The argument over whether Sarah Palin was misinformed about the historical facts of Paul Reveres ride has moved to where bar bets go to be settled: Wikipedia. Since Ms. Palin described the ride last week while she was visiting Boston, Wikipedias Paul Revere article page has been the site of a mini edit war. And the page has gone from a little-visited one 2,000 or so page views a day to a more heavily trafficked one, with54,000 on Saturday when Ms. Palins comments were gaining the most news attention.
Over the course of the weekend, people added sentences to the Revere article that repeated Ms. Palins claims. It can be hard to discern motives for changes on Wikipedia, and in some cases people appeared to be attributing the claims to Ms. Palin in order to mock her.
One editor, Tomwsulcer, added the following sentence: Accounts differ regarding the method of alerting the colonists; the generally accepted position is that the warnings were verbal in nature, although one disputed account suggested that Revere rang bells during his ride.
When the discussion board for the Revere article was ringing with complaints that this was a lie, Tomwsulcer replied that it should be included as a theory because a prominent American politician, that is, Sarah Palin, had said it. If you follow Wikipedias rules, he wrote, we must maintain a neutral position, representing the mainstream position as well as disputed versions.
He lost the argument, but others have been searching history books to find evidence to support Ms. Palins claims.
One editor added the fact that the colonists on the eve of revolution were themselves British. That argument was included at the end of a passage stating that Revere did not shout the phrase later attributed to him (The British are coming!), largely because the mission depended on secrecy and the countryside was filled with British army patrols.
By that logic, Revere did, as Ms. Palin put it, warn the British namely, the rebel colonists who were still technically British subjects.
Click for Full Text!