Opinions/Editorials
See other Opinions/Editorials Articles
Title: Critics: Obama’s Latest Long-Form Birth Certificate Is a Fake
Source:
Gateway Pundit
URL Source: http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.c ... m-birth-certificate-is-a-fake/
Published: Apr 27, 2011
Author: Posted by Jim Hoft
Post Date: 2011-04-27 22:09:47 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 21644
Comments: 44
Photoshop expert Mara Zebest sent this in: This is so maddening to listen to the media on this recent revelation… it’s such an obvious fake. (Click on image for larger view) Look at the attached JPG… (which shows what you will see when opening the PDF in Illustrator and how to get there)… but to recap… if you open the PDF in Illustrator (instead of Photoshop) – Select the entire document and go to the Object menu and choose Clipping Mask > Release. Repeat as necessary until all clipping masks are released. Also open the Layer and turn off the visibility of each clipping group and you can see all the numerous places in which information was added (edited) into the form. Lastly, look at the attached 1961 sample image found on the Internet of a legitimate 1961 Hawaii Birth Certificate (which someone posted to show what a real certificate would look like from that year in Hawaii)… look at the marks on this Internet version and you can see this was the template for Obama’s BC handiwork. The handwriting is exactly the same between posted Internet image and Obama’s fake version — the placement of boxes and marks are in the exact same position, dates are where the modified clipping masks occur to adjust dates to fit for Obama, but the handwriting of dates match (except for the clipping mask changes). Even the Cert. number is only off by the last two digits (which…you guessed it… happens to be a clipping mask layer). Finally, also wanted to make the point that regardless of where Obama is born, he’s still not a Natural Born Citizen since both parents were not born on U.S. soil but I won’t hold my breath waiting for the media to educate the public on this fact.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
#2. To: All, Skip Intro, war, Murron, Rudgear, We The People, nolu chan (#0)
fyi
Yea so? They're fucking idiots.
They're fucking idiots. Have you been drinking? Why are you so overly emotional about this issue?
I don't consider getting gales of laughter from the after-birthers as being overly emotional. And that's all without getting into how Obama made The Donald look like even more of a buffoon than he was on this issue... But then I've senn The Donald take victory laps for bewing stupid before...
Laughter? I don't see laughter, I see anger.
You're seeing things...maybe that explains your current pathology over Obama's long form birth certificate being released. Watching you after-birther's is second only to Yukon's self-outing in hilarity.
Watching you after-birther's is second only to Yukon's self-outing in hilarity. Oh war, why must you always be so.....out there? I have repeatedly stated that , I'll type slow... I D O N T C A R E W H E R E O W A S B O R N! So there is no pathology. And if you're going to start calling me names, I'm afraid I'll have to do the same. That's not what we want is it?
This issue has become sublime. The language of the 14th amendment is clear..."anyone born is a citizen"...and there are only two classes of citizen...natural born and naturalized. It's over WTP. If there was every a question that would have needed to be addressed it was his place of birth not who bore and sired him.
It's over WTP. Sorry, I disagree. But you can have the last word, if you wish.
First off, quoting Vattel and citizenship is a non-starter. The very first naturalization law recognized certain children born outside the borders as being natural born. Tha blows Vattel out of the water right there. Vattel's requirement was that to be natural born one must be bound to the nation by both blood and soil. Secondly, the Framers and the courts subsequently recognized Blackstone as being the authority on citizenship and changed but one aspect of his theory..."subject of the crown" became "Citizen of the nation". Most of the early and subsequent immigration and naturalization laws and rules were legal offshoots of Blackstone. Finally, again, there is nothing in statutory, administrative or case law that makes US citizenship a tri-furcate of naturalized, natural born and just plain citizen. The intent of the Framers was clear: Natural born rather than naturalized or immigrant. The fact that they made eligible only those persons, who at the Framing of the nation, had been here 14 years, eligible underscores this. They were looking to exclude IMMIGRANTS from the Presidency. Given all of the above, the only rational conclusion that can be drawn is that Framers wanted to exclude immigrants, i.e. those unbound to the US by both blood and soil.
There are no replies to Comment # 44. End Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#12. To: A K A Stone (#2)
#33. To: war (#12)
Yea so?
#34. To: We The People (#33)
(Edited)
#35. To: war (#34)
I don't consider getting gales of laughter from the after-birthers as being overly emotional.
#39. To: We The People (#35)
#41. To: war (#39)
You're seeing things...maybe that explains your current pathology over Obama's long form birth certificate being released.
#42. To: We The People (#41)
#43. To: war (#42)
and there are only two classes of citizen...natural born and naturalized.
#44. To: We The People (#43)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 44.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]