Title: Welcome Nolu Chan Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Aug 11, 2011 Author:A K A Stone Post Date:2011-08-11 17:46:58 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:397539 Comments:437
I'm looking foreward to his posts. I remember him under the screen name Columbo at Anti-Kooking / Clown Posse as one of that site's more genuinely investagative members and not just one of its hacker / trouble makers.
I particularly liked his expose of Jim Rob's involvement with human sexual trafficing sites before founding FreeRepublic that he did for the kloughns as Columbo.
His 'expose' was as false as the all the other crap the clone pussies 'created'.
Nothing but maggots and shit bugs in a hamster cage.
What an impact they made...just as effective at closing down FR as the resident sociopaths have been in destroying LP and LF.
None of the 'TOS' sites mean squat in the political landscape. FR as one of the first almost made a difference and then reverted to nothing but a non-stop crusade for extreme right wing fundy bullshit. DU, lucianne are no different.
American Thinker is only slightly more boring than reading the obits.
The clone pussies were no different than the hooligans rioting except that the hooligans have an exit strategy. Clone pussies and other anti-forum trolls just want to knock out the status-quo and take over for 'libertarian' rule which is anarchy.
[Harrowup #47] His 'expose' was as false as the all the other crap the clone pussies 'created'.
Nothing but maggots and shit bugs in a hamster cage.
I did not get involved until 4 months after Dung Beetle's original research exposé. The Farm Tours thread began on 02/16/2005 at 14:09 before I was a member of CP. The first substantive post about Jim Rob, Electronic Orchard and Farm Tours was #2 on 02/16/2005 at 14:16 by Dung Beetle:
JimGod put together web sites for something called "Farm Tours" which included--in fact consisted mostly of--a Filipino Bride service. It was quite a racket. You booked a tour, were guaranteed to meet some available "brides" and then you could decide to marry them on the spot--with Farm Tours help--or come home without a wife.
The guy who ran the tour had a Filipino wife, IIRC, and wrote up a testimonial about what good and obedient wives they made.
This "Farm Tour" site was listed alongside other mail bride and sex tour sites on other sites.
Dung Beetle proceeded to explore the subject in multiple posts. When I arrived at CP, I saw the thread, gathered the research of Dung Beetle, and posted it in a single post, with step by step explanations of how the information could be obtained, with links enabling any interested person to replicate the process and see for him or her self. That was on 06/10/2005 at 20:34. It is on pages 185 thru 196 (of 242) of my PDF copy of the CP thread.
My opening paragraph credited Dung Beetle for his original research.
Much of this is previously covered in a series of posts and the first post credit appears to go to Dung Beetle. However, it seemed somewhat difficult to follow, probably especially so for anyone unfamiliar with where the information was coming from or how it was being mined. I have attempted to put it together here in a single post and explain the process so the less computer savvy member or lurker can follow it clearly. It shows how a single mouse click on the Farm Tours home page may take you to a mail order bride site, and provides pictures of some of the prospective brides. They note that it is not uncommon to have a 20, 30, or even 40 year age gap. A 40-year age gap would have a 59- year old traveling to the Phillipines to visit a teenage Filipina he has never met, with marriage in mind because he is attracted by the quality of her mind. Or something like that.
Of course, I included pictures of several of the prospective brides. This elicited the following as the very next post:
ARGH Posted 06/10/05 @ 20:52
To: Columbo
I am speechless. Thanks for the info. (Good grief, they are children!)
This was also covered in Coral Snake's Bites of the Week.
And the post after that:
DeanWormer Posted 06/10/05 @ 20:53
They are kids.
Robinson worked for a pimping chickenhawk service for the scum of the West Coast.
Hey, Jimmy, you sick, perverted f***...karma will get you one day, and not before time.
F*** You.
And the post after that:
golfmann Posted 06/10/05 @ 20:55
Good work...
You obviously condensed and captured the sleeze factor expertly.
The next:
ARGH Posted 06/10/05 @ 20:57
The more I find out about him......
(Wish I could take back every dollar I gave him!)
And one more:
Columbo Posted 06/10/05 @ 21:00
Who'll Break the Chain
(to Who'll Stop the Rain by CCR)
Scammers keep on coming, they're out to try their luck From Baltimore to Fresno, just grifting for a buck. Money keeps on pourin', a "woo-hoo" gets 'em hot Bots, they dig down deeper, to fill up Jimmy's pot.
Pedophiles and perverts, have their sick-ass needs Scumbags and assholes, they see the chance for greed Rim Job writes the software, worth its weight in gold Farm Tours tells the perverts, "We've got 'em twelve years old."
King of all the grifters, yeah Rim Job is the best Tithing for salvation, to Scam-a-Patriot, West. Money keeps on fallin', fallin' like the rain And I wonder, Still I wonder, Who'll break the chain?
It was also covered by one of Coral Snake's Bites of the Week:
Title: Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 18 (FReeper harpies Supporting Scooter, Wantagate Continues, Douggie back on Ebay again and ClownPosse returns to the Bites Radar.) Source: 00-Hotherp Reports URL Source: http://none Published: Aug 6, 2006 Author: Coral Snake Post Date: 2006-08-06 22:45:33 by Coral Snake Keywords: Wantagate, Perv Supporting Harpies, ClownPosse Returns Views: 49 Comments: 7
Coral Snake's Bites of the Week 18 (FReeper harpies Supporting Scooter, Wantagate Continues, Douggie back on Ebay again and ClownPosse returns to the Bites Radar.)
This week's bites deal with a veriety of topics. First is the continuance of Wantagate thanks to Shrubya's refusal to release even the token settlement of the matter agreed to through two Federal courts. The second is the continuind support for the pervert Neo-Con "Scooter" libby by the harpies at FreeRepublic, The third is doug from Upland returning to eBay showing the probable failure of last month's SnookerThon despite the green snookerbar and fake fireworks having shown up. Finally clownPosse returns to the Bites after their religation of Columbo/nolu chan to the ranks of "kookdom". As always Remember the KEY and enjoy.
* * *
Bite Five --------------> Clown Posse
Clown Posse is getting back into the Bites radar with their recent placing in the "kook" catagory one of their best investegators, Columbo, known on other forums as nolu chan for exposing a probable case of ClownPosse libel. While at ClownPosse Columbo/nolu chan produced two of the three best investegations against FreeRepublic that the site was involved with, The exposure of "Never Never Land" as a dource of the inflation of FreeRepublic's membership (which led to my own theory of "Never Never Land" accounts under the control of JimRob and the Admin Mods as a probable source of the "Liberal "ZOT/Kitty" posts that FreeRepublic uses to to direct FreeRepublic's flamwe fighting tendencies away from each other) and the Proud Patriots scam that went on in the Freeper Cantten threads until it was exposed. (Mojo/Dung Beetle was largely responsible for the third which involved JimRob's webmastering for a Phillipina sex trade outfit before starting FR.)
What happened in the case that led to this bite however was that Columbo nolu chan exposed a possible libel at ClownPosse involving the Sinkspur/Catholic Deakon thread and decided to leave the site because of it. In a most JimRobbish manner ClownPosse went on the attack and once back on line started to place nolu chan/Columbo in ranks with their version of "kookdom" with the rest of us. I for one would welcome nolu chan and his proven investigative abilities to any site I would start up. Sorry ClownPosse you lost one of your best posters by sticking to a libelous story and that is worth two white persian cats.
Harrowup apparently is critical as this threatened the marketplace.
The credit for the exposé must go to Dung Beetle who went on to found Sweetness & Light in 2005 and won the CPAC Blog of the Year award in 2009.
Congratulations to Steve Gilbert of Sweetness & Light on being named CPAC's blog of the year. In a characteristically witty post, Steve discusses the awards ceremony to be held at CPAC's annual meeting in DC.
AT readers have known of Steve's amazing talents even before he started Sweetness & Light, as we had the honor of publishing his well-researched observations before he ventured out on his own. We regularly feature links to his outstanding work. Listeners to Rush Limbaugh have also become familiar with Steve's original insights via the show.
Steve Gilbert Receives the Conservative Blogger Award at CPAC 2009
You are still missing the fact that you never proved a damn thing and are also ignoring the fact that your pal Gilbert plagiarized absolutely everything he ever writes that is purported to be fact.
You never got over the fact that you just never made it in prime time and for good reason.
You're a joke; getting booted by the clone pussies for libel was the funniest yet for that bunch of maggots.
You are still missing the fact that you never proved a damn thing and are also ignoring the fact that your pal Gilbert plagiarized absolutely everything he ever writes that is purported to be fact.
You never got over the fact that you just never made it in prime time and for good reason.
You're a joke; getting booted by the clone pussies for libel was the funniest yet for that bunch of maggots.
You are just so full of crap. No facts, no links, just crap. You are still trying to put 291 into a dot-decimal IPA quartet.
I guess you are just jealous of Steve.
I was not booted off anywhere for libel. CP was hosting the libel. I was not booted off CP. I was not booted off the Snitz site and was never a member of the vBulletin site.
"You are still trying to put 291 into a dot-decimal IPA quartet."
#3: Not my problem you're not smart enough to know how to do it. Guess your 'investigative' credentials aren't cleared for that.
the admiral always talks through his ass cause his mouth knows better...
I'm really surprised a hot shot analyst for The NSA doesn't know the code.
harrowup posted on 2011-08-12 19:22:30 ET
You STILL have not documented one piece of the crap you have spewed. 291 in the address given by Goldi was an impossible octet value in the dot decimal notation within which it was given. Only a fraud incompetent poseur non-hacker would even try to find it.
But the only people who will believe the bluff are the ones who believe that the super-sleuths know what they're doing, even after they ran a whois on an ip containing, as part of the address, a number larger than 255.
291 is a legitimate IPa, within a domain VPN, and it takes considerably more than whois to track it. That particular one came out of Holland to England to Canada to (stay tuned for it Easter Monday); you'll enjoy it, mouse turds and all.
No bluff, just stop posting lies and filth on LP and everyone will be happy.
When foul mouthed multi-ID posters cry when they are kicked in the ass and call their attacker 'bullies', it is a clear sign the foul mouthed liar is pissed like any spoiled brat, and it is to laugh at.
harrowup posted on 2011-04-22 12:12:35 ET
291 is a legitimate IPa, within a domain VPN, and it takes considerably more than whois to track it.
Harrowup is full of s**t. The IPA in question was explicitly expressed in dot-decimal notation and is an IPv4 address whose highest octet value is limited to 255.
IPv4 addresses are canonically represented in dot-decimal notation, which consists of four decimal numbers, each ranging from 0 to 255, separated by dots, e.g., 172.16.254.1. Each part represents a group of 8 bits (octet) of the address.
The IPA 95.154.230.291 is in classic IPv4 dot-decimal notation. It cannot be an IPv6 number.
IPv4 utilizes 4 octets. IPv6, a newer system, uses 8 octets. It is not expressed in dot-decimal but in hexadecimal. IPv6 has an extra 4 octets, but any eight bits in memory cannot store more than 0-255. In hexadecimal, the numbers are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E,F representing 0 to 15.
The example IPv6 format address at the Wikipedia link is
2001:0DB8:AC10:FE01:0000:0000:0000:0000
Omitting the 4 zero groups, it can be expressed as:
2001:0DB8:AC10:FE01::
Most incompetents, with Harrowup being a notable exception, can recognize 95.154.230.291 as an invalid IPv4 expression, containing an impossible octet value of 291. It is impossible to store the value 291 in 8 bits binary.
As one may observe, An IPv6 IPA is expressed in hexadecimal 4-digit numbers. It does not resemble IPv4. The three-digit dot-decimal expression of IPv4 is, indeed, limited to 255 in each of its octets. This is a mathematical limitation of what a computer can store in 8 bits.
Computer memory is an ON/OFF condition. It always represents one of two states, a BINARY condition. Each bit represents 0 or 1. A byte of data, 8 bits, can store 28, or 256 combinations. Starting with Zero, the highest number possible is 255.
It is not possible to become a proficient hacker without a basic knowledge of binary, octal and hex. The Yukons™ do not know the difference between an ISP and an IPA. The do not understand binary and hex. They have not a clue why 8 bits cannot represent more than 28 or 255. And, obviously, they do not know that IPv6 is not represented in dot-decimal. They are bulls**ting while waiting for publication of Hacking for Idiots.
Every machine on the Internet has a unique identifying number, called an IP Address. The IP stands for Internet Protocol, which is the language that computers use to communicate over the Internet. A protocol is the pre-defined way that someone who wants to use a service talks with that service. The "someone" could be a person, but more often it is a computer program like a Web browser.
A typical IP address looks like this:
216.27.61.137
To make it easier for us humans to remember, IP addresses are normally expressed in decimal format as a dotted decimal number like the one above. But computers communicate in binary form. Look at the same IP address in binary:
11011000.00011011.00111101.10001001
The four numbers in an IP address are called octets, because they each have eight positions when viewed in binary form. If you add all the positions together, you get 32, which is why IP addresses are considered 32-bit numbers. Since each of the eight positions can have two different states (1 or zero), the total number of possible combinations per octet is 28 or 256. So each octet can contain any value between zero and 255. Combine the four octets and you get 232 or a possible 4,294,967,296 unique values!
Out of the almost 4.3 billion possible combinations, certain values are restricted from use as typical IP addresses. For example, the IP address 0.0.0.0 is reserved for the default network and the address 255.255.255.255 is used for broadcasts.
The octets serve a purpose other than simply separating the numbers. They are used to create classes of IP addresses that can be assigned to a particular business, government or other entity based on size and need. The octets are split into two sections: Net and Host. The Net section always contains the first octet. It is used to identify the network that a computer belongs to. Host (sometimes referred to as Node) identifies the actual computer on the network. The Host section always contains the last octet. There are five IP classes plus certain special addresses. You can learn more about IP classes at What is an IP address?.
LP Supersleuths Strutting Their Stuff
#907. To: ALL, yukon, Gatlin, 22Rifle, Internet sleuths (#906)
I'm posting the IP of the person who hacked Yukon's posting file.
95.154.230.253 password hacker (hacked yukon)
95.154.230.291
Maybe someone can find him/her. Isn't there some legal precident for filing a lawsuit for doing that? Remember someone hacked Palin's email...and I think the guy went to jail, or something bad happened to him.
Anyone Know?
Goldi-Lox posted on 2011-04-04 17:54:56 ET
95.154.230.291 is invalid. The last octet 291 is impossible. It represents 8 bits of binary memory and that can never represent a value greater than 255, except in Harrowup New Math where 111111112, the greatest possible of 8 binary digits, achieves 291. Elsewhere, 111111112 equals 255 to the base 10, or our common everyday numbering system.
First one goes to the UK ... Looks like Buckeroo was right, when he told Stone (I believe it was stone) that he could hide an IP by channeling it through many differnt ones. I'll try to get his exact quote ... when I can.
I will check the second IP ...
Jethro on NCIS has faced this same situation many time.
Gatlin posted on 2011-04-04 18:02:38 ET Reply Trace
Gatlin goes off on a mindless wild goose chase to identify who is 95.154.230.291.
- - - - -
#911. To: Goldi-Lox (#907)
95.154.230.291 is not a valid IP address.
Retrieving DNS records for 95.154.230.291... Attempt to get a DNS server for 95.154.230.291 failed: 95.154.230.291 does not exist in the DNS
WhiteSands posted on 2011-04-04 18:04:09 ET Reply Trace
WhiteSands reports of the valiant effort to retrieve the DNS records for 95.154.230.291, but does not have a clue more than Sherlock Gatlin why it is invalid.
Email reply from yukon: /snip/ > About the Ibluafartsky screen name. Someone registered the yukon > name on LF and at FF just to ridicule me. So I was forced to come > up with a screen name. I chose something flippant with the > password of fartsky. I didn't intend to post at LF much. I didn't > ever admit to being yukon because it rattled the CTs cages. I'd > always hoped I could eventually get the yukon screen name somehow > because whoever had registered it hadn't used it for a long time … /snip/
[...]
Gatlin posted on 2011-04-23 11:36:58 ET [Locked]
I will proceed using the interpretation that the Ibluafartsky password was Fartsky.
= = = = =
On April 1, 2011 yukons™ denied that he used the same password on different forums.
Gatlin claimed that he guessed Ibluafartsky's password at LF on the very first guess.
Gatlin claimed that Goldi guessed yukon's password at LP within minutes.
On April 10, 2011 Tater/Gatlin maintained that "yukon and Ibluafartsky used the same password at both LP and LF." In that case, both passwords were Fartsky, i.e., Gatlin claims the password of Yukon at LP was also Fartsky.
QUESTIONS:
When did Gatlin learn the two passwords?
Why would yukon's password at LP be Fartsky?
Why would anyone guess that the LP password was Fartsky?
If, on April 10, 2011 Gatlin knew that the Ibluafartsky password was Fartsky, why did he maintain that the yukon password at LP was Fartsky?
I will go back and answer the questions if you want me to ... no problem.
BTW ... during the excitement, I think I said that someone over at LP guessed yukon's password in a few minutes.
I forgot to tell you that I guessed Ibluafartsky's password at LF on the first guess. I have the email confirming that ... of course the doubters will say that email is a fake, but IDGAS what the doubters say.
#824. To: A K A Stone, Liberator, buckeroo, calcon, war, Murron, (#815)
Damn Chan. You have way to much time on your hands.
I've heard of Tommie Chan, idiot #3 son and having more than a dozen children it was inevitable that another idiot comes along.
The 'epic fail' would be that pile of crap. Yukon's pw was stolen at LP; hacked was a term that never should have been used. Where it began, is immaterial. There was a theft and then libel and slander undertaken by at least three posters who have/had posting privileges at both LP and LF.
There is nothing to be gained by further displays of ugliness and stupidity.
Many of the posters in the last few days with far too much imagination couldn't accept the fact that the truth was displayed by Tater/Gatlin on Sunday in a display of complete honesty with both the expose on the ease of PW theft and a short lecture on hate which was followed by exactly that point.
Eventually the crazies had no fallback and decided to go Lord of the Maggots and are convinced that Gatlin, harrowup and others are one poster.
The intentional reinforcement of that silliness led to the predictable reactions of the last few posters and reinforces my belief that the egos involved are toxic.
Now, y'all can go on taking this opportunity to express your outrage at your host using us as a cover or you can go back to being whatever it is you claim you are at least in your own minds.
This has never been an attack on A K A Stone or Liberty's Flame. LF has some meaningful members just as does LP. My final comment on the matter will be directed to Goldi, once more suggesting she reinstate the culprits to LP so that, if necessary, we have the opportunity to smack them down one more time.
harrowup posted on 2011-04-19 7:16:50 ET
Now yukon's password was "stolen," not guessed. Harrowup does not explain how it was "stolen."
At least Harrowup recognizes that "hacked was a term that never should have been used." Of course that did not stop TEAM YUKONS from using precisely that term over and over until it backfired and became a liability.
Harrowup claims, "Where it began, is immaterial." That is because he would like everyone to forget that false claim, repeated over and over by TEAM YUKONS, in order to shovel new false claims to the internet.
Harrowup Esq. claims, "There was a theft and then libel and slander undertaken by at least three posters who have/had posting privileges at both LP and LF." I can't wait to see the lawsuit, Internet handle Harrowup v. Internet handle Badguy. Slander is oral defamation. Harrowup must have heard voices.
Many of the posters in the last few days with far too much imagination couldn't accept the fact that the truth was displayed by Tater/Gatlin on Sunday in a display of complete honesty with both the expose on the ease of PW theft and a short lecture on hate which was followed by exactly that point.
Many of the posters do not accept the crap that Gatlin posted because it is false crap, contradicted by his earlier false crap, exposed as exhibiting far too much imagination, and lacking in fact.
Harrowup cannot show any evidence of theft. If the multiple passwords were stolen, who were the multiple passwords stolen from? Gatlin said they were guessed. Gatlin said he, himself, divined the Ibluafartsky password on his very first guess. Did he, thereby, steal the password?
Of course, the posts of witless Gatlin are a smoking gun. He claimed knowledge that the same password was used on the LP yukon account and the LF Fartsky account. Unless he was privy to the passwords as a community user of those handles, he could not know the original passwords unless yukon/Fartsky revealed them. He could not even verify his guess except via yukon/Fartsky. Unfortunately for Gatlin, on 4/1/2011 yukon had already emphatically denied that he had used the same password on the two sites. But if yukon was not the source of Gatlin's information, what was?
