The main thing I disagree with regarding this kooks kook is we can't afford another four years of Owe-bama.
The rest? Sheesh, yep his comments related to bin Laden, his view on schedule two drugs, there is a long list of kook based nonsense Ron Paul has spewed over the years.
His followers are cult like in their devoution, can't deny that. But sorry, this kook couldn't get elected dog catcher outside of his weird district. How many times does he have to get blown out in primaries for that simply, unarguable fact to sink in?
It's been the economy for years. We've been on a fast train to this very point for years. This isn't new.
How about a name? Romney perhaps?
Actually, it hasn't been.
2008 was 'beating Bush' even though he wasn't on the ticket. Thats how a clown with zero experience in the real world became POTUS on 'hope and change'.
2010 was about Owe-bama's nationalizing of healthcare, and tripling the annual deficit.
2012 will be ALL about the economy.
Romney...I think he could easily win the Presidential election cycle. I just don't know if he can win the GOP primaries. The 'experts' keep claiming if Romney wins the GOP nomination then 'Owe-bama's nationalization of healthcare is off the table' because of Romneycare in MA.
The election won't be about Owe-bama care. Thats a secondary issue now. An important one to be sure, but it won't be THE issue next year.
Record numbers of unemployed Americans, and Owe-bama the Foodstamp President will be. Toss in middle class Americans homeless due to another year of record foreclosures - the last four months of this year will stagger the country when the reviewing of robo signings gets done and that floodgate opens btw - will drive the election cycle way past anything the Left can possibly spin.
2008 was 'beating Bush' even though he wasn't on the ticket.
Ahhhh, I see. We're talking talk radio/ R v D talking points, not the real world.
I didn't ask for your analysis of the last 2 presidential elections and the last midterm, I asked who are you leaning toward supporting. It's a simple question but to answer it requires that you either type the name of a candidate or potential candidate or 'none of the above'.
Right now those I would 'lean towards' aren't in the race. I really like Paul Ryan. Gotta admit Herman Cain impressed me Sunday, and again last night on Hannity.
You made an assertion that wasn't factually accurate about the last POTUS election cycle in my view, I corrected it. Same for what drove the 2010 mid terms.
I'll get however I choose to get. Don't tell me you're one of those who dish but can't take?
I really like Paul Ryan.
I thought you were a conservative. Are you a 'free trade', pro patriot act, hate FISA warrants for Americans, "unbreakable U.S.-Israel bond", compassionate conservative and you want comprehensive immigration reform but of course oppose amnesty too?
And you have the nerve to laugh at others who support candidates who oppose all of those? Thanks, that is truly laughable.
Gotta admit Herman Cain impressed me Sunday, and again last night on Hannity.
Oh good Lord! We don't even need to get into that.
You made an assertion that wasn't factually accurate...
LOL!!!
But calling a candidate that I like, a CONSERVATIVE, a military man, doctor and 20 year Congressman a "kook's kook" is a factually accurate statement? Please. Now you're approaching ridiculous.
