Economy
See other Economy Articles
Title: Bad News For The GOP: Manufacturing Report RISES Unexpectedly
Source:
Bloomberg News
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com
Published: Jun 30, 2011
Author: Shobhana Chandra
Post Date: 2011-06-30 09:46:55 by war
Keywords: Fuck You, Boofer
Views: 64400
Comments: 92
June 30 (Bloomberg) -- The Institute for Supply Management- Chicago Inc. said today its business barometer unexpectedly rose to 61.1 in June from 56.6 a month earlier. Figures greater than 50 signal expansion. Economists projected the gauge would drop to 54, according to the median estimate in a Bloomberg News survey. Another report today showed the labor market is struggling to improve as more Americans than forecast filed first-time applications for unemployment benefits. Jobless claims dropped by 1,000 to 428,000 last week, the Labor Department said. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg projected 420,000 claims, according to the median estimate. For Related News and Information:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-19) not displayed.
.
.
.
#20. To: war (#17)
Artificial transcription factor?
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
LMAO! Start here: http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=21416&Disp=62#C62 to see where mininggold claims lucysmom's post as hers.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so!
She was hacked. My goodness, can nobody stop this evil hacker from destroying the reputations of multi-tabbed browser users? This looks like a job for Moderator X to investigate and report, as Dickie would say.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
For starters, the article that you posted in NOT at the link. Secondly, the MSM pushes the propaganda that Given your confessed lack of knowledge on economics (after all, how much useful information can you get with a poli-sci degree, that you took EIGHT YEARS to get), you're not exactly someone who can argue economic points. So I'll say flat-out... the economy is still slowly spriraling down the toilet, regardless of the bullshit propaganda you post. I'm sure I'll be telling you "toldja' so" again... and again... and again. Wait and see, dummy. Bookmarked for future laughing at the dummy.
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: It's the only possible explanation! Only TSA could do it better! I feel so safe here now.
Tag line: I wuz HACKED, cuz I SAY so!
Actually, your link shows nothing of the sort.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. In fact, that article is at that link.* *[see two points down] Secondly, the MSM pushes the propaganda that DICK ob@m@ pushes, even as everyone in real life is laughing at it... 4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. ~and~ #17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues. Given your confessed lack of knowledge on economics That's an outright lie. Had I added a Stats course insteead of taking Algebra and Trig, I could have had a degree in Econ. *So there must be "26" Rules of Disinformation for Morons. (after all, how much useful information can you get with a poli-sci degree, that you took EIGHT YEARS to get), you're not exactly someone who can argue economic points. It took me eight years, doofuse, because I worked, usually two jobs so that I could PAY for school, and went part time for 5 of them. And I went to grad school for a FULL year, i.e. 2 Summer terms and a Winter and a Spring term, afterward, where I studied geo-politics and had I bothered to write a thesis, I'd have the degree. So I'll say flat-out... the economy is still slowly spriraling down the toilet, regardless of the bullshit propaganda you post. 13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
HA... All time favorite... But I like your thinking...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Liar. Uh-huh. I had 2 years of Alegebra and Trig, plus another year of geometry... in high school. My econ degree required two years of portfolio/risk management, 2.5 years of Stats, and a year of Engineering Calculus. What, you get your "degree" online, or from a diploma- mill??? LOL. Again, you get caught in a lie. "Underwater basket-weaving." Thanks for the laugh. As a final note, doing the copy-and-paste of the Rules of Disinformation, but improperly applying them due to your apparent inability to understand, makes you look like an even BIGGER ass-hat than you usually do (which is hard to even imagine). A little *hint* for you, dummy... your constant FAILURE to apply those rules to me, is because I'm putting out REAL information, not the DISINFORMATION that YOU post. Bottom line: You're using bravado, propaganda and pure bullshit, to push an agenda whose real agenda is beyond your comprehension. You don't understand economics... Frankly, you don't know how much you don't know... which makes you both stupid and dangerous. Oh, BTW, when Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: studied geo-politics... "Underwater basket-weaving." Thanks for the laugh. Probably more relevant to economics than engineering.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
Wanna' try making a comment that makes sense?
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: Never heard of that. 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. "Underwater basket-weaving." Thanks for the laugh. 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. As a final note, doing the copy-and-paste of the Rules of Disinformation, but improperly applying them due to your apparent inability to understand, makes you look like an even BIGGER ass-hat than you usually do (which is hard to even imagine). A little *hint* for you, dummy... your constant FAILURE to apply those rules to me, is because I'm putting out REAL information, not the DISINFORMATION that YOU post. 13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact. Bottom line: You're using bravado, propaganda and pure bullshit, to push an agenda whose real agenda is beyond your comprehension. You don't understand economics... Frankly, you don't know how much you don't know... 19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance. which makes you both stupid and dangerous. 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
All that bullshit, and it wasn't worth my time to read. Thanks for the laughs, poly-sci dummy.
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: That's my new quote...
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: Put it right there with your claim that you had "Alegebra" in HS...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Heh.
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: 1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it - especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
The irony is that no one "sees" taglines any more thanks to the fact that yours are stupid. Check your setup function, doof. You can control seeing taglines. ROFLMAO....
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Hey, dummy, as I've already told you... your tactics don't work, because it's not me that's pushing DISINFORMATION. I'll leave the lies to you and your... 'savior,' Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: 2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit. I'll leave the lies to you and your... 'savior,' DICK ob@m@. 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
What do economics and political science have in common - think about it.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
They are TIED at the hip. And when you delve further that more than one of my profs - including my advisor - were actually political economists, it get incestuous. But watching Erica pretend there is a world of difference between the two is hilarious. Whether you are studying a political system or an economic system at several points there are going to be policy influences and overlap.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Dickie is finding his way onto a lot of tag lines. Whenever he pops off, I always hear President Reagan say 'There you go again'.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
He can't help it, he's an engineer.
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
My ass he's an engineer. His mind is too cluttered. Every engineer whom I know is a meticulous thinker and can present a cogent argument. It's all about angles to them...not spheres...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
(laughing) Truth hurts. And I'll note the dwarf's repressed sexual appetites come out at the oddest times....
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
What's stopping YOU? I'm biased, goofy. Duh.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
Always nice to hear from the resident bigot. How's the Hitler Youth league membership driving going, ming?
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
That false but distractive assertion is evidence you have dead babies under your floorboards.
Proxy IP's are amusing.....lmao
It's a lack of social skills, something engineers are known for. (Actually, he reminds me of an engineer I once taught to drive - the car had a stick shift, he always insisted he was right even when the car went through a series of jerks and died.)
Von Mises associates any Government involvement in markets as "Socialism" , to mislead people into thinking Government is the enemy , when infact empire is the enemy and empire is Privatized.
He's some mail clerk or similiar that "engineers and so called 'professionals'" have tried talking some sense into, but have obviously failed bigtime.
LOL. Nice.
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: Economics is essentially the mathematical modeling of consumer behavior in a market, as well as production and distribution of goods. Interesting variables come into play in the field of economics, depending on what you believe. For example, free-market capitalism theory is consumer behavior without government interference or regulation, and the freedom to choose any good you wish, depending on your preferences. OTOH, the Keynesian hypothesis of economics depends on government interference and regulation in economic models, to supposedly achieve greater efficiency and social "justice" (i.e., monetary redistribution via the business-end of a gun). It should be noted that free-market capitalism is easily the most efficient of all systems, and the longest lasting. Keynesian and socialist or communist models always collapse, because the inherent inefficiencies are capitalized on by beggars and corrupt bureaucrats, ultimately bankrupting those systems. This is historically and mathematically demonstrable- the USSR being the most recent example of a failed socialist model. China will be the next communist model to fail, and when the economic collapse occurs in the Western world fails (over the next few months to years), it will be the latest example of corporatist-fascism to fail. A point you keep bringing up, due your lack of understanding, is that the USA is NOT a free-market economy; it's not even close. If you believe it is, then show me a single market (or even a single commodity) that you can buy, where the government hasn't interfered/taxed/regulated. The only example I can currently come up with, is Craigslist- the last bastion of true free-market economics. Indeed, I'm building my car using damn-near everything purchased through that website. Poli-sci studies political events and their relationships. It's a foo-foo area, with no real value to anyone except beggars and corrupt bureaucrats. It offers NOTHING of value to the real world, beyond a bunch of putzes sitting around, pontificating on different ways to fleece their fellow men... As far as I'm concerned, they have nothing in common, from a practical perspective.
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: Bullshit. "Economics" is first and foremost the study of production and distribution, wealth transfer and consumption. From those studies some amount of modeling may be done but there has yet to be a mathamatical model that has done anything more than DESCRIBE events rather than predict them. Mathamatical modeling can only occur with some amount of "givens". Since economic "givens" are so broad in nature and the "X" variable omnipresent, no such modeling has ever withgstood the test of time. Poli-sci studies political events and their relationships. Bullshit. Poli-Sci is first and foremost the study of governance and the "political" systems by and from which governance occurs.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
dummy: Bullshit. Since you never had any classes that would generally be referred to as "math," I can certainly understand how you would be left behind in the very first sentence. Unfortunately for you, you're so far behind the curve that you actually think you're in the lead. No need to read further on your reply. You're too stupid to hold up your end of the conversation. Oh, and thanks for playing, dummy.
Socialists & Democrats want you to do one thing: What's so unusual about that? I had two years of algebra, geometry, and trigonometry in high school. I know people who have had calculus in high school.
Now, I know I’m not going to change the minds of any of the True Believers…those who read all of Reverend Al’s sermons, and say things like, “You know, global warming can mean warmer OR colder, wetter OR drier, cloudier OR sunnier, windier OR calmer, …”. Can I get an ‘amen’??
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit. The "math" of economics does not require anything more than a knowledge of the General Algebraic Modeling System aka GAMS. Had you studied ALGEBRA instead of the ALEGEBERA that you claim to have studied then you'd know this. If you had any real knowledge of Econ then you’d know that Mathematical Economics is a sub- branch of Economics. And I note with irony that the most famous of this branch of economics and who won a Nobel, is ALSO a believer in climate change and social equality…Kenneth John Arrow…
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
You had ALGEBRA...he had ALEGEBRA which, from the "sound" of it, requires drinking before dividing.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." "THE MILITIA IS COMING!!! THE MILITIA IS COMING!!!" I lurk to see if someone other than Myst or Pookie posts anything...
Especially when it whacks you in the forehead like that manufacturing data did today, huh? Feel better dummy.
Comments (61 - 92) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIt's his ATF...
#21. To: Rudgear (#19)
DING! DING! DING! DING! DING!
#22. To: Wood_Chopper (#21)
to see where mininggold claims lucysmom's post as hers.
#23. To: war, capitalist eric (#14)
Do you have any information that would obviate any of the information in this release, Erica?
DICK ob@m@ pushes, even as everyone in real life is laughing at it... 
#24. To: Rudgear (#22)
She was hacked.
This looks like a job for Moderator X to investigate and report
#25. To: Wood_Chopper (#21)
Start here: to see where mininggold claims lucysmom's post as hers.
#26. To: Capitalist Eric (#23)
(Edited)
For starters, the article that you posted in NOT at the link.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#27. To: lucysmom (#20)
Artificial transcription factor?
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#28. To: war (#26)
In fact, that article is at that link.*
Had I added a Stats course insteead of taking Algebra and Trig, I could have had a degree in Econ.
studied geo-politics...
DICK ob@m@ shits on your face, are you gonna' say it's a shit sandwich?
#29. To: Capitalist Eric (#28)
#30. To: lucysmom (#29)
#31. To: Capitalist Eric (#28)
Uh-huh. I had 2 years of Alegebra [sic]
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#32. To: war (#31)
#33. To: war (#9)
...You "say" the most iodtic things...
LMAO.
#34. To: Capitalist Eric (#33)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#35. To: All (#33)
"You "say" the most iodtic things..." --our local dummy DwarF
#36. To: Capitalist Eric (#32)
All that bullshit, and it wasn't worth my time to read. Thanks for the laughs, poly-sci dummy.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#37. To: Capitalist Eric (#35)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#38. To: war (#36)
DICK ob@m@.
"You "say" the most iodtic things..." --our local dummy DwarF
#39. To: Capitalist Eric (#38)
Hey, dummy, as I've already told you... your tactics don't work, because it's not me that's pushing DISINFORMATION.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#40. To: Capitalist Eric (#30)
Wanna' try making a comment that makes sense?
#41. To: lucysmom (#40)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#42. To: Capitalist Eric (#35)
#43. To: war (#41)
But watching Erica pretend there is a world of difference between the two is hilarious.
#44. To: lucysmom (#43)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#45. To: Thunderbird (#3)
#46. To: lucysmom (#6)
Somebody do an accuracy check, please.
#47. To: mininggold (#11)
#48. To: Badeye (#47)
Always nice to hear from the resident bigot. How's the Hitler Youth league membership driving going, ming?
#49. To: mininggold (#48)
Always nice to hear from the resident bigot. How's the Hitler Youth league membership driving going, ming?
#50. To: war (#44)
His mind is too cluttered. Every engineer whom I know is a meticulous thinker and can present a cogent argument.
#51. To: lucysmom (#43)
He can't help it, he's an engineer.
#52. To: Badeye (#49)
That false but distractive assertion is evidence you have dead babies under your floorboards.
#53. To: Rudgear (#42)
Dickie is finding his way onto a lot of tag lines. Whenever he pops off, I always hear President Reagan say 'There you go again'.
"You "say" the most iodtic things..." --our local dummy DwarF
#54. To: lucysmom (#40)
What do economics and political science have in common - think about it.
"You "say" the most iodtic things..." --our local dummy DwarF
#55. To: Capitalist Eric (#54)
(Edited)
Economics is essentially the mathematical modeling of consumer behavior in a market, as well as production and distribution of goods.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#56. To: war (#55)
Capitalist Eric: Economics is essentially the mathematical modeling of consumer behavior in a market, as well as production and distribution of goods.
"You "say" the most iodtic things..." --our local dummy DwarF
#57. To: war (#34)
Put it right there with your claim that you had "Alegebra" in HS...
#58. To: Capitalist Eric (#56)
(Edited)
Since you never had any classes that would generally be referred to as "math," I can certainly understand how you would be left behind in the very first sentence.
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#59. To: no gnu taxes (#57)
(Edited)
--GW Bush
--Sarah Palin's version of "The Midnight Ride of Paul revere"
#60. To: Badeye (#45)
Truth hurts.
.
.
.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]