LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: The 25 Rules of Disinformation [The Leftist Play-book Exposed]
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestne ... he-25-rules-of-disinformation/
Published: May 26, 2011
Author: H. Michael Sweeney
Post Date: 2011-05-26 14:47:12 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 21942
Comments: 36
From Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist) by H. Michael Sweeney. These 25 rules are everywhere in media, from political debates, to television shows, to comments on a blog. 1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it - especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues. 2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit. 3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact. 4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues. 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. 6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning - simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint. 7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive. 8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources. 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. 10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues - so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source. 11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made - but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues. 12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues. 13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact. 14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10. 15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. 16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue. 17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues. 18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”. 19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance. 20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. 21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. 22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively. 23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes. 24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats. 25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)
Sounds like what the Republicans do.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
Uh-HUH. It's exactly what YOU do, every day. Let's go through the list, shall we? Does Godsheit "Become incredulous and indignant."? CHECK. Does Godsheit "Use a straw man."? CHECK. Does Godsheit "Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left- wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth."? CHECK. Does Godsheit "Hit and Run. "? CHECK. Does Godsheit "Question motives. "? CHECK. Does Godsheit "Play Dumb. "? CHECK. Yeah, you're the master of "dumb." Does Godsheit apply "Alice in Wonderland Logic. "? CHECK. Does Godsheit "Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. "? CHECK. Does Godsheit "Ignore proof presented"? CHECK. Does Godsheit manufactture "False evidence."? CHECK. Thanks for playing, Gobsheit. I figured a turd like you would jump on the thread... As long as I have the lowest of expectations, you don't disappoint.
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: In his defense, I don't think he's playing.
Now, I know I’m not going to change the minds of any of the True Believers…those who read all of Reverend Al’s sermons, and say things like, “You know, global warming can mean warmer OR colder, wetter OR drier, cloudier OR sunnier, windier OR calmer, …”. Can I get an ‘amen’??
LMAO... Yeah, I see your point...
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: Did you look at your own responses? With the kooky drawings of feces flinging, etc you would find on kook sights like Rense?
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
This is one of those circle jerk threads that allows them to escape defending their stupid assed arguments.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." Every point of bad behavior he is saying the left does is what he does on here. I mean talk about cognitive dissonance...... Actually, I am starting to think Capitalist Eric is actually doing a put on. He is a leftist - posts leftist leaning - anti-capitalist articles - but acts all Archie Bunker-ish and claims those positions are right wing positions.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
has long been kept from having anything resmbling an original thought. He can't even ***think*** about what it is he posts.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." ... I mean talk about cognitive dissonance...... ...the kooky ... kook sights... Thanks, DwarF and gobsheit, for perfectly demonstrating: 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. I knew this thread would be enjoyable to watch, as you shitheads attempt to divert the thread... You don't disappoint. LMAO! Ping to the others, for your pleasure. :)
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: This is so true. It make me sick every time I think about it.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. 7. Question motives. 19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. 20. False evidence. Whenever possible ...introduce new facts or clues... and 23. Create bigger distractions. PERFECT!!!
Isn't this right out of the Birther Handbook?
LOL! NOTHING makes these libTURD tools, fools, and WHORES, more angry than others pointing out the "rules" that they play by, and then, playing by those same "rules" against these same noxious vermin. They soil themselves when you turn Alinsky et. al. back around AT THEM! It makes em bitch and whine, it makes em cry like the little chickensheit beyeeachess that we all know they REALLY are. Look at their libTURD herd members frantically pissing all over themselves PROVING the point! GOOD STUFF! "POP! goes the weasel!" LOL!
Spoiled, stupid and ignorant, brain dead phuckwads, libTURD fools, tools, and idiots, are the real sickness; the messiah "king" obammy and his regime are only the symptoms.
Thanks Erica for once again proving #5 and #9.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." You're not much for meaningful answers, ARE you? As usual, you pull shit out of your ass, pretend it's a fact, and then march on like you have good sense... You are the very personification of the deranged leftist mentality.
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: Disinformation Rule #5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. I figured you would NOT be able to resist, and would knee-jerk right into the article... Good laughs! :) Thanks for playing!
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: Hmm, let's see... "List of those unable to think: mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation. " As they say, Capitalist Eric, you spot it you've got it
It is our responsibility to protect that child once that child’s born too. When we start debating a budget, let’s make sure we don’t cut 100,000 vaccines. Let’s make sure we’ve got health insurance. We seem to worship what we cannot see, but as soon as that baby’s born, oh no, we don’t want to be intrusive. Texas is going to shrink government until it fits inside a women’s uterus. Senator Leticia Van de Putte
I'm exercising my first right amendment rights and advising others to stay off this site until Stone decides to put a damper on the nasty spam this poster tries to intimidate others with.
war no, godwinson yes
Intimidate????? I suppose if the truth hurts that much it could be intimidating.... Rules for Libtards #1). The truth hurts me...
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning
It is a little rough here sometimes. Mike just called me a bigot and hateful. All I did was relay Gods word. Anyway what is so offensive? Is it the flying monkey crap?
My answer was on topic, Erica. Maybe that's why you didn't recognize it.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." Anyway what is so offensive? Is it the flying monkey crap? You know what? I take it back. It shows Erica and those who "think" like him in a true light. Buttholes.
Anyway what is so offensive? Is it the flying monkey crap? What's so offensive, is that their veneer of intellect and civility are exposed for what they REALLY are: tactics designed to suppress debate of those they disagree with. Indeed, that is the point of the article, and IMO was very well-written.
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: Indeed, that is the point of the article, and IMO was very well-written. Don't worry, infantile cartoons represents YOUR mentality well. You are doing Ron Paul a disservice though.
Thanks for your attempted use of the following Disinformation Rules: 18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”. This article nails you leftist down so well, you don't really know how else to respond, do you??? LMAO.
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: Yet you just admitted to Badeye your own attempts at disinfo. Someday you will grow up and learn that the rules you post apply to YOU too.
thanks for demonstrating Next?
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: Rule of Disinformation #20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. Next? You apparently consider any reply to you which you disagree with disinfo. Yet you break your own rules with impunity.
WOW... you got a LOT of them, this time. I'm impressed! 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. 13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact. 15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. 18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”. 20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications. Next attempt?
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: Actually it nails all the purchasers of foreign brides on this forum. Showing that good conservative capitalists buy everything, even their wives
Mixing the tactics up, eh? Let's see... which ones do you cover THIS time??? Rule of Disinformation #7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive. Rule of Disinformation #15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place. Rule of Disinformation #9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. You still FAIL. From your continued attempts, it's obvious that you're getting desperate. At this point, you're reverting to femi-NAZI slurs, in a vain attempt to generate some sort of traction... How amusing... NEXT try??? LOL.
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car: How could I fail, when you say I have been so successful. Feminazi...lolol. You Limbaugh lover you.
?
So much for the "Voice of Reason"....... LOL.......
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning
bookmarked.
List of those unable to think: Bumper sticker on DwarF's car:
#2. To: Godwinson (#1)
Sounds like what the Republicans do.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#3. To: Capitalist Eric (#2)
Does Godsheit "Play Dumb."
#4. To: no gnu taxes (#3)
In his defense, I don't think he's playing.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#5. To: Capitalist Eric, no gnu taxes (#2)
"Become incredulous and indignant."
#6. To: Godwinson (#5)
--GW Bush
#7. To: Capitalist Eric, war (#6)
#8. To: Godwinson (#7)
Capitalist Eric
--GW Bush
#9. To: war, godwinson, CZ82, hondo68, A K A Stone, Rudgear, jwpegler, socalv8 (#8)
This is one of those circle jerk threads that allows them to escape defending their stupid assed arguments. ... has long been kept from having anything resmbling an original thought. He can't even ***think*** about what it is he posts.
7. Question motives.
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible ...introduce new facts or clues... and
23. Create bigger distractions.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#10. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)
"Everything that can be invented has been invented."-- Charles Duell, Commissioner of US Patent Office, 1899
#11. To: Capitalist Eric (#9)
Thanks, DwarF and gobsheit, for perfectly demonstrating:
"Everything that can be invented has been invented."-- Charles Duell, Commissioner of US Patent Office, 1899
#12. To: Godwinson (#1)
Sounds like what the Republicans do.
#13. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)
#14. To: Capitalist Eric (#9)
(Edited)
--GW Bush
#15. To: war (#14)
(Edited)
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#16. To: Skip Intro (#12)
Isn't this right out of the Birther Handbook?
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#17. To: Capitalist Eric (#2)
(Edited)
Does Godsheit "Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left- wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth."? CHECK.
#18. To: lucysmom, AKA Stone (#17)
As they say, Capitalist Eric, you spot it you've got it
#19. To: Capitalist Eric (#9)
I can hear gwin turning playbook pages between posts.
#20. To: mininggold (#18)
I'm exercising my first right amendment rights and advising others to stay off this site until Stone decides to put a damper on the nasty spam this poster tries to intimidate others with.
#21. To: mininggold (#18)
#22. To: Capitalist Eric (#15)
You're not much for meaningful answers, ARE you?
--GW Bush
#23. To: A K A Stone (#21)
It is a little rough here sometimes. Mike just called me a bigot and hateful. All I did was relay Gods word.
#24. To: A K A Stone, mininggold (#21)
To: mininggold It is a little rough here sometimes. Mike just called me a bigot and hateful. All I did was relay Gods word.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#25. To: Capitalist Eric (#24)
(Edited)
What's so offensive, is that their veneer of intellect and civility are exposed for what they REALLY are: tactics designed to suppress debate of those they disagree with.
#26. To: mininggold, A K A Stone (#25)
(Edited)
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#27. To: Capitalist Eric. Badeye (#26)
Thanks for your attempted use of the following Disinformation Rules:
#28. To: mininggold (#27)
Yet you just admitted to Badeye your own attempts at disinfo.
Rule of Disinformation #20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#29. To: Capitalist Eric (#28)
thanks for demonstrating
#30. To: mininggold (#29)
You apparently consider any reply to you which you disagree with disinfo. Yet you break your own rules with impunity.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#31. To: Capitalist Eric (#26)
(Edited)
his article nails you leftist down so well, you don't really know how else to respond, do you??? LMAO.
#32. To: mininggold (#31)
Rule of Disinformation #20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
#33. To: Capitalist Eric (#32)
You still FAIL.
#34. To: mininggold (#31)
Actually it nails all the purchasers of foreign brides on this forum.
#35. To: mininggold (#31)
Actually it nails all the purchasers of foreign brides on this forum. Showing that good conservative capitalists buy everything, even their wives
#36. To: capitalist eric (#35)
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, mininggold, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list, you're too fucking stupid to hold a real conversation.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]