[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse"

"Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD"

"Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy"

Woodworking and Construction Hacks

"CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination"

"NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law"

"Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing"

Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine

Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn.

After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning

Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate

Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending.

Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar”

"Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny"

"Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is"

Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner.

Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him

South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien

GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis

Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash

New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms

Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania

Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally

"It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala

Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump

Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive'

(Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Did Obama Forget Those Private Jet Tax Breaks He Just Denounced Were Created By His Own Stimulus Plan?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://michellemalkin.com/2011/06/29/obama-stimulus-2/
Published: Jun 30, 2011
Author: Doug powers
Post Date: 2011-06-30 15:34:55 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 37475
Comments: 60

Before signing the stimulus bill (aka “Porkulus”) in February of 2009, White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton said that, even though the president probably hadn’t read the entire 1,079 bill cover-to-cover, he knew it was okay to sign because he had “a team of the best legislative and economic experts in the country who advised him.”

Apparently Obama didn’t check with them before letting loose on private jet tax breaks at today’s press conference.

From the Heritage Foundation:

The chief economic culprit of President Obama’s Wednesday press conference was undoubtedly “corporate jets.” He mentioned them on at least six occasions, each time offering their owners as an example of a group that should be paying more in taxes.

“I think it’s only fair to ask an oil company or a corporate jet owner that has done so well,” the president stated at one point, “to give up that tax break that no other business enjoys.”

But the corporate jet tax break to which Obama was referring – called “accelerated depreciation,” and a popular Democratic foil of late – was created by his own stimulus package.

More background on that here.

“The stimulus is working as intended! Well, except for that part… and that part… and…”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 50.

#6. To: All (#0)

This was a GOP ornament that was put on to the stim Chirstmas Tree so that it could pass.

war  posted on  2011-06-30   16:02:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: war (#6)

He didn't need any GOP votes to get the stimulus passed.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-30   16:12:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: no gnu taxes (#7)

He didn't need any GOP votes to get the stimulus passed.

Yes he did.

Dems had only 59 votes. Franken hadn't been seated yet.

war  posted on  2011-06-30   16:15:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: war (#8)

The Senate then began consideration of the bill starting with the $275 billion tax provisions in the week of February 2, 2009.[11] A significant difference between the House version and the Senate version was the inclusion of a one-year extension of revisions to the alternative minimum tax which added $70 billion to the bill's total.

Republicans proposed several amendments to the bill directed at increasing the share of tax cuts and downsizing spending as well as decreasing the overall price.[12] President Obama and Senate Democrats hinted that they would be willing to compromise on Republican suggestions to increase infrastructure spending and to double the housing tax credit proposed from $7,500 to $15,000 and expand its application to all home buyers, not just first-time buyers.[13] Other considered amendments included the Freedom Act of 2009, an amendment proposed by Senate Finance Committee members Maria Cantwell (D) and Orrin Hatch (R) to include tax incentives for plug-in electric vehicles[14] and an amendment proposed by Jim DeMint (R) to remove language from the bill that would prohibit funds which would be "used for sectarian instruction, religious worship, or a school or department of divinity; or in which a substantial portion of the functions of the facilities are subsumed in a religious mission".[15]

The Senate called a special Saturday debate session for February 7 at the urging of President Obama. The Senate voted, 61-36 (with 2 not voting) on February 9 to end debate on the bill and advance it to the Senate floor to vote on the bill itself.[16] On February 10, the Senate voted 61-37 (with one not voting)[17] All the Democrats voted in favor, but only three Republicans voted in favor (Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, and Arlen Specter), with Specter later switching to the Democratic party.[18] At one point, the Senate bill stood at $838 billion

Nothing there about Obama giving a concession of corporate jets. So, as usual, you're just making it up.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-30   16:21:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: no gnu taxes (#9)

ROFLMAO...I'm not as stupid as you are.

Who is a US Senator from the State of Kansas and what company is headquartered there, douche?

war  posted on  2011-06-30   16:30:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: war (#10)

Who is a US Senator from the State of Kansas and what company is headquartered there, douche?

No Kansas Senator voted for the stimulus, douche.

You are making the whole thing up.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-30   16:42:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: no gnu taxes (#11) (Edited)

No Kansas Senator voted for the stimulus, douche.

You never answered the question, douche.

Why would a particular Senator have to vote FOR something that he knew was going to pass?

But to add further intrigue, why would he have to vote FOR something that had already existed for seven years.

For someone who worked in Washington you sure are stupid as to how it works.

war  posted on  2011-06-30   18:43:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: war (#13)

You never answered the question, douche.

Why would a particular Senator have to vote FOR something that he knew was going to pass?

Not only are you making things up, you are being stupid about it. You clearly stated that Obama signed the stimulus to appease Republicans (without any evidence of such). Then you tried to say he did it to coax Kansas Senators who never voted for it. In fact, the three GOP Senators who did sign it were Collins, Snow, and Spectre, who didn't need to be coaxed. Having made a dumbass of yourself over those arguments, you move on to "it was initiated 7 years earlier anyway.

Just admit you are FOS.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   8:13:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: no gnu taxes (#19)

You clearly stated that Obama signed the stimulus to appease Republicans

Either ping me to that post where I so stated or admit that you just outright lied.

A) What I stated was this: This was a GOP ornament that was put on to the stim Chirstmas Tree so that it could pass.

And this:

B) Yes he did[need GOP votes to get the stim passed].

Dems had only 59 votes. Franken hadn't been seated yet.

`````

In the case of "A", to avoid a filibuster the stim HAD to have "pet" programs either sustained, expanded or put in. Had Obama not agreed to such then the bill would have never gotten to - which brings us to "B" - CLOTURE which requires 60 votes. He needed GOP votes FOR CLOTURE. So, not only did he AGREE to keep those breaks he AGREED to have them folded into the accelerated depreciation schedule that the stim provided.

You look pretty odd calling me stupid when you look so dumb.

No wonder Ron Paul fired your ass.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   8:42:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: war (#20)

What I stated was this: This was a GOP ornament that was put on to the stimuls Chirstmas Tree so that it could pass.

Provide evidence of such or admit you are full of shit. 3 GOP Senators were going to vote for it anyway.

Prove any of the 3 Senators who did sign did so because of the jets tax break or admit you are full of shit.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   8:57:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: no gnu taxes (#21)

I'm sorry...did you PING me to that post in which you claim I stated that Obama signed the stim to appease the GOP?

Fuck off, Paddy. Brownback was going to filibuster the stim if that provision was stripped out.

And now you admit that he needed GOP votes for the stim?

What a fucking liar you are.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   10:04:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: war (#22)

What I stated was this: This was a GOP ornament that was put on to the stimuls Chirstmas Tree so that it could pass.

Provide evidence of such or admit you are full of shit. 3 GOP Senators were going to vote for it anyway.

Prove any of the 3 Senators who did sign did so because of the jets tax break or admit you are full of shit.

Couldn't do it, huh?

Just as I figured.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   10:16:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: no gnu taxes (#23)

I'm sorry...did you PING me to that post in which you claim I stated that Obama signed the stim to appease the GOP?

war  posted on  2011-07-01   10:18:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: war (#24)

You get caught in a falsehood and now you want to play word games to get out of it?

Transparent, typical, and expected.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   10:33:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: no gnu taxes (#25) (Edited)

I love giving you rope, Paddy...you always lynch yourself:

Republicans threaten to block Obama stimulus in Senate AGENCIES Feb 1, 2009, 08.31pm IST WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama's signature attempt to kick- start the stricken US economy risks running into a Republican wall in the Senate this week, a top opposition senator said Sunday.

Jon Kyl, the Republican's second-ranking Senate member, said the party would flex its muscles by stalling the 819-billion-dollar stimulus package without a fundamental rethink of the bill's mix of spending and tax cuts.

<"I think that we would all agree there will be a 60-vote requirement for the bill. That's the end result of a filibuster," he said on "Fox News Sunday," referring to a parliamentary tactic to drag out debate indefinitely.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   10:48:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#29)

This was a GOP ornament that was put on to the stimuls Chirstmas Tree so that it could pass.

Provide evidence of such or admit you are full of shit. 3 GOP Senators were going to vote for it anyway.

Still waiting

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   10:52:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: no gnu taxes (#31)

Fuck you. I'm still waiting for you to buck up the post in which I stated Obama signed the stim to appease the GOP.

The stim was negotiated with the GOP, Paddy. No matter how you try to spin, wriggle and bury yourself here, had any tax increase been put into this bill, it would have been filibustered.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   10:57:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: war (#33)

had any tax increase been put into this bill, it would have been filibustered

straw man.

I've haven't claimed anything at all concerning tax increases and the bill.

The subject is the jet tax cuts.

This was a GOP ornament that was put on to the stimuls Chirstmas Tree so that it could pass.

Provide evidence of such or admit you are full of shit. 3 GOP Senators were going to vote for it anyway.

Still waiting

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   11:04:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: no gnu taxes (#34) (Edited)

straw man.

BULLSHIT. That's the crux of the argument, douche. I posted the article in which Brownback defended the tax break on the jets. The break has existed since 2002.

As usual, you've spun your argument into oblivion.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   11:06:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: war (#35)

BULLSHIT. That's the crux of the argument

Give one time in the article or in any my posts where anything about tax increases are discussed. The issue is Obama attacking coporate jet tax breaks now while gladly signing them into law.

Also, this:

Yes, Obama still owns the tax break for corporate jets

A few non-profit arms of the Obama administration -- namely Media Matters and the Center for American Progress -- have attacked the Heritage foundation for correctly pointing out that President Obama signed general this general aviation tax break into law through as part of his stimulus package.

The pedantic complaint is that Heritage's original post incorrectly implied that Obama had concocted the idea himself. In fact, he merely extended the accelerated depreciation provision for "corporate jets." But that doesn't change the fact that President Obama railed six times yesterday against a tax break that exists in law today because of his signature.

Heritage's Mike Gonzales has posted the official reply:

So, yes, obviously, if we could write it again, we would say “re-authorized” not “created.” To the writer over at Media Matters who said we should issue a “sweeping correction” we recommend switching to decaf. President Obama did create the Stimulus, which did include a tax break for the purchase of private jets. That failed bill only received three Republican congressional votes.

The jet tax provision is not a serious issue ($3 billion over ten years?), and Obama's repeated mention of it demonstrates he is not serious about deficit reduction. It just adds icing to the cake that it exists in law today only because of his signature.

And further, it is perhaps lost in this debate that Obama is attacking an industry that is one of the few remaining loci of American leadership in manufacturing. I don't like the idea of special treatment for any particular industry, but Obama, who has no qualms about corporatism, has been talking about promoting manufacturing. Well, what does he think this corporate jet subsidy was all about? Promoting manufacturing, of course. It's Obamanomics at work.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   11:40:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: no gnu taxes (#37) (Edited)

Give one time in the article or in any my posts where anything about tax increases are discussed.

Stop being a stupid douchebag, Paddy. If the tax break for jets was eliminated - and in Jan of '09 it was discussed - in GOP think that's a tax hike and the bill would have been filbustered. Brownback, who is in Cessna's back pocket was very vocal about preserving the break and that he would fight any attempt to kill it.

The issue is Obama attacking coporate jet tax breaks now while gladly signing them into law.

The tax break came into being in 2002. He wasn't POTUS and thus could not have signed anything into law.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   11:45:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: war (#38)

the bill would have been filbustered.

It couldn't have been filibustered because Snow, Collins and Spectre were always going to vote for it.

You can't provide one example of any GOP official saying it would have been filibustered if the corporate jet tax breaks weren't included.

You can't provide one example of Obama criticising the tax break at that time.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   11:56:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: no gnu taxes (#39)

It couldn't have been filibustered because Snow, Collins and Spectre were always going to vote for it.

Assumes facts not in evidence.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   12:21:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: war (#40)

Mr. Obama called Ms. Collins and Mr. Specter, as well as Senator Olympia J. Snowe of Maine, another Republican expected to support the deal, to acknowledge they were acting against pressure from their party and, one official said, to thank them for their patriotism in helping advance the bill at a critical time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/07/us/politics/07stimulus.html

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   13:00:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: no gnu taxes (#41) (Edited)

expected to

Words of speculation...

Thanks...

war  posted on  2011-07-01   13:10:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: war (#42)

Snowe didn't even participate in the obligatory "negotiations," and voted for it. And they didn't even need her.

It is abundantly clear all three of these 3 "moderates" were always going to vote for the bill. Certainly a lot more clear than it would have been certainly successfully filibustered if Obama hadn't sacrificed his principles (as if he had any) to include this obscure concession.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   13:19:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: no gnu taxes (#43)

Had their been any tax increase in that bill, it would have been filibustered and Snowe et al would have run for cover...

war  posted on  2011-07-01   13:25:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: war (#44)

Talk about offering facts not in evidence.

to acknowledge they were acting against pressure from their party

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   13:36:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: no gnu taxes (#45)

Talk about offering facts not in evidence.

I posted on this very thread an article with direct quotes that any tax increases would lead to a filibuster.

war  posted on  2011-07-01   13:43:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: war (#46)

Jon Kyl, the Republican's second-ranking Senate member, said the party would flex its muscles by stalling the 819-billion-dollar stimulus package without a fundamental rethink of the bill's mix of spending and tax cuts.

<"I think that we would all agree there will be a 60-vote requirement for the bill. That's the end result of a filibuster," he said on "Fox News Sunday," referring to a parliamentary tactic to drag out debate indefinitely.

He never had any ability to accomplish a filibuster.

What about Snowe, Collins, and Spectre negotiating exclusively with Democrats and ignoring Party wishes do you not understand?

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01   13:55:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: no gnu taxes (#48)

He never had any ability to accomplish a filibuster.

Speculation.

What about Snowe, Collins, and Spectre [sic] negotiating exclusively with Democrats and ignoring Party wishes do you not understand?

Paddy...knock it off...you worked for Ron Paul...you know how this crap works...

war  posted on  2011-07-01   14:00:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 50.

#51. To: war (#50)

He never had any ability to accomplish a filibuster.

Speculation.

Your notion that a filibuster could have ever been accomplished is hell of a lot more speculation given the proven actions of the moderate 3.

In fact, you've still given no proof at all of the original point -- that Obama only signed the stimulus allowing the "Christmas tree ornament," because otherwise he couldn't pass it.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-07-01 14:09:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 50.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com