[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Business
See other Business Articles

Title: Rise of the Barter Economy and Gold and Silver Currency
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article29066.html
Published: Jul 5, 2011
Author: Peter_Schiff
Post Date: 2011-07-05 14:37:04 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 75052
Comments: 141

Imagine a day when you go to buy a quart of milk, ask the price, and the cashier says, "that'll be a tenth ounce silver." As the US dollar's decline accelerates, several efforts around the country are trying to make this vision a reality.

Historically, paying for items in silver or gold was actually quite common. We happen to live in an unusual time and place where generations have grown up trading exclusively in paper. While my parents still used dimes made of silver, we have now gone several decades with no precious metals in any of our official coinage. But this system of money by government fiat is unsustainable.

While the practice of bartering precious metals directly for goods and services has continued on a small-scale over the last few decades, the 2000s saw the beginning of organized efforts to revive gold and silver as money.

THE LIBERTY DOLLAR One such effort was spearheaded by an eccentric mintmaster from Hawaii named Bernard Von Nothaus. He called his project the Liberty Dollar, and it centered on privately minted gold and silver rounds as well as deposit certificates for precious metals held in his firm's vaults.

I had many reservations about how the project was implemented - coins were minted with a fixed US dollar amount at which they were supposed to circulate, the dollar amount was well above the spot price of the metal, and authorized "distributors" were allowed to pocket the difference (which often resulted in buyers paying far higher prices for their gold than what they would have paid had they simply bought, say, Canadian Maple Leafs instead) - but I believe Nothaus' idea was a good one, even if the product was over-priced. Tellingly, despite the obvious flaws, public participation grew steadily from 1998 until 2007, when federal agents raided the Liberty Dollar's offices on trumped-up charges of counterfeiting.

Really, they were charging him with competing with the US dollar's monopoly privileges by offering a better product. It's important to note that the case against Nothaus was built around his coins looking similar to official US coinage (though no one actually mistook Liberty Dollars for US currency), and not around encouraging people to use precious metals as circulating money.

DIGITAL GOLD Next came a crop of internet-based currencies backed by gold and silver. Most prominent among them are eGold and GoldMoney. Both were designed to allow customers to open online accounts that were valued in, and backed by, gold and silver bullion.

eGold was perhaps the better known of the two until it, too, was shut down by the US government on charges of money laundering. eGold was positioned more as an online payment system than a means of holding bullion. Due to the anonymous nature of the transactions - it was akin to spending cash - the authorities alleged that it was being used by criminal enterprises to funnel illegal funds. But mostly it was being used by regular people to begin saving and trading in money that holds its value. eGold had a transparent system of annual audits and live transaction screening by any user to keep the system honest. It, too, was growing robustly, and was putting up strong competition against PayPal until the authorities intervened.

GoldMoney, founded by my friend James Turk, has remained in operation by keeping its principal operations overseas and by cooperating fully with onerous US financial regulations. It offers similar services to eGold, but with an emphasis on long-term storage. GoldMoney improves upon traditional storage by locating offshore, offering real-time online account access, and providing extra liquidity. These services do come at a cost, however. Still, over the course of the last decade, GoldMoney has swelled to over $2 billion in assets. Clearly, many people want to trade gold and silver over US dollars.

Digital gold is a niche service, but I think the public's rapid embrace of these projects - none older than ten years - shows that investors are viewing gold and silver as more than mere commodities, but once again seeing them as money. This could signal a paradigm shift back to tradition, which is good news for any precious metals holder.

STRAIGHT UP BARTER While digital currencies are neat, in practical terms, nothing beats the resilience of traditional barter of bullion for goods and services. If you actually own the physical gold and silver that you intend to save or trade, then you can be sure it will be there until you're ready to sell. You don't have to trust anyone except yourself.

In that vein, several efforts have popped up around the country to simply get people trading gold and silver rather than dollars. Since the transactions involved are usually small, such as buying lunch at a local diner, silver is typically the metal of choice.

There are several hotspots for this sort of activity.

Philadelphia has one group, DelValley Silver, that has fostered a local barter market there by encouraging merchants to accept silver coins in addition to dollars. DelValley is also a silver dealer, but they sell privately minted rounds, which can be harder to liquidate than well-known coins like the American Gold Eagle and Canadian Maple Leaf.

Meanwhile, in New Hampshire, many merchants associated with the Free State Project have begun accepting gold and silver at their businesses. Innovation abounds here and the practice of encasing small amounts of silver in laminated cards seems to be the most successful.

Shire Silver encloses silver and gold wire in their cards and measures them in terms of grams. It's much easier to trade a flat, plastic card containing a gram of silver than to carry around a 1 oz coin. However, even their website will admit that the premium on such a small amount of silver makes it less than ideal for investment purposes. Of course, when you're ready to barter, they'll be happy to take your 1 oz rounds in return for some Shire Silver. And that Shire Silver is being accepted by more and more merchants across New Hampshire and beyond.

Another variation, from a group based in Phoenix, Arizona, encloses a pre-1965 US dime inside the laminated card. Before '65, every dime contained 90% silver, making them worth about $2.50 each in today's debased dollars. That's why you won't find any pre-'65 dimes in your change from the grocery store. However, one fellow had the clever idea of putting them in these cards so they could trade at their silver value without getting mixed in with the worthless dimes we carry around today. The same group even created a free iPhone app that translates US dollar prices into various amounts of silver (more info here).

While I'll still be selling regular old bullion coins and bars at Euro Pacific Precious Metals, because these are the best way to invest in physical precious metals, I am energized by these efforts. The great thing about holding and bartering physical precious metals is that there is no central company running the operations, like with the digital gold currencies, and therefore there's no single person the government can go after.

(My new offshore bank, Euro Pacific Bank, Ltd., will soon be offering Visa-branded debit cards back by individual holdings of gold or silver. Euro Pacific Bank customers will be able to purchase gold from the bank, have it stored, and then access their holdings directly using their Visa cards to either make purchases though merchants or withdraw cash from banks and ATMs. Unfortunately, due to the reasons described above, I cannot offer this service to US customers. For more information about my offshore brokerage and banking companies, please visit www.europacintl.com.)

THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL Besides these grassroots efforts at building barter communities, I'm seeing a cultural shift in favor of precious metals. Utah recently passed a law establishing gold and silver as legal tender and abolishing state capital gains taxes on their appreciation. I was interviewed for a new animated film called Silver Circle that features a rebel group in the near future which mints silver coins in defiance of an even more aggressive Federal Reserve. More and more people are starting to watch the gold price as often as they watch the Dow.

Overall, this bodes well for our investments and for our country. If gold and silver are successfully re-monetized, our children may know a rate of economic growth not seen since our great-grandparents were in their prime. And prices may never return to today's levels again.

Regards,
Peter Schiff

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 137.

#4. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)

DelValley is also a silver dealer, but they sell privately minted rounds, which can be harder to liquidate than well-known coins like the American Gold Eagle and Canadian Maple Leaf.

Do he mean that privately minted coins are harder to liquidate than evil government ones?

Skip Intro  posted on  2011-07-05   14:53:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Skip Intro (#4)

Do he mean that privately minted coins are harder to liquidate than evil government ones?

Currently, the answer to that would be "yes."

Such coins carry not only bullion value, but numismatic value, and are widely regarded throughout the world as "good" coins, i.e., the standard by which other coin values are measured... it's a wierd thing, on coin values.

Interestingly, China has gotten into the act, counterfeiting silver Eagles. Because the price of "numismatic" coins (high collector value) are far in excess of the cost of minting, China is very busy fleecing the collectors of numismatics.

OTOH, because the price of silver rounds from various mints is relatively low, there's not enough profit margin in it for Chinese fakes to be profitable. So I buy silver rounds... I don't give a rats ass about "collector" value, I buy bullion for its intrinsic value.

I think no more of numismatics than I do of collecting stamps, or baseball cards.

When I was in Russia two months ago, I gave my father-in-law a silver round, from a well-respected mint here in the USA. A few days later, he gave me a 1923 Russian ruble... 18g of silver in it. The round I gave him was worth maybe $40, but the collector value made the ruble he gave me worth ~$130.

Go figure.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-05   20:25:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Capitalist Eric (#17)

When I was in Russia two months ago, I gave my father-in-law a silver round...

Is your wife one of those mail-order brides? A friend of mine went over there about 5 years ago and came very close to marrying one - she was a knockout.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2011-07-06   9:00:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Fred Mertz (#20)

She's Russian.

There's no such thing as a "mail-order bride." That's a term the feminists made up, to twist reality.

Fact of the matter is, she had a very good position, was making excellent money, and had a higher net value (by far) than I. She did her best, to convince me to move to Russia.

After I finish my doctorate, we'll see.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-06   11:43:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Capitalist Eric (#32)

Thanks for the clarification.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2011-07-06   11:46:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Fred Mertz (#33) (Edited)

Thanks for the clarification.

He's BSing as usual. There are tours abroad exploiting legal loopholes where the participants pick the girl of their dreams out of a lineup, then a scenario is created where they appear to meet randomly and spend a few hours getting acquainted, so the perps can legally declare the expressed purpose of their trip abroad wasn't for finding a bride.

But I guess technically he's correct, no brides legally are mailed to the US.

mininggold  posted on  2011-07-06   11:56:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: mininggold, Fred Mertz (#34)

He's BSing as usual.

For what purpose? I have no reason to lie, yet you leftists insist that I do.

There are tours abroad exploiting legal loopholes where the participants pick the girl of their dreams out of a lineup, then a scenario is created where they appear to meet randomly and spend a few hours getting acquainted, so the perps can legally declare the expressed purpose of their trip abroad wasn't for finding a bride.

There was a time when that was true... about 15 years ago. The negative publicity, plus a Russian girl who came to America and was murdered by her new American "husband" caused the government to get strict on immigration laws, especially with regard to K-1 or K-3 visas.

It is a very long and frustrating process. And one thing you'll never admit to- it's very expensive.

IF a guy chose to go on one of those "tours," where basically an agency would introduce him to young and eligible women, the probabilities of finding an "ultra-Natasha," i.e., a gold-digger, are pretty high. The tours basically are a way for agencies to separate fools from their money, while having young girls (who for the most part only want to leave the Hell-hole they're in) act interested.

In my case, when I take vacation, I prefer to go off the beaten path. I've never been to Hawaii, but I've been to Romania a bunch of times. Same with Ireland. My last major vacation, I decided to go to Russia...

I talk with people from all over the world, so I had a standing invitation to Russia... took my cameras, had an itinerary which started in Rostov-On-Don, then Moscow, then St.Petersberg. I had friends at each location, waiting for me to show up.

But I met this nice girl in Rostov... and never made it to Moscow.

We've been married just over five years, and have two daughters.

Oh, and there's one other aspect of the so-called "mail-order bride" propaganda... that somehow they're more docile or whatever. The fact is, my wife is incredibly tough, and savvy. Plus, she can stretch a penny until it's molecule-thin. I've learned a lot from her... and continue to do so.

Your statements- for the most part- are. mischaracterizations.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-06   12:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Capitalist Eric (#36)

Your statements- for the most part- are. mischaracterizations.

You said there was no such thing as mail order brides and I begged to defer. Not once did I accuse you of participating, yet you went right on the defensive.

mininggold  posted on  2011-07-06   12:44:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: mininggold (#39) (Edited)

Again, you reactionaries are living in the past.

Mail order brides existed in the 19th century when America was opening the west.

Modern Internet dating sites are not "mail order brides".

jwpegler  posted on  2011-07-06   14:39:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: jwpegler (#43)

Mail order brides existed in the 19th century when America was opening the west.

They are still around. The term still applies even if the means of communication have changed.

Ever hear of a one horse town?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2011-07-06   14:53:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: Fred Mertz (#45)

They are still around. The term still applies even if the means of communication have changed.

Ever hear of a one horse town?

Maybe if you are talking about an American woman from another town or state hook,but not when it comes to foreign women marrying for citizenship.

Or for foreign men marrying American women for US citizenship,as far as that goes.

sneakypete  posted on  2011-07-06   16:41:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: sneakypete (#73)

Ever hear of a one horse town?

This was an example of a colloquialism still in use today from the old days.

Just like mail order brides are still out there today, usually from foreign countries.

It's a phrase, not a technical thing. Capitalist Eric can likely explain it to you.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2011-07-06   23:00:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: Fred Mertz (#87) (Edited)

s a phrase, not a technical thing. Capitalist Eric can likely explain it to you.

LOL One horse town..usually a town most people would rather not be in.

But between SP and Erica they'll used up the rest of the bandwidth posting their superior wisdom and still say nothing.

Sorry about your dog. You sound like a thoughtful owner and she was lucky to have you.

mininggold  posted on  2011-07-06   23:13:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#106. To: mininggold, sneakypete, jwpegler, lucysmom, mininggold (#89)

mininggold: But between SP and Erica they'll used up the rest of the bandwidth posting their superior wisdom and still say nothing.

Between pegler, sneakypete and myself, we've explained a lot about the subject you're knee-jerking about. That you refuse to accept those explanations is strictly your problem.

Fred Mertz to JWPegler: That is what I saw my from vantage point. He likely worked out the details and money in advance, like you suggest. You seem to have a great deal of knowledge about it. Did you marry one?

Me: Translation: Ok, I was talking out my ass. YOU must be married to one of them damned Afuriners!" Sad. Better to admit you don't know, and have done with it.

Fred Mertz: No wonder every one thinks you're an a-hole. Piss off and I'm glad you and your mail-order bride's arrangement worked out so far.

Equally sad. You talk out your ass, on a subject where your only source of information is the MSM, and make yourself look like an idiot. You get caught, and try to cover that by insulting the person, instead of having any sense of class, and simply bowing out of the discussion. Tacky. When I point this out to you, then I am the ass-hole? LOL. Get OVER yourself, grandpa. Your views- when based on the MSM propaganda- are worth a squirt of warm piss. Oh, and your continued insults after the fact, simply reconfirm that YOU are the ass-hole.

LucysIDIOTmom: You really are a very angry man.

Typical response from a leftist sheeple. Oh, you're suffering from something... It's a sad attempt to minimize the facts of what I've posted. To actually accept such facts, would force you to consider that the truth may not be what you were brainwashed to think.

And I'm not angry. As my mother has stated, I've "no tolerance of fools."

Capitalist Eric: I recommend to all my friends, to look for a woman outside the Western hemisphere.

Fred Mertz: Are you suggesting that I should seek a mail-order bride?

Where did I ever suggest you were my friend?

mininggold: The gold run was part of the Hunt brother's fiasco
sneakypete: That was silver,not gold.
minggold: Look it up doofus.

From wikipedia: (Redirected from Hunt brothers)

Nelson Bunker Hunt (born February 22, 1926) is an American oil company executive. He is best known as a former billionaire whose fortune collapsed after he and his brother William Herbert Hunt tried but failed to corner the world market in silver.

ming, is there anything that you don't get wrong?

Fred Mertz: ...mail order brides are still out there today, usually from foreign countries. It's a phrase, not a technical thing.

Bullshit. After having the facts presented to you, you insist on using "a phrase" meant to malign any who would reject American women. This "phrase," BTW, was pushed by the feminist organizations, who saw such ideas as a threat to their primacy. The term was a sound-bite description, which told nothing of the truth, but was easily accepted by the stupid and ignorant public.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-07   12:12:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: Capitalist Eric (#106)

And I'm not angry. As my mother has stated, I've "no tolerance of fools."

You say that like it's a good thing.

Your words are that of an angry, and now we can add intolerant, man. The source of your trouble with American women is not the women, but your lack of emotional intelligence.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-07   18:56:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: lucysmom (#111)

You say that like it's a good thing.

It is. It keeps me focused on what matters.

People who are ignorant, but willing to learn, I'll teach.

Those that refuse to learn are a waste of time.

Your words are that of an angry, and now we can add intolerant, man.

From The Great Lie of Partisan Tolerance

The Free Dictionary defines ‘tolerance‘ as follows.

tol·er·ance

1. The capacity for or the practice of recognizing and respecting the beliefs or practices of others.

That’s what tolerance used to mean, before Orwellian progressives performed their cunning linguistic tricks on it. Now the class-obsessed left has divided tolerance into two classes: partisan (good) and repressive (bad). The dirty secret is that both their meanings are identical and neither one is real tolerance.

It all started with Herbert Marcuse, the Marxist theoretician, who decried “repressive tolerance” that doesn’t take sides (or maybe it takes the side of tradition. This is confused in the essay.) and advocated its replacement with “partisan tolerance” that takes sides against the status quo, which means taking sides against anyone who isn’t a partisan “victim,” or even better an actual outlaw.

In other words, you "progressives" (i.e., socialists) paint "tolerance" as a good thing, and tradition as "bad." The full explanation is at the link.

Bottom line, to be described by you and your ilk as "intolerant," is a compliment.

The source of your trouble with American women is not the women, but your lack of emotional intelligence.

Hmmm... A paradoxical statement... the "lack of emotional intelligence" that you describe, is something I did suffer from in the past. But I smartened up a LOT, after divorcing my ex-wife.

Gaining the "emotional intelligence" you speak of, is what finally made me comprehend that American women- generally speaking- are stupid and greedy. That intelligence and the accompanying wisdom, is what made me realize, "I could do better."

And I did.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-07   19:14:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: Capitalist Eric (#112)

Hmmm... A paradoxical statement... the "lack of emotional intelligence" that you describe, is something I did suffer from in the past. But I smartened up a LOT, after divorcing my ex-wife.

What you call "smartened up" sounds a lot like bitterness.

1. The capacity for or the practice of recognizing and respecting the beliefs or practices of others.

Yep, that's what tolerance means and you ain't got it.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-07   23:53:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: lucysmom, sneakypete, jwpegler (#118)

What you call "smartened up" sounds a lot like bitterness.

That's one of the stages a person goes through, when they realize that what they were taught was a lie.

You are still living in fantasyland, so you have no idea what I'm referring to.

that's what tolerance means and you ain't got it.

I don't have to tolerate fools. I don't have to respect the beliefs of others, when those beliefs are demonstrably false. Where the beliefs of another cannot be confirmed or debunked, it's becomes a question of "faith," which I have no opinion of, one way or the other. And that is why you never see me trolling the threads on religion.

There's another word that used to have great significance, before you liberal idiots tried to twist it around: "discriminate."

dis·crim·i·nate34; 34;/v. djÈskrjmYÌnejt; adj. djÈskrjmYnjt/ Show Spelled
[v. dih-skrim-uh-neyt; adj. dih-skrim-uh-nit] Show IPA
verb, -nat·ed, -nat·ing, adjective –verb (used without object)
1. to make a distinction in favor of or against a person or thing on the basis of the group, class, or category to which the person or thing belongs rather than according to actual merit; show partiality: The new law discriminates against foreigners. He discriminates in favor of his relatives.
2. to note or observe a difference; distinguish accurately: to discriminate between things.
–verb (used with object)
3. to make or constitute a distinction in or between; differentiate: a mark that discriminates the original from the copy.
4. to note or distinguish as different: He can discriminate minute variations in tone.

The leftist Orwellian approach now makes definition #1 the only acceptable definition.

What rot.

I have discriminating tastes- in women, in who I choose to call friend, in who I allow to be in my life, or allow to affect my life. Oh, I know, now you're gonna' say I'm a racist, or some such nonsense... logic is certainly not a great strength for you.

You liberal idiots think that I have to "tolerate" every bullshit idea that you come up with. You think I have to show "tolerance" for every dirtbag, know- nothing moron who has an opinion based on nothing. You think that the very idea of having standards is "intolerant."

If I didn't have standards, if I wasn't able to discriminate between right and wrong, good and bad, acceptable and UNacceptable, I'd fall for every bullshit idea and be another gullibe dupe... which, of course, is exactly what you leftist morons are...

You want me to be willfully stupid, just like you.

NEVER happen.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-08   11:29:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: Capitalist Eric (#123)

You liberal idiots think that I have to "tolerate" every bullshit idea that you come up with.

"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn"

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-08   11:42:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#126. To: lucysmom (#125) (Edited)

Then why show up here?

NONE but your fellow idiots buy into the bullshit you post. NONE with any modicum of common sense take you seriously.

Unlike you, I do care, I DO take it personally.

From the article I posted, titled "xxx,"

Rule #9: Take It Personally

When someone tries to steal from you, hurt you, or enslave you, unless you are some kind of nut, you take it pretty personally, right? Why should it be any different when a government commits the same grievances? Americans should be furious over the destruction of their economy, their currency, their infrastructure, and their Constitutional freedoms! They should be enraged over the endless wars overseas that are bankrupting the nation. They should be bellowing to the rooftops over the cooption of their political system by a slimy brood of corporate bankers. Is this “extremist” behavior? Who cares!? If your anger is not visible then it is not worth a damn. Don’t just get active, get emotional! This is about your life, and the lives of those you love. That’s not to say that we should take out our frustrations randomly and haphazardly, but if we can’t at least make known our anger over the misdeeds of government, then what the hell is the point of calling ourselves free?

YOU, lucysIDIOTmom, are a parasite. You don't give a shit about anything beyond sucking the life from other people, and being a tool of those that use you for their own political gain.

You're beneath contempt, and you reconfirm that with every worthless, empty post you make.

You don't give a damn? GOOD. LEAVE, you silly bimbo.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-08   13:15:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#129. To: Capitalist Eric (#126)

Then why show up here?

NONE but your fellow idiots buy into the bullshit you post. NONE with any modicum of common sense take you seriously.

I come here for discussion and debate, not for your approval, commissar.

YOU, lucysIDIOTmom, are a parasite. You don't give a shit about anything beyond sucking the life from other people, and being a tool of those that use you for their own political gain.

You're beneath contempt, and you reconfirm that with every worthless, empty post you make.

You don't give a damn? GOOD. LEAVE, you silly bimbo.

Like all petty dictators, you find dissent really intorerable, don't you?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-08   15:31:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#131. To: lucysmom (#129)

I come here for discussion and debate,

Liar.

"Discussion and debate" requires intellectual honesty. It requires the use of plain terms. When the meaning of words are plain, but not complimentary to your wishful-thinking, you attempt to redefine them in such a way as to make them seem to match your view.

And THAT is what makes you contemptible.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-08   17:00:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#133. To: Capitalist Eric (#131)

Liar.

"Discussion and debate" requires intellectual honesty. It requires the use of plain terms.

How do you define "plain terms"?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-08   18:40:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#134. To: lucysmom (#133)

How do you define "plain terms"?

Thanks for proving my point.

I'd suggest you read The Ethics of Rhetoric by Richard Weaver. He shared something in common with you... He was a socialist. But later in life, he started to think for himself, and is considered one of the great thinkers of the 20th Century.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-08   19:03:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#135. To: Capitalist Eric (#134)

How do you define "plain terms"?

Thanks for proving my point.

I'd suggest you read The Ethics of Rhetoric by Richard Weaver.

In other words, you use the term but have no idea how to define it.

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-08   19:10:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#136. To: lucysmom (#135)

In other words, you use the term but have no idea how to define it.

Nice try.

If you can't understand what "plain terms" means, then your relativistic mind (what little there is) cannot have meaningful conversations.

You demonstrate this daily. It's why you keep switching back and forth to the whining-old screen-name.

You're as much of a loon as banjo-boy Boris.

But unlike you, banjo-boy does post elegant observations, from time to time.

You can't even manage that.

Capitalist Eric  posted on  2011-07-08   19:37:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#137. To: Capitalist Eric, A K A Stone, mininggold (#136)

If you can't understand what "plain terms" means...

I don't know what "plain terms" means to you and Weaver. If your posts are an example, then plain terms must include lots of name calling. Now, I'm perfectly capable of telling people they're various flavors of "stupid", however I never saw much value in that. I've never noticed that telling an idiot he's an idiot made him one bit smarter, and it doesn't do one darn thing to enhance my life - so I gave it up.

...then your relativistic mind (what little there is) cannot have meaningful conversations.

Until we define our terms, we can not have meaningful conversation - just a fact, Jack.

You demonstrate this daily. It's why you keep switching back and forth to the whining-old screen-name.

Really? And if mininggold and I are two distinct and separate human beings, what does that make you?

lucysmom  posted on  2011-07-08   20:40:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 137.

#140. To: lucysmom, Capitalist Eric (#137) (Edited)

Until we define our terms, we can not have meaningful conversation - just a fact, Jack.

Eric cannot define those terms because he is unable to express himself in any other way than the way we see here, without cutting and pasting a script written by someone else or copied from other's posts.

mininggold  posted on  2011-07-08 23:53:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 137.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com