[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
International News Title: Chinese Take On The Birtish Royals Lead: Tomorrow, British Prince William and Katherine's wedding ceremony will soon be held. This big marriage is not only priceless, the English to will show in the national hold 5500 factions to celebrate at least. When “the date does not fall the empire” to enter near 100 year declines, when the recent section of royal court marriage approaches the tragedy the form ended, the English why must celebrate another royal court marriage, why also energy “the tolerance” a royal court existence? 6% English marry greatly to prince did not care that 75% English support the extension monarchy In the past 20 for many years, the British royal court's luck has been ruined simply. What is mysterious, although lives falls into the confusion, they still “live in the British person heart”. Compared with in the illusory republican system, the English is willing to retain a royal court. Market investigation and study organization Ipsos-Mori started from 1993, unceasingly “the difficult choice” threw to the British voter. 1993-2006 year cruising data which issued according to them, the English nearly always does not plan to get rid of the royal court, these years, only have to the royal court support level two times fall to 70% below (70%! in 2008, the Austria Pama's support level attains when the crest also does not have such high). Last week, this support level was 75% - -, although 46% English expressed that did not care to William's big marriage, 32% English expressed “did not want to respond from the start”. Royal court confusion: How marriage failure's family does work as “the moral model” a repeatedly The English to the royal court sentiment, seems intertwines very much; Perhaps intertwines is the royal court itself. 14 years ago (on September 6, 1997), when William Prince's mother Diana funeral holds when Westminster Abbey, the British populace respond with to Diana most sincere, surpass at any time to the British royal court sentiment. However, that is also a British royal court frailest quarter: At that time Diana already is not “Princess Wales”, the high-sounding talk cherishes the memory of one to love the human “the royal court old friend”, in fact is in sounds the alarm for the royal court contemporary validity. 5 year ago in 1992, this family just now just has experienced three section of defeat's marriages, queen's three children is not the divorce, is lives apart. Queen Elizabeth is called as 1992 “the unlucky year” (“annus horribilis”) one year. This fills the political wisdom the crowned head fully realized surely that this family's validity already no longer comes from “the royal power to be supreme”, maintains the colony the unity, but acts as this modern country “the moral model”. In the 17th century, when Cromwell started the bourgeois revolution, the British royal court has already survived in name only, but the English must let this family remain down, simultaneously left a modern Britain royal court eternal confusion: What role does the English want us to play? in 1945, George five th and British Prime Minister Clement · Attlee then. World War II period, the royal court in encouraged the English and Fascist battles has played the very major role. “provides the happy industry for the people” British writer Hitchins (Christopher Hitchens) once had shared a piece of amusing thing. He in Charles's Crown Prince temporary palace, hears somebody discussion works as prince's taste: “anything has not been difficult, not waited for own mother to die”. This certainly is only teases, the real situation may not that simple. Deceased Queen Elizabeth private secretary Charteris your excellency (Lord Charteris) once said that “what we are at is one provides the happy industry for the people”. This words hit have pointed out contemporary Britain royal court all significances: Transmits values which joyful, happy, stable, English and so on courage even upper reaches believe. Has written many royal court report British well-known Reporter Matthew Engel, the other day (company welcome you) take “Welcome to the firm” as the topic, has composed a related big marriage's column. He teases elaborates that the contemporary Britain royal court looks like an enterprise, but it “preserves the vigor of youth” the secret weapon is provides these unfailing, the related happy values for the people, but queen likely is this family enterprise's helmsman. The world wind and cloud not measured, only then she eternally unchangings. This kind eternal is valuable. The intelligence report which considers thinks, to succeed to the throne when she reads is about Stalin. So long as looks like queen such to have 70 year rich experience character, only then matches with discusses the morals and the value. Outside the official situation, queen's affinity and the sense of humor also very much have the power. The modern royal court must reform, queen cannot only say “My-husband-and-I” (my husband and I) Just like the young people listen to the elder rigid theorizing bored, grows up gradually along with the new generation young people, queen more and more is not also good works as. in 1981 looks Charles and Diana two new people marches into the church in the adult, had half to die, how did present's British public already not rely on to the custom tradition, regardless of were the marriage, the political party, royal power. 30 years later, Britain has just like become another country. The people are still glad discuss the royal court, but the young people like landing click on “Like” to the royal court on Facebook main page (to like) the button. In Europe, many royal courts move toward the secularization, the common people gradually, always the arrogant British royal court can also not but drift with the current. in 2002, the British royal court's public information officer press information officers were determined that changes Buckingham Palace's image, they leave release conference that icy table, changes rides the bus together with reporters. In more and more reports, the people discover not only queen that position talks over “My-husband-and-I” queen (the note: “my husband and I”, queen on makes the lecture to “the pet phrase” take the opening by this, this several dozens year invariable phrases use in referring to a generation of English to queen's mechanical impression), in real life's she not only deeply knows by heart the politics, wise and many humorous, she asks a question unexpectedly baffles in the government frequently ministers In real life George five th and family member. As an inborn stuttering, he goes to the completely crowned head's responsibility diligently, and, therefore has moved a generation of English. “on throne's family”: Royal court contemporary significance not in “king”, but lies in “the room” If the English is only hoped that the royal court turned the average person, the matter is much simpler. In wins an award greatly high praise Oscar the movie "King's Lecture", just treated is broadcasting has completed George five th which one time lectures when the son who scolds stutters said that the royal court member already turned the actor. The fact proved that the British taxpayers pay 3,000,000 pounds every year for the royal court for its expenditure, not only but anticipates these. Just like the royal court English name “Royal Family” suggested such, the windsor family was already expected that must have the noble gas, also to look like a family the type. In modern Britain, they are honored as “on throne's family”. If Charles Crown Prince will succeed to the throne in the future, his that position remarries Princess Camilla will possibly face a political incident. If the English is willing to regard as really the royal court the ordinary family, they should not resist one “the third party” to manage this family, but the result is very possibly contrary to what expects 30 years ago, Charles and Diana have held the grand wedding ceremony. More than ten years later, that union by one kind of tragedy way announcement defeat. The English cannot bear the royal court old-fashioned, actually has “people essence principle submitting to” to the royal court Cull•Marx once had said such a few words, “a person so-called is a king, is because around him the human is willing saying that he is the king”. The BBC renowned director, "Discussed Royal court" (On Royalty) book author Jeremy Paxman quotes these words to explain the English complex and the contradictory point of view: The English to the royal court the dependence is one kind of approaching “people essence principle submitting to”, this causes them to set the near harsh request to the windsor family member's content family life; May on the other hand, when as head's royal court guardian to achieve people's this anticipation take queen, but makes time the similarly severe control to after that the generation, the English is not glad. Above British writer Hitchins simultaneously is "Monarchy" (The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain's Favorite Fetish) a book's author, he thought the modern monarchy faces the core challenge, is the people still needs the royal power, and requests it to glow the charm in the new times. When does not exist to the royal power ancient worship, how can the royal court not but go to ponder over maintains this kind of charm, even to spare no sacrifice the royal court member's individual freedom and happiness Renowned Hollywood star Ze tower Jones, just had some time ago accepted royal court awarding a decoration. Moves toward republican? Continues the social class which enjoys the British royal court to represent and steady In prince greatly marries when namely, the Economist “the Bagehot column” wrote caustially that we give Prince William and Katherine•Myddelton's wedding present is: Moves toward republican. The article pointed out that what royal court representative is the English most ignominious social class idea, the royal court “the occupation described” has included more and more user-friendly things, the crowned head is freely the occupation which came apart with the entire society; But since the royal court most basic morals personal integrity could not maintain continually, why did the English also need them? This view approaching is unkind. But in Britain, wants the royal court not to want, in fact does not have the opinion poll to reflect that obviously (the latter's support level only to maintain about 20%). The support retains the royal court the human on the support royal power, for example Britain historian Peter Hennessy pointed out not necessarily that “this world sufficed chaotically, we did not want to have any calamity again”. Just in the past's 174 years had 123 years, Britain were rule by a queen (said accurately that in name by her rule), this “the custom” even let the English as well as the Australians are indefinite, whether was a masculine crowned head competent - - to the English who was not willing to change easily, including changed into the male from the female to be able to give rise to controversy, much less let the crowned head vanish thoroughly? Although William and Kate's marriage will be very possible not to look like more than 300 years ago will hatch “the honorable revolution” that section of marriages same, to open new times, will be impossible to look like 30 years ago his parents' wedding ceremony same load bearing English about the happy fantasy; We still pray for heavenly blessing them to have section of successes, content and the happy marriage - - after all, this regarding the monarchy supporter, again important. z88;z88;z88;The net arranges: First quarter moon
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|