Yep. I do have to admit that Boehner and the House Republicans are holding up better than I thought they would.
Contrast this with the castrated GOP cowards in the Senate who propose to give Obama carte blanche to run up $2.5 trillion more in debt in the hopes that the voters will blame him for digging us deeper into a hole.
I do have to admit that Boehner and the House Republicans are holding up better than I thought they would.
Contrast this with the castrated GOP cowards in the Senate who propose to give Obama carte blanche to run up $2.5 trillion more in debt in the hopes that the voters will blame him for digging us deeper into a hole.
You act as though there isn't some kind of unofficial set of agreements/policies and procedures that occur between within the same political parties that run between the two houses of Congress.
You act as though there isn't some kind of unofficial set of agreements/policies and procedures that occur between within the same political parties that run between the two houses of Congress.
As of tonight there isn't. The GOP is seemingly prepared to crash the U.S. economy come Monday when markets open.
The GOP is seemingly prepared to crash the U.S. economy come Monday when markets open.
I really haven't been following this at all, but why do you think it'll be mess when markets open on Monday? Do investors and whoever really think the worthless government dufus's won't do what has to be done by the deadline?
He's [go65] really worried he wont get his welfare check.
I am calling in Moderator X to ban your nasty ass, Stone.
You have played wayyyyy tooo looonng at the throttle of despicable behaviour. You are running off good posters without any serious debate or factual information. You have allowed yourself to succumb to the depths of deplorable despair as Gatlin, yukon, harrowup and all the others representing atrocious manners from LP.
Oh .. you are just PISSED to the Maximilianus that some good posters like, "We The People" remain on LP to kick your ass. You were a wimp posting to "We The People" today.
So why are you here chit-chatting with me on LF as opposed to the glorious confines of LP where you can share one-liners with "yukon" all day and night to gain insightful meanings about the world and politics around us?
Since he can delete or prevent them ... he "owns" the right to "control" them.
As does he also "own" the right to control "who" posts here.
You and I post here at his courtesy ... and don't you forget it!!!
So your contention is that "he" can can control our thoughts and repress the free exchange of ideas unless we agree with him. How do we know how to agree with anything he thinks about? There are no clear rules that are documented anywhere.
Similar to your lovelust, Goldie's forum. Both forum managers make up rules as they go along.
So your contention is that "he" can can control ...
... Both forum managers make up rules as they go along.
Nope, it is not my contention that he can control our thought ...
I have never seen that to be the case, where Stone "tries" to control our thoughts or repress any free exchange of ideas ... and I have never seen any edict that we agree with him.
Do you need rules of etiquette documented here for you to be courteous?
Both forum manager have the right to do whatever they want to, and do that anytime they want to ... with respect to their forums.
If you don't not like that, then you also have a right ... the right not to post on their forums.
Nope, it is not my contention that he can control our thought ...
So why the repression of your pal, "yukon's" madcap adventure ride on LP, March 27, 2011?
I have never seen that to be the case, where Stone "tries" to control our thoughts or repress any free exchange of ideas ... and I have never seen any edict that we agree with him.
Biased. On this thread alone, Stone removed comments; he even timed me out for awhile.
Do you need rules of etiquette documented here for you to be courteous?
This is the Internet; the rules of engagement must be characterized by documented policies and procedures. For forum managers too lazy to understand this important idea, they shall flounder forever wondering why they can't herd a pile of people with different backgrounds and political concepts into a nice channel having tea and crumpets with a chat.
Both forum manager have the right to do whatever they want to, and do that anytime they want to ... with respect to their forums.
No they don't. If there are no clear rules; they are as much the issue as anyone.
If you don't not like that, then you also have a right ... the right not to post on their forums.
But, you miss the entire point. That is why I am here.
So why the repression of your pal, "yukon's" madcap adventure ride on LP, March 27, 2011?
Nowhere did I see an unconscious exclusion of painful impulses, desires, or fears from the conscious mind.
Biased. On this thread alone, Stone removed comments; …
Since I did not see that happen … I, of course, cannot comment on that. Therefore you need to direct the comment to Stone.
… he even timed me out for awhile.
You deserved it … I thought he had banned you. I would have. But, since he did not, I will concede that your statement on TPF is correct: “Stone is afraid” of you. That is blatantly obvious to me now.
This is the Internet; the rules of engagement must be characterized by documented policies and procedures. For forum managers too lazy to understand this important idea, they shall flounder forever wondering why they can't herd a pile of people with different backgrounds and political concepts into a nice channel having tea and crumpets with a chat.
Sounds like your personal problem, Bucky. I have never had a conflict with a forum owner. Yet you seem to be in constant conflict with every one of them. Ever wonder why that is? Nah, of course you wouldn’t!
It is impossible of a forum owner to write a rule for ever contingency.
No they don't. If there are no clear rules; they are as much the issue as anyone.
I repeat: Every forum owner has the absolute right and authority to do anything he/she desires as long as it is lawful and does not violate any contractual agreement.
But wait!!! You are the provocateur about rules. You are the who provokes trouble, causes dissension, or the like; the agitator … about rules.
Since you have become such a stickler for rules, why don’t you post for everyone the see: The Operating Rules for a Chit-Chat Forum Owner. You do that for us, please. You can … can’t you?
But, you miss the entire point. That is why I am here.
No, I didn’t miss your point … you never make an intelligent one. You may try again, if you like … and next time attempt to make sense.
The conclusion you arrive at with a faulty reasoning … is a faulty conclusion. ~ Author Unknown.
As I have said: If you don't like the way a forum owner runs a forum, there is an unwritten but commonly accepted rule. That is, you have the inherent right not to post on their forum.
