[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

Rare Van Halen Leicestershire, Donnington Park August 18, 1984 Valerie Bertinelli Cameo

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten

Jewish students beaten with sticks at University of Amsterdam

Terrorists shut down Park Avenue.

Police begin arresting democrats outside Met Gala.

The minute the total solar eclipse appeared over US

Three Types Of People To Mark And Avoid In The Church Today

Are The 4 Horsemen Of The Apocalypse About To Appear?

France sends combat troops to Ukraine battlefront

Facts you may not have heard about Muslims in England.

George Washington University raises the Hamas flag. American Flag has been removed.

Alabama students chant Take A Shower to the Hamas terrorists on campus.

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

In Day of the Lord, 24 Church Elders with Crowns Join Jesus in His Throne

Deadly Saltwater and Deadly Fresh Water to Increase

Deadly Cancers to soon Become Thing of the Past?

Plague of deadly New Diseases Continues

[FULL VIDEO] Police release bodycam footage of Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley traffi

Police clash with pro-Palestine protesters on Ohio State University campus

Joe Rogan Experience #2138 - Tucker Carlson

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Debt ceiling deal does not solve our fiscal woes
Source: The Washington Times
URL Source: http://communities.washingtontimes. ... oes-not-solve-our-fiscal-woes/
Published: Aug 1, 2011
Author: Vasko Kohlmayer
Post Date: 2011-08-01 18:35:11 by We The People
Keywords: None
Views: 80043
Comments: 139

Back slapping and smiles abounded as the president and congressional leaders reached a debt ceiling compromise last night.

The deal, they said, will save us from falling over the fiscal cliff.

Do not believe a word of it. The bipartisan deal does not alter the grim fact that the US government is saddled with far greater obligations than it can conceivably meet.

Public debt of $14.5 trillion and long term unfunded liabilities well in excess of $100 trillion are simply an insurmountable burden.

To put it plainly, the US federal government is bankrupt. The only reason its finances have not yet collapsed is due to the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency.

Debt ceiling (Image: AP). Increase of debt ceiling will not address the heart of the problem.

Normally when a country acquires more debt than it can carry, creditors dump its bonds and the currency falls apart.

Most of our creditors know that we will not be able to pay our debts. They would love to dump their dollars, but they have a serious problem. There is really nowhere else they can put their money.

Consider the alternatives. Should they sell dollars and buy euros instead? But the euro is as troubled as the dollar is. Or should they try the British pound or the Japanese yen? Those too happen to be heavily over-indebted and shaky.

There are some currencies – such as the Swiss frank and the Canadian dollar – that are relatively healthy, but they are too small to be considered as global alternatives.

The bottom line is that there is at the present time no currency that could reliably absorb the world's monetary reserves.

The world is in a currency crisis and holders of reserves – whether national banks or private institutions – have no choice but to stick with the dollar for now.

Sensing the train wreck ahead, creditors plead in desperation with our government to do something about its out-of-control spending. Unfortunately for them, American politicians – despite their rhetoric – have no intention of doing anything.

Both Republicans and Democrats want the same thing: They want to spend more. The only difference between them is the kind of programs on which they want to spend.

Even the fiscal hawks in the Republican party become dovish when it comes to cutting. Paul Ryan's plan The Road to Prosperity, which he released with much noise earlier this year, would not balance the budget for another thirty years.

What this really means is that it would never balance the budget, because it is impossible to forecast anything with any degree of accuracy thirty years out.

The far-off balancing date in Paul Ryan's budget was only a cop out. That much was obvious. Yet he still got savaged for his supposed fiscal “ruthlessness.”

If the mere pretense of wanting to balance the budget makes one a political pariah, then you know we are in serious trouble as a country.

If you really want to understand what is going on in our capitol when it comes to money and budgeting, you need to grasp one thing: There is only one party in Washington, D.C. It is the party of Big Spending.

This is its modus operandi: The greater our debts, the more it wants to spend.

Let us not forget that it was George Bush and the Republicans that set us on the road to never-ending bailouts and soaring budget shortages.

Obama took it a step further and the Republicans cried fault. They complain about the deficits, but even the most fiscally “hawkish” among them do not want to balance the budget. Instead they pretend that little cuts around the edges will solve our problems.

With an annual deficit of some $1.5 trillion, cutting two trillion over the next ten years is only a drop in the bucket. To have any chance, we would need to cut $1.5 trillion now just to stop the hemorrhage.

This will not happen, of course. With such leadership as we have we are headed for disaster.

The fact is that we are bankrupt, and we will eventually default. Raising the debt ceiling now only postpones the inevitable.

Do not celebrate. Rather prepare for the crash.

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/vasko-kohlmayers-globe/2011/aug/1/debt-ceiling-deal-does-not-solve-our-fiscal-woes/

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 110.

#7. To: We The People (#0)

This deal us nothing but nonsense.

The government will spend 3,700 billion this year.

THey will borrow 1,500 billion to do so.

This bill will cut a tiny 4 billion out of this year's borrowing.

It not even a pimple on the deficit's ass.

jwpegler  posted on  2011-08-01   20:40:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: jwpegler (#7) (Edited)

For once you've gotten something correct. This BS was nothing more than trying to weaken a POTUS politically.

war  posted on  2011-08-02   7:52:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: war (#10)

This BS was nothing more than trying to weaken a POTUS politically.

Why the hell must the welfare of the USA be secondary to the POTUS's commie agenda, weak leadership and sabotage of the country's economy and sovereignty?

WHY are we in Libya again? Why did he shut down the US's coal and oil industries??

0bama is America's Nero.

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   12:06:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Liberator (#22)

Why the hell must the welfare of the USA be secondary to the POTUS's commie agenda, weak leadership and sabotage of the country's economy and sovereignty?

The position of Drama Queen has already been taken by Captialist Erica...you'll need to battle it out with her...

war  posted on  2011-08-02   12:10:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#25)

I'm positive YOU can spin my claim of "the POTUS's commie agenda, weak leadership and sabotage of the country's economy and sovereignty" into...the complete opposite. Even though that spin would be based on smoke and mirrors while utiizing a large BONG.

Btw - that Janet Nappy is some hot broad, ain't she?

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   12:25:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Liberator (#28)

Actually Obama seems rather Reaganesque

mininggold  posted on  2011-08-02   12:31:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: mininggold (#29)

Actually Obama seems rather Reaganesque

On WHAT planet??

Nevermind.

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   12:49:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Liberator (#30)

On WHAT planet??

Nevermind.

That's true. He does have a bit to go before he raises the debt ceiling to a percentage comparable to that done by Reagan.

mininggold  posted on  2011-08-02   12:52:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: mininggold (#31)

That's true. He does have a bit to go before he raises the debt ceiling to a percentage comparable to that done by Reagan.

Are you seriously comparing the optimism and shape of the American economy, the trade deficit situation, the value of the dollar, and the growth of the economy during Reagan's Presidency....to TO-DAY??

My word - you really do dwell on Mars. Hey - do the little green men treat your "problem" with dignity?

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   13:08:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Liberator (#34)

Are you seriously comparing the optimism and shape of the American economy, the trade deficit situation, the value of the dollar, and the growth of the economy during Reagan's Presidency....to TO-DAY??

You think a major banking crisis created by Reagan's policies didn't affect the Reagan economy? Have you received your 'trickle down' yet? LOLOLOLOL

mininggold  posted on  2011-08-02   13:16:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: mininggold (#36)

The Reagan Adminstration was romamticized WHILE it was still in progress...why would you believe it would be any different now.

war  posted on  2011-08-02   13:26:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: war, mininggold (#38)

The Reagan Adminstration was romamticized WHILE it was still in progress...why would you believe it would be any different now.

And rightfully so. WHILE it was in progress.

Now? Well, the Statist-Leftist virus plaguing the GOP probably wouldn't even allow Reagan into it "Big Tent."

War...You voted for Reagan, didn't you? How were the years from 1981-1989 for you?

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   13:30:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Liberator (#40) (Edited)

War...You voted for Reagan, didn't you? How were the years from 1981-1989 for you?

Yes in 1984 because I hate Walter Mondale...at the beginning of 1981, I was fine but by the end of 1981, I barely had a pot to piss in. In 1989, I nearly lost my job thanks to the blowback from S&L deregulation...and my taxes went up each year that the 1987 tax reform was phased in. My best years economically were 1994-2001. And then again in 2007-2010. This year has been okay.

war  posted on  2011-08-02   13:44:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: war (#44)

Yes [I voted for Reagan] in 1984 because I hate Walter Mondale...at the beginning of 1981, I was fine but by the end of 1981, I barely had a pot to piss in. In 1989, I nearly lost my job thanks to the blowback from S&L deregulation...and my taxes went up each year that the 1987 tax reform was phased in. My best years economically were 1994-2001. And then again in 2007-2010. This year has been okay.

By 1981 Reagan's agenda had hardly been implemented.

How'd you do from '82-'88? Good times or bad? Whether you personally did well or not, we know America was in GREAT relative shape emotionally, financially, socially, and on most counts. Even the culture of music and entertainment was better.

As your taxes went up during the Reagn Years, I suppose your earnings did commensurately.

1994-2001 - which goob policies helped or hurt you?

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   14:14:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Liberator (#51)

As your taxes went up during the Reagn Years, I suppose your earnings did commensurately.

Actually...no...for those three years my income was about $55K but because of the phase out of deductions, my AGI and thus my taxes went up every year...

war  posted on  2011-08-02   14:24:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: war (#56)

For those three years my income was about $55K but because of the phase out of deductions, my AGI and thus my taxes went up every year...

Which 3 years? Reagan wuz Prez for 8 years.

Back in the 80s, an income of 55k was pretty good. And I suppose you took advantage of tax breaks and deduction expenses.

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   14:39:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: Liberator (#68)

Which 3 years? Reagan wuz Prez for 8 years.

I stated the year that the tax reform began,...1987...

war  posted on  2011-08-02   14:42:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: war (#70)

I stated the year that the tax reform began,...1987...

I think we all got whacked on that tax-reform. New capital gains taxation policies hurt the real estate market then as well. And concurrently, Wall St. and you.

Liberator  posted on  2011-08-02   14:45:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: Liberator (#72)

think we all got whacked on that tax-reform

We all did?

-- Well, if you were a tax cheat, doing things like making up deductions for non-existent children, then yes, you got whacked.

-- If you were using a whole bunch of dubious (but often technically legal) deductions to shelter your money, then you got whacked.

It DID change the rules in the middle of the game, but the long term effect was to create a much fairer, and more stable tax system, at least so much as it hasn't since been dismantled.

As for myself, I paid less taxes.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-08-02   15:14:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: no gnu taxes (#87) (Edited)

If you were using a whole bunch of dubious (but often technically legal) deductions to shelter your money, then you got whacked

Thank's for admitting he raised taxes primarily on elderly pensioners and retirees, who had played the game legally on the advice of the financial planners of the day. Too bad those next in line didn't learn from their mistakes.

mininggold  posted on  2011-08-02   15:19:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#100. To: mininggold (#93)

The 86 tax reform act was bipartisan supported by Gephart, Moynihan, et al.

The idea that retirees needed such tax shelters has long since been laid to rest by those today who make the same type of investments and no longer need the tax shelters.

Nobody's money was stolen. You just liquidate and restructure.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-08-02   15:26:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#104. To: no gnu taxes (#100)

The 86 tax reform act was bipartisan supported by Gephart, Moynihan, et al.

The idea that retirees needed such tax shelters has long since been laid to rest by those today who make the same type of investments and no longer need the tax shelters.

Nobody's money was stolen. You just liquidate and restructure.

There are no tax shelters being used today? Oh my, I guess I better talk to my accountant.

mininggold  posted on  2011-08-02   15:28:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: mininggold (#104)

There are no tax shelters being used today? Oh my, I guess I better talk to my accountant.

Not like there were in 1986

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-08-02   15:36:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 110.

#111. To: no gnu taxes (#110) (Edited)

Not like there were in 1986

You are right about that since many tax shelters now require minimum investments.

mininggold  posted on  2011-08-02 15:38:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 110.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com