United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Nearly 1.3 Million In Ohio Sign Recall Of Union-Busting Bill, Placing It On The November 8 Ballot
Source:
RAWSTORY
URL Source: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/06/ ... -recall-of-union-busting-bill/
Published: Jul 1, 2011
Author: By Eric W. Dolan
Post Date: 2011-07-01 11:41:08 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 60821
Comments: 110
The pro-labor coalition We Are Ohio delivered nearly 1.3 million signatures Wednesday to repeal SB 5, a new law restricting the collective-bargaining rights of public employees, placing it on the November 8 ballot. People's World reported that the 1,298,301 signatures were delivered to the Secretary of State's office by a semi-truck packed with 1502 boxes of petitions and accompanied by a large "People's Parade." We Are Ohio collected more signatures than any other petition drive in Ohio history thanks to the work of more than 10,000 volunteers. The signatures must now be validated by each county board of elections office. “Today we celebrate the unprecedented achievement of the more than one million Ohioans who want to repeal SB 5,” Melissa Fazekas, spokeswoman for We Are Ohio, said in a statement. “This historic number of signatures sends a strong, clear message to the extreme politicians who played political tricks to pass SB 5 and to the rest of the country." "More than 1 million voices from all 88 counties can’t be wrong," she continued. "The more than 6200 people who marched today and the more than one million who support the citizen’s veto, are proof that while our campaign may be out spent, we will never be out worked, or out volunteered or out supported by hard working Ohioans.” The filing of the petitions will keep SB 5 from taking effect until the results of the election are known in November.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-28) not displayed.
.
.
.
#29. To: A K A Stone, Moderator X (#28)
You post in broken English, similar to your Moderator X. Are you suggesting that the individual posters can not take advantage of BOZOing any poster they feel subject to their own dislikes? If so, why have a BOZO filter in the first place? If not, you have demonstrated contempt (once again) for your own subscribers. Are you suggesting that the forum is not capable of viewing a thread based on opinion and respond (based on individual contributions) accordingly? If so, why have a forum at all? There was no insurrection; that position infers spamming or joining another chit-chat forum. What you performed is just more "icing on the cake" of the reasons you need another moderator as opposed to more posters. You are simply attempting to alter the venue of LF from what you originally intended.
Then let the words posted by the person who's name it bears stand unless the poster asks his words be edited (that is holding the individual responsible). If the post exceeds the low standards of decency here, then delete it, and apply the same rules to all posts. Of course the site belongs to A K A Stone and he can run it as he sees fit, however how he runs it determines whether or not it is a place of debate or a pot where a limited group can comfortably stew in their own juice.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
Why?
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
Why? Two year olds know they should respect government authority? That's more of that Honda 'logic'. I doubt he has kids if he believes that's the case.
Odd, since you routinely post 'bookmarked' when you don't agree, bitch. And as usual, you are full of fucking shit... Ah, no, dumbass. The database here has at least TWO DOZEN examples of you doing this.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
The dwarf does that on every site he has ever belonged to. This isn't 'news'. What will be news is if you keep the banning in place. How may times have you done this, then recinded? It gets old Stone. Make a decision. And then stick with it. That said, I can now clear my filter.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
Since when does this site have any standards of decency?
You post in the same language too conservative, amongst others, use. You are a Commonwealth citizen or try to affect that perception through consistent Commonwealth spelling. Its got nothing to do with your spell check or other excuses. You never address the observations directly but flee the board until you think it is safe to return. I don't know why you do it, but I don't like being lied to and I cannot imagine why you would on something as harmless and meaningless as a message board unless you simply have a mendacious nature. That or a flaming paranoid.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
Heya Ruddy! Happy Day before the Fourth of July! You can remove your tagline now. War is all washed upped on LF.
WOW! That tagline is all gone! That's a nice lad, Ruddy! Keep up the good work!
DELETED BY A K A Stone ROTFL Here I shall put it back. When the LP Kloaughns post on LF. Ask A K A Stone about his own philosophy about that lot. They are given unbridled liberty to do anything they choose to include lying out their teeth for over a month while others were repeatedly banned, timed-out, censored, threads erased, altered and modified by A K A Stone. Of course all that "moderating" by A K A Stone NEVER once included the LP Kloaughns; it was ALL the rest of us. That is why Stone has his trusty "Moderator X" now. It is ALL too much work for Stone alone.
Yet you have posted many times your sex fantasies with horses but here you are still able to post. Go figure.
The big question is, why DO you have a need to stalk?
If it did, I wouldn't have to employ my own standards and use the bozo filter.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
If I raised the standards any higher you wouldn't be here. You're already here based on a sliding scale.
Liar. Not even close and you can't back up your claim so piss off.
Never swear "allegiance" to anything other than the 'right to change your mind'!
Just what does he post here that is so bad? And why don't you put the bestiality fantasizer here, badeye, on the same sliding scale, since you seem to think the standards here are so high. And while you are at it broadcast it so everyone else here knows.
He is an ill mannered liberal.
First of all, war is not ill-mannered unless someone [anyone] provides a condescending opinion about himself; you can see this same characteristic throughout ALL of his posts and your perspective is rare with the exception of badeye. Still, war has made more sound posts on LF than anyone and I don't necessarily agree with him; he makes a point and follows up with REAL data. So what if he leans towards the liberal side of politics? Isn't that the scope of perspective folks want to see beyond your Palin and Israel rant?
So that's why so called conservative perverts are tolerated. I see. And that's why your site is so full of them.
Including you?
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
Name the conservative perv-o's and how you know them to be perverted. Or are you just throwing the hyperbole around, hoping some will stick.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
So that's why so called conservative perverts are tolerated. I see. And that's why your site is so full of them. What conservative perverts?
And including you.
Of course the site belongs to A K A Stone and he can run it as he sees fit, however how he runs it determines whether or not it is a place of debate or a pot where a limited group can comfortably stew in their own juice. So has anybody ever asked Stone if he could be held responsible for the content of his website????
When asked by a Liberal what I bought my Granddaughter for her 1st birthday I replied, "MORE AMMUNITION"!!!!
I deleted every article from that Las Vegas place that was suing people. They sent me an email. Besides they will never take me alive. ;)
Supposedly if the editing of titles and content occurs it doesn't matter what Stone thinks, the answer is yes (if anyone wants to pursue it). Which is probably why Stone does his best to keep traffic down on this site.
That slip and fall law firm was shot down in court recently. The judge ruled that posting the full article was fair use. YMMV.
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Where do you get these wacky ideas?
I notice your model web master Robin is deleting threads over at your example of Internet integrity. What's up with that?
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
So what you are saying is if you repost someone elses article the content has to stay the same, verbatim?????? If any changes are made to it then it's illegal??? And if the thread is illegal, who can be held responsible for it??? The webmaster/moderator or the person who posted it????
When asked by a Liberal what I bought my Granddaughter for her 1st birthday I replied, "MORE AMMUNITION"!!!!
As far as I can figure, the decision took into account the type of content and a lot of other factors. It's far from a hard and fast ruling that you can post re- post anything. What the judge had for breakfast that morning could have been a factor. ;)
Obama's watch stopped on 24 May 2008, but he's been too busy smoking crack to notice.
Because you banned war and kept woodchopper.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
That would seem logical.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
woodchoppper didn't start a thread.
So it's personal then.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
Aint that the truth.... LOL......
When asked by a Liberal what I bought my Granddaughter for her 1st birthday I replied, "MORE AMMUNITION"!!!!
Great example of why you aren't taken seriously, ming.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
Wrong again, ming.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
The database here has at least TWO DOZEN examples of you doing this. Liar. Not even close and you can't back up your claim so piss off. Fair enough. Approximately a dozen times, so fuck off Brian. You know you routinely have done this, have been called on it. Then again, we both know you are a coward.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
Horseshit, bucky.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
Comments (70 - 110) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhen someone posts an article telling everyone to bozo my new moderator.
That is an insurrection. Any two year old would know that is a no no.
#30. To: CZ82, A K A Stone (#27)
This is the mass attitude of why America is so fucked upped. Take responsibility for your own actions, man!
#31. To: A K A Stone (#28)
When someone posts an article telling everyone to bozo my new moderator. That is an insurrection. Any two year old would know that is a no no.
#32. To: lucysmom, A K A Stone, Moderator whatever (#31)
That is an insurrection. Any two year old would know that is a no no.
#33. To: Brian S (#19)
#34. To: A K A Stone (#24)
#35. To: lucysmom (#30)
If the post exceeds the low standards of decency here, then delete it, and apply the same rules to all posts.
#36. To: buckeroo (#29)
You post in broken English, similar to your Moderator X.
#37. To: Rudgear (#36)
You never address the observations directly but flee the board until you think it is safe to return.
#38. To: All, Rudgear (#37)
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
#39. To: Skip Intro, yukon, Gatlin, harrowup, WhiteSands, 22rifle, A K A Stone, Moderator X (#35)
(Edited)
Since when does this site have any standards of decency?
#40. To: Badeye (#34)
(Edited)
The dwarf does that on every site he has ever belonged to.
#41. To: Badeye (#33)
Ah, no, dumbass. The database here has at least TWO DOZEN examples of you doing this.
#42. To: Skip Intro (#35)
Since when does this site have any standards of decency?
#43. To: Skip Intro (#35)
Since when does this site have any standards of decency?
#44. To: Badeye (#33)
The database here has at least TWO DOZEN examples of you doing this.
#45. To: A K A Stone, Skip Intro (#43)
(Edited)
If I raised the standards any higher you wouldn't be here. You're already here based on a sliding scale.
#46. To: mininggold (#45)
Just what does he post here that is so bad?
#47. To: A K A Stone, war (#46)
He [war] is an ill mannered liberal.
#48. To: A K A Stone (#46)
He is an ill mannered liberal.
#49. To: buckeroo (#47)
Still, war has made more sound posts on LF than anyone
#50. To: mininggold (#48)
#51. To: mininggold (#48)
He is an ill mannered liberal.
#52. To: Rudgear (#49)
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
#53. To: lucysmom (#30)
This is the mass attitude of why America is so fucked upped. Take responsibility for your own actions, man! Then let the words posted by the person who's name it bears stand unless the poster asks his words be edited (that is holding the individual responsible). If the post exceeds the low standards of decency here, then delete it, and apply the same rules to all posts.
#54. To: CZ82 (#53)
So has anybody ever asked Stone if he could be held responsible for the content of his website????
#55. To: CZ82, A K A Stone (#53)
So has anybody ever asked Stone if he could be held responsible for the content of his website????
#56. To: A K A Stone (#54)
that Las Vegas place that was suing people
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#57. To: mininggold (#55)
Which is probably why Stone does his best to keep traffic down on this site.
#58. To: buckeroo (#52)
#59. To: hondo68 (#56)
that Las Vegas place that was suing people That slip and fall law firm was shot down in court recently. The judge ruled that posting the full article was fair use. YMMV.
#60. To: CZ82 (#59)
the content has to stay the same, verbatim?????? If any changes are made to it then it's illegal???
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
#61. To: A K A Stone (#57)
Where do you get these wacky ideas?
#62. To: CZ82 (#59)
So what you are saying is if you repost someone elses article the content has to stay the same, verbatim??????
#63. To: lucysmom (#61)
Because you banned war and kept woodchopper.
#64. To: A K A Stone (#63)
woodchoppper didn't start a thread.
#65. To: hondo68 (#60)
What the judge had for breakfast that morning could have been a factor. ;)
#66. To: mininggold (#40)
#67. To: mininggold (#41)
The big question is, why DO you have a need to stalk?
#68. To: Brian S (#44)
#69. To: buckeroo (#47)
First of all, war is not ill-mannered unless someone [anyone] provides a condescending opinion about himself; you can see this same characteristic throughout ALL of his posts and your perspective is rare with the exception of badeye.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]