United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Congress To Vote On Declaration of Worldwide Perpetual War With No Borders And No Clear Enemies
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://theintelhub.com/2011/05/15/c ... h-no-borders-no-clear-enemies/
Published: May 16, 2011
Author: Alexander Higgins with excerpts from Ale
Post Date: 2011-05-16 01:07:12 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 2834
Comments: 4
The legislation authorizes the President of the United States to take unilateral military action against all nations, organizations, and persons, both domestically and abroad, who are alleged to be currently or who have in the past supported or engaged in hostilities or who have provided aid in support of hostilities against the Untied States or any of its coalition allies. The legislation removes the requirement of congressional approval for the use of military force and instead gives the President totalitarian dictatorial authority to engage in any and all military actions for an indefinite period of time. It even authorizes the President the authority to launch attacks against American Citizens inside the United States with no congressional oversight whatsoever. Just to recap, because that was a mouthful: The America Civil Liberties Union writes: Congress may soon vote on a new declaration of worldwide war without end, and without clear enemies. A “sleeper provision” deep inside defense bills pending before Congress could become the single biggest hand-over of unchecked war authority from Congress to the executive branch in modern American history. President Obama has not sought new war authority. In fact, his administration has made clear that it believes it already has all of the authority that it needs to fight terrorism. But Congress is considering monumental new legislation that would grant the president – and all presidents after him – sweeping new power to make war almost anywhere and everywhere. Unlike previous grants of authority for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, the proposed legislation would allow a president to use military force wherever terrorism suspects are present in the world, regardless of whether there has been any harm to U.S. citizens, or any attack on the United States, or any imminent threat of an attack. The legislation is broad enough to permit a president to use military force within the United States and against American citizens. The legislation contains no expiration date, and no criteria to determine when a president’s authority to use military force would end. Of all of the powers that the Constitution assigns to Congress, no power is more fundamental or important than the power “to declare War.” That is why, in 2002, when Congress was considering whether to authorize war in Iraq, it held fifteen hearings, and passed legislation that cited specific harms, set limits, and defined a clear objective. Now, Congress is poised to give unchecked authority to the executive branch to use military force worldwide, with profoundly negative consequences for our fundamental democratic system of checks and balances. Once Congress expands the president’s war power, it will be nearly impossible to rein it back in. The ACLU strongly opposes a wholesale turnover of war power from Congress to the president – and all of his successors. Coalition Memo to the House Committee on Armed Services Regarding a Proposed New Declaration of War Comparison of 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force and Proposed Expanded Authorization The offending text uses doublespeak to declare perpetual war. Specifically, the text uses the phrase “affirms” armed conflict which is the terminology used by congress to declare war in every instance since World War 2. Congress affirms that — (1) the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces and that those entities continue to pose a threat to the United States and its citizens, both domestically and abroad; (2) the President has the authority to use all necessary and appropriate force during the current armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note); (3) the current armed conflict includes nations, organization, and persons who— (A) are part of, or are substantially supporting, al48;Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or (B) have engaged in hostilities or have directly supported hostilities in aid of a nation, organization, or person described in subparagraph (A); and (4) the President’s authority pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority to detain belligerents, including persons described in paragraph (3), until the termination of hostilities. Indeed, the moment we all feared has come before us as Congress is set to give the President absolute power over the military, including the authority to launch military strikes within the United States against U.S. Citizens. With the assassination of Osama Bin Laden on Pakistan soil many were naive enough to believe that the War on Terror would come to an end. Instead, the reported success of the raid is being used as a crutch to push through new legislation in the defense bills which literally authorize World War 3, an endless war with no defined enemies and no borders. The whole Osama Bin Laden staged media spectacle was put forward not only in order to install TSA in train stations, malls, and all major public events, it is also being used to convince the public to support endless war all in the name of security. Short of committing genocide the termination of the hostilities will never come and as such the war will never come to end. We have already learned that officials falsified reports that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction to justify the invasion of Iraq for the “prize” of oil. If a whole government of top officials can not be trusted then surely a single president cannot be trusted either. We have seen the U.S Government turn Nazi and buy and burn every copy of a book that had evidence of a 9/11 cover up. The Department of Justice has already published a memo calling constitutionalists and survivalist potential terrorists. Is it not bad enough that U.S courts have already legalized the abduction of U.S Citizens along with their indefinite detention and torture in overseas prison camps? Or that the U.S Government openly admits to gunning down, kidnapping and torturing American college students? Under the definition of the legislation, the President could authorize the military to attack the ACLU building because they have supported the “terrorists” by arguing for their civil rights. How long will it take before this moves towards assassinating activists? Join The Intel Hub Breaking News Alerts Mailing List The have already labeled conspiracy theories as “dangerous thoughts that could lead to violence” and have even specifically called The Intel Hub, which routinely publishes my articles, an echo chamber pushing out “dangerous thoughts that could lead to violence”. Uncle Sam openly admits to turning its multi-billion dollar espionage network against U.S Citizens which has produced such great fruits as innocent activists exercising their first amendment rights being placed on the terrorist watch list by the FBI and Department of Homeland Security. Just remember as long as we are in a state of war your civil liberties and constitutional rights are pretty much null and void, only enforceable if the Government allows you to have them. Even then, they can declare you a terrorist, an enemy combatant or a threat to national security to revoke your constitutional rights immediately. They then can play the national security card when they are asked to explain their allegations. All around this is rotten and the first step to getting our rights back is to end the perpetual wars. Contact your congressman and tell them NO WAY to this egregious bill!!
Poster Comment: This sort of shit smacks of the political moves which allowed Adolf Hitler to obtain complete dictatorial powers- legally.
New Authorization of Worldwide War Without End?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)
I didn't read your entire article yet. To me it sounds like they arlready passed something like this in the authorization of force against Iraq. It gave the president the power to enforce UN resolutions.
The authorization for WOT passed 9/14 was a declaration against the perps of 9/11 as well as against those who aided then prior and after.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." I was not aware of just how bad the flooding was; thanks for posting.
Pay attention to what I said. Iraq war.
Pay attention to what I "said"...the WOT preceded the Iraq war. The Iraq war was a separate resolution. The WOT resolution has very open ended language in terms of who, what and where.
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." I was not aware of just how bad the flooding was; thanks for posting.
#2. To: A K A Stone (#1)
--GW Bush
#3. To: war (#2)
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)
--GW Bush
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]