The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles
Title: Welcome Nolu Chan
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 11, 2011
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2011-08-11 17:46:58 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 417976
Comments: 437
Welcome Nolu Chan. Hey be nice everybody.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-74) not displayed.
.
.
.
#75. To: harrowup (#70)
Done. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1380372/posts?page=270#270 270 posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:44:06 AM by harrowup (Just naturally perfect and humble of course) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/593030/posts?page=254#254 254 posted on 12/19/2001 6:55:30 PM PST by harrowup Shouldn't you be back disrupting Liberal Post?
#71. To: calcon, nolu chan (#69) #3: Not my problem you're not smart enough to know how to do it. Guess your 'investigative' credentials aren't cleared for that. I'm really surprised a hot shot analyst for The NSA doesn't know the code. harrowup posted on 2011-08-12 19:22:30 ET You STILL have not documented one piece of the crap you have spewed. 291 in the address given by Goldi was an impossible octet value in the dot decimal notation within which it was given. Only a fraud incompetent poseur non-hacker would even try to find it. http://the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=23395&Disp=290#C290 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19712&Disp=195#C195 291 is a legitimate IPa, within a domain VPN, and it takes considerably more than whois to track it. That particular one came out of Holland to England to Canada to (stay tuned for it Easter Monday); you'll enjoy it, mouse turds and all. No bluff, just stop posting lies and filth on LP and everyone will be happy. When foul mouthed multi-ID posters cry when they are kicked in the ass and call their attacker 'bullies', it is a clear sign the foul mouthed liar is pissed like any spoiled brat, and it is to laugh at. harrowup posted on 2011-04-22 12:12:35 ET Harrowup is full of s**t. The IPA in question was explicitly expressed in dot-decimal notation and is an IPv4 address whose highest octet value is limited to 255. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_address The IPA 95.154.230.291 is in classic IPv4 dot-decimal notation. It cannot be an IPv6 number. IPv4 utilizes 4 octets. IPv6, a newer system, uses 8 octets. It is not expressed in dot-decimal but in hexadecimal. IPv6 has an extra 4 octets, but any eight bits in memory cannot store more than 0-255. In hexadecimal, the numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E,F representing 0 to 15. The example IPv6 format address at the Wikipedia link is Omitting the 4 zero groups, it can be expressed as: Most incompetents, with Harrowup being a notable exception, can recognize 95.154.230.291 as an invalid IPv4 expression, containing an impossible octet value of 291. It is impossible to store the value 291 in 8 bits binary. As one may observe, An IPv6 IPA is expressed in hexadecimal 4-digit numbers. It does not resemble IPv4. The three-digit dot-decimal expression of IPv4 is, indeed, limited to 255 in each of its octets. This is a mathematical limitation of what a computer can store in 8 bits. Computer memory is an ON/OFF condition. It always represents one of two states, a BINARY condition. Each bit represents 0 or 1. A byte of data, 8 bits, can store 28, or 256 combinations. Starting with Zero, the highest number possible is 255. It is not possible to become a proficient hacker without a basic knowledge of binary, octal and hex. The Yukons™ do not know the difference between an ISP and an IPA. The do not understand binary and hex. They have not a clue why 8 bits cannot represent more than 28 or 255. And, obviously, they do not know that IPv6 is not represented in dot-decimal. They are bulls**ting while waiting for publication of Hacking for Idiots. http://computer.howstuffworks.com/internet/basics/internet-infrastructure5.htm by Jeff Tyson Internet Protocol: IP Addresses Every machine on the Internet has a unique identifying number, called an IP Address. The IP stands for Internet Protocol, which is the language that computers use to communicate over the Internet. A protocol is the pre-defined way that someone who wants to use a service talks with that service. The "someone" could be a person, but more often it is a computer program like a Web browser. A typical IP address looks like this: To make it easier for us humans to remember, IP addresses are normally expressed in decimal format as a dotted decimal number like the one above. But computers communicate in binary form. Look at the same IP address in binary: The four numbers in an IP address are called octets, because they each have eight positions when viewed in binary form. If you add all the positions together, you get 32, which is why IP addresses are considered 32-bit numbers. Since each of the eight positions can have two different states (1 or zero), the total number of possible combinations per octet is 28 or 256. So each octet can contain any value between zero and 255. Combine the four octets and you get 232 or a possible 4,294,967,296 unique values! Out of the almost 4.3 billion possible combinations, certain values are restricted from use as typical IP addresses. For example, the IP address 0.0.0.0 is reserved for the default network and the address 255.255.255.255 is used for broadcasts. The octets serve a purpose other than simply separating the numbers. They are used to create classes of IP addresses that can be assigned to a particular business, government or other entity based on size and need. The octets are split into two sections: Net and Host. The Net section always contains the first octet. It is used to identify the network that a computer belongs to. Host (sometimes referred to as Node) identifies the actual computer on the network. The Host section always contains the last octet. There are five IP classes plus certain special addresses. You can learn more about IP classes at What is an IP address?. I'm posting the IP of the person who hacked Yukon's posting file. 95.154.230.253 password hacker (hacked yukon) 95.154.230.291 Maybe someone can find him/her. Isn't there some legal precident for filing a lawsuit for doing that? Remember someone hacked Palin's email...and I think the guy went to jail, or something bad happened to him. Anyone Know? Goldi-Lox posted on 2011-04-04 17:54:56 ET 95.154.230.291 is invalid. The last octet 291 is impossible. It represents 8 bits of binary memory and that can never represent a value greater than 255, except in Harrowup New Math where 111111112, the greatest possible of 8 binary digits, achieves 291. Elsewhere, 111111112 equals 255 to the base 10, or our common everyday numbering system. - - - - - 95.154.230.253 password hacker (hacked yukon) 95.154.230.291 That's great, now maybe A K A Stone will do the same at LF ... just hoppin' I am sure the Sherlocks are already hard at word ... Wish Mel were here ... she was the very best at finding out "who." Gatlin posted on 2011-04-04 17:58:26 ET Reply Trace Sherlock Gatlin doesn't have a clue. - - - - - Anyone who tries or does harm to LP, or any of LPs members will get their IP posted right out to the public. No more anonymous attack protection. Turnabout is fair play. === We have folks here that can do a DOS and other annoying things if they know an IP of a disruptor. Goldi-Lox posted on 2011-04-04 18:02:29 ET Reply Trace And The Closet™ Commandos are the ones misidentifying and tracking down the alleged evildoers based on IPA 95.154.230.291. - - - - - First one goes to the UK ... Looks like Buckeroo was right, when he told Stone (I believe it was stone) that he could hide an IP by channeling it through many differnt ones. I'll try to get his exact quote ... when I can. I will check the second IP ... Jethro on NCIS has faced this same situation many time. Gatlin posted on 2011-04-04 18:02:38 ET Reply Trace Gatlin goes off on a mindless wild goose chase to identify who is 95.154.230.291. - - - - - 95.154.230.291 is not a valid IP address. Retrieving DNS records for 95.154.230.291... Attempt to get a DNS server for 95.154.230.291 failed: 95.154.230.291 does not exist in the DNS WhiteSands posted on 2011-04-04 18:04:09 ET Reply Trace WhiteSands reports of the valiant effort to retrieve the DNS records for 95.154.230.291, but does not have a clue more than Sherlock Gatlin why it is invalid. - - - - - I just sent you mail. yukon posted on 2011-04-04 18:04:17 ET Reply Trace - - - - - get Abby! Or McGee WhiteSands posted on 2011-04-04 18:04:58 ET Reply Trace - - - - - A total dead end on the second ... I did a copy and paste, do I have the correct numbers? Gatlin posted on 2011-04-04 18:05:09 ET Reply Trace No, you moronic self-proclaimed White Hat Hacker. It is an impossible number.
IPv6 is distinctly expressed in colon hexadecimal notation. Goldi gave an IP distinctly expressed in the IPv4 dot decimal notation, 95.154.230.291. An address in colon hexadecimal notation looks like this: 2001:0DB8:AC10:FE01:0000:0000:0000:0000. harrowup quite obviously demonstrated he had no idea what he was talking about.
http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19712&Disp=491#C491 [...] Gatlin posted on 2011-04-23 11:36:58 ET [Locked] I will proceed using the interpretation that the Ibluafartsky password was Fartsky. = = = = = On April 1, 2011 yukons™ denied that he used the same password on different forums. Gatlin claimed that he guessed Ibluafartsky's password at LF on the very first guess. Gatlin claimed that Goldi guessed yukon's password at LP within minutes. On April 10, 2011 Tater/Gatlin maintained that "yukon and Ibluafartsky used the same password at both LP and LF." In that case, both passwords were Fartsky, i.e., Gatlin claims the password of Yukon at LP was also Fartsky. QUESTIONS: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=305524&Disp=253#C253 Not in my case. yukon posted on 2011-04-01 13:31:02 ET - - - - - http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19241&Disp=337#C337 [excerpt] Tater posted on 2011-04-10 21:04:05 ET - - - - - http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19591&Disp=484#C484 I will go back and answer the questions if you want me to ... no problem. BTW ... during the excitement, I think I said that someone over at LP guessed yukon's password in a few minutes. I forgot to tell you that I guessed Ibluafartsky's password at LF on the first guess. I have the email confirming that ... of course the doubters will say that email is a fake, but IDGAS what the doubters say. Gatlin posted on 2011-04-18 1:08:06 ET - - - - - http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19712&Disp=254#C254 Yea, over there and over here. Goldi guessed yukon's on password on LP in a couple of minutes and I guess yukon's password over here on the first try. The hacker did the same ... and changed the password, so he could post and yukon could not get back on. Sure missed your help on this ... remember how great you are in chasing spooks. Gatlin posted on 2011-04-22 16:34:53 ET Damn, it was all incredible GUESS work.
http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=19591&Disp=824#C824 I've heard of Tommie Chan, idiot #3 son and having more than a dozen children it was inevitable that another idiot comes along. The 'epic fail' would be that pile of crap. Yukon's pw was stolen at LP; hacked was a term that never should have been used. Where it began, is immaterial. There was a theft and then libel and slander undertaken by at least three posters who have/had posting privileges at both LP and LF. There is nothing to be gained by further displays of ugliness and stupidity. Many of the posters in the last few days with far too much imagination couldn't accept the fact that the truth was displayed by Tater/Gatlin on Sunday in a display of complete honesty with both the expose on the ease of PW theft and a short lecture on hate which was followed by exactly that point. Eventually the crazies had no fallback and decided to go Lord of the Maggots and are convinced that Gatlin, harrowup and others are one poster. The intentional reinforcement of that silliness led to the predictable reactions of the last few posters and reinforces my belief that the egos involved are toxic. Now, y'all can go on taking this opportunity to express your outrage at your host using us as a cover or you can go back to being whatever it is you claim you are at least in your own minds. This has never been an attack on A K A Stone or Liberty's Flame. LF has some meaningful members just as does LP. My final comment on the matter will be directed to Goldi, once more suggesting she reinstate the culprits to LP so that, if necessary, we have the opportunity to smack them down one more time. harrowup posted on 2011-04-19 7:16:50 ET Now yukon's password was "stolen," not guessed. Harrowup does not explain how it was "stolen." At least Harrowup recognizes that "hacked was a term that never should have been used." Of course that did not stop TEAM YUKONS from using precisely that term over and over until it backfired and became a liability. Harrowup claims, "Where it began, is immaterial." That is because he would like everyone to forget that false claim, repeated over and over by TEAM YUKONS, in order to shovel new false claims to the internet. Harrowup Esq. claims, "There was a theft and then libel and slander undertaken by at least three posters who have/had posting privileges at both LP and LF." I can't wait to see the lawsuit, Internet handle Harrowup v. Internet handle Badguy. Slander is oral defamation. Harrowup must have heard voices. Many of the posters do not accept the crap that Gatlin posted because it is false crap, contradicted by his earlier false crap, exposed as exhibiting far too much imagination, and lacking in fact. Harrowup cannot show any evidence of theft. If the multiple passwords were stolen, who were the multiple passwords stolen from? Gatlin said they were guessed. Gatlin said he, himself, divined the Ibluafartsky password on his very first guess. Did he, thereby, steal the password? Of course, the posts of witless Gatlin are a smoking gun. He claimed knowledge that the same password was used on the LP yukon account and the LF Fartsky account. Unless he was privy to the passwords as a community user of those handles, he could not know the original passwords unless yukon/Fartsky revealed them. He could not even verify his guess except via yukon/Fartsky. Unfortunately for Gatlin, on 4/1/2011 yukon had already emphatically denied that he had used the same password on the two sites. But if yukon was not the source of Gatlin's information, what was? Don't you just hate it when that happens? Damn, this time it was THEFT and not GUESS work.
Thanks. Still, I am not concerned about the technical details of the Admiral's own statement and I doubt anyone else is, at this point as the discussion is stale. There is a clear issue about the Admiral's confrontation with calcon over a silly detail wherein Admiral harrowup is DEADWRONG, though. That is fairely typical even outside technical discussions.
Theft? Who stole what and how?
#491. To: A K A Stone, war, ALL (#485) Email reply from yukon: /snip/ Of course, but there is something that many didn't pick up on by the revelation of the email. The LP Kloughns had consistent and constant communications without the use of of methods of communication through the chit-chat channel. They are ALL guilty!
Yeah, whom did what, Major tater? Good question, you fuckin' self-debasing idiot.
It's a MAGIC ip!!! Or.... Goldi wuz hacked! The CT sucks? (yukon is as queer as a three dollar bill)
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
I agree and I also doubt anyone else is. This has been covered, explained, or talked about to the point of nausea. Tireless repetition of old information provides nothing. Definitely stale …
Who stole what and how? Yeah, whom did what, Major tater? Good question ... Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one. Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Maybe chan has an answer ... maybe.
I'm just putting it to bed. Harrowup claimed I only post where I can't be hindered by facts. And he only posts where he can't be hindered by facts. I made mincemeat of him once before so bring it on. harrowup posted on 2011-08-11 22:15:41 ET I took on the motley crew at CU and at TOAK, their home turf, after they handed out an invite. At both sites there was the formation of a puddle of pee followed by attempts to make the evidence disappear. Mercuria captured the CU 16-ton weight of fact before it quickly disappeared. They received a smackdown at LP as well. I have been documenting that I presented facts. He can only present the usual crap with no link or source. When called upon to present something, anything, and back it up, he can't. The passwords were guessed, they were stolen, they were the subject of a brute force attack, there was a hack, there was no hack. And then there was Nuclear Option Day, Pleased to disappoint you folks but you've been goofed again. Any shred of credibility was goofed away. It no longer exists. They should stop pretending they can challenge anyone on facts or credibility. The yukons™ have become a source of derision.
Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Maybe chan has an answer ... maybe. Just take any of your explanations. They are all equally worthless.
My comment was directed to Admiral harrowup about his own naivete attempting to bait calcon. But you play a large role in propagating fallacious errors, too. I am glad you joined this discussion.
Maybe chan has an answer ... maybe. Just take any of your explanations. They are all equally worthless. I will concede that. The question remains: Who Did What to Whom ... and How?
I am pleased that you are glad.
Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Why don't you ask your own pal, "yukon" or the notorious goat herder, Admiral harrowup?
Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Why don't you ask your own pal, "yukon" or the notorious goat herder, Admiral harrowup? I will decide to ask whomever I wish to ask! That is my right ... and I will freely exercise my right!
Well, today, I got a +10,000 dollar spike in my stock portfolio without further trading. My optimism is genuinely uplifted. Still, I loathe you liberals on LP begging for a police state. Many fine folks beat you down, too. I want to end this "yukon" BS. If you and your pals don't bring it up again, you have my commitment to not discuss it again despite my differences with your liberal opinions. I can't speak for any others on LF; they are ALL separate and distinct personalities.
I am happy for you. On Wednesday I picked up $10,525.78 from my trades in silver equities ... I join you with my optimism also genuinely uplifted. I am no liberal begging for a police state ... you must learn to comprehend what you read.
Welcome.
Your association of and about "yukon" is solid proof you don't understand diddly-squat, Major tater. Essentially, you want to play some more games isn't that correct?
I too would like to do that … to end this “yukon” BS. I had much rather discuss the political issues at hand. I will accept your commitment to not discuss it again … and I will join you in that commitment. However, I challenge your assertion that I have liberal opinions … just because my opinions are sometimes in disagreement with yours in no way makes them “liberal opinions.” Does your offer to cease and decease also include all perverted versions of sexual innuendos? I hope so. For I do believe that you are someone able to think at such a high order and can come up with unique and original ideas that elevates thinking and expressing to the next level. You can have insights or eureka moments that have a universal effect without the filth talk. Maybe Stone will join with us in cleaning up the exchanges on the threads … maybe.
Your COMMITMENT did not last long … did it? Not even ONE post. Nowhere did I mention ***** and then you came back at me with this:
And this has something to do with me? You'll [still] have to refresh my memory on that reference.
ROTFLMMFAO!!!!
Relevance?
It's the truth, relevant or not.
in no way makes them “liberal opinions.” Maybe Stone will join with us in cleaning up the exchanges on the threads … maybe. Off the reservation, and so soon. The liberal statist jack boots of censorship are on the march. Also, only a lib would want to start a war because some nation might get a weapon, that the UN thinks they shouldn't have. With that logic the UN should decide what weapons, if any, you may have.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Now there you go again burning up space with c/p ancient history that simply demonstrates how frustrated all you maroons are because you aren't nearly as smart as you say you are. I offered to show you how it is done; but you weren't cleared given your notorious reputation for lying stupidity. Your diatribes would be more meaningful if you ever remembered to quote the correct reference before your meaningless data dumps.
Impossible to answer all of your absurd theories. Just one of your false statements involves hacking. I might have quoted others as claiming hacking but I never said it was a hack at LP or LF. LP p/w was never my concentration. I was only interested in LF and that didn't involve guessing or hacking. It was simple identity theft.
What do you think this thread was all about? Everyone is attempting to alter differences by ensuring a new and vigorous capability on LF, similar to the vision you have for political chat. I don't think it was very easy for NC to appear here; in fact, I doubt he would have made a single post if it weren't for the Admiral, playing more kookery. Everyone wants to drop the "yukon" stuff. It is old, tiring and stale. But, one issue that came out of this scenario is that many don't enjoy lies and skulduggery besides being outright STUPID. I want the entire matter matter behind me as I enjoy serious political ideas on these chit-chat channels.
Delusional. I will repeat. I do not know yukon or his email.
I still have absolutely no idea what the hell you are mewling about and how I am linked to not smacking you down at CU or TOAK. What is CU? You are a victim of data overload. What kind of freak keeps so many lies implicating himself in nothing more than self-flagelation? There is a clinical expression which I'll save.
Missed that; what the hell are you talking about, and keep your reply down to the specific message as opposed to a #3 shit dump.
Who said that someone wants to start a war because some nation might get a weapon? Link ...
Yeah, right. And you are a lawyer and admiral. It somehow makes sense. Ever consider babbling along with byeltsin?
Yes … Oh, I said that already. Yes … Oh, I already said that too.
What the fuck? A K A Stone invited him. I said it would be a hoot and then you and calcon went into your standard bat shit crazy dance. #3 is only famous for enormous shit data dumps appropriate for a clone pussy maggot and shit bug. He's proved that again here.
You miss about 99% of the posts in front of you as you are outstanding in your field as Mr.goatherder and then when dizzy come back in to the home and catch a glimpse of the truth and as a function of your sporadic attention make a post from time to time. I know you weren't endowed with any brains, so I give you forgiveness. It is your genetic line that I am concerned with. With good fortune, you haven't created any progeny.
Comments (116 - 437) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestYou'll have to refresh my memory on that reference.
I joined the ACLU after seeing a couple of dumb cops beating up a Zuni on the sidewalk in Flagstaff, AZ in the early 50's for no other reason than he was a Native American and back then the Green River laws were in effect...
... That may be because I am a liberal and not a conservative....
#76. To: harrowup, calcon (#71)
"You are still trying to put 291 into a dot-decimal IPA quartet."
the admiral always talks through his ass cause his mouth knows better...
Harrowup and His Magic IPA
#195. To: Wood_Chopper (#188)
But the only people who will believe the bluff are the ones who believe that the super-sleuths know what they're doing, even after they ran a whois on an ip containing, as part of the address, a number larger than 255.
291 is a legitimate IPa, within a domain VPN, and it takes considerably more than whois to track it.
INTERNET PROTOCOL ADDRESS (IPA)
IPv4 addresses are canonically represented in dot-decimal notation, which consists of four decimal numbers, each ranging from 0 to 255, separated by dots, e.g., 172.16.254.1. Each part represents a group of 8 bits (octet) of the address.
How Internet Infrastructure Works
LP Supersleuths Strutting Their Stuff
#907. To: ALL, yukon, Gatlin, 22Rifle, Internet sleuths (#906)
#908. To: Goldi-Lox, Mel_Living (#907)
To: ALL, yukon, Gatlin, 22Rifle, Internet sleuths I'm posting the IP of the person who hacked Yukon's posting file.
#909. To: Gatlin (#908)
#910. To: Goldi-Lox (#907)
#911. To: Goldi-Lox (#907)
#912. To: Gatlin (#906)
Relayed to you through 22rifle ...
#913. To: Gatlin (#910)
Jethro on NCIS has faced this same situation many time.
#914. To: Goldi-Lox (#909)
95.154.230.291
#77. To: buckeroo, harrowup, calcon (#72)
LOL .... IPv4 is till the prevalent method of routing. IPv6 is yet to take off.
#78. To: harrowup, calcon, Gatlin (#71)
YUKON passwords - The Gatlin Meltdown
#491. To: A K A Stone, war, ALL (#485)
Email reply from yukon:
/snip/
> About the Ibluafartsky screen name. Someone registered the yukon
> name on LF and at FF just to ridicule me. So I was forced to come
> up with a screen name. I chose something flippant with the
> password of fartsky. I didn't intend to post at LF much. I didn't
> ever admit to being yukon because it rattled the CTs cages. I'd
> always hoped I could eventually get the yukon screen name somehow
> because whoever had registered it hadn't used it for a long time …
/snip/ #253. To: TooConservative (#211)
Some people use the same passwords over and over at different forums.
My explanation is as it has been from day two ... yukon and Ibluafartsky used the same password at both LP and LF.
#484. To: A K A Stone (#482)
#254. To: mel (#251)
#79. To: harrowup, calcon, Gatlin (#71)
#824. To: A K A Stone, Liberator, buckeroo, calcon, war, Murron, (#815)
Damn Chan. You have way to much time on your hands.
Many of the posters in the last few days with far too much imagination couldn't accept the fact that the truth was displayed by Tater/Gatlin on Sunday in a display of complete honesty with both the expose on the ease of PW theft and a short lecture on hate which was followed by exactly that point.
#80. To: nolu chan, harrowup, calcon (#77)
harrowup quite obviously demonstrated he had no idea what he was talking about.
#81. To: nolu chan (#79)
Damn, this time it was THEFT ...
#82. To: nolu chan, harrowup, gatlin, 22rifle, whitesands, goldi-loks, (#78)
> About the Ibluafartsky screen name. Someone registered the yukon
> name on LF and at FF just to ridicule me. So I was forced to come
> up with a screen name. I chose something flippant with the
> password of fartsky. I didn't intend to post at LF much. I didn't
> ever admit to being yukon because it rattled the CTs cages. I'd
> always hoped I could eventually get the yukon screen name somehow
> because whoever had registered it hadn't used it for a long time …
/snip/
[...]
Gatlin posted on 2011-04-23 11:36:58 ET [Locked] I will proceed using the interpretation that the Ibluafartsky password was Fartsky. = = = = = On April 1, 2011 yukons™ denied that he used the same password on different forums. Gatlin claimed that he guessed Ibluafartsky's password at LF on the very first guess. Gatlin claimed that Goldi guessed yukon's password at LP within minutes. On April 10, 2011 Tater/Gatlin maintained that "yukon and Ibluafartsky used the same password at both LP and LF." In that case, both passwords were Fartsky, i.e., Gatlin claims the password of Yukon at LP was also Fartsky.
#83. To: Gatlin (#81)
Who stole what and how?
#84. To: nolu chan, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#77)
Goldi gave an IP distinctly expressed in the IPv4 dot decimal notation, 95.154.230.291.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#85. To: buckeroo, nolu chan, harrowup, (#80)
Thanks. Still, I am not concerned about the technical details of the Admiral's own statement and I doubt anyone else is …
… at this point as the discussion is stale.
#86. To: buckeroo, nolu chan (#83)
(Edited)
#87. To: buckeroo (#80)
Thanks. Still, I am not concerned about the technical details of the Admiral's own statement and I doubt anyone else is, at this point as the discussion is stale.
http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=23007&Disp=27#C27
#88. To: Gatlin (#86)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one.
#89. To: Gatlin, calcon, harrowup, nolu chan (#85)
Definitely stale …
#90. To: nolu chan (#88)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one. Who Did What to Whom ... and How?
#91. To: buckeroo (#89)
I am glad you joined this discussion.
#92. To: Gatlin, harrowup (#86)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one.
#93. To: buckeroo (#92)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one.
#94. To: Gatlin (#91)
I am pleased that you are glad.
#95. To: buckeroo (#94)
Well, today, I got a +10,000 dollar spike in my stock portfolio without further trading. My optimism is genuinely uplifted.
Still, I loathe you liberals on LP begging for a police state.
Many fine folks beat you down, too.
LOL ... no one is beating me down, you know better than that ... LOL!
#96. To: nolu chan (#59)
#97. To: Gatlin (#95)
LOL ... no one is beating me down, you know better than that ... LOL!
#98. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone, harrowup (#94)
I want to end this "yukon" BS. If you and your pals don't bring it up again, you have my commitment to not discuss it again despite my differences with your liberal opinions. I can't speak for any others on LF; they are ALL separate and distinct personalities.
#99. To: buckeroo (#97)
I want to end this "yukon" BS. If you and your pals don't bring it up again, you have my commitment to not discuss it again ...
Your association of and about "yukon" is solid proof you don't understand diddly-squat, Major tater. Essentially, you want to play some more games isn't that correct?
#100. To: nolu chan (#73)
blah blah blah ...Mercuria...
"Do you mean that time I turned the ThunderDome into the WhimperDome? (CU, 2006)"
#101. To: Gatlin (#98)
I too would like to do that … to end this “yukon” BS.
#102. To: nolu chan (#75)
Shouldn't you be back disrupting Liberal Post?
#103. To: harrowup (#102)
#104. To: Gatlin, buckeroo, A K A Stone, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#98)
(Edited)
I challenge your assertion that I have liberal opinions
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#105. To: nolu chan (#76)
No, you moronic self-proclaimed White Hat Hacker. It is an impossible number.
#106. To: nolu chan (#79)
#107. To: Gatlin, A KA Stone, nolu chan, harrowup (#98)
Maybe Stone will join with us in cleaning up the exchanges on the threads … maybe.
#108. To: buckeroo (#82)
The LP Kloughns had consistent and constant communications without the use of of methods of communication through the chit-chat channel. They are ALL guilty!
#109. To: nolu chan (#87)
I took on the motley crew at CU and at TOAK, their home turf, after they handed out an invite. At both sites there was the formation of a puddle of pee followed by attempts to make the evidence disappear. Mercuria captured the CU 16-ton weight of fact before it quickly disappeared. They received a smackdown at LP as well.
#110. To: buckeroo (#89)
My comment was directed to Admiral harrowup about his own naivete attempting to bait calcon. But you play a large role in propagating fallacious errors, too. I am glad you joined this discussion.
#111. To: hondo68 (#104)
Also, only a lib would want to start a war because some nation might get a weapon, that the UN thinks they shouldn't have. With that logic the UN should decide what weapons, if any, you may have.
#112. To: harrowup (#108)
Delusional. I will repeat. I do not know yukon or his email.
#113. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone, nolu chan, harrowup (#107)
Everyone wants to drop the "yukon" stuff. It is old, tiring and stale.
I want the entire matter behind me as I enjoy serious political ideas on these chit-chat channels.
#114. To: buckeroo (#107)
I doubt he would have made a single post if it weren't for the Admiral, playing more kookery.
#115. To: harrowup (#110)
Missed that
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]