a media defendant is involved, a statement on matters of public concern must be provable as false before liability can be assessed, Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U. S. 767, thus ensuring full constitutional protection for a statement of opinion having no provably false factual connotation. Next, statements that cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about an individual are protected, see, e.g., Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. Bresler, 398 U. S. 6, thus assuring that public debate will not suffer for lack of "imaginative expression" or the "rhetorical hyperbole" which has traditionally added much to the discourse of this Nation. The reference to "opinion" in dictum in Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U. S. 323, 418 U. S. 339-340, was not intended to create a wholesale defamation exemption for "opinion." Read in context, the Gertz dictum is merely a reiteration of Justice Holmes' "marketplace of ideas" concept, see Abrams v. United States, 250 U. S. 616, 250 U. S. 630. Simply couching a statement -- "Jones is a liar" -- in terms of opinion -- "In my opinion, Jones is a liar" -- does not dispel the factual implications contained in the statement. Pp. 497 U. S. 11-21.
2. A reasonable factfinder could conclude that the statements in the Diadiun column imply an assertion that Milkovich perjured himself in a judicial proceeding. The article did not use the sort of loose, figurative, or hyperbolic language that would negate the impression that Diadiun was seriously maintaining Milkovich committed perjury. Nor does the article's general tenor negate this impression. In addition, the connotation that Milkovich committed perjury is sufficiently factual that it is susceptible of being proved true or false by comparing, inter alia, his testimony before the OHSAA board with his subsequent testimony before the trial court. Pp. 497 U. S. 21-22.
An opinion, susceptible of being proved true or false, is sufficient to maintain a libel action.
In my opinion, Chancellor Palpatine is an attorney.
#3, your task was to revisit your problems with ASCII and HTML associations. Don't knock yourself out. I've work to do.
I have no problem with non-existent ASCII and HTML "associations".
You have a problem with computer terminology to the point where you lapse into incoherent baby talk.
ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange), or more specifically the high bit ASCII Table is a standard using 8 bits (one byte) of computer memory to create a table of 256 different outcomes or characters. The value range that may be contained in 8 bits, or 1 byte of memory is 0-255 decimal. The original low bit ASCII Table only allowed 128 different outcomes as one bit was used as a parity bit for error checking.
HTML (HyperText Markup Language) is a computer language.
IPA (Internet Protocol Address), version 4 (IPAv4) is an address expressed in dot decimal notation, e.g., 255.255.255.255. Each 3-digit block, or octet, is the decimal expression of 8 bits of binary memory.
It is the physical impossibility of 8 binary bits to express a decimal value greater than 255 which limits the high bit ASCII Table to 256 outcomes or characters. It is the precise same physical limitation that limits any dot decimal IPA octet to a value ranging from 0-255. You, however, claimed that 95.154.230.291 is valid.
Your baby talk about an imagined association between ASCII and HTML compares to an association between a language and an alphabet.
We all know you are a blithering idiot. There is no need to reinforce the point.
As for your "work," get back to enjoying your queso de cabrito. Perhaps you have more experience with queso de cabrito and could explain how you make that stuff.