International News
See other International News Articles
Title: We're All Greeks Now
Source:
Pat Buchanan
URL Source: http://buchanan.org/blog/were-all-greeks-now-4802
Published: Jul 18, 2011
Author: Pat Buchanan
Post Date: 2011-07-18 15:47:55 by jwpegler
Keywords: None
Views: 32150
Comments: 63
Departing for New Hampshire in November 2010, Sen. Judd Gregg, the fiscal conservative President Obama wanted in his Cabinet, blurted an inconvenient truth: “This nation is on a course where if we don’t do something about it, get … fiscal policy (under control), we’re Greece.” The remark was regarded as hyperbole. But Gregg had a point. For though Greece, measured by the size of her economy, is only 2 to 3 percent of the EU or the U.S. economy, she is a microcosm of the West. Consider the demography. According to the most recent revision of the U.N.’s “World Population Prospects,” Greece in 2010 had 11.2 million people. More than 24 percent were 60 or above, more than 18 percent 65 or older. Three percent were 80 or above. And, every year, for every nine Greeks who are born, 10 Greeks die. Greece is slowly passing away. Fast forward to 2050. Greece’s population will have fallen by 300,000 to 10.8 million. The median age will have risen by eight years to 49.5. Half the population will be 50 or older. More critically, the share of Greece’s population 60 or older will be 37.4 percent, with 31.3 percent over 65. One in nine Greeks will be over 80. If Athens is breaking under the weight of early retirement and pensions for seniors today, her situation will be horrendous by mid-century. Where, in 2010, there were four Greeks under 60 for every Greek over 60, by 2050, there will only be 1.7 Greeks under 60 for every Greek over 60. Conclusion: The retirement age must rise, and pension benefits fall, or Greece collapses. What of the possibility of a new baby boom? Not likely, given that the fertility rate in Greece has been below replacement levels for three decades and is today only two-thirds of that needed to replace the present population. Indeed, by 2050, the fertility rate of Greek women will have been below zero population growth for 80 years. One wonders: How can the U.N. estimate that Greece’s population will fall only 3 percent by then? Is the U.N. assuming mass immigration from the Muslim world? But what does Greece have to do with the rest of Europe, or with us? Only this. The median age of all of Europe is rising, and the demographic numbers for Greece look positively rosy alongside those of the east, where population declines in the tens of millions are projected for Russia and Ukraine. And outside Iceland and Albania, not one nation of Europe has a fertility rate sufficient to maintain its population. Those that are projected to grow, like Britain, have to be relying on Third World immigrants and their higher birth rate. But while this may maintain an existing population size, immigrants from the Maghreb, Middle East, Caribbean, Latin America and South Asia, on average, lack the language, technical skills and educational levels of native-born Europeans. The same is true in the U.S., where peoples of European descent are expected to drop to half the population by 2041. Hispanics will grow from 15 percent to near 30 percent of the U.S. population, and their absolute numbers from 50 million to 135 million by 2050. Yet, again, Hispanics and children of Hispanic immigrants have not, as of yet, reached close to parity in educational achievement with Americans of East Asian or European ancestry. People equate today’s immigration with the immigration of 1890-1920. But another major difference is this: We erected a Great Society over 50 years that did not exist in 1920. In Washington in the 1950s, a city of 800,000, half black and half white, food stamps had not been invented. Families fed themselves. Today, in a District of Columbia of 600,000, one in five are on food stamps. Nationally, a program that did not exist in 1964 feeds one in seven Americans, 44 million people, at a cost of $77 billion a year. And that is but a small fraction of our new Great Society. We are entering a new “age of austerity,” said British Prime Minister David Cameron in 2009. The halcyon days are over. Government payrolls, as is happening from California to New York to Washington, D.C., will have to be slashed. Pension and health care benefits, not only for seniors, will have to be reduced. Retirement ages will have to be raised. From food stamps to foreign aid, programs are going to be capped and cut. The left believes it can get the money from the wealthy. But the top 1 percent of Americans in income already carry 40 percent of the federal income tax load, while the bottom 50 percent of wage-earners ride free. This, too, will have to end. We are either going to man up and radically reduce government at all levels in the United States, or the bond markets are going to do it for us, as they are doing it today for Greece, Ireland and Portugal. We’re all Greeks now.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-23) not displayed.
.
.
.
#24. To: lucysmom (#23)
Weren't you alive when Reagan was president?
Already debunked: here; http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/18/stupid-stimulus-tricks/ Another: http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/cepr-blog/the-stimulus-did-not-create-jobs-the-35496th- try And another: http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/2011/05/did-stimulus-really-destroy-million.html Here's the real story: http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-08-30-stimulus30_CV_N.htm
"Thats because your basically and idiot." Obama's stimulus propped up state government jobs and we still had around 9% unemployment. ALL of Obama's programs in housing, employment, autos, etc. have done one thing - they've postponed needed corrections in distorted markets. This is why the economy is still in the toilet.
All Obama has created in debt. You can't borrow your way to prosperity. Every so called job that was created destroyed even more jobs.
Reagan signed eleven tax hikes as President, and he increased government spending (even non-defense- related). You guys keep ignoring that.
"Thats because your basically and idiot." True, and you can't massively cut your way to it either. Your approach is that when you get sick, the best recourse to reducing medical bills is to cut off your arm so there's less of you to treat. What we do know is that if Congress simply does nothing over the next 3 years, the budget will be balanced in less than a decade.
"Thats because your basically and idiot." Obama hates kids. That is why he like it when they are murdered in the womb. The ones who escape the womb are saddled with 300 thousand dollars in debt or more by the time they are 18. Obama is lower then a piece of monkey shit. He should be made to pay back every penny he spent plus interest. If he can't pay HIS debt he should be enslaved and passed around to different families he has destroyed to work for them FOR FREE!
The Reagan who was president then is not the same Reagan who is idolized now.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
I've long argued that tbe biggest failure of Obama's stimulus was that 1/3rd of it went to tax cuts in an effort to win Republican votes. As we have seen, tax cuts have little stimulative effect stimulate the economy - otherwise we would have seen stronger performance under Bush than we did under Clinton or Reagan. Again, you keep ignoring the FACTS that taxes are at record lows and governments everywhere are shedding jobs and cutting spending. Where's the boom that you keep arguing will result from these policies?
"Thats because your basically and idiot." Your analogy is horse shit. Here is a better one. When you keep going out to eat and buying new cars and houses on credit. If you don't pay you end up bankrupt and homeless.
Businesses do it all the time.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
So you never see increasing your wages as an achievable goal?
"Thats because your basically and idiot." I don't give a shit if the government gets less or more money if they raise or lower taxes. It is theft you fucking moron.
I work for myself. I don't get wages.
Reagan lowered the top marginal tax rate from 70% to 28%. Marginal tax rates are what counts for economic growth. Ask Bill Bradley or Erskin Bowells.
They borrow money to make a product, pay back the loan and make profits. Not stealing from working people to give to some lazy ass deadbeat sitting in his section 8 housing playing his xbox eating ice cream cones paid for with food stamps and going to get his toothache paid for by medicaid. You liberals have really screwed up this country.
Snotty leftist elitists view most Americans with contempt, not just kids.
Right, when businesses borrow money they do so to facilitate future growth. Obama borrowed a trillion to temporarily pay for government bureaucrats, who are now losing their jobs. Obama postponed the inevitable correction and lengthened the recession. Stupid, stupid, stupid...
I'm not ignoring anything. I'm disputing your nonsensical assertions. Just today, I responded to you on two different threads on why the economy is still on the toilet, namely: A) Obama's policies have postponed inevitable corrections in distorted markets (markets that were distorted by previous ill-advised government programs). B) The uncertainty that Obama has created with his business bashing rhetoric, regulatory programs, etc. The challenge is that you don't read what I post. You keeping responding with the same exact nonsense. You don't really engage. I expect this from loonymom and Goober, but not from you.
MORE OF EVERYTHING FOR EVERYBODY,and it ain't going to cost anybody anything! Other than those evil rich people that don't need government aid,that is. You really do believe that,don't you?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Yet the dumb ass claims Reagan had a huge debt.
THAT is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. The only jobs government creates is more government jobs,and government jobs produce NOTHING for the marketplace. As for your favorite cry of "TAX THE RICH! Feed the poor,until there are no poor no more!",has the off-shoring of manufacturing taught you NOTHING? Wealth=mobility. Penalize the wealthy too harshly,and they will take themselves and their fortunes somewhere else. The end result will be the end of the middle class and the beginning of serfdom again as the government resorts to printing money not backed by anything to cover expenses and we end up being a fascist nation living in company towns.
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
Yeah,THAT'S the ticket! We will get out of debt by borrowing more money! Brilliant!
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
The point was comparing Greece's inability to borrow at cheap rates vs the USA's ability to borrow cheaply and pay off the debt with American printed dollars.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
B) The uncertainty that Obama has created with his business bashing rhetoric, regulatory programs, etc. The challenge is that you don't read what I post. Ditto on that in No Trump. 'Too Big to Fail' and Fannie/Freddie and the Fed telling the Treasury how to prioritize its accounts payable are going to sink us all.
The stimulus may have temporarily saved the jobs of some state and local bureaucrats, but that's exactly the problem. It just postponed the inevitable and those people are getting laid off now. This is not how you grow an economy.
This is not how you grow an economy. if you don't grow the economy by cutting government spending, then why do you keep arguing for cutting government spending?
Tagline for sale - inquire within
and yet despite drastic cuts in government spending across the country, coupled with historically low tax rates, unemployment is rising. Strange, isn't it?
Tagline for sale - inquire within
Read what I said again, when you are sober and able to comprehend it.
Strange, isn't it? What's strange about unemployment when the government has been chasing manufacturing out of the country since the 60's?
"I adore John McCain, support him 100 percent and will do everything I can to support his reelection. As everyone knows, I was honored and proud to run with him. And Todd and I were with him in D.C. just a week ago." (Sarah Palin,Dec 2009) ************************************ DID Palin say or write these things or not? (Me) I don't know or F ing care. (Mad Dog posted on 2009-12-26 16:36:33 ET,post # 105 http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=5510&Disp=114#C114)
sorry, I'd have to be drunk to ignore as much economic reality as you do. Maybe one of these days you could explain why government cutbacks and layoffs across the country coupled with record low tax rates aren't leading to a booming economy.
Tagline for sale - inquire within
It used to be the leftists that had bumper-stickers that said things like "Question Authority.' Today they follow Orwells' mottos: War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. They blindly LOVE Big Brother. They believe competition, pride & profiting from ones labor, are evil things to be banished. Stephen King once observed, "The beauty of religion mania is that it has the power to explain everything... [and] …logic can be happily tossed out the window. This describes socialists. They will ignore logic and "common sense." They will ignore REALITY. Because THEY are religious zealots... Their God... is the STATE.
I've already explained it, but you are not comprehending. So, I'll give you an analogy to help you understand. In the 1970s, the government came out with a food pyramid. It said: Fats are bad and carbohydrates are good. We now know that this is completely incorrect. There are fats that make you healthy (omega-3), fats that are a little unhealthy (saturated fats), and fats that will kill you (trans fats, like margarine that the government promoted as a healthier alternative to other fats). We now also know that some carbohydrates (complex carbohydrates) are healthy while others will make you fat. There are good and bad tax and spending policies as well. Larding up the 80,000 page tax code with more special interests deductions is unhealthy because it distorts economic activity. Simplifying the tax code, while lowering marginal tax rates is healthy. Spending money on transfer payments is unhealthy because is disincents people from making an effort. Spending money on new infrastructure is healthy because it supports economic activity. So, what has Obama done? Borrow money to spend on transfer payments. What does he want to do? Increase marginal tax rates and use the money on transfer payments. This is very unhealthy for the country. That's the problem.
Again, the facts don't support your claim. In addition for calling for $3 trillion in cuts in programs including SS and Medicare, Obama continues to push for more spending on infrastructure: And you still haven't addressed how government layoffs and cut-backs, coupled with record low tax rates, have gotten us to 9.2% unemployment.
Tagline for sale - inquire within
He's done no such thing. Obama has refused to put one concrete spending cut on the table. Listen to his language. He wants to "cut spending in the tax code". That means he wants to eliminate deductions to raise more money. He doesn't want to cut spending at all. Not even on programs that study hookers in China or try to determine if the size of a gay man's penis predisposes him to be on the top or bottom. (These are both actual government programs that we've spent millions of dollars on.) Obama and the Democrats passed an $800 billion "stimulus" bill. Only $60 billion went to infrastructure. The other $740 bill went to transfer payments, including those that temporarily kept unneeded state and local bureaucrats in their jobs. It predictably failed. Those bureaucrats are getting laid off now that the "stimulus" money is gone. The government is out of control. It's time to reign it in.
Ok, one simple question: WHEN? Oh, that's right, the "cuts" won't start until he's already been booted out of office, and the congress that "agreed" to such cuts are long gone... Of course, the congress that'll be sitting there when such "cuts" are to occur, will refuse to accept that poison-pill, and stop the cuts. If the phony POTUS were to make REAL proposals, he'd start by balancing the 2012 fiscal budget, to not have ANY deficit spending. Anything else is smoke and mirrors. jw, please pass this question along to goober56, since the socialist hypocrite is too much of a wimp to face REAL facts, from someone who won't let his bullshit slide...
It used to be the leftists that had bumper-stickers that said things like "Question Authority.' Today they follow Orwells' mottos: War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. They blindly LOVE Big Brother. They believe competition, pride & profiting from ones labor, are evil things to be banished. Stephen King once observed, "The beauty of religion mania is that it has the power to explain everything... [and] …logic can be happily tossed out the window. This describes socialists. They will ignore logic and "common sense." They will ignore REALITY. Because THEY are religious zealots... Their God... is the STATE.
Bull. He's proposed a plan that would cut $3 trillion and raise $1 trillion in new revenues over 12 years. The GOP flatly dismissed it. See: http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/07/07/obamas-4-trillion-grand-bargain/ That's part of it - Tom Coburn proposed the same thing. Heck Reagan signed tax simplification into law in 1986 that raised revenues. Another false claim - 1/3rd of the stimulus went to tax cuts. You continue to make point after point - none of which have any factual basis. So why isn't the economy growing as a result of state / local government cuts coupled with record low tax rates?
Tagline for sale - inquire within
Tax RATES are NOT at record lows. I've tried to explain this to you over and over but you are too dense to get it. There is no point in talking to you any longer. You are now the third person on my content filter.
You F ing libTURDS are delusional kool-aide swilling FOOLS. Not a word you that have said here is true. It's ALL "spin"/LIES. YOUR messiah "king" obammy is destroying this nation's economy on purpose and you libTURD fools are all for it! You assholes are dangerous to us ALL, YOU ALL must be politically destroyed for the good of America's future, FOR OUR CHILDREN. FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on.
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Tax REVENUES are at a record low, I stand corrected. Remember as I noted to you recently, 68% of US companies pay NO federal taxes.
Tagline for sale - inquire within
The best they can do is ignore the fact that following the conservative prescription for economic growth results in high unemployment and lackluster economic growth.
#25. To: A K A Stone (#19)
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2011/05/17/stimulus_killed_1_million_jobs
To tease any effect of the stimulus out of these interstate differences, if it's possible at all, would require very careful and scrupulous statistical work -- and we'd like to see some elaborate robustness checks before buying into any results thereby found.
The latest anti-stimulus paper shows no sign of that kind of care. It makes no effort to control for the differential effects of bubble and bust. It uses odd variables on both the left and the right side of its equations. The instruments -- variables used to correct for possible two-way causation -- are weak and dubious. Dean Baker suspects data-mining, with reason; the best interpretation is that the authors tried something that happened to give the results they wanted, then stopped looking.
Really, this isn't the sort of thing worth wasting time over
With an exercise like this, you always have to worry about the problem of cherry picking. It is very easy to run 1000 regressions in an hour. Inevitably, you find 4 or 5 of these 1000 that show you almost anything. (Our standard of significance is a result that you would not get by random chance more than 10 times in a hundred. This means that if you ran 1000 regressions of things that had nothing to do with each other, you would expect 100 of them to have statistically significant results.)
For this reason, you usually want to run your regressions a variety of different ways to show that the results do not depend on some arbitrary specification. It doesn't look like they have done this, or at least they did not show much evidence of such robustness tests in their paper.
Their results depend on pulling out four private sector industry groups (lumped together) and measuring the stimulus against trend job growth in these industries. Even for these four industry groups , most of the results are only marginally significant. It is clear from their tables that if they took all private sector jobs, their results would be insignificant. So, how did they decide on lumping these four industry groups together? It certainly is not a standard break out. It does raise a suspicion that they ran many different regressions and then discovered that they got the results they wanted with these four industries lumped together.
There are many other peculiar items here.
But, given the lack of any statistically significant findings, this paper does not deliver the results that it advertised. Conley and Dupor's abstract should read "We find no evidence for a significant effect of the ARRA on job creation." That would be scientifically honest, but would not turn a lot of heads. Instead, the abstract makes the more politically incendiary claim that the ARRA destroyed jobs, which the authors actually did not find
But to estimate the answers to such questions, economists rely on models based on historical relationships between various policies and real-world results. Earlier this month, Zandi and co-author Alan Blinder, former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, released the most detailed assessment of the government's efforts to combat the so-called Great Recession. Neither economist is regarded as a partisan firebrand. Zandi, for example, backed John McCain in the 2008 presidential campaign and has advised members of both parties.
Their conclusion: The fiscal stimulus created 2.7 million jobs and added $460 billion to gross domestic product. Unemployment would be 11% today if the stimulus hadn't been passed and 16.5% if neither the fiscal stimulus nor the banks' rescue had been enacted, according to Zandi and Blinder. "It's pretty hard to deny that it had a measurable impact," Zandi said.
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET
#26. To: go65 (#17)
(Edited)
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#27. To: go65 (#25)
#28. To: A K A Stone (#24)
Weren't you alive when Reagan was president?
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET
#29. To: A K A Stone (#27)
You can't borrow your way to prosperity.
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET
#30. To: jwpegler (#26)
#31. To: A K A Stone (#24)
Weren't you alive when Reagan was president?
#32. To: jwpegler (#26)
(Edited)
Obama's stimulus propped up state government jobs and we still had around 9% unemployment.
ALL of Obama's programs in housing, employment, autos, etc. have done one thing - they've postponed needed corrections in distorted markets. This is why the economy is still in the toilet.
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET
#33. To: go65 (#29)
True, and you can't massively cut your way to it either. Your approach is that when you get sick, the best recourse to reducing medical bills is to cut off your arm so there's less of you to treat.
#34. To: A K A Stone (#27)
You can't borrow your way to prosperity.
#35. To: A K A Stone (#33)
Here is a better one. When you keep going out to eat and buying new cars and houses on credit. If you don't pay you end up bankrupt and homeless.
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET
#36. To: go65 (#32)
#37. To: go65 (#35)
So you never see increasing your wages as an achievable goal?
#38. To: go65 (#28)
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#39. To: lucysmom (#34)
Businesses do it all the time. T
#40. To: A K A Stone (#30)
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#41. To: A K A Stone (#39)
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#42. To: go65 (#32)
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#43. To: go65 (#1)
Folks want to continue to manufacture a debt crisis in the U.S. when there is none, simply because they want to dismantle New Deal and Great Society programs that they've hated for years.
#44. To: sneakypete (#43)
#45. To: go65 (#4)
Cutting spending in a recession further reduces revenues - see U.S. 1937, Ireland/UK, for examples. Heck, you can even look at the present-day U.S. where massive cuts in state/local government spending over the last year coupled with record low tax rates have resulted in a 9.2% unemployment rate and a slowing economy.
#46. To: Godwinson (#8)
Greece, can't print euros but the USA can print dollars. America is credit worthy (unless the Republicans downgrade us by not raiding the debt limit) and everyone wants to loan money to the USA at cheap rates. Greece has to borrow at a premium.
#47. To: sneakypete (#46)
Yeah,THAT'S the ticket!
#48. To: jwpegler (#42)
A) Obama's policies have postponed inevitable corrections in distorted markets (markets that were distorted by previous ill-advised government programs).
#49. To: go65 (#15)
(Edited)
The stimulus created or saved 3 million jobs
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#50. To: jwpegler (#49)
It just postponed the inevitable and those people are getting laid off now.
#51. To: sneakypete (#45)
The only jobs government creates is more government jobs,and government jobs produce NOTHING for the marketplace.
#52. To: go65 (#50)
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#53. To: go65 (#51)
and yet despite drastic cuts in government spending across the country, coupled with historically low tax rates, unemployment is rising.
#54. To: jwpegler (#52)
Read what I said again, when you are sober and able to comprehend it.
#55. To: go65 (#54)
jwpegler: Read what I said again, when you are sober and able to comprehend it.
goober56: sorry, I'd have to be drunk to ignore as much economic reality as you do. 
#56. To: go65, capitalist eric (#54)
(Edited)
Maybe one of these days you could explain why government cutbacks and layoffs across the country coupled with record low tax rates aren't leading to a booming economy.
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#57. To: jwpegler (#56)
(Edited)
So, what does Obama want to do? He wants to increase marginal tax rates and use the money on transfer payments. This is very unhealthy. That's the problem.
U.S. Chamber praises Obama's call for infrastructure spending
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum- line/2011/01/us_chamber_endorses_obamas_cal.html
#58. To: go65, capitalist eric (#57)
(Edited)
In addition for calling for $3 trillion in cuts...
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#59. To: go65, jwpegler (#57)
[Ob@m@ is} calling for $3 trillion in cuts in programs including SS and Medicare,
#60. To: jwpegler (#58)
(Edited)
He's done no such thing.
Listen to his language. He wants to "cut spending in the tax code". That means he wants to eliminate deductions to raise more money.
Obama and the Democrats passed an $800 billion "stimulus" bill. Only $60 billion went to infrastructure. The other $740 bill went to transfer payments, including those that temporarily kept unneeded state and local bureaucrats in their jobs. It predictably failed. Those bureaucrats are getting laid off now that the "stimulus" money is gone.
Those bureaucrats are getting laid off now that the "stimulus" money is gone.
#61. To: go65 (#60)
record low tax rates
To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude. — Thomas Jefferson
#62. To: go65 (#60)
So why isn't the economy growing as a result of state / local government cuts coupled with record low tax rates?
#63. To: jwpegler (#61)
Tax RATES are NOT at record lows. I've tried to explain this to you over and over but you are too dense to get it.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]