[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Coal Industry Attorney’s Blame Coal’s Health Impacts on Inbreeding Remember the study published a few weeks ago that found a link between mountaintop removal mining and birth defects? Well, so do the coal industrys lawyers, and theyve got a different explanation: The study failed to account for consanquinity [sic], one of the most prominent sources of birth defects, the attorneys statement said. It then went on to advertise the firms services to coal companies looking to counter unfounded claims of injury or disease from potential lawsuits sparked by the study. Consanguinity, which is presumably what the attorneys were referring to, is defined as: relationship by descent from a common ancestor. Seriously, WTF. Ken Ward talked to Michael Hendryx, one of the authors of the MTR study, who broke it down: Jeff Goodell isnt impessed with the coal industrys argument: After being called out, the attorneys quickly pulled the claim from their website. Fortunately, Ward saved it, so you can download it here.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|