Title: New OBL video Source:
N/A URL Source:http://N/A Published:May 5, 2011 Author:CZ82 Post Date:2011-05-05 15:52:30 by CZ82 Keywords:None Views:36867 Comments:73
Anybody want to guess what might happen if a new Osama bin Laden video pops up outta nowhere in another week or so saying "HA HA you Missed"?????
It was all part of a secret plot by Bush to let Obama (who he knew was going to take his place) take credit for killing him. It makes a lot of sense if you think about it long enough...
Don't tell Stone your actual opinion or he might ban you, limit your posts, suspend you, attempt to VOODOO DOLL you or some other method. BTW, I am on shaky ground with Stone, too, but at least I know how to get around the system until the next sentence.
You only get banned when you call woman posters c@nts. Or when you use multiple screen names.
Can I take that to the bank? You see, you banned me for no fucking reason... so I came back with one new monicker at a time to haunt you. Eventually, you relinquished the idea you could control this poster.... still, I wasn't this rat you suggested called "clyven."
Hey even if you ain't Clyven. Take it easy on the poor old mouse. I kind of liked the fella while he lasted. How can ya not like a talkin mouse
I haven't seen him/her post for awhile. The truth is, that monicker showed up right after the GREAT PASSWORD CT occurred. The only reason why I remember its posts is because of its tagline which by LF's own standards was not only funny but impressive besides being well-built. I don't have a tagline; it clutters up the screen and wastes BW.
Another thing that was impressive (to me) was that monicker was too fuckin' nice in its posts for a chit-chat political channel. What is the point of being "nice" and semi-formal in discussion when the goal is to get right into a food fight and state an opinion and sling it out thereafter?
I love these barroom brawls; the more I see the sparks going off, the chairs smashing the windows and mirrors, the guns blazing and the whiskey bottles flung; the fist fights and so forth ... the better; sometimes, for hours, I am in such riveted belly-laffter that I can't type; although, admittedly I rarely contribute posting to them.
But that Clyven was sneaky about something because it appeared right when "yukon" lost his password. It appeared on two different channels that I know of, here and 4um. I was accused of being Clyven there too, although it was never PROVEN; in fact, on 4um, I was already posting AND as I have said before I don't run multiple-clients.
When Stone kept limiting my posts on LF or screwing around with the titles of threads or deleting comments of threads, I joined TBF because nolu-chan was posting some good analysis about this "yukon" issue. I have only made a few posts there as it is a rather subdued chit-chat channel and the keen analysis (although refreshing and well received on several topics of interest) is limited in barroom brawl content that I really enjoy. There is a monicker there, "the talking mouse" which I assume is whom A K A Stone makes reference towards, as well. Again, I don't run multiple-clients; that person is completely unique and is not myself posting.
Stone, can YOU GET IT THROUGH YOUR FAT SKULL that I don't run multiple-clients? If you can CATEGORICALLY PROVE THAT I AM DOING THAT, SHOW THE DATA OR DROP THE SUBJECT.
You banned me, I came back time after time after time with other monickers one after the other. Then, you finally gave up and renewed my standard "buckeroo" monicker.
But your suggestion isn't running multiple clients as you have accused me.
You are so confused about phrasing that which you want to state, you don't make any sense half the time. Take a minute and use your own forum with purpose and clarity. As an example:
you are a tricky one.
What the HELL does that mean? What are you attempting to state beyond playing around? Use your forum as an opportunity to state an idea with precision and accuracy.
I like you buckeroo. You do have some good points you make.
I want to come back to this snide comment on your part. You don't like anyone except the three stooges on LP defending their resident queer.
Why the HELL are you out here on the Internet? You consistently act as a tyrant, actually an obscure, pathetic monster giving platitudes when you can't defend yourself for the lies, deceit and treachery you have personally performed not just against your own beliefs but also in publick humiliation making claims that are far from the TRUTH.
A lot of people across the Internet have you pegged, pal. Now, there is a time in life wherein you can start acting as "manager" of an out-of-the-way Internet chit-chat political forum without your fuckin' EGO involved.
As I said before:
over the past few months the management here (I won't mention any names but their initials are: A K A Stone) has consistently deleted posts, changed thread topic titles, suspended good posters, banned good posters, ensured harm on good poster's LF standing, sought coalition with other posters of another website, timed good LF posters out, spied on good poster's IPs, stated good posters are malicious and harmful to LF because of cheap rumours, caused unnecessary grievance and destruction towards the free and responsible use of the Internet and beyond all of the above, deserves a suspension from management duties so that responsible posters, such as myself can fully achieve the broadcasting power that my pen wields.
You can break the place or make it happen with increasing poster inputs and you see it; I know you see it because I DO. Its upto YOU, pal; not lies, rescission of decision, backtracking, gobble-D-goop, or anything other than your own commitment to understand WHAT YOU HAVE DONE. Don't hurt posters. You owe LF a BIG_APOLOGY.
The attorneys most active in fighting Las Vegas copyright enforcement company Righthaven LLC now want to participate in a potentially pivotal case involving copyright infringement allegations against the Pahrump Life blog.
Attorneys representing Righthaven defendant the Democratic Underground and another group of attorneys representing the Media Bloggers Association asked U.S. District Judge James Mahan in Las Vegas on Friday for permission for the Democratic Underground and the bloggers group to participate as friends of the court in the Pahrump Life case.
They sought to participate by filing briefs and potentially appearing at Pahrump Life hearings.
The Pahrump Life case is important in the Righthaven litigation as Mahan — who has already ruled against Righthaven on fair use grounds in another case — is now threatening to find Righthaven doesn’t have standing to sue over content allegedly misappropriated from the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
Righthaven, meanwhile, has lined up a star attorney from New York to help defend its right to sue.
Based on past experience in the fair use decision, Mahan is likely to allow the Democratic Underground and the Media Bloggers Association to participate in the Pahrump Life case.
(more in link)
Buck, he isn't even on the radar of Righthaven, the law firm suing forums for alleged fair use violations because they allow about four paragraphs if copywritten news pieces to be reposted with links to the source.
And Stone's forum is something those people would have a field day with if they cared to go after it, because not only entire pieces are cut and pasted, but they are altered too.
So I don't know what is more pathetic; the fact Stone does fair use so bad, or that people are being sued on fair use issues who are more responsible in how they comply with the most careful interpretation of the concept.
