There is no such thing as homosexual parents. They can't reproduce.
Sure there is and sure they can. They do it everyday,and have done it everyday since the dawn of mankind.
Two people of the same gender can't reproduce,but there is nothing preventing a homosexual from creating a baby with someone from the opposite gender.
Just look at former Bush White House Spiritual Advisor ,"The Rev-Rund Ted Haggard" for proof of this. He was not only the married father of 5,he was also a graduate of Anal Roberts University,a fundie Christian pastor,and the president of the national Evangelical association.
He also seems to have been fond of meth and hookers,but this is also true of many heterosexuals.
Why not? Here you are commenting on it,don't you think it would be best to watch it first so you know what you are commenting on?
Besides,if you will watch it you will see it was a obvious setup with the "complaining customers" being in on it. The whole purpose was to push for a federal law to make it illegal for a private business to deny service to homosexuals.
Why do you insist on diminishing the economic freedom of others (business owners) as to whom they will do business with, and call it freedom?
How am I free to make my own economic choices if a sign on the door says "We DO NOT Sell To WASPs"?
You either want a FREE market in which all the participants are FREE to make the SAME choices or you want an managed market in which some may fully participate and others either may not or may do so in a limited fashion.
You either want a FREE market in which all the participants are FREE to make the SAME choices or you want an managed market in which some may fully participate and others either may not or may do so in a limited fashion.
You want a "free" market where everyone's told what they may and may not do.
Being told by others what you may and may not do is not freedom, it's a managed market, no matter how you spin it.
I believe that you and I have a different view of freedom. Freedom isn't about limiting choice or access. It's allowing the system of exchange to function unencumbered - and that includes any artifical encumberance initiated by the irrational prejudices of the participants.
