[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Business
See other Business Articles

Title: Durable Goods Orders Rebound In May; GDP Revised Up
Source: USA TODAY/AP
URL Source: http://www.usatoday.com/money/econo ... -06-24-durable-goods-gdp_n.htm
Published: Jun 24, 2011
Author: Martin Crutsinger
Post Date: 2011-06-24 11:43:56 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 37689
Comments: 67

WASHINGTON — Businesses boosted their orders for machinery, electronics products and airplanes in May. The pickup suggests manufacturing is rebounding after the Japan crises made parts scarce and slowed production of some factory goods temporarily.

Orders long-lasting manufactured products increased 1.9% in last month, the Commerce Department said Friday. A key category that signals business investment plans rose 1.6%.

The stronger demand follows a revised 2.7% decline in April that was largely the result of supply disruptions caused by Japan's March 11th earthquake and tsunami. The inability to get critical component parts in such industries as autos and electronics slowed U.S. manufacturing.

Orders for autos and auto parts rose 0.6% in May after having fallen 5.3% in April. The rebound in May in both autos and broader categories supports the view that the April lull was temporary.

Separately, the Commerce Department said the economy grew at a 1.9% annual rate in the January-March quarter. That's not much better than the 1.8% rate estimated a month ago. The small upward revision reflected stronger exports and more business spending on stockpiles.

The bulk of the strength in the durables report came across a wide range of industries. Businesses boosted their orders for machinery 1.2% and demand for computers rose 1.3%. Communications equipment jumped 3.6% increase.

Businesses boosted demand for transportation products 5.8%. Much of that increase reflected a 36.5% surge in orders for commercial aircraft, a very volatile industry that had reported a big decline in production in April. Excluding the volatile transportation category, orders would have risen 0.6% in May after dropping 0.4% in April.

The capital goods category excluding aircraft is viewed as a proxy for business investment. It rose 1.6% after a 0.8% drop in April. Economists believe this category will show strength as companies respond to a one-year tax break aimed at spurring capital spending.

Manufacturing has been one of the strongest sectors of the economy since the recession official ended two years ago. However, there are concerns that the production pace could slow in coming months as businesses decide to scale back their restocking of inventories.

A closely watched gauge of manufacturing activity from the Institute of Supply Manage showed manufacturing dipped to 53.5 in May from 60.4 in April. Readings above 50 indicate manufacturing is continuing to expand. Regional manufacturing surveys put out by the Federal Reserve Banks of New York and Philadelphia also showed recent weakness.

But as production returns to more normal levels in Japan, economists are forecasting that disruptions to factory production in the United States will ease in coming months.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

Under 2% is basically 'running in reverse'.

Badeye  posted on  2011-06-24   11:52:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Badeye (#1)

Under 2% is basically 'running in reverse'.

Not hardly, Badlie. The economy is slowly improving despite your best efforts to suggest otherwise.

Thunderbird  posted on  2011-06-24   12:31:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Thunderbird (#4)

A growth of under 2% 2 years after the recession supposedly ended is pathetically anemic growth.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   12:34:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: no gnu taxes (#5) (Edited)

A growth of under 2% 2 years after the recession supposedly ended is pathetically anemic growth.

Given the depths of the economic downturn, which, btw, the stim stopped dead in its tracks, any positive growth rate is a miracle.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   12:37:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: war (#6)

Not only did the stimulus not work, it actually made the economy worse

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   12:46:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: no gnu taxes (#7) (Edited)

Bullshit.

There's not a credible economist out there who can support any conclusion that the stim did not work.

The economy stopped bleeding jobs. Confidence at major corporations increased. Consumer confidence increased. Purchases of big ticket items such as cars and houses stablized or turned up. Just about every aspect of the economy that was targeted in that stim reacted positively to it.

A stim is a pump prime...a crutch...hopefully deep enough to initiate and sustain its own activity until the broader economy turns up...it functions as an innoculation does. Had you a brain you'd know this. YOu don't so you're an ignoramus and, as we saw again today, a racist one at that.

But I'm sure Boofer will be along to agree with you.

[snicker]

war  posted on  2011-06-24   12:55:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: war (#8)

How we know the stimulus didn't work

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   13:03:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: no gnu taxes (#10)

That was an assessment made 6months into the stim when 3 months of hard data was available.

Stick to posting rants about ni**ers, Paddy...that's what you're best equipped for...

war  posted on  2011-06-24   13:06:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#11)

stimulus didn't work

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   13:12:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: no gnu taxes (#14)

His argument is that that the stim didn't work because it didn't hit the baselines that HE, ex post facto, created for it.

What else you got?

war  posted on  2011-06-24   13:17:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: war (#16)

At least these sources are providing genuine analysis. All you've offered is boilerplate left wing rhetoric on why it SHOULD have worked.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   14:04:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: no gnu taxes (#19) (Edited)

All you've offered is boilerplate left wing rhetoric

There's an old saying in the economic world that states: "When you have to use charts, graphs and statistics instead of words to 'prove' a point...you're probably lying."

That last link was hilarious, btw. Upon further review of Mulligan's work, I nailed EXACTLY what he did, i.e. he simply made up his own baselines, declared them "Keynesian" and then drew his "comparison".

What you call "boilerplate" is actually HOW the effectiveness of a stim gets measured, doofus. The first goal of a stim in a recession is to stop the reccession. It did that. The second goal of a stim in a recession is to initiate nascient growth in some "critical" sectors of the economy of which "sentiment" is a part. The stim did all of that.

The problem with the stim is that while it was BIG enough to stop the recession it was not big enough to jump start, or to use the term that an economist would use, "shock" the economy into a broader based recovery and expansion. In fact, we've only recently "recovered" to the chain weighted value of 4Q 2007 GDP when the recession began. teh stim worked only in its target sectors and nothing more. It just wasn't big enough.

The problem with MouthBreathers such as you and the Boofers of the world is that you beleive the political rhetoric.

Is the economy in good shape? No. But it would have been far worse without the stim.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   14:50:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: war (#21)

instead of words

Bullshit talks.

The stimulus underperformed ALL stated goals and expectations. There is absolutely no evidence that it produced any better results than doing NOTHING. In fact, the unemployment rate exceeded what was predicted if we did do NOTHING.

You think different? Prove it.

And frankly, the money from that was supposed to be used for jobs was simply transferred to local agencies who used it to finance existing projects and pay local employees.

All we got from it was another day older and trillions in debt.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   15:08:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: no gnu taxes (#22)

And frankly, the money from that was supposed to be used for jobs was simply transferred to local agencies who used it to finance existing projects and pay local employees.

Bullshit.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   15:16:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: war (#24)

State governments and the inefectiveness of the Federal stimulus

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   15:22:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: no gnu taxes (#26)

"Leakage" is a problem with any inter-government transfer of funds. The article makes that general observation yet offers no tangible evidence beyond that observation.

It might help if you knew what to look for. What you need to do is go back and look at a) what the expectations for the economy were as the stim was being formulated...b) what occurred as the "form" came into being and c) what we ended up with and, finally, d) how wrong the intial projections of exactly how bad Bush had left the economy were going forward from Jan of 2009.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   15:27:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: war (#28)

The 800 lb gorilla out there you can't ignore is the sheer number of economists out there who don't speak from a partisan viewpoint (like Krugman or even fairly, the Heritage foundation) who provide frank and unbiased analysis that the stimulus was simply a failure.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   15:35:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: no gnu taxes (#29)

You've yet to provide one that holds up to scrutiny. I have a one year head start on you with this Paddy. I totally eviscerated a well known - and very partisan - TV "economist" at a Roundtable last year - almost to the day, in fact - when he tried to promote this same nonsense.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   15:52:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war (#30)

So prove what you say the stimulus did.

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24   15:53:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: no gnu taxes (#31)

So prove what you say the stimulus did.

A) We're no longer in a recession.

B) Business optimism did turn up after the stim had passed.

C) Job losses, especially in construction, were halted and turned positive - where they remain today.

D) Manufacturing indicators turned positive where they remain today.

war  posted on  2011-06-24   16:00:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 33.

#37. To: war (#33)

A) We're no longer in a recession.

Begging the point. How do you know the recession wouldn't have ended anyway as they always do? And frankly to claim we might not technically be in a recession isn't saying much as shitty as the economy has been and still is 2 1/2 years after the stimulus was passed.

Business optimism did turn up after the stim had passed.

So much so that 2 1/2 years later, and 2 years after the recession ended, businesses STILL do not want to hire full time workers. Sure.

Job losses, especially in construction, were halted and turned positive - where they remain today.

The job gains are not even keeping up with population gains -- 2 years into "recovery."

Manufacturing indicators turned positive where they remain today.

Positive? By what standards. They are still very weak when looked at over the last few months.

Two years after a recession ends (supposedly) with a stimulus plan in place and unemployment is still rising, and growth is under 2%? What planet would anyone live on to think that anything that dumbass did has worked?

no gnu taxes  posted on  2011-06-24 16:20:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com