[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Water Cooler
See other The Water Cooler Articles

Title: Tea Party Zealots Scare McConnell Straight On Debt Limit
Source: FORBES
URL Source: http://blogs.forbes.com/beltway/201 ... onnell-straight-on-debt-limit/
Published: Jul 15, 2011
Author: Howard Gleckman
Post Date: 2011-07-15 19:48:13 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 15035
Comments: 32

Let me see if I have this right: Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has effectively embraced the debt limit plan first offered months ago by President Obama. Under the McConnell/Obama scenario, Congress would extend the government’s borrowing authority through next year without agreeing to a dime’s worth of spending reductions or tax increases.

As the deadline for action nears, the partisan rhetoric heats up, and the consequences of Congress’s failure to increase the debt limit become clearer, senators of both parties seem to be climbing aboard McConnell’s do-nothing-and-get-out-of-town bandwagon. But the tea party House Republicans are spitting mad. And Obama, who senses new political advantage on the deficit issue, is publicly cool. Somehow, the president, who spent his first two-and-half years in office studiously ignoring the deficit, has now become Fiscal Hawk-in-Chief.

McConnell’s proposal is devilishly complicated, with its multiple congressional votes, supermajority requirements and, perhaps, creation of another bipartisan deficit reduction panel (oh, the forests that give their lives for budget commissions).

Why would McConnell, who a week ago was demanding steep spending cuts as his price for extending the debt limit, now abandon the field without getting any reductions at all? Mostly, I think, because the tea party is scaring him half-to-death. As he candidly acknowledged yesterday, McConnell fears a default would destroy the GOP brand.

But the veteran lawmaker also seems to have recognized the severe economic consequences of the government defaulting on its obligations. In a new report, the Bipartisan Policy Center does a careful day-by-day cash flow analysis of what would happen if the government exceeds its borrowing authority on Aug. 2. And the results are frightening.

From Aug. 3-31, the government would have to reduce spending by $134 billion. That is to say, it would pull $134 billion out of the economy in just 29 days—more than 10 percent of monthly GDP.

The economic effects at a time of 9 percent unemployment would be catastrophic, even if the bond market did not demand higher interest rates on Treasury debt—which it very likely would.

The BPC looked at what would happen if the government tried to preserve its bond rating by paying the $29 billion in interest it will owe on Treasury securities in August, and prioritized the rest of its spending. You might call this the Bachmann model of governing.

Such a step would leave only about $143 billion to pay $277 billion in non-interest bills. Let’s say Obama paid Social Security, unemployment, and veteran’s benefits, met the military payroll, and kept the courts and the FBI running. Those programs alone would take up about $70 billion, leaving only $73 billion to run the rest of government.

With those remaining funds, Washington would have to make some exceedingly unpleasant choices: It could pay doctors, hospitals, nursing homes, and home health agencies what it owed for Medicare and Medicaid services, but that would cost $50 billion and leave just $23 billion to pay all other bills—everybody from defense contractors to senior day care center operators to disaster relief. And keep in mind that these are for goods and services the government has already bought.

Sure, McConnell sees some political advantage in forcing Obama and the Democrats to increase the debt limit unilaterally (I can see the attack ads now). But mostly, he seems very worried about the real world consequences of a fiscal train wreck in part of his own making. And it looks as if he’s looking for a way to stop the locomotive. Subscribe to *Tea Party On Parade*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

senators of both parties seem to be climbing aboard McConnell’s do-nothing-and-get-out-of-town bandwagon. But the tea party House Republicans are spitting mad.

So Forbes labels them Zealots because they want to do something about the debt problem? That's nuts.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-07-15   23:02:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Brian S, A K A Stone (#0) (Edited)

Somehow, the president, who spent his first two-and-half years in office studiously ignoring the deficit, has now become Fiscal Hawk-in-Chief.

Factcheck.org:

The U.S. is borrowing about 36 cents of every dollar spent so far this year. It borrowed 37 cents on the dollar last year, and 40 cents in fiscal 2009.

Federal spending ("outlays" in budget jargon) is expected to equal 24.1 percent of the nation's gross domestic product in the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. The figure was 25 percent in fiscal year 2009, highest since 1945.

On the other hand, federal revenues are expected to drop to 14.8 percent of GDP this year, lower even than the 14.9 percent attained in both 2009 and 2010. There has been only one year since World War II when revenues have been as low as in any of these years: 1950, when the figure was 14.4 percent.

Spending isn't "out of control", it is falling relative to GDP. It's revenues stupid.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   12:39:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: go65 (#2)

Spending isn't "out of control",

If you say so.

Did you say the same when Reagan was president?

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-07-16   12:52:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: go65 (#2) (Edited)

Spending isn't "out of control", it is falling relative to GDP

I've posted the facts before. While you aren't as dumb as Goobershit, you are as stubborn as loonymom. It's maddening.

Here are the facts once again:

Federal spending and taxes as a percentage of GDP:

PeriodTaxesSpending
Post WWII average18%20%
200019% 19%
Today16.5%25%

The problem is spending. PERIOD. The government is spending more money that at any time since we were in WWII.

Yes, taxes revenues are a little low, but that's because we are in a horrible recession.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   12:57:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: A K A Stone (#3)

Did you say the same when Reagan was president?

Reagan raised taxes 11 times, you know that, right?

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   18:37:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: jwpegler (#4) (Edited)

The problem is spending. PERIOD. The government is spending more money that at any time since we were in WWII.

Maybe you didn't read what I posted? For this fiscal year federal spending is down to 24% of GDP. Spending relative to GDP is falling, but not as fast as revenues.

At the state level things are a lot different, and government spending is falling quickly among state/local governments.

Do you ever ask yourself why with record low taxes, massive cuts in state / local spending, and large reductions in government workforces around the country over the last year, the economy isn't booming right now?

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   18:39:45 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: go65 (#6)

For this fiscal year federal spending is down to 24% of GDP

Which is still 20% above historic rates. The conclusion you reached is that "revenues" are the problem. That's incorrect from a perspective of the last 65 years.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   18:42:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: jwpegler (#7) (Edited)

Which is still 20% above historic rates. The conclusion you reached is that "revenues" are the problem. That's incorrect from a perspective of the last 65 years.

But falling, so why aren't we seeing a massive economic boom?

The conclusion you reached is that "revenues" are the problem. That's incorrect from a perspective of the last 65 years.

Again, look at the chart, taxes relative to GDP are at historic lows. Bring them back in line with historical averages and you'll see a massively reduced deficit.

You are aware, I assume, that if Congress simply lets the Bush tax cuts expire, stops patching the AMT, and stops passing the Medicare doctor "patch" each year, the budget will be balanced in less than 10 years.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   18:45:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: jwpegler (#4)

Interesting post...thanks.

socalv8  posted on  2011-07-16   18:45:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: go65 (#6) (Edited)

Do you ever ask yourself why... the economy isn't booming right now?

I ask myself that every day.

The answer is clear.

Business owners are scared to death that the most anti-business President in our lifetime will foist new regulations, taxes, and control on them. So, they are not willing to risk their capital making new investments in innovation and productive capacity.

Every single survey of businesses demonstrates this.

But the lunatic left just doesn't listen. They are too caught up in the notion of punishing successful people to understand that doing so hurts everyone.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   18:46:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: go65 (#8) (Edited)

But falling

LOL. Falling how? Oh 25% last year a bit less than 25% this year. Thank the GOP House for that minor miracle. Image if Nancy Pelosi were still in charge.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   18:48:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: go65 (#8) (Edited)

Again, look at the chart, taxes relative to GDP are at historic lows.

Because of the recession.

They are nowhere as low as the historic post-WWII spending highs.

Cut spending to 19% of GDP, where it was when Clinton left office. Then we'll talk about taxes, if needed.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   18:50:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: go65 (#5) (Edited)

Reagan raised taxes 11 times, you know that, right?

Reagan cut the top margin tax rate from 70% to 50% and then from 50% to 28% (with the help of Democrat Senator Bill Bradley).

Obama's debt commission proposed lowering the top marginal tax rate to 23%.

The top marginal tax rate is what counts if you want to provide the right condition for economic investment and development.

If we want to be competitive in the world, it should be no higher than 17%.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   19:33:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: jwpegler (#13)

Obama's debt commission proposed lowering the top marginal tax rate to 23%.

they also proposed closing loopholes and eliminating credits with a net result of raising revenues. However, the tea party/norquist bloc won't let the GOP consider doing what Reagan did, raising revenues to reduce the deficit.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   19:36:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: All (#14)

The top marginal tax rate is what counts if you want to provide the right condition for economic investment and development.

didn't the top rate fall under Bush? Care to compare job growth under Bush and Clinton (who raised taxes)?

How many more examples do you need before accepting the fact that cutting top tax rates doesn't spur economic growth. What spurs growth is demand, not supply.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   19:37:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: jwpegler (#12) (Edited)

Cut spending to 19% of GDP, where it was when Clinton left office. Then we'll talk about taxes, if needed.

the net result would be further reduction in revenues as a result of negative economic impact of the cuts.

Here's the CBO's take:

...Congress' fiscal watchdog also echoed a message that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has been delivering for months: As tempting as it might be to take a hatchet to the budget ASAP, implementing those changes too quickly could end up worsening, rather than improving the fiscal outlook.

"Making such changes while economic activity and employment remain well below their potential levels would probably slow the economic recovery," according to the report.

http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/22/news/economy/federal_budget_debt/? section=money_latest

Again, it's revenues stupid:

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   19:40:02 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: go65 (#14)

they also proposed closing loopholes and eliminating credits

I favor those things too.

Simplify, simplify, simplify.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   19:46:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: go65 (#16) (Edited)

Wrong.

Government generally spends 20% of GDP. Now it spends 24% to 25% of GDP.

This is really, really simple math. Really simple.

The fact that you don't understand this makes me think that you are as inumerate as loonymom and goobershit.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-16   19:47:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: jwpegler (#10)

Business owners are scared to death that the most anti-business President in our lifetime will foist new regulations, taxes, and control on them. So, they are not willing to risk their capital making new investments in innovation and productive capacity.

He's already done that with ObozoCare..... so they know more is coming and are just waiting his silly ass out..... they also know he will be gone come Jan 2013...

"Lunatic Left"..... you're being way too kind to them

When asked by a Liberal what I bought my Granddaughter for her 1st birthday I replied, "MORE AMMUNITION"!!!!

CZ82  posted on  2011-07-16   20:41:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: jwpegler (#18)

The fact that you don't understand this makes me think that you are as inumerate as loonymom and goobershit.

Peas in a pod..... oh by the way you left out a few others....

When asked by a Liberal what I bought my Granddaughter for her 1st birthday I replied, "MORE AMMUNITION"!!!!

CZ82  posted on  2011-07-16   20:43:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: jwpegler (#18)

Government generally spends 20% of GDP. Now it spends 24% to 25% of GDP.

it fell relative to GDP in the last year. And taxes are historically low while governments everywhere are slashing spending and cutting jobs.

So why isn't the economy booming?

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   22:02:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: CZ82 (#19)

He's already done that with ObozoCare..... so they know more is coming and are just waiting his silly ass out..... they also know he will be gone come Jan 2013...

Maybe you should take a look at corporate profits being reported now.

Alcoa, the first of the major companies to report stated that it's 2nd quarter profit more than doubled. For all this talk about how "Obama is anti-business" corporate profits have never been better, and the DJIA is sitting at 12,500.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   22:05:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: jwpegler (#17)

I favor those things too.

Simplify, simplify, simplify.

Good, but the Norquist pledge keeps Republicans from voting against cutting tax subsidies or closing loopholes unless they are offset by other cuts - resulting in revenue neutral scenarios.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-16   22:06:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: go65 (#22)

Alcoa, the first of the major companies to report stated that it's 2nd quarter profit more than doubled. For all this talk about how "Obama is anti-business" corporate profits have never been better, and the DJIA is sitting at 12,500.

Small businesses are hurting.

Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-17   8:13:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: go65 (#5)

Reagan raised taxes 11 times, you know that, right?

You're not exactly known as honest.

Could you give me who he raised taxes on. The bill number and the date. Thanks. Then I might believe you. But I think you aren't telling the truth.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-07-17   10:08:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: go65 (#16)

Government unconstitutional spending accounts for 100 percent of the deficit. Screw you commies.

A K A Stone  posted on  2011-07-17   10:09:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: A K A Stone, go65 (#25)

Could you give me who he raised taxes on. The bill number and the date. Thanks. Then I might believe you. But I think you aren't telling the truth.

If you would ever bother to learn how to do some research instead of taking the advice of your neocon friends here you would find that poster has one of the higher percentages for veracity.

You didn't know Reagan raised taxes? He also slashed income tax deductions such as interest from credit cards that used to be deductible.

mininggold  posted on  2011-07-17   10:49:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: go65 (#21) (Edited)

And taxes are historically low...

So why isn't the economy booming?

Because businesses are scared to death of what else might be coming from the most anti-business administration in my lifetime.

First, as usual, you are confusing margin tax rates with tax revenues. America has the highest corporate tax rates in the world. Sure, some politically connected business may pay very little because they have massive lobbying efforts to get special deductions just for them, but most businesses are getting screwed in American compared to every other OCED country. I'm really tired of explaining this to you.

Second, American is only one of five developed countries in the world that tax overseas earnings when they are repatriated. American corporations are sitting on upwards of $3 trillion of overseas that will not be brought back to the U.S. and invested here because of double taxation (taxed in the country where the money was earned and taxed again when they bring the money to the U.S.) It's a brain dead stupid policy that hurts America -- so very typical of the envious and vengeful left.

Third, although Obamacare passed, the actual implementation won't happen until 2014. Although businesses already know that this is going to hurt them, they are still trying to figure out just how much pain this will cause. Until they figure this out, they are not going to start hiring a bunch of people.

Forth, the Obama administration has been recklessly dishing out new regulations at a historic pace. The tyrants at Obama's EPA is even ready to declare that the stuff you exhale from your lungs is a greenhouse that needs to be regulated. All of these things are adding tremendous costs to business.

Fifth, Obama keeps harping about raising taxes.

This is why business are not investing and creating jobs. Once Obama gets booted from office, things will change.


I'll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years -- Lyndon Johnson

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-17   13:37:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: jwpegler (#28)

Because businesses are scared to death of what else might be coming from the most anti-business administration in my lifetime.

While they post record profits.

Care to try again? You keep ignoring facts that don't fit your ideology.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-17   19:01:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: jwpegler (#28)

America has the highest corporate tax rates in the world. Sure, some politically connected business may pay very little because they have massive lobbying efforts to get special deductions just for them, but most businesses are getting screwed in American compared to every other OCED country. I'm really tired of explaining this to you.

this is utter BS. The U.S. takes in the 4th lowest corporate tax revenues of the 30 wealthiest nations in the world. A whopping 68% of all US corporations pay NO income tax. (http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/12/news/economy/corporate_taxes/)

Again, facts getting swept aside in the name of ideology. You seem too smart to rehash false Rush Limbaugh talking points, but you do it all the time.

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-17   19:04:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: jwpegler (#28)

Fifth, Obama keeps harping about raising taxes.

Clinton raised taxes, Bush II lowered them. Reagan raised them as well.

Who had the best job growth?

"Thats because your basically and idiot."
Badeye posted on 2011-04-29 10:30:22 ET

go65  posted on  2011-07-17   19:05:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: go65 (#29)

While they post record profits.

Care to try again? You keep ignoring facts that don't fit your ideology.

That does seem to be a problem in jw's worldview. Even with those damn outrageous taxes, the rich just keep getting richer and companies just keep posting record profits quarter after quarter.

Best to just ignore the whole thing and stick to the talking points.

Skip Intro  posted on  2011-07-17   20:11:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com