No, first we start with ALL "gun control" laws, federal state and local based on the second and fourteenth amendments. Then we go to that Willy Wonka fudge mountain of paper the executive "regulatory agencies" foisted on us unconstitutionally MAKING LAW when only the Congress has that authority. (I'm refering to that mountain of paper that Stossel shows on his Faux Nr=ews show every time it is about "regulatory agencies" then we can worry about congressionally passed "commerce clause" nonsense.
You are defensive again, tater. It is a G-R-E-A-T day to watch you cower before other posters. "We The People" beat you and harrowup to a bloody pulp, again on LP.
Since he can delete or prevent them ... he "owns" the right to "control" them.
As does he also "own" the right to control "who" posts here.
You and I post here at his courtesy ... and don't you forget it!!!
So your contention is that "he" can can control our thoughts and repress the free exchange of ideas unless we agree with him. How do we know how to agree with anything he thinks about? There are no clear rules that are documented anywhere.
Similar to your lovelust, Goldie's forum. Both forum managers make up rules as they go along.
I enjoy your restatement of a classical phrase, "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder." Is that all you can attempt at a clever expression? But, then entire forum watched "We The People" kick your ass into complete humiliation. You are so defensive, you saw my post over here on LF..... you are always watching and waiting with a puckered anal sphincter.
You are too quick on the draw to prove much worth against formidable odds. You are a babbling joke.
So your contention is that "he" can can control ...
... Both forum managers make up rules as they go along.
Nope, it is not my contention that he can control our thought ...
I have never seen that to be the case, where Stone "tries" to control our thoughts or repress any free exchange of ideas ... and I have never seen any edict that we agree with him.
Do you need rules of etiquette documented here for you to be courteous?
Both forum manager have the right to do whatever they want to, and do that anytime they want to ... with respect to their forums.
If you don't not like that, then you also have a right ... the right not to post on their forums.
Nope, it is not my contention that he can control our thought ...
So why the repression of your pal, "yukon's" madcap adventure ride on LP, March 27, 2011?
I have never seen that to be the case, where Stone "tries" to control our thoughts or repress any free exchange of ideas ... and I have never seen any edict that we agree with him.
Biased. On this thread alone, Stone removed comments; he even timed me out for awhile.
Do you need rules of etiquette documented here for you to be courteous?
This is the Internet; the rules of engagement must be characterized by documented policies and procedures. For forum managers too lazy to understand this important idea, they shall flounder forever wondering why they can't herd a pile of people with different backgrounds and political concepts into a nice channel having tea and crumpets with a chat.
Both forum manager have the right to do whatever they want to, and do that anytime they want to ... with respect to their forums.
No they don't. If there are no clear rules; they are as much the issue as anyone.
If you don't not like that, then you also have a right ... the right not to post on their forums.
But, you miss the entire point. That is why I am here.
You are as much fun to watch as "yukon." Please remember, this is pure entertainment for the most experienced posters as some of us find time out of our busy lives.
I especially enjoy watching you "flinch" and "quiver" based on your own naivete.
So why the repression of your pal, "yukon's" madcap adventure ride on LP, March 27, 2011?
Nowhere did I see an unconscious exclusion of painful impulses, desires, or fears from the conscious mind.
Biased. On this thread alone, Stone removed comments;
Since I did not see that happen I, of course, cannot comment on that. Therefore you need to direct the comment to Stone.
he even timed me out for awhile.
You deserved it I thought he had banned you. I would have. But, since he did not, I will concede that your statement on TPF is correct: Stone is afraid of you. That is blatantly obvious to me now.
This is the Internet; the rules of engagement must be characterized by documented policies and procedures. For forum managers too lazy to understand this important idea, they shall flounder forever wondering why they can't herd a pile of people with different backgrounds and political concepts into a nice channel having tea and crumpets with a chat.
Sounds like your personal problem, Bucky. I have never had a conflict with a forum owner. Yet you seem to be in constant conflict with every one of them. Ever wonder why that is? Nah, of course you wouldnt!
It is impossible of a forum owner to write a rule for ever contingency.
No they don't. If there are no clear rules; they are as much the issue as anyone.
I repeat: Every forum owner has the absolute right and authority to do anything he/she desires as long as it is lawful and does not violate any contractual agreement.
But wait!!! You are the provocateur about rules. You are the who provokes trouble, causes dissension, or the like; the agitator about rules.
Since you have become such a stickler for rules, why dont you post for everyone the see: The Operating Rules for a Chit-Chat Forum Owner. You do that for us, please. You can cant you?
But, you miss the entire point. That is why I am here.
No, I didnt miss your point you never make an intelligent one. You may try again, if you like and next time attempt to make sense.
The conclusion you arrive at with a faulty reasoning is a faulty conclusion. ~ Author Unknown.
As I have said: If you don't like the way a forum owner runs a forum, there is an unwritten but commonly accepted rule. That is, you have the inherent right not to post on their forum.
Of course it is. If they can't borrow more money, "non-essential" portions of the government will have to shut down. Yahoo.
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. Thomas Jefferson
You act as though there isn't some kind of unofficial set of agreements/policies and procedures that occur between within the same political parties that run between the two houses of Congress.
There are 535 individuals in Congress, each of which have a person career agenda to preserve and move forward.
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. Thomas Jefferson
Really? Where? All I see are Republicans/Democrats continuing their decades old political antics screwing the US Constitution and the American People.
Mostly I see that too, but there really are a small handful that are different. Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Connie Mack, and maybe 5 or 10 others, including Dennis Kunchinich on the other side.
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. Thomas Jefferson
"The day is good when many posters slap you and "yukon" et al, across the head with a 2X4. Yep, the day is good."
Hasn't happened ... Stay off the booze.
Honestly, if We The People is even remotely representative of Ron Paul supporters then I seriously underestimated the depth of their ignorance and cult like brain washing.
Of course it is. If they can't borrow more money, "non-essential" portions of the government will have to shut down. Yahoo.
a lot more than non-essential operations will shut down - unless you don't consider things like the FAA, border security, food inspections, and so on "essential"
They're all doing a lousy job and will not be missed. Private enterprise, the US Army and public spirited vigilante volunteers, can do a far better job.
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
They're all doing a lousy job and will not be missed. Private enterprise, the US Army and public spirited vigilante volunteers, can do a far better job.
Yeah right, history has already proved that to be wrong. And I was told by hundreds of Vets that "it was the right way or the Army way" was a very accurate statement.