Ive often wondered why the American Right has been so quiet about V.S. Naipaul. Hes easily the most talented reactionary writer in the English languagemaybe the only living talent left in the right-wing zombiesphere. The American Right devotes an insane amount of resources into manufacturing hagiographies on anyone whom they believe makes them look goodeven the Soviets couldnt compete with todays American Right when it comes to glorifying their pantheon of degenerate cretins like Ayn Rand, Phyllis Schlafly, Friedrich von Hayek
I found a few passages that I think explain why they never liked Naipaul much. Basically, it comes down to this: The American Right only needs team playersshameless, cynical hacks who can be counted on to churn out whatever rank propaganda ordered up by the Heritage Foundation. For that, you need a Rotary Club nihilist like Dinesh DSouza, someone totally devoid of a literary ego, intellectual curiosity or a gag reflex.
I was just reading Patrick Frenchs brilliant biography of Naipaul, The World Is What It Is, and came across this interesting scene from Naipauls visit to America in 1969. Naipaul had already started developing a reputation at that point as one of the rare examples of a dark-skinned reactionary Tory from a Third World colony, making him one of the most despised literary figures among the trendy-left.
Click for Full Text!