[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
LEFT WING LOONS Title: Why does liberalism exhibit self-destructive behavior? Why does liberalism exhibit self-destructive behavior? April 26, 2011 Posted by Craig Covello craig@hollywoodrepublican.net This past week, I was having a conversation with my friend Bruce. He is a staunch conservative, as am I, so predictably the subject of politics was raised. More specifically, we talked about the seemingly bizarre behavior that has been demonstrated by progressive liberals. This behavior been going on for decades, and now it seems as if it is reaching a crescendo as Obama begins his campaign for 2012. Then I suggested to Bruce that liberalism is for all intents and purposes self-destructive. Why? Because it appears as if progressives are on the wrong side of every issue that would sustain their longevity. Here are a few examples - •Liberals would like to see a declining US population through any means necessary, so it’s no surprise that they are likely to advocate for abortion on demand. It’s also no surprise that White House science czar John Holdren proposed forced sterilization using methods as frightening as spiking the public water supply. This was documented in his 1973 book “Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions”. So while the rest of the world’s population is increasing, progressives would like to see American’s population decrease. And less population means less progressives. •The Obama administration, including Atty. Gen. Eric Holder’s Justice Department, refuses to confront or even acknowledge radical Islam’s jihad against the United States. In fact, Holder could not even bring himself to use the term “radical Islam” during Senate subcommittee hearings last year. Predictably, this administration wanted to close Guantánamo Bay and try terrorists under legal system designed for Americans. And, of course, Obama was slow to address the massacre at Fort Hood. All these actions illustrate that any aggressive behavior exhibited by radical Muslims desiring a caliphate has been downplayed by the White House. So I wonder if liberalism would survive under institutionalized sharia law worldwide. •Similarly, the National Organization for Women has been stone silent regarding the treatment of females under sharia law. Again, I doubt that NOW would survive under a Muslim dominated culture. Yet NOW voices no objections. •It’s clear that Obama has weakened our military during his presidency. The giveaways to Russia contained in the new START treaty are testament to our declining nuclear capability. If nations hostile to US interests eventually gain a strategic nuclear advantage under this plan, it’s not beyond reason to believe that the United States could be attacked. Sometimes the unthinkable is precisely that, “unthinkable”, because of the nuclear deterrent muscle flexed by the United States. Reducing the influence of that deterrent means increasing the risk to American lives. And those Americans targeted would include liberals, wouldn’t they? •The liberal Congress last year refused to pass a budget while Obama increased our spending by another $4 trillion. And progressive radicals such as Francis Fox Piven have dedicated their careers to destroying the US economy by advocating for increased entitlements intended to crash the financial system. Compound that with liberals, such as George Soros, who openly call for a “new world order” that would replace the need for US leadership and influence. So it begs the question; what would happen to American liberal politics if America no longer existed as we know it? Would liberals be free to express themselves under an authoritarian central socialist/communist government? Probably not. •Progressives have been responsible for draconian environmental laws which have made our country unacceptably dependent upon foreign oil. As a result, we purchase energy from nations who are openly hostile to US interests. This also has a destructive influence on our foreign policy, since we must walk a fine line between supporting freedom in the world and appeasing dictatorial regimes that happen to be placed upon geologically rich oil reserves. Sorry, but most of the liberals I know consume just as much energy, if not more, than their conservative counterparts. No, foreign oil dependence does not seem to be in the best interests of an indulgent liberal lifestyle. Particularly in Hollywood. So in the final analysis, it makes you wonder how liberalism can survive if its ultimate objectives are reached. Unless, of course, the real objective is to extinguish itself. Ironic, isn’t it?
Poster Comment: Why does liberalism exhibit self-destructive behavior? Because they are so stupid.... Duhhhh....
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|