Humor
See other Humor Articles
Title: Obama regrets burying Osama at sea
Source:
BG
URL Source: http://biggovernment.com/files/2011/05/OBAMANATION84.jpg
Published: May 15, 2011
Author: Hudnall/ Lash
Post Date: 2011-05-15 17:11:42 by CZ82
Keywords: None
Views: 14585
Comments: 24
(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
#1. To: CZ82 (#0)
The real "Mission Accomplished"
I know the true story of how Saddam was captured. I’ve been privileged to go shooting with the guys who actually did the op (I bought them a box of cigars for their accomplishment). The story the Bush people put out was an effective cover story. They wanted to protect the identity and capability of those who actually did the mission. What a contrast with Obama. He and his team can’t tell the same story two days in a row. Awful. And in the process he is exposing important classified capabilities. But Obama does not care. He’s desperate to get a bump from this and will do anything to get it. The contrast between Bush and Obama on this score is enormous. Bush acted like a real leader when it came to the capture of Saddam. Obama has violated everything he claimed to stand for. http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2011/05/10/bush-did-it-better-than-obama/
I wasn't a fan of Bush. But this Kenyan makes Bush look pretty good comparatively.
Well, comparatively, isn't it better to eat cat shit than dog shit, since cat shit is smaller, comparatively?
Cat shit stinks more. I think it is more akin to this. obama is cat shit. Bush is a grub worm. I'd rather eat the grub worm.
I think you are caught up in a bad analogy. Just admit it and bail.
It's a perfect analogy of how we got to where we are. Relativism.
When you have two people with D nomination and R nomination. One will be president. One will be better and one worse. You can vote Perot or Peroutka as I did. But a D or R is still going to be president. You may want to pretend that the candidates are carbon copies. But they are not, not by a long shot. So we need to try to get someone good nominated on the R side. The D's have a baby killer. He should be easy to beat.
Perot lost, get over it! Do you think that pappy Bush's second term would have been any better than slick willie? Just because Perot lost, doesn't mean that we're stuck with choosing between D or R shit, till Kingdom come!
Just because Perot lost, doesn't mean that we're stuck with choosing between D or R shit, till Kingdom come! At the time Bush 1 seemed better then Clinton. They both suck. My point still stands that Bush as terrible as he was is better than Obama. Obama being elected over McCain, even thought McCain was better slightly, may be better because it awakened more people. Gingrich is better than Obama too. I prefer Rand Paul.
There are no replies to Comment # 23. End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: go65 (#1)
However, let’s give Bush credit for not milking the capture of Saddam Hussein the way that Barack Obama is milking the killing of Bin Laden. The irony is huge and delicious. Bush made a big deal about not treating terrorists under the rules of “law enforcement.” However, when Saddam was snatched from the spider hole he was treated as a prisoner and ultimately tried. He got the law enforcement treatment.
#3. To: no gnu taxes (#2)
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)
I wasn't a fan of Bush. But this Kenyan makes Bush look pretty good comparatively.
#5. To: Wood_Chopper (#4)
#7. To: A K A Stone (#5)
#11. To: Rudgear (#7)
I think you are caught up in a bad analogy.
#12. To: Wood_Chopper (#11)
#20. To: A K A Stone (#12)
(Edited)
You can vote Perot or Peroutka as I did.
#23. To: hondo68 (#20)
Perot lost, get over it! Do you think that pappy Bush's second term would have been any better than slick willie?
Replies to Comment # 23.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]