[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Can Britain Be Restored?"

"Trump's Big, Beautiful Cartel Crackdown: 92 Cartel Members Extradited Before Jalisco Raid"

"Why the Left is Triggered by Western Culture"

"The Uncomfortable Truth About Trans Violence and Political Radicalization"

"AOC’s Risible Performance"

"Why the Outrage Over the Cuts at the Washington Post Is So Annoying"

"New Poll Crushes Dem, Media Narrative: Americans Demand Mass Deportations, Back ICE Overwhelmingly"

"Democratic Overreach on Immigration Beckons"

How to negotiate to buy a car

Trump warns of a 'massive Armada' headed towards Iran

End Times Prophecy: Trump Says Board of Peace Will Override Every Government & Law – 10 Kings Rising

Maine's legendary 'Lobster Lady' dies after working until she was 103 and waking up at 3am every day

Hannity Says Immigration Raids at Home Depot Are Not ‘A Good Idea’

TREASON: Their PRIVATE CHAT just got LEAKED.

"Homan Plans to Defy Spanberger After ‘Bond Villain’ Blocks ICE Cooperation in VA: ‘Not Going to Stop’"

"DemocRATZ Radical Left-Wing Vision for Virginia"

"Tim Walz Wants the Worst"

Border Patrol Agents SMASH Window and Drag Man from Car in Minnesota Chaos

"Dear White Liberals: Blacks and Hispanics Want No Part of Your Anti-ICE Protests"

"The Silliest Venezuela Take You Will Read Today"

Michael Reagan, Son of Ronald Reagan, Dies at 80

Patel: "Minnesota Fraud Probes 'Buried' Under Biden"

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bush Wars
See other Bush Wars Articles

Title: Why is bin Laden breathing? this represents a fundamental failure of President Bush's "war on terror"
Source: Joseph Farah
URL Source: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51876
Published: Sep 8, 2006
Author: Joseph Farah
Post Date: 2006-09-08 15:42:10 by TLBSHOW
Keywords: None
Views: 306

Five years after the worst foreign attack on U.S. soil, why is the man who claimed responsibility for it still alive?

I'm surprised by how few people are asking this question.

Maybe it's just too disturbing for Americans to think about.

In my view, the fact that Osama bin Laden is still alive today – still plotting and directing more attacks against America and her allies – represents a fundamental failure of President Bush's "war on terror."

Or does it?

Is it possible – is it conceivable – that President Bush doesn't really care about getting bin Laden?

Someone needs to ask this question of the president and demand a straightforward public response. If no one else does it, I promise our White House correspondent will make the effort.

Why does the question need to be asked?

Because less than a year after Sept. 11, 2001, Bush said he didn't care about bin Laden.

"I truly am not that concerned about him," is the way he put it.

Reading those comments has troubled me – troubled my soul.

I have many and profound disagreements with President Bush. Much of what he does and does not do as president mystifies me. But, until reading those words, one thing I was certain we had in common was our desire to "get bin Laden!"

Immediately after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Bush said he wanted bin Laden "dead or alive." That was the right thing to say. That was the right objective to pursue.

But less than a year later, perhaps discouraged by his inability to catch bin Laden, Bush's attitude had already undergone a pronounced shift.

Asked by a reporter if he believed bin Laden continued to pose a threat, Bush responded:

Well, as I say, we haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is I – I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run. I was concerned about him, when he had taken over a country. I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban. So, according to Bush, only enemies running countries are important? I thought that, by definition, terrorists were considered stateless operators. If Bush is looking now for terrorists running countries, I can name a bunch. However, I am flabbergasted that the president's interest in bin Laden would drop after only six months simply because he had been apparently dislodged from power in Afghanistan.

Somehow, I thought our commitment to get bin Laden for the murders of 3,000 Americans was not conditional. I didn't think our interest in him would ever wane. I didn't think U.S. officials would ever give up pursuing him because it was difficult, costly or even that he ceased to be a continuing threat. Silly me.

Bin Laden remains a threat. In fact, I would say that for millions of Americans he is a bigger threat than ever before. But even if you don't perceive the threat I see, as a simple matter of justice, we must never take our eye off bin Laden.

We must never forget.

We must always remember 9-11.

No matter what we achieve in Iraq or Afghanistan or any other front in this war on jihadist terrorism, unless we get bin Laden, we will never have closure over the events of Sept. 11, 2001. The longer it takes, the more we risk.

It's time to refocus our efforts on eliminating this human plague from the planet.

It's time to redouble our efforts to find him and smoke him.

It's time to pull out all the stops – and if that means attacking him in Pakistan or Iran or any other nation, we do it. If we have to use bunker-buster bombs or tactical nuclear weapons, we do it. If we have to redeploy armed forces from elsewhere on the globe, we do it.

It's time to use all our great technology and all our great manpower and American ingenuity to do something that will make America's day.

I'm surprised no one else is saying this.

It's been too long.

I know there are many other threats in the world besides the monster known as bin Laden. I know the conflict is not over the day bin Laden assumes room temperature. I know this is about much more than one man.

But without bin Laden, we've failed.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com