Title: Controlled Demolition Expert on Dutch TV says WT7 was imploded Source:
YouTube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uqrn5x2_f6Q Published:Sep 12, 2006 Author:Dutch person Post Date:2006-09-12 23:54:45 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:5085 Comments:6
Yep it is strange, because in the real world steel buildings don't collapse symetrically. So how did 30 or 40 guys happen to be there to set it up while the fire was going on. Take off your blinders TLB, you are still part Bushbot or Govtbot
Mr. Silversten, who made a down-payment of $124 million on this $3.2 billion complex, promptly insured it for $7 Billion. Not only that, he covered the complex against “terrorist attacks”.
Following the attacks, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy ($7B), based on the two -- in Silverstein's view -- separate attacks. The insurance company, Swiss Re, paid Mr. Silverstein $4.6 Billion — a princely return on a relatively paltry investment of $124 million.
Al Jazeera - Fox News Channel - correspondent - Steve Centanni
"NOVA: The Twin Towers collapsed essentially straight down. Was there any chance they could have tipped over?
Eagar: It's really not possible in this case. In our normal experience, we deal with small things, say, a glass of water, that might tip over, and we don't realize how far something has to tip proportional to its base. The base of the World Trade Center was 208 feet on a side, and that means it would have had to have tipped at least 100 feet to one side in order to move its center of gravity from the center of the building out beyond its base. That would have been a tremendous amount of bending. In a building that is mostly air, as the World Trade Center was, there would have been buckling columns, and it would have come straight down before it ever tipped over."
