Title: New OBL video Source:
N/A URL Source:http://N/A Published:May 5, 2011 Author:CZ82 Post Date:2011-05-05 15:52:30 by CZ82 Keywords:None Views:36851 Comments:73
Anybody want to guess what might happen if a new Osama bin Laden video pops up outta nowhere in another week or so saying "HA HA you Missed"?????
It is my opinion based on the evidence I've accumulated over the years.
Team Obama figured out that Obama was dead (no videos or a peep for years, sometimes right before elections). So they decided make up a story for some uncertain reason.
You can choose to believe Obama if you want to. But no evidence has been presented. That is a fact. You could even be right. But at this point it is just an opinion, based on your trust of Obama or the government or something.
It was all part of a secret plot by Bush to let Obama (who he knew was going to take his place) take credit for killing him. It makes a lot of sense if you think about it long enough...
It's just inexpensive US Military Bourbon Whiskey..... aka Evan Williams..... If it was good sipping bourbon like Eagle Rare then I would be enjoying it "neat"....
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning (_*_)
Black is the typical color but I have a bib overalls that are black and yellow...
Are you trying to re-enact The Flight of the Bumble Bee????
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning (_*_)
Don't tell Stone your actual opinion or he might ban you, limit your posts, suspend you, attempt to VOODOO DOLL you or some other method. BTW, I am on shaky ground with Stone, too, but at least I know how to get around the system until the next sentence.
You say that with a lot of confidence. Too much imo and with no evidence. What about all the people that had to be involved in the scam? Like all the people watching the video (or supposedly watching a video ;-)). That's where conspiracy theories get into trouble when they have to account for all the players.
You only get banned when you call woman posters c@nts.
So what if I called a man poster a c*nt????
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning (_*_)
You only get banned when you call woman posters c@nts. Or when you use multiple screen names.
Can I take that to the bank? You see, you banned me for no fucking reason... so I came back with one new monicker at a time to haunt you. Eventually, you relinquished the idea you could control this poster.... still, I wasn't this rat you suggested called "clyven."
war has to do something for entertainment. The voices in his head aren't speaking to him and his imaginary friends have found reasons not to come over anymore.
Well you would have to mentally abuse me for month after month after month. Then do it and some other stuff.
But I like Buck. He once sat in the mountains with the minutemen drinking beer and watching them Mexicans cross. Then he got some picutes and posted them. But no aprehensions. ;)
Prove your contention just like you sided with ALL those LP assholes: WhiteSands, Gatlin and Harrowup defending the password conspiracy theory about "yukon" or Ibluafartsky.
You can't prove anything, pal. Here is why: I didn't do it.
It was all part of a secret plot by Bush to let Obama (who he knew was going to take his place) take credit for killing him. It makes a lot of sense if you think about it long enough...
It certainly does, especially when you consider that Obama was cunning enough to place a fake birth announcement in the paper when he was 0 years old.
"We need to counter the shockwave of the evildoer by having individual rate cuts accelerated and by thinking about tax rebates." George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Oct. 4, 2001
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning (_*_)
Steeler colors dude...you know the team...they've "owned" every team in Ohio for the last forever...
I can't remember the last time I watched a football game that had an Ohio team in it..... sometime back in the 70s if I remember correctly..... Then again I don't watch the Steelers either.....
"I love the 45 caliber M1911, I respect the 9MM M9 Beretta but I only carry a CZ for my own personal protection". Quote courtesy of Lt Col John Dean Cooper, recognized as the Father of Modern Handgunning (_*_)
Hey even if you ain't Clyven. Take it easy on the poor old mouse. I kind of liked the fella while he lasted. How can ya not like a talkin mouse
I haven't seen him/her post for awhile. The truth is, that monicker showed up right after the GREAT PASSWORD CT occurred. The only reason why I remember its posts is because of its tagline which by LF's own standards was not only funny but impressive besides being well-built. I don't have a tagline; it clutters up the screen and wastes BW.
Another thing that was impressive (to me) was that monicker was too fuckin' nice in its posts for a chit-chat political channel. What is the point of being "nice" and semi-formal in discussion when the goal is to get right into a food fight and state an opinion and sling it out thereafter?
I love these barroom brawls; the more I see the sparks going off, the chairs smashing the windows and mirrors, the guns blazing and the whiskey bottles flung; the fist fights and so forth ... the better; sometimes, for hours, I am in such riveted belly-laffter that I can't type; although, admittedly I rarely contribute posting to them.
But that Clyven was sneaky about something because it appeared right when "yukon" lost his password. It appeared on two different channels that I know of, here and 4um. I was accused of being Clyven there too, although it was never PROVEN; in fact, on 4um, I was already posting AND as I have said before I don't run multiple-clients.
When Stone kept limiting my posts on LF or screwing around with the titles of threads or deleting comments of threads, I joined TBF because nolu-chan was posting some good analysis about this "yukon" issue. I have only made a few posts there as it is a rather subdued chit-chat channel and the keen analysis (although refreshing and well received on several topics of interest) is limited in barroom brawl content that I really enjoy. There is a monicker there, "the talking mouse" which I assume is whom A K A Stone makes reference towards, as well. Again, I don't run multiple-clients; that person is completely unique and is not myself posting.
Stone, can YOU GET IT THROUGH YOUR FAT SKULL that I don't run multiple-clients? If you can CATEGORICALLY PROVE THAT I AM DOING THAT, SHOW THE DATA OR DROP THE SUBJECT.
You banned me, I came back time after time after time with other monickers one after the other. Then, you finally gave up and renewed my standard "buckeroo" monicker.
But your suggestion isn't running multiple clients as you have accused me.
You are so confused about phrasing that which you want to state, you don't make any sense half the time. Take a minute and use your own forum with purpose and clarity. As an example:
you are a tricky one.
What the HELL does that mean? What are you attempting to state beyond playing around? Use your forum as an opportunity to state an idea with precision and accuracy.