If you happened to be watching the Live CNN Polling the night of the debate, you may have noticed something odd about the results:
Are we really to believe Ron Paul polled at 0% after having won the CPAC straw poll decisively in February of 2011?
At the very same time CNN ran their insider poll showing Ron Paul at 0%, their online poll showed him at 81%. Granted, the online poll could be skewed and we can probably attribute a good portion of those online votes to alternative media readers who get most of their news on the internet, but 0% just doesnt seem remotely plausible.
There is a concerted effort to diminish Dr. Pauls standing among republican voters, as has been evidenced time and again by the way his policies and popularity are covered. The left-leaning mainstream media has already chosen their candidates with Mitt Romney leading the pack. As they did in 2008, the media is pushing the republican candidate with the most left-leaning platform of the group, and the one that can be attacked as non-conservative post-primary, just as they did with John McCain. We know how that ended up in the last election, and theyre using the same playbook today.
President Obamas popularity may have tumbled in the last two years, but when it comes time to hit the voting booths he will still have a large amount of support nationwide. The third party movement the real third party movement, which can just as easily be called the No Party movement is certainly not voting Obama. And, wed be surprised to see them vote for a mainstream republican candidate as well this time around.
Mainstream media of the democrat persuasion, which includes CNN, NBC, CNBC, ABC, and CBS know that independently minded Constitutionally-leaning voters are apt to stay home and not vote for the lesser of two evils this election. This bodes very well for President Obama, as the republican candidate will need these third party independents to swing the election, so eliminating any possibility of a truly faithful Constitutional candidate from emerging is the immediate goal of the mainstream media (including Fox News) for the next year until the primaries.
For those who understand that the left and right political spectrum is a tool of tyranny, its easy to see that Mitt Romney is just another Bill Clinton, George Bush and Barack Obama. In the end, it really wont matter all that much whether we have a second Obama Presidency, or a Romney Presidency, because neither one of these individuals will step up to stop the corruption in business and government, the looting of our wealth, and the attack on personal liberties in America.
To review, heres what conventional education would have us believe is the political spectrum: Here is the way it actually works:
The traditional left and right paradigm attempts to differentiate between the Republican and Democrat parties. The True View shows us that both parties are one and the same in terms of personal, political and economic freedom.
At this time, we remain pessimistic about the chances of a true view right leaning, or even centrist, candidate winning the White House in 2012. And, unless the appetites of third-party / no-party electorate are satiated with a Presidential, or even Vice-Presidential, candidate who they can trust, it is quite possible that President Obama rules (his words, not ours) for another term.
As frustrating, scary, damaging and pessimistic as that may sound, it is what it is. It is still early in the Presidential election cycle and there will certainly be trends and surprises that emerge over the next year and a half, so this assessment is certainly subject to change. But right now, its not looking good for the American people or the US Constitution.
Poster Comment:
The two "parties" are simply different sides of the same corrupt coin.
CNN is infamous for rigging polls to get the results they want. The first example was a gun control "poll" they ran back around 1990 or 1991. They were obviously expecting massive votes for gun control,and when it went the other way they took the poll down saying there were "technical problems" with it and that it would be put back up when the problems were fixed. A lot of us were suspicious about this so we saved screen shots from our browsing history.
Guess what? When the poll went back up the numbers were reversed,and there was massive support FOR more gun control. Not only that,but any vote cast against gun control was logged on as being for gun control. We were all over them for that,posting screen shots to prove our claims. They shut the poll down again then and never responded to any of the complaints.
Also,I just happened to be in Moscow during the 1996 presidential elections there,and the Communist Party of Russia just happened to be holding a campaign rally right outside the Hotel Belgrade,where I was staying. Their party leader and presidential candidate was standing on the back of a flatbed truck surrounded by the Moscow police,and giving a speech when I came down into the lobby to meet with my driver/translator. I was close enough I could see his mouth move and his eyes blink. The tv was on in the lobby,and it was CNN international reporting on the speech in English,and the reporter was saying the communist candidate had massive support from the people and even the Moscow police were there at the rally to show their support for him because he had vowed to end the lawlessness.
I asked the translator about this and both he and other English-speaking Russians in the lobby all told me this was nonsense and asked me why the Americans were supporting the communists. I took a close look and the police surrounding the flat bed truck were NOT cheering and applauding the speech. In fact they had their backs to the truck and were there to guard him against the mostly anti-communist crowd that had shown up. CNN didn't mention this and they didn't mention the riot control militia detachment nearby that was ready to jump in if things got out of hand.
I told the Russians I was talking to that if somebody would give me a belt-fed machine gun and a couple of good ammo bearers I would solve this little problem for them in just a few minutes. They started slapping me on the back and offering to buy me drinks in the bar.