Title: Obama's Birth Certificate Released - Proof it is Has Been Altered. Possible Fake? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Apr 27, 2011 Author:3truthseeker33 Post Date:2011-04-27 19:48:44 by A K A Stone Keywords:None Views:32473 Comments:79
A scanned document, and that's what this fake purports to be, would not have layers. It would scan as a one dimensional graphic with no differentiation between background and text. Why would it have layers? A scanner or PDF program isn't intelligent. It can't distinguish between readable text and background. But someone deliberately constructing new text over another document would layer it, piece by piece.
btw, screw you. Hide behind your filter, coward and liar that you are.
Why would it have layers? A scanner or PDF program isn't intelligent. It can't distinguish between readable text and background.
That isn't entirely true, Rudgear. In today's world most scanned images use a vectored approach (layers) towards graphics for electronic data distribution. And very often Adobe PDF Writer is used to perform that task. In fact, Adobe CAN extract text from an image, minimizing manual re-typing.
I have the Professional version of Adobe and use it all the time.
Well said. I have no argument with your statements. I think a lot of folks just don't understand contemporary graphic art and associated software is all.
Well said. I have no argument with your statements. I think a lot of folks just don't understand contemporary graphic art and associated software is all.
I didn't understand it myself when the layer issue was brought up, so I spent all of five minutes testing it. Like you, I have the pro version of Acrobat as well as Illustrator.
It's funny that not one of these internet "experts" thought of doing the same thing.
It's funny that not one of these internet "experts" thought of doing the same thing.
It isn't their fault from a true sense. Technology is moving so rapidly that it is hard for the average layman to keep up with much less experts in a given field.
There is no argument about the authenticity of 0bama's birth as a US Citizen; there never really was one. Just like the Internet production of the COLB from some four years ago from Hawaii, it has been challenged.
The ONLY way that you could take this document as proof of anything is to have gone in with a predetermined bias.
OK, PDF's have layers. But can those layers be edited? Could this have been faked?
If the answer to either of those questions is yes, then this cannot be considered as proof of anything, except maybe that people are gullible when they have preconceived biases.
The ONLY way that you could take this document as proof of anything is to have gone in with a predetermined bias.
I fully concur. I believe 0bama was born in the USA. The reason is simple: not one piece of data has disproved the notion other than forged attempts in all kinds of ways. Plus, I have to be honest, that World Nuts Daily senior writer by the name of Jerome Corsi cooked upped an earlier CT that went away, remember the Amero and the attempt at creating one government in Mexico, Canada and the USA? And that BS highway to connect the three countries.
Corsi pounded that idea EVERYDAY, too. Where is it? And now he has an all new sensational piece he writes about this new CT concerning a BC.
It is just fun to me. I wouldn't place a nickel on that man's credibility to save anyone's life.
"We hope that issuing certified copies of the original certificate of live birth to President Obama will end the numerous inquiries related to his birth in Hawaii," Fuddy said in a prepared statement Wednesday. Fuddy said she viewed the records and that they "further prove the fact that he was born in Hawaii."
Oh, and just as an aside, does anyone know what those "shocking" revelations Trump's alleged investigators allegedly found during their alleged search in Hawaii. I don't believe that The Donald has ever mentioned them again after the first time.
Who is Fuddy? I've never heard of her. Is she credible? If so how do you know she is?
That's why I always give you links. But, just for you,
"On April 22, Obama and his personal attorney wrote letters to Health Director Loretta Fuddy.
In them, they argued that a waiver would allow Obama to make public his original birth certificate and relieve the state from the burdens that came with the repeated inquiries.
"We hope that issuing certified copies of the original certificate of live birth to President Obama will end the numerous inquiries related to his birth in Hawaii," Fuddy said in a prepared statement Wednesday.
Fuddy said she viewed the records and that they "further prove the fact that he was born in Hawaii."
After Fuddy approved the exception, Obama's attorney, Judith L. Corley, picked up the documents in Hawaii and carried them back to Washington on a plane. The documents arrived around 5 p.m. Tuesday."
You know, that plane trip is probably the most expensive thing that Obama has had to spend on the BC issue. It quite easily could have cost $2 million if it was a private flight.
