United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Blackballed Pelosi Stammers Through Interview With Series of Offensive and False Claims
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://nation.foxnews.com/nancy-pel ... series-offensive-and-false-cla
Published: Jun 27, 2011
Author: foxnews
Post Date: 2011-06-27 13:56:58 by no gnu taxes
Keywords: None
Views: 30689
Comments: 54
Pelosi has been iced out of debt talks and has reportedly demanded a seat at the table … to no avail … and appeared visibly upset about it. Imitating Jack Nicholson’s famous line from “A Few Good Men,” Pelosi told Eric Cantor he “can’t handle the truth,” and then told this whopper: "All this talk about tax cuts, in the Bush years the Republicans said that tax cuts would produce jobs; they didn't. They produced a deficit." In fact, following Bush’s 2003 tax relief, the U.S. had 52 months of uninterrupted job growth, the longest run on record. The former speaker finished off the interview by claiming Republicans were not “patriotic.”
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
#2. To: no gnu taxes (#0)
100% correct. Smallest private sector job growth in decades...and the deficits...well...there's no disputing the fiscal irresponsibility of Boy Blunder and his GOP minions.
Whatever, nancy. What's that college you attended again? I know it wasn't U Pitt or Penn St. It was Pawxatawny Community College or something like that.
She went to Trinity College.
You're claim to fame is that you are a money market manager? Money Market Geez, you get a whole 2.2% APR for your clients and that makes you some kind of economic genius? Gosh, wally.
That's not my claim to fame. I'm a broker. I don't manage money. I move it from one place to the other.
I feel sorry for your clients with a willful idiot like you handling their money.
His description has changed over the years, as the above shows.
Could that be because I've had different jobs in the industry, Boofer? I've been a money market, government and repo trader, then moved into sales while simultaneously a SVP of a branch office of Sanwa's broker dealer, Managing Director of Fixed Income for a Canadian bank and then moved over to the brokerage side in 2002.
Wow, all that on a Poli-Sci degree? No wonder you don't know diddley-shit about economics... you're a parasite in the financial system, living off the trends of those more stupid than you. You think you understand, but the truth is that your whole life is about fleecing others.
I probably could have graduated with a degree in any of: Econ, History, Sociology, English/Writing, or Philosophy and, as it is, should I ever teach or student teach, I;ll have a degree in Communications/Theater. I did undergrad for 8 years...the five I spend as a sophomore were some of the happiest of my life. As for what I know...click your Ruby Slippers together Dorothy...I'm a Wizard compared to you...
Given your proclivities to mental laziness, you wouldn't have made it in economics. AKA "underwater basket-weaving," same as Poli-Sci. LMAO. Bwa-HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Communications and THEATER??? Shit, you're a PROFESSIONAL drama- queen... LMAO. LMAO! Reminds me of a quote: "I’ve been going to this high school for 7 ½ years, I’m no dummy…" --Charles Dumar, "Better Off Dead" Oh, I'm SURE that's what you think... but reality is a bit different from your selective perceptions:
Chuckles...I don't copy and paste anything and try to pass it off as my own. Nor do refer people back to what I have posted as proof that what I have posted is proof positive of what I have posted. Nor, when questioned about what I have posted do I offer up the typical feeble rejoinder of "You're too stupid to understand!!!" Nor when all else has failed do I post a picture that 999 out of 1000 times [you're on 233, btw] isn't funny. None of that is the product of an active mind, Erica. But it is the product of your mind.
#25. To: war (#21)
Impressive. Straight back to the playbook, eh, dummy DwarF? Rule #13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact. Rule #15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. And your favorite: Poor dummy... Sooooooo predictable. So feeble. Thanks for playing, dummy.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest"All this talk about tax cuts, in the Bush years the Republicans said that tax cuts would produce jobs; they didn't. They produced a deficit."
#3. To: war (#2)
In fact, following Bush’s 2003 tax relief, the U.S. had 52 months of uninterrupted job growth, the longest run on record.
#4. To: no gnu taxes (#3)
#7. To: war (#4)
#9. To: no gnu taxes (#7)
#10. To: war (#9)
I'm a broker. I don't manage money. I move it from one place to the other.
#11. To: Rudgear (#10)
#13. To: Badeye (#11)
(Edited)
His description has changed over the years, as the above shows.
#17. To: war (#13)
I've been a money market, government and repo trader, then moved into sales while simultaneously a SVP of a branch office of Sanwa's broker dealer, Managing Director of Fixed Income for a Canadian bank and then moved over to the brokerage side in 2002.
#18. To: Capitalist Eric (#17)
(Edited)
#20. To: war (#18)
I probably could have graduated with a degree in any of: Econ
History, Sociology, English/Writing, or Philosophy...
...should I ever teach or student teach, I;ll have a degree in Communications/Theater.
I did undergrad for 8 years...the five I spend as a sophomore were some of the happiest of my life.
As for what I know...click your Ruby Slippers together Dorothy...I'm a Wizard compared to you...
#21. To: Capitalist Eric (#20)
(Edited)
Given your proclivities to mental laziness, you wouldn't have made it in economics.
Replies to Comment # 21. I don't copy and paste anything and try to pass it off as my own. Nor do refer people back to what I have posted as proof that what I have posted is proof positive of what I have posted. Nor, when questioned about what I have posted do I offer up the typical feeble rejoinder of "You're too stupid to understand!!!" Nor when all else has failed do I post a picture that 999 out of 1000 times [you're on 233, btw] isn't funny.
Rule #5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
Rule #18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]