[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"International court’s attack on Israel a sign of the free world’s moral collapse" "Pete Hegseth Is Right for the DOD" "Why Our Constitution Secures Liberty, Not Democracy" Woodworking and Construction Hacks "CNN: Reporters Were Crying and Hugging in the Hallways After Learning of Matt Gaetz's AG Nomination" "NEW: Democrat Officials Move to Steal the Senate Race in Pennsylvania, Admit to Breaking the Law" "Pete Hegseth Is a Disruptive Choice for Secretary of Defense. That’s a Good Thing" Katie Britt will vote with the McConnell machine Battle for Senate leader heats up — Hit pieces coming from Thune and Cornyn. After Trump’s Victory, There Can Be No Unity Without A Reckoning Vivek Ramaswamy, Dark-horse Secretary of State Candidate Megyn Kelly has a message for Democrats. Wait for the ending. Trump to choose Tom Homan as his “Border Czar” "Trump Shows Demography Isn’t Destiny" "Democrats Get a Wake-Up Call about How Unpopular Their Agenda Really Is" Live Election Map with ticker shows every winner. Megyn Kelly Joins Trump at His Final PA Rally of 2024 and Explains Why She's Supporting Him South Carolina Lawmaker at Trump Rally Highlights Story of 3-Year-Old Maddie Hines, Killed by Illegal Alien GOP Demands Biden, Harris Launch Probe into Twice-Deported Illegal Alien Accused of Killing Grayson Davis Previously-Deported Illegal Charged With Killing Arkansas Children’s Hospital Nurse in Horror DUI Crash New Data on Migrant Crime Rates Raises Eyebrows, Alarms Thousands of 'potentially fraudulent voter registration applications' Uncovered, Stopped in Pennsylvania Michigan Will Count Ballot of Chinese National Charged with Voting Illegally "It Did Occur" - Kentucky County Clerk Confirms Voting Booth 'Glitch'' Shifted Trump Votes To Kamala Legendary Astronaut Buzz Aldrin 'wholeheartedly' Endorses Donald Trump Liberal Icon Naomi Wolf Endorses Trump: 'He's Being More Inclusive' (Washed Up Has Been) Singer Joni Mitchell Screams 'F*** Trump' at Hollywood Bowl "Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race" He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom! "Kamala’s Inane Talking Points" "The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics" Easy Drywall Patch Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind" Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’ Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer? hurricanes and heat waves are Worse 'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA. Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence. Status: Not Logged In; Sign In United States News See other United States News Articles Title: Ron Paul: I Would Not Have Ordered Bin Laden Raid Source: Fox News URL Source: http://nation.foxnews.com/politics/ ... ot-have-ordered-bin-laden-raid Published: May 12, 2011 Author: Fox News Post Date: 2011-05-12 23:07:39 by go65 Keywords: None Views: 4557 Comments: 15 Rep. Ron Paul, a likely Republican presidential candidate known for opposing U.S. military intervention overseas, said if he were president, he would not have duplicated President Obama's plan for taking out the man responsible for the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. In a radio interview Tuesday, Paul suggested the U.S. government could have worked with Pakistan to secure Usama bin Laden's capture instead of unilaterally entering the country and killing him -- despite concerns that the Pakistanis could have tipped him off. "It was absolutely not necessary," Paul said of the May 1 CIA-led Navy SEALs raid. Click for Full Text! Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11. #1. To: go65 (#0) Paul said the United States should have gone after bin Laden the same way it went after Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, architect of the Sept. 11 attacks, by working with the Pakistan government. I love Ron Paul and supported him in 1988, but I'm going to call him out on this. Paul has said from the very beginning of 9/11 that the way to deal with bin Laden is through the Constitutionally sanctioned means of "Letters of Marque and Reprisal". What does "reprisal" mean? According to Wikipedia: In international law, a reprisal is a limited and deliberate violation of international law to punish another sovereign state that has already broken them. Reprisals in the laws of war are extremely limited, as they commonly breached the rights of civilians... Reprisals refer to acts which are illegal if taken alone, but become legal when adopted by one state in retaliation for the commission of an earlier illegal act by another state. Counter-reprisals are generally not allowed. The Constitution allows the U.S. government to take such limited action. Shooting bin Laden in the head is justified reprisal. No ifs, ands, or buts. Ron Paul is completely out-to-lunch on this. Completely. jwpegler  posted on  2011-05-13   0:13:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #2. To: jwpegler (#1) Ron Paul is completely out-to-lunch on this. Completely. I disagree. What he said makes perfect sense. Fred Mertz  posted on  2011-05-13   0:22:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #3. To: Fred Mertz (#2) What he said makes perfect sense. A.) How so? B.) What he said was completely inconsistent with what he has been saying since 9/11 jwpegler  posted on  2011-05-13   0:25:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #4. To: jwpegler, mcgowanjm (#3) (Edited) A.) How so? I'll answer your question with a question. Would it be a better thing to capture Bin Laden or kill him on the spot? Think about it. If you read James' stuff, it is possible that we did capture him...with the cover story out there of his assassination. Fred Mertz  posted on  2011-05-13   0:29:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #5. To: Fred Mertz (#4) (Edited) Would it be a better thing to capture Bin Laden or kill him on the spot? But that's not the point Paul was making in this interview. He said that he would have worked with the corrupt Pakistani government (which includes a lot of extremists) to bring bin Laden to justice. bin Laden would have escaped. Look, I am against the death penalty because I don't think the government has the right to kill American citizens. bin Laden is not an American citizen. He doesn't live in America. He used his inheritance to plot and execute the murder of over 3,000 people, from abroad. It was an act of war, and an ugly one because he targeted civilians. Ron Paul has been right since 9/11 -- REPRISAL. Not getting bogged down in Afghanistan. Certainly not nation building in Iraq. REPRISAL. We did that. BRAVO. Now, Ron Paul is changing his tune. I'm beginning to think that he's really a pacifist rather than a constitutionalist. jwpegler  posted on  2011-05-13   0:36:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #7. To: jwpegler (#5) They fooled you on 911. A K A Stone  posted on  2011-05-13   7:51:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #8. To: A K A Stone, badeye (#7) They fooled you on 911. Careful Stone, I just heard from Badeye that truthers are lefties. go65  posted on  2011-05-13   8:32:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   #11. To: go65 (#8) So you calling me a lefty? I'm right handed. A K A Stone  posted on  2011-05-13   8:48:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   Replies to Comment # 11. #13. To: A K A Stone, badeye (#11) So you calling me a lefty? I'm right handed. Which makes you left-brained, and therefore, a lefty! :-) But hey, Badeye says those that believe that the government is lying about 9/11 are the left's equivalent to "birthers" on the right. So that makes you a flaming liberal! go65  posted on  2011-05-13 10:32:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply   End Trace Mode for Comment # 11. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com