The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles
Title: Welcome Nolu Chan
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 11, 2011
Author: A K A Stone
Post Date: 2011-08-11 17:46:58 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 417989
Comments: 437
Welcome Nolu Chan. Hey be nice everybody.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-84) not displayed.
.
.
.
#85. To: buckeroo, nolu chan, harrowup, (#80)
I agree and I also doubt anyone else is. This has been covered, explained, or talked about to the point of nausea. Tireless repetition of old information provides nothing. Definitely stale …
Who stole what and how? Yeah, whom did what, Major tater? Good question ... Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one. Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Maybe chan has an answer ... maybe.
I'm just putting it to bed. Harrowup claimed I only post where I can't be hindered by facts. And he only posts where he can't be hindered by facts. I made mincemeat of him once before so bring it on. harrowup posted on 2011-08-11 22:15:41 ET I took on the motley crew at CU and at TOAK, their home turf, after they handed out an invite. At both sites there was the formation of a puddle of pee followed by attempts to make the evidence disappear. Mercuria captured the CU 16-ton weight of fact before it quickly disappeared. They received a smackdown at LP as well. I have been documenting that I presented facts. He can only present the usual crap with no link or source. When called upon to present something, anything, and back it up, he can't. The passwords were guessed, they were stolen, they were the subject of a brute force attack, there was a hack, there was no hack. And then there was Nuclear Option Day, Pleased to disappoint you folks but you've been goofed again. Any shred of credibility was goofed away. It no longer exists. They should stop pretending they can challenge anyone on facts or credibility. The yukons™ have become a source of derision.
Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Maybe chan has an answer ... maybe. Just take any of your explanations. They are all equally worthless.
My comment was directed to Admiral harrowup about his own naivete attempting to bait calcon. But you play a large role in propagating fallacious errors, too. I am glad you joined this discussion.
Maybe chan has an answer ... maybe. Just take any of your explanations. They are all equally worthless. I will concede that. The question remains: Who Did What to Whom ... and How?
I am pleased that you are glad.
Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Why don't you ask your own pal, "yukon" or the notorious goat herder, Admiral harrowup?
Who Did What to Whom ... and How? Why don't you ask your own pal, "yukon" or the notorious goat herder, Admiral harrowup? I will decide to ask whomever I wish to ask! That is my right ... and I will freely exercise my right!
Well, today, I got a +10,000 dollar spike in my stock portfolio without further trading. My optimism is genuinely uplifted. Still, I loathe you liberals on LP begging for a police state. Many fine folks beat you down, too. I want to end this "yukon" BS. If you and your pals don't bring it up again, you have my commitment to not discuss it again despite my differences with your liberal opinions. I can't speak for any others on LF; they are ALL separate and distinct personalities.
I am happy for you. On Wednesday I picked up $10,525.78 from my trades in silver equities ... I join you with my optimism also genuinely uplifted. I am no liberal begging for a police state ... you must learn to comprehend what you read.
Welcome.
Your association of and about "yukon" is solid proof you don't understand diddly-squat, Major tater. Essentially, you want to play some more games isn't that correct?
I too would like to do that … to end this “yukon” BS. I had much rather discuss the political issues at hand. I will accept your commitment to not discuss it again … and I will join you in that commitment. However, I challenge your assertion that I have liberal opinions … just because my opinions are sometimes in disagreement with yours in no way makes them “liberal opinions.” Does your offer to cease and decease also include all perverted versions of sexual innuendos? I hope so. For I do believe that you are someone able to think at such a high order and can come up with unique and original ideas that elevates thinking and expressing to the next level. You can have insights or eureka moments that have a universal effect without the filth talk. Maybe Stone will join with us in cleaning up the exchanges on the threads … maybe.
Your COMMITMENT did not last long … did it? Not even ONE post. Nowhere did I mention ***** and then you came back at me with this:
And this has something to do with me? You'll [still] have to refresh my memory on that reference.
ROTFLMMFAO!!!!
Relevance?
It's the truth, relevant or not.
in no way makes them “liberal opinions.” Maybe Stone will join with us in cleaning up the exchanges on the threads … maybe. Off the reservation, and so soon. The liberal statist jack boots of censorship are on the march. Also, only a lib would want to start a war because some nation might get a weapon, that the UN thinks they shouldn't have. With that logic the UN should decide what weapons, if any, you may have.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Now there you go again burning up space with c/p ancient history that simply demonstrates how frustrated all you maroons are because you aren't nearly as smart as you say you are. I offered to show you how it is done; but you weren't cleared given your notorious reputation for lying stupidity. Your diatribes would be more meaningful if you ever remembered to quote the correct reference before your meaningless data dumps.
Impossible to answer all of your absurd theories. Just one of your false statements involves hacking. I might have quoted others as claiming hacking but I never said it was a hack at LP or LF. LP p/w was never my concentration. I was only interested in LF and that didn't involve guessing or hacking. It was simple identity theft.
What do you think this thread was all about? Everyone is attempting to alter differences by ensuring a new and vigorous capability on LF, similar to the vision you have for political chat. I don't think it was very easy for NC to appear here; in fact, I doubt he would have made a single post if it weren't for the Admiral, playing more kookery. Everyone wants to drop the "yukon" stuff. It is old, tiring and stale. But, one issue that came out of this scenario is that many don't enjoy lies and skulduggery besides being outright STUPID. I want the entire matter matter behind me as I enjoy serious political ideas on these chit-chat channels.
Delusional. I will repeat. I do not know yukon or his email.
I still have absolutely no idea what the hell you are mewling about and how I am linked to not smacking you down at CU or TOAK. What is CU? You are a victim of data overload. What kind of freak keeps so many lies implicating himself in nothing more than self-flagelation? There is a clinical expression which I'll save.
Missed that; what the hell are you talking about, and keep your reply down to the specific message as opposed to a #3 shit dump.
Who said that someone wants to start a war because some nation might get a weapon? Link ...
Yeah, right. And you are a lawyer and admiral. It somehow makes sense. Ever consider babbling along with byeltsin?
Yes … Oh, I said that already. Yes … Oh, I already said that too.
What the fuck? A K A Stone invited him. I said it would be a hoot and then you and calcon went into your standard bat shit crazy dance. #3 is only famous for enormous shit data dumps appropriate for a clone pussy maggot and shit bug. He's proved that again here.
You miss about 99% of the posts in front of you as you are outstanding in your field as Mr.goatherder and then when dizzy come back in to the home and catch a glimpse of the truth and as a function of your sporadic attention make a post from time to time. I know you weren't endowed with any brains, so I give you forgiveness. It is your genetic line that I am concerned with. With good fortune, you haven't created any progeny.
With his overuse of technobabble/technospek in the form of specialized technical terms, or technical slang that served no purpose to anyone … in that it is incomprehensible for nearly all of the posters here and may give an impression of plausibility through mystification, misdirection, and obfuscation. He did …
He's proved that again here. Although I can't speak for NC, I believe he asked YOU for specific citations of and about your considerations. NC has protected his veracity with not just one post but several with specific [and linked] references. In SUMMARY: WHERE's THE BEEF?
Link ... Gatlin posted on 2011-08-12 13:35:41 ET How will you accomplish this, a stern look and your bouncing pool boy gif? Get your azz over there and stop them, or STFU you chickenhawk warmonger libtard!
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
No, I have already discussed your misinterpretation and mischaraterization of those silly charges...started by none other than #3's good buddy, the maggot shit bug Stevie and his disaterous attempt to further that nastiness finally frustrated himself so much he ran away...several times from several forums until he finally found a forum where he could be as crazy as he wanted to be and nobody read. Now, he has another blog where he apparently has found his stride. Good for him. Maybe his 'wife' won't have to pay for his drool cups anymore.
I asked if you would like to deny MUSLIM FANATICS, who continue to kill people and themselves with their suicide bombs, a nuke bomb tool ... you didn't answer. Will you now answer, please ... WOULD YOU?
Everyone wants to drop the "yukon" stuff. It is old, tiring and stale. Yes … Oh, I said that already. I want the entire matter behind me as I enjoy serious political ideas on these chit-chat channels. Yes … Oh, I already said that too. OK. I've said it before and I'll repeat. Let there be peace. I'm done here.
Learn to read ... nowhere did I say that I wanted to start a war.
What's the matter Major tater? The silly details get into your way? I love it. I shall pray that NC decides to spend some time with you pulling you up-side-down and hanging you from a oak tree and watching you gaggle and spit again. With a bit of luck, he might release you so your head comes crashing down upon the ground to knock some sense into you.
Not gonna happen ... don't hold your breath. Since you HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO DO IT .. then why do you think anyone can?
#3's shit data dumps are his weapon of choice for obfuscation in extremis and seems to think that every one actually reads everything he writes wherever he writes it. He makes associations that just aren't there. Maybe he is actually a borg.
Comments (126 - 437) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThanks. Still, I am not concerned about the technical details of the Admiral's own statement and I doubt anyone else is …
… at this point as the discussion is stale.
#86. To: buckeroo, nolu chan (#83)
(Edited)
#87. To: buckeroo (#80)
Thanks. Still, I am not concerned about the technical details of the Admiral's own statement and I doubt anyone else is, at this point as the discussion is stale.
http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=23007&Disp=27#C27
#88. To: Gatlin (#86)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one.
#89. To: Gatlin, calcon, harrowup, nolu chan (#85)
Definitely stale …
#90. To: nolu chan (#88)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one. Who Did What to Whom ... and How?
#91. To: buckeroo (#89)
I am glad you joined this discussion.
#92. To: Gatlin, harrowup (#86)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one.
#93. To: buckeroo (#92)
Thank you, I know it was a good question ... and a simple one.
#94. To: Gatlin (#91)
I am pleased that you are glad.
#95. To: buckeroo (#94)
Well, today, I got a +10,000 dollar spike in my stock portfolio without further trading. My optimism is genuinely uplifted.
Still, I loathe you liberals on LP begging for a police state.
Many fine folks beat you down, too.
LOL ... no one is beating me down, you know better than that ... LOL!
#96. To: nolu chan (#59)
#97. To: Gatlin (#95)
LOL ... no one is beating me down, you know better than that ... LOL!
#98. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone, harrowup (#94)
I want to end this "yukon" BS. If you and your pals don't bring it up again, you have my commitment to not discuss it again despite my differences with your liberal opinions. I can't speak for any others on LF; they are ALL separate and distinct personalities.
#99. To: buckeroo (#97)
I want to end this "yukon" BS. If you and your pals don't bring it up again, you have my commitment to not discuss it again ...
Your association of and about "yukon" is solid proof you don't understand diddly-squat, Major tater. Essentially, you want to play some more games isn't that correct?
#100. To: nolu chan (#73)
blah blah blah ...Mercuria...
"Do you mean that time I turned the ThunderDome into the WhimperDome? (CU, 2006)"
#101. To: Gatlin (#98)
I too would like to do that … to end this “yukon” BS.
#102. To: nolu chan (#75)
Shouldn't you be back disrupting Liberal Post?
#103. To: harrowup (#102)
#104. To: Gatlin, buckeroo, A K A Stone, *Yukon neo-Progressive Vermin* (#98)
(Edited)
I challenge your assertion that I have liberal opinions
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#105. To: nolu chan (#76)
No, you moronic self-proclaimed White Hat Hacker. It is an impossible number.
#106. To: nolu chan (#79)
#107. To: Gatlin, A KA Stone, nolu chan, harrowup (#98)
Maybe Stone will join with us in cleaning up the exchanges on the threads … maybe.
#108. To: buckeroo (#82)
The LP Kloughns had consistent and constant communications without the use of of methods of communication through the chit-chat channel. They are ALL guilty!
#109. To: nolu chan (#87)
I took on the motley crew at CU and at TOAK, their home turf, after they handed out an invite. At both sites there was the formation of a puddle of pee followed by attempts to make the evidence disappear. Mercuria captured the CU 16-ton weight of fact before it quickly disappeared. They received a smackdown at LP as well.
#110. To: buckeroo (#89)
My comment was directed to Admiral harrowup about his own naivete attempting to bait calcon. But you play a large role in propagating fallacious errors, too. I am glad you joined this discussion.
#111. To: hondo68 (#104)
Also, only a lib would want to start a war because some nation might get a weapon, that the UN thinks they shouldn't have. With that logic the UN should decide what weapons, if any, you may have.
#112. To: harrowup (#108)
Delusional. I will repeat. I do not know yukon or his email.
#113. To: buckeroo, A K A Stone, nolu chan, harrowup (#107)
Everyone wants to drop the "yukon" stuff. It is old, tiring and stale.
I want the entire matter behind me as I enjoy serious political ideas on these chit-chat channels.
#114. To: buckeroo (#107)
I doubt he would have made a single post if it weren't for the Admiral, playing more kookery.
#115. To: harrowup (#110)
Missed that
#116. To: harrowup (#114)
#3 is only famous for enormous shit data dumps appropriate for a clone pussy maggot and shit bug.
He's proved that again here.
#117. To: harrowup, nolu chan (#114)
#3 is only famous for enormous shit data dumps appropriate for a clone pussy maggot and shit bug.
#118. To: Gatlin, *Neo-Lib Chickenhawk Wars* (#111)
(Edited)
Who said that someone wants to start a war because some nation might get a weapon?
I would however like to deny MUSLIM FANATICS, who continue to kill people and themselves with their suicide bombs, a nuke bomb tool ... wouldn't you?
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#119. To: buckeroo (#112)
And you are a lawyer and admiral.
Delusional. I will repeat. I do not know yukon or his email.
#120. To: hondo68 (#118)
I would however like to deny MUSLIM FANATICS, who continue to kill people and themselves with their suicide bombs, a nuke bomb tool ... wouldn't you?
#121. To: Gatlin, buckeroo, A K A Stone (#113)
#122. To: hondo68 (#118)
Who said that someone wants to start a war because some nation might get a weapon?
#123. To: Gatlin, nolu chan (#116)
With his [NC] overuse of technobabble/technospek in the form of specialized technical terms, or technical slang that served no purpose to anyone … in that it is incomprehensible for nearly all of the posters here and may give an impression of plausibility through mystification, misdirection, and obfuscation.
#124. To: buckeroo (#123)
(Edited)
I shall pray that NC decides to spend some time with you pulling you up-side-down and hanging you from a oak tree and watching you gaggle and spit again. With a bit of luck, he might release you so your head comes crashing down upon the ground to knock some sense into you.
#125. To: Gatlin (#116)
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]