In response to Tuesday's editorial "Amtrak idea is risky," the true risk with Northeast Corridor high-speed passenger rail is continuing the status quo with Amtrak's costly, subpar performance. The federal government simply can't afford Amtrak's 30-year, $117 billion plan to bring high-speed rail to the corridor. While some criticize Congress for not sufficiently funding Amtrak over the years, no one can reasonably expect Congress to provide this kind of money for this project, particularly in this budgetary environment. That is why we have proposed an innovative approach to fund improved passenger rail by encouraging competition in the corridor. We must attract needed private-sector resources and expertise to dramatically lower taxpayer costs and speed up delivery of real high-speed rail. Our committee has heard testimony regarding successful private-sector involvement in rail operations around the world. To suggest that investors are waiting to pounce on this opportunity to take over the corridor just to provide inferior rail service is ludicrous - that's not how the free-market system works. Our proposal includes specific performance standards to ensure the least cost to taxpayers and the most private-sector participation. It also protects existing rail operations against service disruptions. We support a robust national passenger rail system. Our proposal will improve and expand passenger rail service by welcoming competition and forcing Amtrak to improve.
Rep. John L. Mica (R., Fla.)
Chairman, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Rep. Bill Shuster (R., Pa.)
Chairman, House Subcommittee on Railroads,
Pipelines and Hazardous Materials
Washington