If you will recall, when the two photos of Saddam's sons were released, a great deal of care was made to make the corpses as decent looking as possible as not to exacerbate feelings of rage and anger that could generate many acts of retaliation and revenge.
The U.S. Government, if it releases a picture will do the same with a Bin Laden.
They will want to prove him dead, not defiled.
If they wanted to do defiling, they would of deep fried him in bacon grease and drug the corpse through the streets of New York.
Instead, they buried him at sea to keep Muslims from being revengeful over a lack of adherence to respect to the traditions and manner in which Muslims handle the dead within 24 hours after a person dies.
You're too desperate for a slam dunk and did not check the facts carefully enough.
That makes you look foolish, and you have no one to blame but yourself.
On the question of whether or not the Obama administration should release photos of bin Laden to prove to the public that he is dead, Lieberman noted that the photos would be gruesome, but said his instinct is to release them anyway.
Unless theres an acknowledgement by the people in al Qaeda that bin Laden is dead, it may be necessary to release the pictures gruesome as they undoubtedly will be because he was shot in the head to quell any doubts that this somehow is a ruse that the United States government has carried out, he said. So my own instinct is its necessary to release those pictures, but I will respect whatever decision the president makes.