Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles
Title: The Agendas Behind the bin Laden News Event
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/the-agendas-behind-the-bin-laden-news-event/
Published: May 5, 2011
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2011-05-05 16:06:48 by Capitalist Eric
Keywords: None
Views: 16143
Comments: 29
The US government’s bin Laden story was so poorly crafted that it did not last 48 hours before being fundamentally altered. Indeed, the new story put out on Tuesday by White House press secretary Jay Carney bears little resemblance to the original Sunday evening story. The fierce firefight did not occur. Osama bin Laden did not hide behind a woman. Indeed, bin Laden, Carney said, “was not armed.” The firefight story was instantly suspicious as not a single SEAL got a scratch, despite being up against al Qaeda, described by former Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld as “the most dangerous, best-trained, vicious killers on the face of the earth.” Every original story detail has been changed. It wasn’t bin Laden’s wife who was murdered by the Navy SEALs, but the wife of an aide. It wasn’t bin Laden’s son, Khalid, who was murdered by the Navy SEALs, but son Hamza. Carney blamed the changed story on “the fog of war.” But there was no firefight, so where did the “fog of war” come from? The White House has also had to abandon the story that President Obama and his national security team watched tensely as events unfolded in real time (despite the White House having released photos of the team watching tensely), with the operation conveyed into the White House by cameras on the SEALs helmets. If Obama was watching the event as it happened, he would have noticed, one would hope, that there was no firefight and, thus, would not have told the public that bin Laden was killed in a firefight. Another reason the story had to be abandoned is that if the event was captured on video, every news service in the world would be asking for the video, but if the event was orchestrated theater, there would be no video. No explanation has been provided for why an unarmed bin Laden, in the absence of a firefight, was murdered by the SEALs with a shot to the head. For those who believe the government’s story that “we got bin Laden,” the operation can only appear as the most botched operation in history. What kind of incompetence does it require to senselessly and needlessly kill the most valuable intelligence asset on the planet? According to the US government, the terrorist movements of the world operated through bin Laden, “the mastermind.” Thanks to a trigger-happy stupid SEAL, a bullet destroyed the most valuable terrorist information on the planet. Perhaps the SEAL was thinking that he could put a notch on his gun and brag for the rest of his life about being the macho tough guy who killed Osama bin Laden, the most dangerous man on the planet, who outwitted the US and its European and Israeli allies and inflicted humiliation on the “world’s only superpower” on 9/11. When such a foundational story as the demise of bin Laden cannot last 48 hours without acknowledged “discrepancies” that require fundamental alternations to the story, there are grounds for suspicion in addition to the suspicions arising from the absence of a dead body, from the absence of any evidence that bin Laden was killed in the raid or that a raid even took place. The entire episode could just be another event like the August 4, 1964, Gulf of Tonkin event that never happened but succeeded in launching open warfare against North Vietnam at a huge cost to Americans and Vietnamese and enormous profits to the military/security complex. There is no doubt that the US is sufficiently incompetent to have needlessly killed bin Laden instead of capturing him. But who can believe that the US would quickly dispose of the evidence that bin Laden had been terminated? The government’s story is not believable that the government dumped the proof of its success into the ocean, but has some photos that might be released, someday. As one reader put it in an email to me: “What is really alarming is the increasingly arrogant sloppiness of these lies, as though the government has become so profoundly confident of their ability to deceive people that they make virtually no effort to even appear credible.” Governments have known from the beginning of time that they can always deceive citizens and subjects by playing the patriot card. “Remember the Maine,” the “Gulf of Tonkin,” “weapons of mass destruction,” “the Reichstag fire” – the staged events and bogus evidence are endless. If Americans knew any history, they would not be so gullible. The real question before us is: What agenda or agendas is the “death of bin Laden” designed to further? There are many answers to this question. Many have noticed that Obama was facing re-election with poor approval ratings. Is anyone surprised that the New York Times/CBS Poll finds a strong rise in Obama’s poll numbers after the bin Laden raid? As the New York Times reported, “the glow of national pride” rose “above partisan politics, as support for the president rose significantly among both Republicans and independents. In all, 57 percent said they now approved of the president’s job performance, up from 46 percent.” In Washington-think, a 24% rise in approval rating justifies a staged event. Another possibility is that Obama realized that the the budget deficit and the dollar’s rescue from collapse require the end of the expensive Afghan war and occupation and spillover war into Pakistan. As the purpose of the war was to get bin Laden, success in this objective allows the US to withdraw without loss of face, thus making it possible to reduce the US budget deficit by several hundred billion dollars annually – an easy way to have a major spending cut. If this is the agenda, then more power to it. However, if this was Obama’s agenda, the military/security complex has quickly moved against it. CIA director Leon Panetta opened the door to false flag attacks to keep the war going by declaring that al Qaeda would avenge bin Laden’s killing. Secretary of State Clinton declared that success in killing bin Laden justified more war and more success. Homeland Security declared that the killing of bin Laden would motivate “homegrown violent extremists” into making terrorist attacks. “Homegrown violent extremists” is an undefined term, but this newly created bogyman seems to include environmentalists and war protesters. Like “suspect,” the term will include anyone the government wants to pick up. Various parts of the government quickly seized on the success in killing bin Laden to defend and advance their own agendas, such as torture. Americans were told that bin Laden was found as a result of information gleaned from torturing detainees held in Eastern European CIA secret prisons years ago. This listing of possible agendas and add-on agendas is far from complete, but for those capable of skepticism and independent thought, it can serve as a starting point. The agendas behind the theater will reveal themselves as time goes on. All you have to do is to pay attention and to realize that most of what you hear from the mainstream media is designed to advance the agendas.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)
I think it is hilarious they found some clown named Carney to shill on their behalf. I don't guess the site parlor pinks will pick up on it.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
Actually, I think it's perfectly appropriate. 8^)
Socialist ass-hats think "There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more." And yes, that IS from LF's answer to Ben Bernanke, go65, leading disfunctional and delusional socialist of the forum. "You want me to kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, I'll kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, Rebs, or Sioux, or Cheyenne... For 500 bucks a month I'll kill whoever you want. But keep one thing in mind: I'd happily kill you for free." Algren, "The Last Samurai" Conservative Republicans calling SEALs murderers. How long can you right wing traitors and al-Qaeda sympathizers go?
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
Who called Seals traitors, cocksucker Destro?
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
I called YOU a traitor for bumping up an article that claims the SEAL team "murdered" OBL, You filthy little anti-American traitor. From the article you scum are praising "Every original story detail has been changed. It wasn’t bin Laden’s wife who was murdered by the Navy SEALs, but the wife of an aide. It wasn’t bin Laden’s son, Khalid, who was murdered by the Navy SEALs, but son Hamza." Murdered? Fuck you and move to Pakistan, traitors.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
Which article, Dipso? Gimmie a link, as your butt buddy war would say.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
This article right here you commented on where SEALs are called murderers.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
Gimmie a link, punk. I'm not going to let you try to reclaim the offensive with lying charges, cocksucker.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
This article - right here - you commented on how the Obama's are covering up murderers.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
I commented on a thread? You commented, too, dummy. God Almighty, you're a DESPERATE IDIOT.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
You commented in agreement with the article's premise that the SEALs carried out murders. I just commented on how your a traitor-pig.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
You are a lying piece of liberal shit, Destro. Since when does a parlor pink like you defend the military? Your big thing is posting pictures of dead American military and laughing about it.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
That old trick of linking non Republicans as weak on the military is so 1979. Who got Obama? Cowboy tough talking Bush or cool Obama? Suck on Obama's smoke fumes. I see no pictures of dead Americans posted and laughed at by anyone. Source it, bitch.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
I don't do your homework, Destro. Go fuck yourself.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
You make a charge, prove it. Prove I am this guy who posted pictures of dead soldiers and laughed about it. Meanwhile I PROVED you agree with articles from the right wing fringe that called the SEAL heroes MURDERERS.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
Larry Sinclair?
Now, I know I’m not going to change the minds of any of the True Believers…those who read all of Reverend Al’s sermons, and say things like, “You know, global warming can mean warmer OR colder, wetter OR drier, cloudier OR sunnier, windier OR calmer, …”. Can I get an ‘amen’??
You reputation and actions are well known on the Internet. Just like Yukon's, Destro.
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
Yea? Where? Link? Source? Who is Destro and what did he do to gain such a reputation? Meanwhile you are agreeing with those that call SEALs murderers and liars.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
You've got to make things really simple for Rudy. As you can tell just from this thread, he's really stupid.
"We need to counter the shockwave of the evildoer by having individual rate cuts accelerated and by thinking about tax rebates." — George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2001
Typical MISrepresentation of the facts. The EXACT quote from the article: an unarmed bin Laden, in the absence of a firefight, was murdered by the SEALs with a shot to the head. IF there was a firefight, where bin Laden was clearly threatening the SEALs, then his killing would be perfectly justified. However, since it now comes out that he wasn't armed, that he wasn't fighting, then the only logical term for this is either "murder" or "assassination," depending on your point of view. Even Saddam Hussein got his trial- albeit a "show" trial, to be perfectly accurate... Don't you know that the videotapes where bin Laden supposedly was gloating over the WTC events, was mis-translated? What he said on the tapes, was NOT what the government officially "translated." Terrorists ALWAYS take credit for their acts of terrorism... From Khilafah.com, 10 Oct 2001, Don't you know that bin Laden was a CIA asset- financed and trained by the US Government? Now... all that being said, he may very well have been involved... he may even had organized the attacks of 9/11, as our oh-so-trustworthy government says... But now we'll never know, will we? Dead men, after all, tell NO tales. Had he been captured, the intelligence potential was huge... Unless, of course, the intelligence he had to tell implicated others who didn't want to be connected to 9/11...? Who really knows, right? Any way you slice it, he should have had his day in court- whether by military tribunal or whatever might have been appropriate. Instead, he was eliminated quickly, in the old Chicago-mafia style...
Socialist ass-hats think "There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more." And yes, that IS from LF's answer to Ben Bernanke, go65, leading disfunctional and delusional socialist of the forum. "You want me to kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, I'll kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, Rebs, or Sioux, or Cheyenne... For 500 bucks a month I'll kill whoever you want. But keep one thing in mind: I'd happily kill you for free." Algren, "The Last Samurai" Like I said, you are a traitor calling SEALs assassins/murderers.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
He used the word firefight on the tube?
Coming from a socialist shithead like YOU, I take that as a compliment. You assholes push socialism. You push for the police-state. You push for TOTAL control of people. There are a great many of us- FAR more than you- who will fight back. YOU, and all of those who stand with you, are the enemy. I'm looking forward to seeing you get everything you deserve.
Socialist ass-hats think "There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more." And yes, that IS from LF's answer to Ben Bernanke, go65, leading disfunctional and delusional socialist of the forum. "You want me to kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, I'll kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, Rebs, or Sioux, or Cheyenne... For 500 bucks a month I'll kill whoever you want. But keep one thing in mind: I'd happily kill you for free." Algren, "The Last Samurai" Once again I urge you to go right ahead and start...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." I don't start fights. I finish them.
Socialist ass-hats think "There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more." And yes, that IS from LF's answer to Ben Bernanke, go65, leading disfunctional and delusional socialist of the forum. "You want me to kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, I'll kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, Rebs, or Sioux, or Cheyenne... For 500 bucks a month I'll kill whoever you want. But keep one thing in mind: I'd happily kill you for free." Algren, "The Last Samurai" And you advocate for Osama Bin Laden because you rather do that than praise Obama.
"Keep Your Goddamn Government Hands Off My Medicare!" - Various Tea Party signs.
I finish them. WTF does that mean, Erica? That proclaim victory as you dance on the graves dug by others ? Pussy...
America...My Kind Of Place... "I truly am not that concerned about [bin Laden]..." Look up the term "blowback," then get back to me. I'm not going to do your homework for you. Get educated or stay stupid. Choose.
Socialist ass-hats think "There will be no more money when the U.S. dollar has no value, until that time we can keep printing more." And yes, that IS from LF's answer to Ben Bernanke, go65, leading disfunctional and delusional socialist of the forum. "You want me to kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, I'll kill THE ENEMIES of Jappos, Rebs, or Sioux, or Cheyenne... For 500 bucks a month I'll kill whoever you want. But keep one thing in mind: I'd happily kill you for free." Algren, "The Last Samurai" I finish them. lol, you fucking retard.
-------------------------------------
#2. To: Rudgear (#1)
I think it is hilarious they found some clown named Carney to shill on their behalf.
#3. To: Rudgear, Capitalist Eric, calcon, war, go65, lucysmom (#1)
No explanation has been provided for why an unarmed bin Laden, in the absence of a firefight, was murdered by the SEALs with a shot to the head.
#4. To: Godwinson (#3)
#5. To: Rudgear, Capitalist Eric (#4)
(Edited)
#6. To: Godwinson (#5)
#7. To: Rudgear (#6)
#8. To: Godwinson (#5)
#9. To: Rudgear (#8)
#10. To: Godwinson (#7)
#11. To: Rudgear (#10)
#12. To: Godwinson (#11)
#13. To: Rudgear (#12)
(Edited)
Since when does a parlor pink like you defend the military?
#14. To: Godwinson (#13)
#15. To: Rudgear (#14)
#16. To: Godwinson (#13)
Who got Obama?
#17. To: Godwinson (#15)
#18. To: Rudgear (#17)
#19. To: Godwinson (#7)
This article right here you commented on where SEALs are called murderers.
#20. To: Godwinson (#7)
This article ... where SEALs are called murderers.
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti-Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.
#21. To: Capitalist Eric (#20)
However, since it now comes out that he wasn't armed, that he wasn't fighting, then the only logical term for this is either "murder" or "assassination," depending on your point of view.
#22. To: Capitalist Eric (#0)
If Obama was watching the event as it happened, he would have noticed, one would hope, that there was no firefight and, thus, would not have told the public that bin Laden was killed in a firefight.
Liar. Liar. Polls on fire.
#23. To: Godwinson (#21)
Like I said, you are a traitor
#24. To: Capitalist Eric (#23)
There are a great many of us- FAR more than you- who will fight back.
--GW Bush
#25. To: war (#24)
#26. To: Capitalist Eric (#23)
#27. To: Capitalist Eric (#25)
I don't start fights.
--GW Bush
#28. To: Godwinson (#26)
And you advocate for Osama Bin Laden because you rather do that than praise Obama.
#29. To: Capitalist Eric (#25)
I don't start fights.
Why don't you make like a tree and get out of here?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]