United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: No Breakfast For Kids Wearing ‘Wrong’ Shoes At Grade School
Source:
chicago.cbslocal.com
URL Source: http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2011/05 ... g-wrong-shoes-at-grade-school/
Published: May 11, 2011
Author: staff
Post Date: 2011-05-11 06:45:24 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 6492
Comments: 21
CHICAGO (CBS) — Chicago Public Schools is apologizing to a Chicago mother and her two young sons, ages 5 and 6, after they were denied breakfast because they came to schools wearing the wrong kind of shoes. CBS 2’s Dorothy Tucker reports. The Nicholson brothers only grab a quick snack before heading to class because they qualify for a full free breakfast at Adam Powell Grade School. It’s something they look forward to every day, and it hurt when they were recently turned away. They were wearing black athletic shoes. The boys told their mom that the assistant principal, Angela Peagler wouldn’t let them eat because their shoes didn’t fit the school uniform, which calls for a regular black dress shoe. “I felt sad. We’re always supposed to have breakfast,” first-grader Noah Nicholson says. Noah and his brother Niko, who is in kindergarten, went to class hungry and didn’t eat until lunch. "It hasn’t been a problem all this time and all of a sudden they can’t have breakfast because of their shoes,” Kahlia Edwards, the boys’ mother, says. Edwards says the boys have been wearing the shoes all year and administrators never complained. She’s confused. The boy’s great aunt is livid. “I don’t care if they had on orange shoes, they were in line to eat,” Robin Price says. “I’m not going to feed you because you have the wrong shoes? Shoes? No, no.” CBS 2 tried to ask both the assistant principal and Principal Derek Jordan to explain what happened. They wouldn’t. However, a manager at the CPS regional office spoke with reporter Tucker. Area 17 Management Support Director Darryl Earl says Peagler told him she thought the boys had returned to the breakfast but he acknowledged she was wrong. “Regardless of what shoes they were wearing, obviously the children should have been allowed the opportunity to merge into breakfast,” he says. Monday afternoon, the principal and the assistant principal apologized to the boys and their mother. They went on to explain that they were reacting to an increase in students violating the school dress code. The principal even offered to buy the boys new black shoes. But here’s the kicker: The school’s dress code does not say the shoes have to be black dress shoes. The boys’ mother says the principal obviously needs to make the rules clearer.
Two Chicago grade-schoolers were denied breakfast at their school because they were wearing these athletic shoes instead of dress shoes. (CBS)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
#1. To: Ferret Mike (#0)
Dumbasses.
Yeah, a no common sense interpretation of a strict uniform dress code that loses sight of what the reason fr that uniform was for is wrong. The shoes look like normal kids shoes. I don't like the logo personally, but what business is that of mine to ever tell someone that? In any event, I'm glad they eventually came to their senses and apologize.
That bitch mother should apologize for sending her kids off to school hungry. It is the PARENTS responsibility to feed and clothe their spawn,NOT the schools.
It is the PARENTS responsibility to feed and clothe their spawn,NOT the schools. What you said is true. But she didn't. No need to not feed these two kids when they are feeding the rest of them. It isn't their fault if their mom is a deadbeat. That is a big IF.
You are missing the point,which is the school shouldn't be feeding ANY of them. The government is NOT their family,and crap like this teaches the kids that the government is their mother and father. Programs like school lunches just tear families apart while strengthening the hand of Big Gubbermint. If parents want respect,they have to earn it.
But that's not what the article is about. Making children bear the brunt for adult decisions is what this article is about and what some posters here condone.
#16. To: mininggold (#13)
(Edited)
The chil-runs have learned the valuable lesson that socialism will let you down. They'll probably grow up to be capitalist crack dealers, like their daddy.
That is EXACTLY what it is about. Big Nanny Gubbermint was "supposed" to feed them,and when they didn't he went hungry. How,OH HOW are the supposed to eat if the goverment doesn't feed them? THAT will teach the little snots to obey the Massa!
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: A K A Stone (#1)
#5. To: Ferret Mike (#2)
In any event, I'm glad they eventually came to their senses and apologize.
#7. To: sneakypete (#5)
That bitch mother should apologize for sending her kids off to school hungry.
#10. To: A K A Stone (#7)
No need to not feed these two kids when they are feeding the rest of them. It isn't their fault if their mom is a deadbeat.
#13. To: sneakypete (#10)
You are missing the point,which is the school shouldn't be feeding ANY of them. The government is NOT their family,and crap like this teaches the kids that the government is their mother and father. Programs like school lunches just tear families apart while strengthening the hand of Big Gubbermint.
Replies to Comment # 13.
#18. To: mininggold (#13)
But that's not what the article is about.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]