Obama Wars
See other Obama Wars Articles
Title: Obama: “We Could Not Say Definitively That Bin Laden Was There” (“His name is Akhbar Han")
Source:
Infowars
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/obama-we-co ... vely-that-bin-laden-was-there/
Published: May 9, 2011
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2011-05-09 13:01:21 by Hondo68
Keywords: in fact his neighbor, Akhbar Han, not Bin Laden
Views: 7472
Comments: 7
During his 60 Minutes interview with CBS News last night, Barack Obama admitted that US intelligence was only 55/45 confident that Bin Laden was even in the compound raided last Sunday night, fearing that the occupant could actually have been a “prince from Dubai,” a skepticism shared by residents of Abbottabad, one of whom told the BBC that the man seen watching television in the tapes released by the White House Saturday was in fact his neighbor, not Bin Laden. The relevant comments are made after the 10 minute mark. “Obviously, we’re going into the sovereign territory of another country and landing helicopters and conducting a military operation. And so if it turns out that it’s a wealthy, you know, prince from Dubai who’s in this compound, and, you know, we’ve spent Special Forces in — we’ve got problems,” Obama told 60 Minutes host Steve Kroft. “At the end of the day, this was still a 55/45 situation. I mean, we could not say definitively that bin Laden was there. Had he not been there, then there would have been significant consequences,” the president added. The White House’s massive uncertainty that Bin Laden was even in the compound and that US forces could instead have been raiding a “prince from Dubai,” is interesting given the fact that the vast majority of neighbors who lived around the house in Abbottabad remain convinced that both the man who lived there and the individual shown watching television in the tape released by US officials Saturday was not Bin Laden. In a BBC News report, Orla Guerin interviewed dozens of people who were adamant that Bin Laden did not live in the compound, with none of them ever witnessing him or hearing rumors that he was there in the five years that Obama claimed Bin Laden was a resident in the town. “It’s all a fake, nothing happened,” said a newspaper seller who has been working in the town for 50 years. Another resident told Guerin that the man seen in the video footage of Osama allegedly flicking between television channels is in fact his neighbor, not Bin Laden. “His name is Akhbar Han, he owns the house they said was Osama’s house, I know him very well,” the man stated. After speaking to “more than 50 people in the market,” Guerin found only one who believed that the man watching television was Bin Laden. As we documented on Saturday, while the face of the man watching television can hardly be seen, the other videos released by the White House show a Bin Laden that looks a lot younger and healthier than he did in 2001. All of the other videos look almost identical to footage first released in 2007 by the Pentagon front group SITE. A separate CCTV news report featured interviews with Abbottabad residents who swore that “Osama was never here,” and that a fable had been invented to help the US isolate Pakistan geopolitically. “I have lived here all my life, I have never seen Osama Bin Laden come or go from here, we are a close knit community, at least we would have seen him once, but we did not,” said another. Members of Pakistan’s anti-terrorist unit could not confirm Bin Laden’s presence either, according to the report, which noted that the consensus that the whole operation was a “hoax” prevailed. Last week, another Abbottabad resident who lived 5 minutes from the alleged Bin Laden compound and also owned a house next door said he never saw any sign that Bin Laden lived in the house, adding that the area was restricted due to it being next door to a Pakistani military facility, and that all new residents had to show ID cards before they could enter the area. http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=14798
Poster Comment: Why did hObama kill Akhbar Han? Just to get re-elected.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
Conserva Nutzie logic: President Obama didn't kill Bin Laden except when it is time to tell the lie it was Bush's policies that got him.
Like the birth-certificate issue, there isn't a single shred of REAL evidence to confirm the governments' claims. But hey, sheeple like YOU will eat a shit sandwich and profess how GOOD it is... because it was delivered by a democrat/socialist. You're a joke. And you're also an asshole.
List of those unable to think: Stop the attempt to use the hind lick maneuver and get your mind off my ass. I don't date men.
This further confirms the nervousness to kill ANYONE identified as OBL and remove the body from publick view. The higher the risk factor the greater the need for assassination/dragging the body away and disposing it at sea without publick review as opposed to kidnapping for further interrogation or for that matter working with the Pakistani military with the entire group of associates in a local prison. In fact, this is why the CIA was elusive about GERONIMO within a friendly nation. There was so little confidence about the mission, they EVEN subtracted the legal Pakistani authority out the equation to improve the outcome of the mission. This event is going to become deeper from not just a US domestic perspective for abuse of presidential power but from an international one for potential war crimes. Thanks for the post, hondo. I wasn't aware of such a low Confidence factor before; I thought that a President would consider something higher such as 90+ for the reliability of his decision. I shall try to find some collaborating stories for your article. You see, what is being said to everyone is that the US President can authorize an assassination squad for anyone based on anything with such low Confidence factor considerations. This is not a positive point of view to understand.
I have to find some collaborative or supporting stories on this quote. If the President REALLY said this, 0bama has in fact admitted to a grave and silly notion often used by despots: You see, that value of confidence that he has suggested is NOT very high and shows how he regards his own decisions as the President for the most powerful nation on the planet.
At 10:20 hObama says 55/45.
I recall a re-run of MASH I saw where this uber right winger named Colonel Flagg... I wonder what some of LF such as Biff has to say about your article.
#2. To: Ferret Mike (#1)
Conserva Nutzie logic:
mcgowanjm, ferret mike, skippy, fartboy/yukko, white sands, bucky, lucys idiot mom, e_type_jackoff, go56, badlie, wreck, calCON, Kafir, war, Banjo Boris, Biff, Godwinson and meguro. If you're on the above list...? PISS OFF.
#3. To: Capitalist Eric (#2)
"And you're also an asshole."
#4. To: hondo68, war (#0)
Barack Obama admitted that US intelligence was only 55/45 confident that Bin Laden was even in the compound raided last Sunday night, fearing that the occupant could actually have been a “prince from Dubai,” a skepticism shared by residents of Abbottabad, one of whom told the BBC that the man seen watching television in the tapes released by the White House Saturday was in fact his neighbor, not Bin Laden.
Note to all: I use risk factor interchangeably with Confidence factor as in the the following simple equation:
Confidence factor = [100% - risk factor],
in other words, the risk is the complement of confidence. If there was no risk (0%), the Confidence factor would have been 100% or if there was 100% risk, the Confidence factor for the decision would have been 0%.
#5. To: hondo68 (#0)
“At the end of the day, this was still a 55/45 situation. I mean, we could not say definitively that bin Laden was there. Had he not been there, then there would have been significant consequences,” the president added.
The ends justify the means
#6. To: buckeroo (#5)
have to find some collaborative or supporting stories on this quote. If the President REALLY said this
"We (government) need to do a lot less, a lot sooner" ~Ron Paul
Godwinson posted on 2011-02-23 11:47:32 ET
http://libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=18011&Disp=46#C46
#7. To: hondo68, Biff Tannen (#6)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]